GNE Preliminary DTD

This is part of the Historical Wikipedia pages collection.

---

Instead of describing an entire DTD in detail, we should add tags to this ``example XML layout until we think everything is covered.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-16"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "preliminaryDTD0.01">
<article>
<id>the-unique-id-for-this-article (assigned)</id>
<authors>
  <author>
  <name>Mike Warren</name>
  <email>foo@bar.com</name>
  </author>
  <author>
  <name>Someone Else</name>
  <email>baz@bar.com</name>
  </author>
</authors>        

<date>January 19, 2001</date>

<content>

<abstract>This is an abstract.</abstract>

<title>A Title</title>

<subtitle>A Sub Title</subtitle>

This is some content. It goes on and on, and doesn't
really care about what is says. Paragraphs split with
a blank line. 

Like this; I am a new paragraph. I'm pretty short, though.

<subtitle>Another Sub Section</subtitle>

I am some more content. My purpose is to demonstrate some
of the semantic hint tags which we might include. <name>Someone
Else</name> might have a name, associated with a birthday (like,
say, <date>April 13, 1977</date>). They might have been born
in a place such as <place>Calgary, Alberta</place> which 
doesn't have to be a full, canonical place-name.

It might be interesting to specify <jargon>jargon</jargon>
in the content. One might even have a footnote, defined inline
<footnote>This footnote would actually be rendered in a manner
considered good for the medium. For example, at the bottom of 
a printed page.</footnote>.

Although complicated, adding inline LaTeX would be a very
nice future feature:
<latex>
�egin{table}
end{table}
</latex>

References are a little harder, but defining those inline
as well might be best, as for the GPL
<reference>
<author>Richard Stallman</author>
<title>General Public License</title>
<proceedings></proceedings>
<book></book>
<journal></journal>
<periodical></periodical>
<date></date>
</reference>. 

</content>

<edit date="January 20, 2001" author="Mike Warren foo@bar.com>">
A context diff on the <content> appears here...
</edit>

</article>