Subvenciones:Evaluación/SiyNo
Esta page se mantiene por un interés histórico. Cualquier política mencionada podría estar obsoleta. Si deseas revivir este tema, puedes usar la página de discusión o añadir un tema en el foro de la comunidad. |
Program Evaluation & Design: What we can do for you and what we don't do for you.
El equipo de evaluación y diseño de programas tiene como objetivo apoyar a la comunidad Wikimedia de líderes de programaindependientemente de su afiliación, y apoyar el evaluación y el diseño de todos los programas. Hay muchas cosas que "podemos hacer" y hay algunas cosas que "no" hacemos.
FRANK: Do/Don'ts with ***asterisks*** in the section header are one's I'm struggling with
Lo que SÍ hacemos
Los aconsejamos en diseño y preguntas para encuestas
Te proveeremos retroalimentación y consejo para que desarrolles tus encuestas. Podemos revisar tus preguntas, ayudarte con el diseño, y proveer consjo en cómo distribuirla y evaluar los datos que recojas. Puedes pedir retroalimentación via el Parlor o Sarah y ella te entregará retroalimentación del equipo de ilícitos de la forma que prefieras (email/página de discusión/etc).
"Hacemos" estudios de casos sobre los programas más impactantes para compartir con ustedes lo que los hace tan exitosos
Estaremos escribiendo estudio de casos sobre los programas más impactantes. A través de sus evaluaciones, podremos aprender que programas son, y trabajar con los líderes del programa para desarrollar esos estudios de casos. Compartir estos estudios de caso permitirá a la comunidad Wikimedia aprender a mejorar sus propios programas y nos permitirá desarrollar un aprendizaje compartido.
"Desarrollamos" herramientas y recursos a lo largo del tiempo para ayudarlo a evaluar sus programas con sus comentarios y ayuda
"Roma no se construyó en un día", por lo que tenemos que trabajar en colaboración para crear y desarrollar las herramientas y recursos adecuados para apoyar su evaluación. A través de encuestas, solicitudes de comentarios y transparencia podemos trabajar juntos para crear grandes herramientas de evaluación para ser usados a través del movimiento.
Fomentamos la consulta apreciativa a medida que avanzamos para hacer crecer el impresionante
Somos partidarios del modelo de evaluación de consulta apreciativa. A través de la consulta apreciativa, podemos ver cuál es el mejor y más exitoso en nuestro trabajo y programas, y aprender de él. En lugar de enfocarnos en lo negativo y lo que está mal en nuestros programas y trabajo, estamos pensando positivo y celebrando lo bueno para hacer que el trabajo que hacemos en el movimiento sea más impresionante.
"Garantizamos" un espacio amistoso y seguro para todos en nuestros espacios de Evaluación y Diseño de Programas
Ya sea en meta-wiki o en nuestro grupo de Facebook, o en un taller en línea o fuera de ella, nuestro equipo asegura un espacio amigable y seguro. Compruebe nuestra política de espacio amistoso y si es considerado con alguna actividad que tenga lugar en cualquier espacio de evaluación y diseño de programas, comuníquese con Sarah para recibir ayuda.
"Ayudamos" a guiarte contando la historia de tu programa
Each program has a story — why you decided to do it, the steps to make it happen, the people and process involved, the outcomes from the program, and the next chapter you hope to write. We're here to help you tell that story.
We do help you discover ways to pull data
Are you looking for the right tool to help you gather data about your GLAM content donation? Not sure how you can use Wiki Metrics to learn about the retention of participants from your workshop? We're here to help you discover the best ways to pull data for your programs. Just ask!
We do host online workshops, meetings and hangouts
We frequently host online events — via Google Hangout and IRC. While we can't always meet with you in person, we can meet anytime via the web. Contact Sarah if you have an idea for an online event, or if you would like to schedule IRC, Hangout, or Skype time with any of the team members. You can often find us hanging out on #wikimedia-pedconectarse.
We do provide feedback about your reports, evaluations, case studies and related documents
We're happy to provide you feedback regarding any reports, evaluations, case studies, and so forth, that you create for yourself or your organization. You can ask for feedback via the Parlor or Sarah and she'll illicit team feedback for you via your preferred method (email/talk page/etc.).
***We do share with you what programs achieve which impacts and goals as we build a shared knowledge about programs***
Through evaluation you can be discover which programs make the biggest and best impacts. As our team learns more about the goals and impacts of your programs, we'll be sharing with you what programs we think are making the best impact on the movement, and how they are doing that.
We do share evaluation stories via social media
Have a story you want to share via blog about your program? Want to share your success about using Wiki Metrics, or how your program retained new editors? We've got just the places for you to do that. Stop by our Facebook group and share your success, or contact Sarah, who can help you draft blog for the Wikimedia Foundation blog. Share your story!
We do support all program leaders and all programs
Our team supports program leaders regardless of their chapter, affiliate, organization, or involvement as an individual in the Wikimedia community. We also aim to support evaluation and design in all programs.
***We do workshops and site visits about evaluation and design***
We will be doing workshops at community conferences and at specially designed events internationally. As we progress with program design, we'll also be doing site visits to meet with community members to see what types of programs they're doing. We can't wait to connect with you in person to make the impact of your programs even bigger.
What we DON'T
We don't collect or pull your data for you
While it can be tempting, we can't pull your data for you. However, we are happy to support you discover ways to pull your data.
We don't design your programs for you
We will support you in providing advice on how to design your programs, including tools and resources, like case studies, we'll develop to make program planning easier. But, we can't design your program for you.
We don't intend on forcing anyone to do evaluation and design
So no, this is not a "top down" approach, which means the Wikimedia Foundation is not forcing anyone — chapters, affiliates, individuals, volunteers — to do program evaluation and design. We hope you will, and we're here to help you learn why it's important to do.
***We don't make any decisions about money***
Nope, we don't touch that stuff. We are here to help you design and evaluate programs. If you're interested in talking money, you can visit the grantmaking department.
We don't tell you what programs to do
We will never tell you what types of programs you, your chapter, or organization should be doing. You can use the resources we provide to make that decision yourself!
We don't tolerate trolling
We want to make sure that the Program Evaluation & Design spaces — online and offline — are friendly spaces. While we do tolerate trolls, we don't tolerate trolling. So keep things positive, encouraging, and supportive.
We don't write your reports, evaluations, case studies, or related documents for you
While we're happy to provide feedback, we are unable to write or co-write your reports, evaluations, case studies and related documents.
We don't write, design, or distribute your surveys for you
We can advise you on survey questions and design but we can't write, design, or distribute your survey for you.