Grants:APG/Proposals/2018-2019 round 1/Wikimedia Argentina/Impact report form
Purpose of the report
editThis form is for organizations receiving Annual Plan Grants to report on their results to date. For progress reports, the time period for this report will the first 6 months of each grant (e.g. 1 January - 30 June of the current year). For impact reports, the time period for this report will be the full 12 months of this grant, including the period already reported on in the progress report (e.g. 1 January - 31 December of the current year). This form includes four sections, addressing global metrics, program stories, financial information, and compliance. Please contact APG/FDC staff if you have questions about this form, or concerns submitting it by the deadline. After submitting the form, organizations will also meet with APG staff to discuss their progress.
Overview
edit2019 has been a year of consolidation and development for Wikimedia Argentina. Our programs - Education & Human Rights, Culture & Open Knowledge and Building Communities - have been strengthened more than ever through projects and strategic alliances at local and regional level and within the Wikimedia Movement itself.
In this sense, we would like to highlight the following:
- The Education program has grown by 25% during 2019. We have continued to incorporate universities and schools, improving the reach at the national level. Our partnership with UNICEF is particularly noteworthy.
- We held the I Conference on Human Rights in Digital Environmentswith +20 organizations from Latin America and Spain.
- We continued to accompany the regional communities in the development of their education and Human Rights programs. During 2019 we collaborated especially with Colombia, Venezuela, Chile and Mexico.
- Last year has been the year of the great alliances for the Culture and Open Knowledge program. We signed working agreements with major cultural institutions that will allow us to access Argentine and Latin American cultural heritage, currently missing in the Wikimedia projects. In this sense, it is remarkable the first agreement with a Latin American university - the National University of La Plata (UNLP)- to incorporate free culture in all its academic institutions.
- We have strengthened more than ever our work with the library community and other diverse cultural communities as governmental and civil society organizations.
- We found room to continue developing innovative projects like tailor-made trainings, webinars on digital rights, the Archive in the classroom educational project etc - to promote access to culture in an equitable way.
- Regarding the communities program, this was the year of the sustainability of the thematic communities. We also expanded our scope and strengthened our line of work with NGOs and communities of experts with the aim of creating quality free knowledge relevant to Argentine society.
- We accompanied and mentored more communities than ever before at the local and regional level. To this end, we distributed technical and financial resources whenever necessary and have designed new learning projects to accompany communities within and outside the movement.
- We continued to transfer knowledge and learnings to communities in the movement. During 2019 we worked with Wikimedia Mexico and Wikimedia Chile in the on-boarding of their new directors with whom we continue to work.
All this work has been possible thanks to the team that during the year has been able to distribute tasks when the strategy process has been very demanding. This, however, has not always been sustainable. Sometimes has put pressure on the team: we have not lowered our objectives and have adapted our schedule to the strategy - especially our director's. This situation need to improve in the future. Having, at least, assurance about the support and resources that the movement's organizations can receive from WMF is fundamental. Chapters and user groups are key to moving forward with implementation. For this reason, guaranteeing access to resources - of any kind - in an equitable, sustainable and context-specific manner is key to ensuring movement's organizations involvement at the local level during the next strategy phase.
Global metrics overview - all programs
editWe are trying to understand the overall outcomes of the work being funded across our grantees' programs. Please use the table below to let us know how your programs contributed to the Global Metrics. We understand not all Global Metrics will be relevant for all programs, so feel free to put "0" where necessary. For each program include the following table and
- Next to each required metric, list the outcome achieved for all of your programs included in your proposal.
- Where necessary, explain the context behind your outcome.
- In addition to the Global Metrics as measures of success for your programs, there is another table format in which you may report on any OTHER relevant measures of your programs success
For more information and a sample, see Global Metrics.
Overall
editTotal metrics | Participants | Newly registered | Content pages | Quality | Impact | Comments |
Education Program | 2532 | 569 | 1440 | 919 | 36 new partners | New partners that address new topics beyond education, human rights and add diversity to the program.
Find all the activities and partners here. |
Culture & Open Knowledge Program | 2168 | 750 | 375 books (96559 pages uploaded to commons)
22005 pages on Wikimedia projects |
91% of content create and released is diverse* | 511 Cultural referents | Our strategic lines of work are oriented to release local and historical missing or excluded content.
Find all the activities and partners here. |
Community Building Program | 818 | 117 | 12750 | 32 new women and LGTBIQ+ involved | 29 new leaders involved* | Find all the activities and partners here. |
Total | 5518 | 1436 | 375 books (96559 pages uploaded to commons)
36195 pages on Wikimedia projects |
n/a | n/a | n/a |
* Movement Organizers: individuals that commit their time, energy, and personal resources to build a stronger network of communities that support Wikimedia growth. People that cooperate and work with us beyond the creation of content.
Education & Human Rights Program
editSummary
During 2019, the Education & Human Rights Program decided to promote alliances with key institutions and organizations of the national and regional scene in order to pursue the following objectives:
- Engaging educators and students in the creation of locally relevant knowledge that addresses the existing content gaps.
- Promoting and establishing learning community for educators and organizations linked to the education world in order to foster exchange and creation of knowledge.
- Consolidating and expanding the WikiDDHH Project (violations of Human Rights, LGBT+ rights and excluded communities) as an education proposal at a local and regional scale.
The Education Program in the classroom
edit
Success: Wikipedia as a learning tool
editDuring 2019, we worked to strengthen our educational projects in the classroom by:
- Continuing promoting our education proposals at a national scale.
- Promoting, scaling up and adapting our proposals to other regional contexts.
- Expanding and promoting our educational community among organizations and educators.
For these purposes, we have worked in the following way:
a) Onsite learning: Wikipedia in the University & Editing Clubs
We carried out our onsite learning program by strengthening our two projects for the Argentinean classrooms: Editing Clubs and Wikipedia in the University. Both proposals have a similar objective: getting educators and students involved in the construction of missing and locally relevant quality knowledge.
How did we develop the project during 2019?
Wikipedia in the University
What did we do in 2019?
How did we do this in 2019?
|
Editing Clubs What did we do in 2019?
How did we do this in 2019 ?
|
B) Remote learning: Wikipuentes in Argentina and Venezuela
During 2019, we continued offering our online course designed for educators in Argentina and Venezuela.
What did we do 2019?
- We carried out two editions of the online Wikipuentes course, in our virtual campus.
- We designed two new classes, focused on topics of interest for the education context: one focused on university needs and another on misinformation.
- We adapted and carried out the project in Venezuela for the first time.
Wikipuentes in Venezuela
During 2019, we carried out an edition of the online course for Venezuelan educators, designed by Wikimedia Argentina and Wikimedia Venezuela together.
Why is this proposal important in Venezuela?
- Given the political and social reality that Venezuela is going through, it is difficult for the local chapter to carry out face-to-face activities in schools and universities.
- University teachers have few training opportunities within the country and are potential allies for Wikimedia Venezuela and its educational projects.
- It allows the members of Wikimedia Venezuela - who are all volunteers - to be directly involved in the design, implementation and monitoring of the project.
How did we do it?
- Together with Wikimedia Venezuela, we designed a Wikipuentes for university teachers using our virtual campus.
- We assessed the Venezuelan context and designed a 5-week course for university professors, adding new learning content about misinformation and Fake News - very relevant topics for the Venezuelan society.
Which have been the most important qualitative results?
- The course that involved 45 professors, was carried out with the development of a joint tutorial, making sure there were tutors who were familiar with the course and also tutors that were experts in the local context.
- 100% of the participating teachers were very satisfied with the proposal and shared the importance of accessing to opportunities that also allows them to diversify tools on access to information in a context of such high conflict.
- 90% of the content added - 200 articles- was quality content due to the fact that the participants were professors and experts in the selected topics.
- It allows us to transfer both technical and financial knowledge and resources to another community so that they can continue to grow.
Developing and strengthening our educational community is an arduous task that we have been carrying out within the program since its inception with the aim of supporting the growth of our educational community. To this end, during 2019 we have strengthened our objective through two strategies:
What did we do 2019?
a) Mentoring
Our program's main goal is to keep strengthening the motivation of teachers as the lead the project in their localities and institutions. In order to respond to this demand, we accompanied teachers with their consultations and projects, developing specific materials and implemented a one-to-one follow-up, to give them the necessary support and leadership in their proposals. What results did we achieve in 2019?
|
b) Thematic trainings We carry out a new cycle of trainings aimed at generating a meeting space to connect, expand and strengthen our educational community. These trainings' main focus was to reflect on the role of free culture and open knowledge in schools. For it, we invited different civil society organizations to discuss with the participants how to bring technologies, human rights, gender and free culture into the classroom. What results did we achieve in 2019?
In terms of numbers, 90 participated and 45 remained active part of our educational community in 2019. |
Which have been the most important qualitative results and learnings?
- Offering and continuing to improve our projects over time allows us to add new partners each year. As an example, in 2019 we worked with 25% more institutions.
- The 1:1 follow up allows us to address the challenges of teachers and strengthen their confidence in the classroom, as well as their sense of belonging to the Wikimedia community. In this sense, during 2019, 20% of activities were carried out by educators in a more autonomous way.
- The online course is much more than a teaching project about how to bring Wikipedia into the classroom. It is a learning project that can be adapted to each context and to a large extent to any political and social situation. Having a project of these characteristics, open and free, is fundamental within the Latin American context.
- Working with other kind of organizations has been crucial to expand the scope of our program and position it in new diverse educational communities. As an example, we started to work with UNICEF and we are currently part of the Advisory Council of its National Education Program.
- Understanding the difficulties and needs of teachers is fundamental to our work in order to continue incorporating more teachers as part of our community.
Main results:
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress (at end of Q2) | End of year | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
600 teachers | 716 | 252 | 600 | Editing Clubs, Wikipedia in the University & Wikipuentes |
500 students | 909 | 539 | 960 | n/a |
1000 articles | 815 | 463 | 1234 | Editing Clubs, Wikipedia in the University & Wikipuentes |
70% high quality articles | 73% | 69% | 70% | In Wikipuentes and Wikipedia in the University the quality of the articles is higher than in Editing Clubs |
70% diverse content | n/a | 80% | 80% | n/a |
70% girls and women confortable | 80% | 93% | 95% | n/a |
300 educators from learning community | n/a | 216 | 300 | Educators from Aulas Abiertas and Quién es esa científica projects. |
25 new partners | n/a | 22 | 37 | n/a |
Resources designed | 8 | 5 | 10 | n/a |
Volunteers involved | 35 | 3 | 7 | 32 volunteers were involved in our program, mainly in our Human Rights project. |
% of satisfaction | 100% | 100% | 100% | n/a |
Gating factor: Setting up new projects takes time
editDuring 2019 we carried out two new projects to continue promoting the development and use of open educational resources (OER) in education:
- Recursos Abiertos para enseñar, a repository of open educational resources (OER) designed to facilitate teachers' access to open and diverse pedagogical resources.
- The educational game "Who is this scientist?", aimed to make visible the role of women in science for primary school students.
How did we do it?
- We partnered with the greatest civil organizations in Argentina and we released under CC licenses a lot of their educational resources.
- We also approached teachers to encourage them to share and open their own educational resources, however the respond wasn't that successful.
- Regarding the game, we managed to got it sponsored by a IT company but due to the economical crisis the sponsorship didn't covered all the costs. Despite the situation, we carried out the project in 11 schools, reaching 26 teachers and +700 students.
In both cases the scope of the projects remained relatively small to what was initially planned.
What have been the main challenges and learnings?
- It has been difficult to adapt to the time and resources of primary schools, even with more shortages. We must continue to strengthen the accompaniment of these teachers' needs.
- The development of educational resources is still considered an undervalued part of the teaching work in our context. We need to continue working with teachers on the importance of not only sharing resources but doing so in an open manner.
- Converting an educations resource into an OER requires a lot of work and exchange with the teacher who creates it. We must rethink the follow-up strategy and better asses the accompaniment needed.
Next steps?
This report is being prepared in the course of the crisis by COVID19 where these projects are becoming recognized. We hope to continue strengthening them during 2020.
Education & Human Rights
edit
Success: The consolidation of Wiki Derechos Humanos
editWiki Derechos Humanos (Wiki Human Rights) project aims at training experts, researchers and university students on how to edit Wikipedia according to international Human Rights standards, and on how to create, document and update content in Wikipedia on Human Rights violations that have taken place in their countries.
Since the beginning of the project we have achieved the following:
- To promote the importance of the Wikimedia projects to make visible Human Rights content from historically excluded communities.
- We carried out the project in 7 countries of the region, offering over 25 training courses on Human Rights for experts, local organizations and institutions.
- Accompany and mentor at a global scale to consolidate of an agreement between the United Nations’ High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Wikimedia Foundation. This agreement allows chapters and user groups to strengthen Human Rights projects with the support of the United Nations at a local, national and global scale.
In this sense, during 2019 we reached the following milestones:
a) Promoting the debate on Human Rights on Internet & the Wikimedia Movement in the region.
After 4 years carrying out the project at the local and regional level, in 2019 we proposed to open a debate on Human Rights and what role the Wikimedia movement can play. For this, in 2019 we carried out:
I Conference on Human Rights in Digital Environments In September 2019, we organized the I Conference on Human Rights in Digital Environments with the main objective of gathering people and generating a debate on the role of the Wikimedia projects and Human Rights in digital environments. For this purpose, we summoned leading organizations related to digital rights and leaders of affiliated groups from the region. Why was this project needed?
What did we do? The three day conference was organized along with globally iconic institutions: Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo and IPPDH MERCOSUR (Mercosur’s Institute for Public Policies on Human Rights) and consisted of the following:
Which were the qualitative results?
|
B) Strengthening Wiki Derechos Humanos through strategic partnerships at local, regional and global level.
During 2019, we fostered the following strategic alliances with the objective of consolidating the project:
a) At the local level
We consolidated our local alliances with universities and national organizations. We carried out a WikiDDHH edit-a-thon in three provinces of the North of Argentina. In 2019 the number of local alliances grew to 26 meaning 206 articles improved. However, we want to highlight our alliances with the UN and with LGBTIQ+ organizations that were key to expand the local content from underrepresented communities and topics: What did we do?
|
b) At the regional level During 2019, we established important alliances with large human rights institutions in the region, such as the General Directorate of Truth, Justice and Reparation in Paraguay and the Museum of Historical Memory of Colombia & Karisma Foundation in Colombia. In both cases, we carried out training and editing workshop in order to to give visibility and create quality content on their justice and memory processes. What did we do?
|
c) At the global level After two years of work, in 2019 WikiDDHH gained global relevance within the Wikimedia movement. In August 2019, within the frame of Wikimania, an agreement between the UN’s OHCHR and Wikimedia was signed. This implies:
What did we do?
|
Which have been the main qualitative results?
- 60 journalists and 70 activists were trained on good practices of communication related to LGBT+ topics.
- 187 experts, researchers and activists of Human Rights were trained on how to edit Wikipedia. 70% of participants were new editors.
- 80% of the incorporated content can be considered as of quality.
- 100% of participants are experts and promoters of Human Rights in their contexts and they disseminated the activities of our projects at a local level.
- 80% of participants replied that editing Wikipedia on Human Rights makes their contexts and realities more visible.
Main results:
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress (at end of Q2) | End of year | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
6 WikiDDHH edit-a-thons | 9 | 5 | 9 | n/a |
200 articles | 279 | 101 | 206 | n/a |
300 participants | 388 | 272 | 597 | Including participants to the DH Conf |
70% diverse content | n/a | 80% | 80% | n/a |
70% women confortable | 75% | 100% | 100% | n/a |
Culture and Open Knowledge Program
edit
Summary
During 2019 we managed to consolidate a flexible and contextualized program, which has allowed us to continue strengthening new projects and alliances in pursuit of the following objectives:
- Reducing the existing content gaps guaranteeing the access and creation of diverse quality knowledge
- Strengthening, consolidating and positioning the work and development of diverse cultural communities in Argentina.
- Promoting the role of Wikimedia Argentina in advocating for free knowledge.
Diverse Partners
edit
Success: Diversifying partnerships to access to local culture
editOne of main goals in 2019 has been guaranteeing the access and creation of content that is representative of the Argentine and Latin American cultural diversity.
For this purpose, we have worked in the following way:
a) Forging long-term alliance to gain access to local cultural heritage
2019 was the year of incorporation of large cultural institutions to our program. We signed agreements with long-standing Argentine organizations, that house Argentina's recent history: the University of La Plata, the National Academy of History, the Library of Argentina’s National Congress, the National Academy of Fine Arts and the Memory Park.
How do we work with them?
We work in four main stages:
- Joint analysis of their cultural heritage: we analyze together the cultural heritage they posses. We prioritize either heritage that requires urgent preservation or what is more significant for the institution and the Argentine society.
- Provide trainings on open access policies: we train the staff in charge of the archives in open access, free licenses and digitalization processes. During 2019 we held 10 workshops in these institutions for +30 archivists.
- Provide technical resources & mentoring: through our WIR we evaluate the resources of the institutions and provide them with technical resources on loan. In 2019, thanks to these alliances, we have released +90,000 pages of content regarding our local culture (see our digitizing project information bellow)
- Adapt, monitor & evaluate: we define a work plan with each institution, adapting ourselves to their possibilities. As soon as they start releasing content, we make monthly reports regarding the impact of their heritage in the Wikimedia projects.
Highlight: Incorporating free culture to the academic world in the National University of La Plata One of our greatest achievements during 2019 was our agreement with the National University of La Plata (UNLP), not only because this is the first agreement of its kind in Latin America, but also because it opened us the doors to several other cultural institutions such as the Museum of La Plata, the UNLP Radio Station, the Historical Archive and the Public Library. In this sense, the agreement has allowed us to:
What did we do during 2019?
Which have been our results, so far?
|
b) Making available cultural content through archives and libraries
We continued strengthening our alliances with archives and libraries with a triple purpose:
- making their local cultural heritage accessible
- protecting heritage at risk and making it a priority
- strengthening and mentoring the work of those communities
What did we do 2019?
a) Digitization project
During 2019, the digitization project expanded aimed to:
What actions have we taken?
|
b) Libraries During 2019, our work with libraries has grown more than ever. We incorporated new counterparts and we continued strengthening our work at a regional scale, with the following purposes:
What actions have we taken?
|
c) Creating locally relevant content through alliances with governmental and civil society organizations
During 2019, we continued working to reduce content gaps in the Wikimedia projects and making locally relevant content visible for the following reasons:
- It allows us to adapt the program to our context and engage local communities as part of Wikimedia Argentina
- We reduce content and information gaps that are important to the Argentine society.
What did we do 2019?
We worked with a diverse range of cultural, civil and governmental partners on very diverse topics:
Partner | Activity | Topics | Impact |
---|---|---|---|
Fundación Espigas | Workshop | Latin American Art | Involve a community of experts as editors |
Dirección General de Verdad, Justicia y Reparación | Workshop + Material Release | Human Rights | Quality content improved |
Secretaría de Cultura de la Nación | Edit-a-thon + Material Release | Culture and Gender | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content improved |
SEDRONAR | Workshop | Current Issues | Involve a community of experts as editors |
CAICYT | Workshop + Material Release + Webinar | Current Issues | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content improved |
Universidad Nacional de la Plata | Workshop + 1bib1ref | Current Issues | Involve a community of experts as editors. |
Directorio Legislativo | Data base release | Current Issues | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content improved |
Médicos sin Fronteras | Webinar | Current Issues | Involve a community of experts as editors. |
Subsecretaría de las mujeres de Neuquén | Edit-a-thon + Material Release | Gender | Involve a community of experts as editors. |
Secretaría de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación de la Nación | Edit-a-thon | Gender and Science | Involve a community of experts as editors. |
Universidad General Sarmiento | Edit-a-thon and Material Release | Gender and Science | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content released. |
UTN - Regional Campana | Edit-a-thon | Gender and Science | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content released. |
CONFEDI | Edit-a-thon | Gender and Science | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content released. |
L'Oréal-UNESCO For Women in Science | Material Release | Gender and Science | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content released. |
Museo Estación Cultural Lucinda Larrosa | Material Release | Local culture | Quality content improved |
CAREF (Comisión Argentina para Refugiados y Migrantes) | Workshop and Edit-a-thon | Local culture | Involve a community of experts as editors. |
Open House Buenos Aires | 2 Trainings + photo contest | Local culture | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content improved. |
Open House Rosario | 2 Trainings + photo contest | Local culture | Involve a community of experts as editors.
Quality content improved. |
As a result, we partnered with 11 cultural, civil and governmental institutions, we trained 511 people on free licenses and 10 institutions released locally relevant content for the first time (meaning 2239 files)
Highlight: Making women scientists visible on Wikipedia In 2019 we have continued working on science & gender for two main reasons:
What did we do during 2019?
Which have been our results, so far?
|
What results did we achieve, beyond the numbers?
- Establishing long-term alliances allow us to institutionalize free culture as a policy inside institutions that have been very conservative historically.
- Gaining access and releasing locally relevant cultural content that is currently missing in the Wikimedia projects, especially regarding Argentine and Latin American history, Latin American art, sciences and Human Rights.
- Strengthening our alliances with all Argentine cultural sectors - librarians, archivists, civil society cultural organizations and government.
Main results:
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress (at end of Q2) | End of year (projected or actual) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Promote the free culture in 10 institutions | 13 | 7 | 10 | 2204 documents released |
300 new cultural leaders involved in our cultural program | 632* | 367 | 511 | n/a |
5 cultural communities | New target | 3 | 5 | NGOs - Data Scientists- Government organizations-Librarians- Photographers |
2 new GLAM cultural partners | n/a | 2 | 4 | Universidad de La Plata - Academia Nacional de Historia - Parque de la Memoria - Biblioteca del Congreso |
Number of editors involved (700) | 328 | 318 | 750 | Women editors: 310 |
Content improved/created besides digitizing project: | n/a | 12676 | 22005 | n/a |
Content improved/created: digitizing project | 441 (123,556 pages uploaded to commons) | 185 books (52,519 pages uploaded to commons) |
375 books* (96559 pages uploaded to commons)
340 items in Wikidata. |
n/a |
Wikipedia page views | 9,411,474 | 1,784,072 | 9.784.970 | n/a |
% of diverse content release | New target | 90% | 90% | Our strategic lines of work are oriented to free content of Argentine popular culture |
Gating factor: Partnerships during the electoral period
edit2019 was a year marked by Argentina’s electoral calendar. This circumstance is key to understand the development and performance our cultural program which has been affected by the following challenges:
- End of a government period
- Lack of budget and human resources
However and despite the situation we managed to strengthening new projects and alliances through strategies such as:
- Establish long standing partnerships : signing agreements can be key to maintaining the pace of work during an election year. Although in Argentina and in many Latin American countries work is done with a certain amount of informality, in election years, formalizing relations is a good strategy to guarantee the continuity of the work.
- Establish long-term working agendas: working on long-term goals helps to keep some of the work active during the months of change.
- Make the work done visible more than ever: generating reports on the work done is essential to be able to continue it when there is a change at the management level.
- Involve more references in the project: generally, our program has a reference that leads and coordinates our projects within the institutions. Expanding and involving more cultural references is fundamental to ensure project continuity, especially in Argentina, where a change of government is always accompanied by a change of management.
- Expand the diversity of partners: partnering with other cultural institution beyond GLAM to furthering our cultural projects.
Free Knowledge Awareness
edit
Success: Promotion & access to free knowledge
editDuring 2019, continued working to:
- to position Wikimedia Argentina as a legitimate actor in the defense and promotion of digital rights at a local and regional level.
- to promote the access to free knowledge in an equitable way for all the Argentinean society.
To this end, during 2019 we have worked as follows:
a) Advocate for free knowledge During 2019 we continued our work on advocacy with local and regional scope with the following goals:
What did we do during 2019?
|
b) Promote access to free knowledge We have realized that as important as to advocate for free knowledge is to promote access to knowledge, ensuring as much as possible, that Argentine society as a whole has the possibility to enjoy it, regardless of its resources. This is important because:
Therefore, during 2019 we developed a pilot project with the aim of bringing culture and free knowledge to communities in provinces with limited access to the Internet What did we do during 2019?
|
What results did we achieve, beyond the numbers?
- Connect with diverse new partners: our advocacy work has opened us the possibility to work with partners outside the traditional cultural spectrum, dealing with present-day issues.
- Consolidating high level partnerships: working in advocacy and access to free knowledge has given us the possibility to consolidate great partners. Beyond regional digital rights organizations, working with UNESCO opens up the possibility of scaling up our project beyond Argentina, an opportunity we are currently exploring.
Main results
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress (at end of Q2) | End of year (projected or actual) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Involving 200 trained on digital rights | 172 | 94 | 204 | +700 views after |
5 new partners | n/a | 3 | 5 | Unesco - Karisma - Aquellare Ciberfeminista - R3D - Artica Online, Fundación Via Libre. |
30 volunteers involved | n/a | n/a | n/a | Cancelled due to the electoral year |
Reach | n/a | n/a | n/a | Cancelled due to the electoral year |
Gating factor: Wikipedia en debate & media crisis
editThe election year impacted on our culture program and this made it impossible for some programmed activities to be carried out for the following reasons:
- The public agenda prioritized a number of issues that forced us to change our schedule.
- Argentina is an ideologically divided country. As a consequence we suffered a lot of media pressure from different political tendencies accusing us of bias in the content of Wikipedia. This situation lasted at least 6 months.
For these reasons one of our major projects for 2018 - Wikipedia in debate - was postponed. We also postponed activities on disinformation and fake news, a line of work that we have been promoting since 2017. While these were complex decisions, we believe that they were correct because of the way the conflict was escalating in some mass media in Argentina.
Still, it was a great learning process and we strengthened even more the relationship with our partners at the local and regional level. As a results, during 2020 we will continue developing this line of work rethought as trainings for citizens on the use of Wikipedia as a source of information along with other Wikimedia affiliates and regional partners.
Community Building Program
editSummary
During 2019 the community program focused on strengthening and growing the local community based on three objectives:
- Expanding and building a motivated community as part of WMAR.
- Defining new volunteer opportunities to build a more diverse and inclusive community.
- Reaching out expert communities with the aim of creating of new content, locally relevant to the Argentine society.
Building communities
edit-
Wikimedia Universe game
-
Edit-a-thon about gender violence
-
Barra Libre women in soccer.
Success: expanding, supporting & strengthening local and regional communities
editDuring 2019 we have continued to work to incorporate new members as part of our community and to provide the necessary support to those who are already part of it both locally and regionally. In order to do so, we have implemented the following strategies:
a) Expanding themed communities
2019 has been the year in which our themed communities consolidated. This implies the continuity of work groups and also thinking about our role when supporting and mentoring communities. Also, our communities have not been unconnected from the local context and agenda, which has forced us to rethink activities and strategies along the year. Despite these challenges, working with themed communities has allowed us to:
- Generate stable bonds among volunteers with similar affinities.
- Engaging relatively new volunteers to become established members of the community
- Position communities as referents in their areas of expertise.
In this sense, during 2019 we worked with themed communities in the following way:
What have we done in 2019?
|
What have we learnt after four years of working with themed communities? Even though this strategy was born as an answer to the needs of our community, it has also allowed us to create a sense of belonging for long-standing and new members and generate direct impact on the construction, not only of equitable bonds among groups members, but also of self-sustainable communities. How have we achieved this? These last years, we have worked in the following way:
|
b) Supporting our long-standing community
In the activities organized by Wikimedia Argentina and by our communities, 80% of participants are new editors. This is essential to incorporate diversity, new roles and profiles, but it is also a challenge regarding our long-standing community of editors. They are a priority community for the program: their work is fundamental for the growth and quality of the Wikimedia projects. For this purpose:
- We designed specific activities that boost their work in the Wikimedia projects
- We guarantee access to resources and support.
What did we do during 2019 to support this community?
- Call for projects: we launched a call for projects, to support and give room to their projects and ideas. In 2019 we supported 4 projects lead by our long-standing community.
- Activities that suit their interests: during 2019 we organized 9 activities, engaging 45 editors.
- Community getting-together: we organized 3 encounters, in which 123 editors participated. This also helps reduce the gap between long-standing and new editors.
- Acknowledgement: we incorporate their work to our designs and merchandising as a way to acknowledge and appreciate their efforts.
Why are these actions important?
- To strengthen the sense of belonging to WMAR.
- To reduce the gap that in many cases separates the online community from the newer volunteer's members of Wikimedia Argentina
- To generate meeting spaces for the transfer of knowledge among long-standing and new editors.
c) Strengthening bonds with communities of the region
During 2019, we worked at a regional scale with two objectives:
- Supporting the creation of new communities and boosting existing ones
- Strengthening bonds with communities of the region.
Accompanying a newly formed community in Paraguay We continued working to promote the development of a community of editors in Paraguay, a project that began two years ago and has progressed hugely during 2019. Why have we undertaken this project?
What action did we take in 2019?
As a result:
|
Strengthening bonds with the region During 2019, we continued working to strengthen bonds and communities in the region with a double purpose:
What did we do in 2019? a) Training workshops: we organized 5 training workshops on how to work with the Wikimedia projects, involving Wikimedians from 5 different countries and training 67 people. The webinars came about in response to the need for training of the community. To do so:
|
What results did we achieve, beyond the numbers?
- We generated specific exchange spaces for each community that allowed us to develop more stable bonds among the volunteers.
- We position Wikimedia Argentina as a flexible organization willing to develop diverse activities according to the multiple interests of our volunteers.
- We have worked to continue promoting the growth of communities in the region and -above all- of smaller groups and their leaders, so they gain leadership spaces within the movement.
- We generated innovative proposals to expand our outreach to new counterparts, with the purpose of promoting the potential development of new communities in the region.
Main results:
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress | End of year (projected or actual) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
Established communities | ||||
40 engaged volunteers. | n/a | 37 | 45 | n/a |
At least 15 of them women or as of LGBTI's collectives | n/a | 97 | 107 | n/a |
4000 improved/created articles | 69117 |
8112 | 12750 | Mainly in commons |
80% feels supported and describe WMAR as an inclusive organization where is easy to participate. 80% feels supported and describe WMAR as an inclusive organization where is easy to participate. | n/a | 90% | 90% | n/a |
New communities | ||||
2 new communities | 2 | 2 | 2 | n/a |
30 new members | n/a | 36 | 42 | n/a |
At least 15 are women or as of LGBTIQ+. | n/a | 26 | 27 | n/a |
5 new alliances | n/ | 3 | 7 | n/a |
Gating factors: Retention & Gender community
editDuring 2019 we had two major challenges within our community program:
a) Adapting to the needs of the gender community
b) The challenge of retaining webinar participants
What did we do in 2019?
a) During 2019 we continue to hold our monthly editing meetings, and the edit-a-thons with a gender perspective. Unlike other communities, the gender community has the particularity that those who participate are not just active editors within the Wikimedia projects, but are activists who seek to make visible the role of women in history within the Wikimedia projects. In this sense, the monthly editing space gradually lost strength and the most powerful activities ended up being those that we coordinated together with civil society organizations to work on issues of the gender agenda beyond the biographies.
b) Webinars are a great tool for outreach but in the case of the community program - where our goal was to involve potential communities - it has been complex to retain participants actively. In this sense, webinars worked very well to strengthen the leadership and learning of established regional communities, while customized trainings have generated better results for new communities.
What are we going to do in 2020 to meet these challenges?
- strengthen the links with gender organizations and their communities to further develop activities.
- expand the editing topics beyond women's biographies, according to the interests and expertise of the women involved.
- promote more tailored training with potential new communities at the regional level, to accompany them according to their pace and needs.
Diversifying our community
editSuccess: Involving diverse social actors as creators of locally relevant knowledge
editOne of our greatest objectives was to work with local experts & civil society organizations' communities on important subjects for the Argentine society, with the following purposes:
- promoting and positioning Wikimedia projects as a useful tool for all citizens
- engaging experts in the creation of locally relevant content
During 2019 we have worked in the following way:
- Identifying interests: we analyzed Argentina’s social agenda and carried out activities and alliances with organizations that answer to the identified interests.
- Prioritizing themes: we defined areas of interests according to WMAR’s strategic planning.
- Strategic alliances: we generated alliances with civil society organizations and social movements.
- New editors: we identified specific audiences in order to engage them as new editors.
- Customized activities: we developed projects according to each topic, audience and organization.
What did we do in 2019?
- We trained 7 civil society organizations in the use of the Wikimedia projects: ACIJ, Fundación Huésped, MINU, Red de Comunicadoras del Chaco, PADF, Ciclo Positivo, Spotlight.
- We mentored 3 civil society communities so they can put the Wikimedia projects into practice as part of their own projects.
- We organized 11 activities with 175 experts and activists to improve articles on themes that are key for the society.
Why is this work important?
Our current and future community participates in our activities if it feels implicated by a cause and thinks invested time has an impact. Even though this implies keeping a flexible and adaptable work schedule, this allows us to continue expanding our community and legitimizing the Wikimedia projects as a space to access local information that is of interest both for citizens and for our counterparts.
Main results:
Target | Last year (if applicable) | Progress | End of year (projected or actual) | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
250 people from outside the Wikimedia movement trained or participating in our community activities. | n/a | 108 | 273 | n/a |
65% women/LGBTIQ+. | n/a | 51% | 50% | n/a |
Engage 25 new participants as volunteers (retention) | n/a | 19 | 35 | n/a |
80% of the participants consider that the Wikimedia projects are a fundamental tool of citizen construction and / or the projects of the program respond to their needs and interests. | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a |
Learning: Why organizing activities even if they don’t produce great quantitative results in the Wikimedia projects? We understand the wear and tear of organizing activities that in theory don’t produce great quantitative results, however, we believe that by doing them we highly improve the outreach of our projects. Leading this kind of projects opens doors to new people and organizations that we didn’t know before and at the same time it positions WMAR as a strategic ally to generate locally relevant and quality content. As we have stated in previous reports, WMAR considers its community to be composed not only of people who edit, but also of those who articulate with us creating new connections, sharing ideas and those who share our ideals and stand for them in their own communities. This allows us to diversify our community with new profiles, just as important as the editors who create content, as was also pointed out in the WMF report on Movement Organizers. |
The Wikimedia Movement development & WMAR
editSuccess: Iberocoop & Wikimedia strategy process
editDuring 2019 we have continued to support the development of a stronger Wikimedia movement. Some of our actions can be found in the progress report . However we found important to highlight the following:
a) Mentoring and accompanying established communities in the region
We continued accompanying and transferring knowledge and learnings to mentor the development of established regional communities in the following way:
- Mentoring program for EDs: we accompanied Wikimedia México and Wikimedia Chile in the training process of their new Executive Directors with mentoring programs in Chile and Buenos Aires. Besides resources and expertises, we helped involving them as part of the EDs group and we have established channels of everyday communication in order to coordinate joint actions and support each other within the Wikimedia movement.
- Support on projects development: we have transferred our experience and knowledge, mentored alliances and offered resources - human, technical and financial- to communities in Venezuela, Colombia and Spain.
b) Supporting the strategy process
We have been actively involved in the strategy process throughout 2019 in different roles such as:
- Part of the Roles and Responsibilities working group in which we perform coordination tasks.
- Group representative during the Harmonization Sprint in Tunisia
- Co design the post Tunisia meeting process
- We took part of the writers group, also attending the face-to-face working meeting in Berlin for a week.
- Subsequent involvement in the drafting of the recommendations during the month of December and January, until their publication.
- Coordination of meetings with the regional groups.
- Community feedback incorporation and final drafting of the recommendations at the NY meeting.
Throughout the process we have always tried not only to bring the Latin American perspective to the decision-making spaces but also to communicate the development of the process to our colleagues in the region.
We are committed to continue promoting the region's involvement in the strategy phase. However, it is necessary to allocate the necessary resources to guarantee the involvement of movement's diverse communities as it is required for the next phase, where we will really implement the proposed change. It is almost impossible to do it successfully without supporting and guaranteeing the necessary resources for it.
Revenues received during this period (6 month for progress report, 12 months for impact report)
editPlease use the exchange rate in your APG proposal.
Revenue source | Currency | Anticipated | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Cumulative | Anticipated ($US)* | Cumulative ($US)* | Explanation of variances from plan |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDC grant | USD | USD 279.784 | USD 163.162 | USD 0 | USD 0 | USD 116.532 | USD 279.694 | USD 279.784 | USD 279.694 | n/a |
Canada Fund- Sexual diversity inclusive communication project | USD | USD 10.618 | ARS 10.618 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | USD 10.618 | USD 10.618 | USD 10.618 | n/a |
Total RevenuesOriginal budgeted sources | USD | USD 290.401 | USD 173.780 | USD 0 | USD 0 | USD 116.532 | USD 290.312 | USD 290.401 | USD 290.312 | n/a |
Membership fees | ARS | USD 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 3.842 | ARS 0 | ARS 3.842 | ARS 7.684 | USD 0 | USD 159 | This income was not incorporated in the previous budget. We used it for Administration Expensses. |
In-kind donations | ARS | ARS 205.000 | ARS 139.500 | ARS 139.500 | ARS 92.500 | ARS 185.000 | ARS 556.500 | USD 5.000 | USD 12.427 | n/a |
Ministry of culture - City of Buenos Aires | ARS | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 176.000 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 176.000 | USD 0 | USD 4.632 | This income was not incorporated in the previous budget. It was used in the digitalization project of the Culture & Open Knolowdge program. |
Facultad de Información y Comunicación - City of Uruguay | ARS | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 36.518 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 36.518 | USD 0 | USD 961 | This income was not incorporated in the previous budget. It was used in the Education program. |
Pan American Development Foundation - City of Buenos Aires | ARS | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 101.439 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 101.439 | USD 0 | USD 2.669 | This income was not incorporated in the previous budget. It was used in the Community Support program. |
Total Revenues | ARS | ARS 10.078.651 | ARS 6.743.139 | ARS 457.299 | ARS 92.500 | ARS 188.842 | ARS 7.481.780 | USD 295.401 | USD 311.161 | The main reason for the variance was a higher income donation than expected. |
Spending during this period (6 month for progress report, 12 months for impact report)
editPlease use the exchange rate in your APG proposal.
Expense | Currency | Budgeted | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Cumulative | Budgeted ($US)* | Cumulative ($US)* | Percentage spent to date | Percentage spent to date ARS | Explanation of variances from plan |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Staff Expenses | ARS | ARS 5.235.588 | ARS 1.288.737 | ARS 889.651 | ARS 1.817.634 | ARS 1.746.421 | ARS 5.742.442 | USD 127.697 | USD 124.129 | 97,2% | 109,7% | High inflation and an even higher devaluation leads prices in ARS be higher than expected, but prices in USD lower than expected. Thus, over execution in ARS and under execution in USD |
General Administration | ARS | ARS 1.350.000 | ARS 333.951 | ARS 473.460 | ARS 434.953 | ARS 615.247 | ARS 1.857.612 | USD 32.927 | USD 40.303 | 122,4% | 137,6% | During 2019 the prices of services such as light and renting, grew much faster than the rest of the prices (there was a stept reduction in subsidies of public services due to the fiscal deficit) |
Education program | ARS | ARS 1.758.587 | ARS 415.406 | ARS 261.771 | ARS 550.632 | ARS 317.548 | ARS 1.545.357 | USD 42.892 | USD 34.930 | 81,4% | 87,9% | Since the Buenos Aires Conference was directly linked with this program, many resources (including human) during some months of the last semester were used in that program. |
Culture & Open Knowledge Program | ARS | ARS 1.155.750 | ARS 227.910 | ARS 154.971 | ARS 216.400 | ARS 638.904 | ARS 1.238.185 | USD 28.189 | USD 24.790 | 87,9% | 107,1% | We recieved unexpected incomes for this project which rised the amount to spend higher. |
Community Support program | ARS | ARS 1.004.665 | ARS 181.121 | ARS 261.611 | ARS 150.128 | ARS 499.792 | ARS 1.092.653 | USD 24.504 | USD 22.787 | 93,0% | 108,8% | We recieved unexpected incomes for this project which rised the amount to spend higher. |
Buenos Aires Human Rights Conference* | ARS | ARS 1.401.872 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 1.359.590 | ARS 9.053 | ARS 1.368.643 | USD 27.242 | USD 27.329 | 100,3% | 122,5% | High inflation and an even higher devaluation leads prices in ARS be higher than expected, but prices in USD lower than expected. Thus, over execution in ARS and under execution in USD |
Wikimedia Movement | ARS | ARS 284.950 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | ARS 0 | USD 6.950 | USD 0 | 0,0% | 0,0% | WMF paid for travel to attend strategy meetings |
In-kind donations | ARS | ARS 205.000 | ARS 139.500 | ARS 139.500 | ARS 92.500 | ARS 185.000 | ARS 556.500 | USD 5.000 | USD 12.427 | 248,5% | 271,5% | |
TOTAL | ARS | ARS 12.396.411 | ARS 2.586.624 | ARS 2.180.964 | ARS 4.621.838 | ARS 4.011.965 | ARS 13.401.391 | USD 295.401 | USD 286.695 | 97,1% | 107,9% | High inflation and an even higher devaluation leads prices in ARS be higher than expected, but prices in USD lower than expected. Thus, over execution in ARS and under execution in USD |
Exchange Rate | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
ARS for 1 USD | ARS 34,00 | ARS 38,00 | ARS 50,00 | ARS 66,00 | ||
ARS 36,00 | ARS 58,00 |
Compliance
editIs your organization compliant with the terms outlined in the grant agreement?
editAs required in the grant agreement, please report any deviations from your grant proposal here. Note that, among other things, any changes must be consistent with our WMF mission, must be for charitable purposes as defined in the grant agreement, and must otherwise comply with the grant agreement.
Are you in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations as outlined in the grant agreement? Please answer "Yes" or "No".
YES
Are you in compliance with provisions of the United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and with relevant tax laws and regulations restricting the use of the Grant funds as outlined in the grant agreement? Please answer "Yes" or "No".
YES
Signature
edit- Once complete, please sign below with the usual four tildes.
- Anna Torres (WMAR) (talk) 18:52, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Resources
editResources to plan for measurement
edit- Global metrics are an important starting point for grantees when it comes to measuring programmatic impact (Learning Patterns and Tutorial) but don’t stop there.
- Logic Models provide a framework for mapping your pathway to impact through the cause and effect chain from inputs to outputs to outcomes. Develop a logic model to map out your theory of change and determine the metrics and measures for your programs.
- Importantly, both qualitative and quantitative measures are important so consider both as you determine measures for your evaluation and be sure to ask the right questions to be sure to capture your program stories.
Resources for storytelling
edit- WMF storytelling series and toolkit (DRAFT)
- Online workshop on Storytelling. By Frameworks institute
- The origin of storytelling
- Story frames, with a focus on news-worthiness.
- Reading guide: Storytelling and Social change. By Working Narratives
- The uses of the story.
- Case studies.
- Blog: 3 Tips on telling stories that move people to action. By Paul VanDeCarr (Working Narratives), on Philanthropy.com
- Building bridges using narrative techniques. By Sparknow.net
- Differences between a report and a story
- Question guides and exercises.
- Guide: Tools for Knowledge and Learning. By Overseas Development Institute (UK).
- Developing a strategy
- Collaboration mechanisms
- Knowledge sharing and learning
- Capturing and storing knowledge.