Abstract Wikipedia/Wiki of functions naming contest/Wikifuncs
Wikifuncs
editVoting
edit- Proposed by Eissink
- ย Support Eissink (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- ย Support 4nn1l2 (talk) 04:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Discussion
edit- Not sure this ad hoc shortening will be translatable to many languages. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 14:08, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- There is no need to translate a name. It's just a name. Eissink (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC).
- @Eissink: no. It says The name must translate well in the name proposal criteria. ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 14:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Names don't translate. We don't translate "Wikipedia" or "Wikidata". I thought it meant "it should not have an ambivalent meaning in other languages". Anyhow, this proposal has no chance anyway, so let's not bother too much. Eissink (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC).
- @Eissink: Who told you that? Quoting GZWDer, "the translated name needs to be informative. In Chinese, names of Wikimedia project are never transliterated". ๐๐ค๐ฏ๐บ๐ช๐ค๐๐๐ท๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐บ๐ด๐๐๐ฐ (๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ ) 14:04, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
- โ What do you mean: "Who told you that?" I wrote "I thought it meant etc.", wasn't that enough information? And now please stop this useless discussion, especially since I find your tone pretty aggressive and not pleasant at all. Not to mention the amount of your comments in this contest is proposterous and bizar already. Eissink (talk) 14:08, 3 October 2020 (UTC).
- Names don't translate. We don't translate "Wikipedia" or "Wikidata". I thought it meant "it should not have an ambivalent meaning in other languages". Anyhow, this proposal has no chance anyway, so let's not bother too much. Eissink (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2020 (UTC).
- There is no need to translate a name. It's just a name. Eissink (talk) 14:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC).