Grants:Project/Putnik/Wikidata module/Final
This project is funded by a Project Grant
proposal | people | timeline & progress | finances | midpoint report | final report |
- Incomplete report
This report has been reviewed by WMF and additional information is required before review may continue.
Grant reports may be marked incomplete if information requested on the grant report form, required by the grant agreement, or requested by Wikimedia Foundation staff is not provided in a timely and complete manner. If a grantee is unresponsive or uncooperative for more than 21 days, reports will automatically be marked Incomplete. Grantees who have an incomplete report will not be eligible for additional grant funds until the report is accepted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
- To read the approved grant submission describing the plan for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Putnik/Wikidata module.
- To understand the reasons why this report has been marked incomplete, please review the comments on this report's discussion page.
- Please do not change the status of this report. Email projectgrantswikimedia.org with questions about this report or its status.
Welcome to this project's final report! This report shares the outcomes, impact and learnings from the grantee's project.
Part 1: The Project
editSummary
editIn a few short sentences, give the main highlights of what happened with your project. Please include a few key outcomes or learnings from your project in bullet points, for readers who may not make it all the way through your report.
During the project, the following results were achieved:
- The module was simplified for both use (to use 1 module and 1 template is enough) and configuration (single configuration page)
- Native support for all data types
- Most of the output is data-based and does not require additional code
- Powerful extensions for individual properties
- Advanced HTML output for the ability to connect external tools (primarily JavaScript gadgets)
- Created the gadget to export information from infoboxes to Wikidata (added 90K statements)
- Created bot for synchronization of modules between different wiki-projects
Methods and activities
editWhat did you do in project?
Please list and describe the activities you've undertaken during this grant. Since you already told us about the setup and first 3 months of activities in your midpoint report, feel free to link back to those sections to give your readers the background, rather than repeating yourself here, and mostly focus on what's happened since your midpoint report in this section.
- Many adjustments have arisen in the process of communicating with other participants interested in integrating Wikipedia and Wikidata
- Some of the solutions were unsuccessful, and they had to be altered after they were implemented
Outcomes and impact
editOutcomes
editWhat are the results of your project?
Please discuss the outcomes of your experiments or pilot, telling us what you created or changed (organized, built, grew, etc) as a result of your project.
- In some Wikipedias, information from the Wikidata was much more actively and suitable used
- Accelerated filling the Wikidata with new information
Progress towards stated goals
editPlease use the below table to:
- List each of your original measures of success (your targets) from your project plan.
- List the actual outcome that was achieved.
- Explain how your outcome compares with the original target. Did you reach your targets? Why or why not?
Planned measure of success (include numeric target, if applicable) |
Actual result | Explanation |
To improve the current module to such an extent that sections that have been using it may wish to completely replace all the parameters of the templates with data from Wikidata. | TBD | |
Make the module easy to install and use in any project. | TBD | |
Deploy the module to the largest possible number of projects. | TBD |
Think back to your overall project goals. Do you feel you achieved your goals? Why or why not?
Global Metrics
editWe are trying to understand the overall outcomes of the work being funded across all grantees. In addition to the measures of success for your specific program (in above section), please use the table below to let us know how your project contributed to the "Global Metrics." We know that not all projects will have results for each type of metric, so feel free to put "0" as often as necessary.
- Next to each metric, list the actual numerical outcome achieved through this project.
- Where necessary, explain the context behind your outcome. For example, if you were funded for a research project which resulted in 0 new images, your explanation might be "This project focused solely on participation and articles written/improved, the goal was not to collect images."
For more information and a sample, see Global Metrics.
Metric | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
1. Number of active editors involved | TBD | |
2. Number of new editors | TBD | |
3. Number of individuals involved | TBD | |
4. Number of new images/media added to Wikimedia articles/pages | TBD | |
5. Number of articles added or improved on Wikimedia projects | TBD | |
6. Absolute value of bytes added to or deleted from Wikimedia projects | TBD |
- Learning question
- Did your work increase the motivation of contributors, and how do you know?
Indicators of impact
editDo you see any indication that your project has had impact towards Wikimedia's strategic priorities? We've provided 3 options below for the strategic priorities that Project Grants are mostly likely to impact. Select one or more that you think are relevant and share any measures of success you have that point to this impact. You might also consider any other kinds of impact you had not anticipated when you planned this project.
Option A: How did you increase participation in one or more Wikimedia projects?
Option B: How did you improve quality on one or more Wikimedia projects?
Option C: How did you increase the reach (readership) of one or more Wikimedia projects?
Project resources
editPlease provide links to all public, online documents and other artifacts that you created during the course of this project. Examples include: meeting notes, participant lists, photos or graphics uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, template messages sent to participants, wiki pages, social media (Facebook groups, Twitter accounts), datasets, surveys, questionnaires, code repositories... If possible, include a brief summary with each link.
Learning
editThe best thing about trying something new is that you learn from it. We want to follow in your footsteps and learn along with you, and we want to know that you took enough risks in your project to have learned something really interesting! Think about what recommendations you have for others who may follow in your footsteps, and use the below sections to describe what worked and what didn’t.
What worked well
editWhat did you try that was successful and you'd recommend others do? To help spread successful strategies so that they can be of use to others in the movement, rather than writing lots of text here, we'd like you to share your finding in the form of a link to a learning pattern.
- Your learning pattern link goes here
What didn’t work
editWhat did you try that you learned didn't work? What would you think about doing differently in the future? Please list these as short bullet points.
Other recommendations
editIf you have additional recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please list them here.
Next steps and opportunities
editAre there opportunities for future growth of this project, or new areas you have uncovered in the course of this grant that could be fruitful for more exploration (either by yourself, or others)? What ideas or suggestions do you have for future projects based on the work you’ve completed? Please list these as short bullet points.
Part 2: The Grant
editFinances
editActual spending
editPlease copy and paste the completed table from your project finances page. Check that you’ve listed the actual expenditures compared with what was originally planned. If there are differences between the planned and actual use of funds, please use the column provided to explain them.
- 13,793 US $
Remaining funds
editDo you have any unspent funds from the grant?
Please answer yes or no. If yes, list the amount you did not use and explain why.
- No
If you have unspent funds, they must be returned to WMF. Please see the instructions for returning unspent funds and indicate here if this is still in progress, or if this is already completed:
Documentation
editDid you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grantsadmin wikimedia.org, according to the guidelines here?
Please answer yes or no. If no, include an explanation.
- No
Confirmation of project status
editDid you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
Please answer yes or no.
- Yes
Is your project completed?
Please answer yes or no.
- No
Grantee reflection
editWe’d love to hear any thoughts you have on what this project has meant to you, or how the experience of being a grantee has gone overall. Is there something that surprised you, or that you particularly enjoyed, or that you’ll do differently going forward as a result of the Project Grant experience? Please share it here!