Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Grants:APG/Proposals/2012-2013 round1/Wikimédia Magyarország/Progress report form/Q2

< Grants:APG | Proposals | 2012-2013 round1 | Wikimédia Magyarország | Progress report form

Basic entity information

edit

Table 1

Entity information Legal name of entity Wikimédia Magyarország Egyesület
Entity's fiscal year (mm/dd–mm/dd) 01/01 - 12/31
12 month timeframe of funds awarded (mm/dd/yy-mm/dd/yy) 01/01/13 - 12/31/13
Contact information (primary) Primary contact name Balázs Viczián
Primary contact position in entity Executive Vice-president
Primary contact username Vince
Primary contact email balazs.viczian@wikimedia.hu
Contact information (secondary) Secondary contact name Andrea Tóth
Secondary contact position in entity Office Manager
Secondary contact username Voglia
Secondary contact email andrea.toth@wikimedia.hu


Overview of this quarter

edit

CHANGES:

  • succesfull article maintenance competition, start the statistical article writing competition
  • we keep the plan

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • opening, equipment of the office; encourage of our editors to use it; increase high quality articles; stabilize infrastructure

GROWTH:

  • there is no significant growth to report for Q2

WIKI FOCUS

  • Hungarian Wikipedia

Financial summary

edit

Revenues for this quarter

edit

Table 2 Please report all spending in the currency of your grant unless US$ is requested.

  • Please also include any in-kind contributions or resources that you have received in this revenues table. This might include donated office space, services, prizes, food, etc. If you are to provide a monetary equivalent (e.g. $500 for food from Organization X for service Y), please include it in this table. Otherwise, please highlight the contribution, as well as the name of the partner, in the notes section.
Revenue source Currency Anticipated Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Cumulative Anticipated ($US)* Cumulative ($US)* Explanation of variances from plan
Membership fees HUF 100000 0 45975 441.488 202.974 most of the membership fees will be collected during the next quarter
FDC Grant HUF 14845000 - 8659583 65,519.10 38,216.74
Interest HUF - - 91491 403.771

* Provide estimates in US Dollars


Table 3 Please report all spending in the currency of your grant unless US$ is requested.

(The "budgeted" amount is the total planned for the year as submitted in your proposal form or your revised plan, and the "cumulative" column refers to the total spent to date this year. The "percentage spent to date" is the ratio of the cumulative amount spent over the budgeted amount.)
Expense Currency Budgeted Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Cumulative Budgeted ($US)* Cumulative ($US)* Percentage spent to date Explanation of variances from plan
office costs HUF 1000000 0* 100565 100565 4,413.76 443.869 *:
office rent HUF 2500000 1765000 14097 1779097 11,033.90 7,850.56 Q1 payed the office rental cost for the whole year
community travel help HUF 3500000 0* 508801 508801 15,444.26 2,245.16 increased with the wikimania hongkong
bank costs HUF 75000 0* 25143 25143 330.943 110.945 *:
wage+tax for the employee HUF 5000000 0* 970458 970458 22,062.60 4,282.16 *:
community meetups HUF 750000 0* 41695 41695 3,309.12 183.965 community building meetups catering for ex.
post costs HUF 100000 0* 20580 20580 441.260 90.8134 *:
telephone, server, internet HUF 550000 0* 145309 145309 2,426.99 641.205 *:

* Provide estimates in US Dollars


Progress toward this year's goals/objectives

edit

Competitions

edit
3rd annual spring cleanup contest

Content improvement by solving flagged problems.

What are the objectives of this program? Please include metrics.
  • Gain new editors for Wikipedia.
  • Expand overall content.
  • Improve overall content.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Low overall (both internal and external) advertising.
  • One volunteer did everything.
Activities conducted.
  • A page was created in the Wikipedia namespace for the event. [1]
  • Participants self nominated their edits in a table, naming the article, the issue(s) solved, the points they got for it, and the before/after diff of the changes they did.
  • Award ceremony was held on June 2, combined with a wikimeetup.
What worked and what did not?
  • A total of 29 editors nominated themselves; no new editors
  • 1223, or ~0.5% of the articles were affected, got their content improved
  • The total number of issues solved in the 1223 articles affected numbers well above 3.000. [2]


Statistical article writing competition

Cooperation with the Hungarian Central Statistical Office and its Library in a joint article writing contest about statistical sciences

What are the objectives of this program? Please include metrics.
  • The competition aims to provide high quality, professional or educational articles in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia.
  • The topics were:
    • economic and environmental statistics;
    • demographics, domestic and foreign censuses;
    • social statistics;
    • regional and spatial statistics.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Too tight topics (sociology, economy and other sciences related heavily to statistics were banned upon the request of the Statistical Office).
  • Low overall interest in statistical sciences (both in general and on huwiki).
Activities conducted.
  • Organized by one volunteer.
What worked and what did not?
  • 37 new, 9 "renovated" articles.
  • Topics should be broadened (if repeated, should not exclude sociology and other sciences that are heavily related to statistics).


Monthly meetups

edit
Board meeting

Normal annual required board meeting

What are the objectives of this program?
  • Make decisions about the chapter's current and future issues.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Working schedule of the members
Activities conducted.
  • The board made decisons about the following topics:

members to be sent to the GLAM Wiki Conference, Wikimania in Hongkong;

  • Official seat; wikicamp; new members.
What worked and what did not?
  • We were waiting to see more results.


Inauguration party of the chapter's office

The grand opening of our office in Budapest.

 
Inauguration team
What are the objectives of this program?
  • The 9 participants discussed about the current issues. Ideas were made by the office equipment and operation. The practical program was the set up of the printer.
  • Involve, create community.
  • Increase the number of volunteers in our projects and foster their participation, making them more active in the community giving a place where they can meet personally.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • It is difficult to move the people out. We need to create more attractive programs.
Activities conducted.
  • Meetup in the office.
What worked and what did not?
  • Few people came to.


The Spring edition of the Chapter's General Assembly in the new office

General meeting for the members of the association

What are the objectives of this program?
  • To discuss how to proceed with the chapter's activity.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Low interest.
Activities conducted.
  • Adoption of the 2012 public benefit annual report.
  • 2012 annual financial report.
  • Long-term strategic direction.
  • Professionalization process.
What worked and what did not?
  • Our aim for the next assembly to achieve higher member participation.


Wikimeeting+award ceremony of the 3rd annual spring cleanup contest & the Article of the year 2012 competition

To celebrate the winners of these contests.

 
Huwiki meetup 02June2013 5
What are the objectives of this program?
  • The top 15 ranked editors in order could choose between 2013 wikicamp attendance, Wikipedia sweaters, Shop vouchers, and other gift items.
  • Create community.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Only with 20 participants. Maybe we could involve more people with a more funny program. Only one volunteer organized it with the help of the office manager.
Activities conducted.
  • Meetup was held with some programmatic activity.
What worked and what did not?
  • Next time we need to organize better.


Mini presentation at the office

Individual initiative of one of our volunteer

What are the objectives of this program?
  • Give informations about the Labs, Wikidata, a Visual Editor, Lua, TemplateSandbox.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Organized by one volunteer.
  • Working schedule of the participants.
Activities conducted.
  • 5 participants involved.
  • meetup was held with presentations.
What worked and what did not?
  • There could come more participants. Next time we need to do bigger pubblicity of this kind of events.
  • Good usability of the office.


Plants Workshop's meeting in the office

Editors finally use the office for meeting

What are the objectives of this program?
  • The aim is to support spontaneous local meetups.
  • Increase the number of the quality articles on Wikipedia.
  • Encourage the editors to meet each other personally and work together.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • 4 volunteers, new articles and the plant workshop on Hungarian Wikipedia is still very active
Activities conducted.
  • Meetup was held, they spent five hours to editing, discussing and they enjoyed it.
What worked and what did not?
  • The participants were complaining about the missing fridge what since than we purchased one.


Program Evaluation Workshop in Budapest

Organized by the WMF with the help of WMHU.

 
Wikimedians approaching Wikimedia Hungary office
What are the objectives of this program?
  • A better understanding of how to increase impact through better planning, execution and evaluation of programs and activities will help to move a step closer to achieving the mission of offering a free, high quality encyclopedia to the readers around the world.
  • Find them here: Program Evaluation and Design
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Visa problems, other organizational mistakes (e.g. participants' dietary restrictions were not discussed with the hotel)
Activities conducted.
  • The worshop was held with a big succes.
What worked and what did not?
  • The Hungarian Chapter's role was helping the organizators with prenoting restaurants, buying things, etc. I think we did our best. :)


Conferences

edit
Free Software Conference Budapest

Organized by the Foundation FSF.hu with the participation of WMHU.

 
In work
What are the objectives of this program?
  • Reaching new editors.
  • Promote and explain Wikipedia.
  • Meet other associations.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • Working schedule of the volunteers.
What worked and what did not?
  • WHMU was pretty popular just like last year.


Training at the University ELTE

12 students of linguist studies received a theoretical and practical wiki presentation in a corpus linguistics lesson.

What are the objectives of this program?
  • Reaching new editors
  • Promote and explain Wikipedia
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • The presentation was taken by one of our volunteer.
Activities conducted.
  • Workshop was held at the University
What worked and what did not?
  • The students was very interested but no follow up.


Wikimedia Chapter Conference Milano

Organized by the Italian chapter

 
State of the movement WMHU
What are the objectives of this program?
  • Meet the other chapters rappresents.
  • Discuss the chapter's work.
  • Change ideas.
Progress against these objectives (include metrics and # of volunteers/staff involved)?
  • With the participation of 2 members and 1 staff.
Activities conducted.
  • A lot of interesting workshops.
What worked and what did not?


Questions

edit
  • Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement? YES
  • Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Grant funds as outlined in the grant agreement? YES

Signature

edit

--Vince (talk) 05:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Voglia (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grants:APG/Proposals/2012-2013_round1/Wikimédia_Magyarország/Progress_report_form/Q2&oldid=15333482"