Grants:Project/Rapid/Biplab Anand/Lekh Sudhaar Sampaadanthan/Report

Report accepted
This report for a Rapid Grant approved in FY 2020-21 has been reviewed and accepted by the Wikimedia Foundation.
  • To read the approved grant submission describing the plan for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Rapid/Biplab Anand/Lekh Sudhaar Sampaadanthan.
  • You may still comment on this report on its discussion page, or visit the discussion page to read the discussion about this report.
  • You are welcome to Email rapidgrants at wikimedia dot org at any time if you have questions or concerns about this report.
Lekh Sudhaar Sampaadanthan

Goals

edit

Did you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went?
Yes. We meet our goals mentioned in our grant application. We are quite happy that the way contributors engaged in the project and improved the stub articles into a readable articles.

Outcome

edit

Please report on your original project targets. Please be sure to review and provide metrics required for Rapid Grants.


Target outcome Achieved outcome Explanation
Number of events: 1 1 We have organized an article improvement contest from September 17, 2020 to October 16, 2020.
Number of participants: 10 to 15 22 22 people signed up as a participants but 13 people submitted their articles in fountain tool.
Number of articles improved: 100 to 120 220 220 article were submitted to fountain of which 33 articles were failed because of contest criteria.


Statistics

edit

Graphical chart

edit

Article improvement (Breakdown)

edit
Date September 17 September 18 September 19 September 20 September 21 September 22 September 23 September 24 September 25 September 26 September 27 September 28 September 29 September 30 October 1
Article improved 11 14 8 11 16 10 4 7 8 9 8 2 2 2 3
Total article improved
(Aggregate)
11 25 33 44 60 70 74 81 89 98 106 108 110 112 115
Date October 2 October 3 October 4 October 5 October 6 October 7 October 8 October 9 October 10 October 11 October 12 October 13 October 14 October 15 October 16
Article improved 5 3 2 7 28 15 10 1 4 5 5 2 4 4 10
Total article improved
(Aggregate)
120 123 125 132 160 175 185 186 190 195 200 202 206 210 220

More details

edit

Learning

edit

Projects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:

  • What worked well?

- Social media promotion, on wiki Citenotice and MassMessage to active and veteran users.

  • What did not work so well?

- We failed to engage more Veteran users to contribute to this contest.

  • What would you do differently next time?

- We would like to organize offline edit-a-thon and promotional event next time to engage more users.

Finances

edit

Grant funds spent

edit

Please describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on.

  • Prizes (Worth of assorted merchandise such as Wikipedia T-shirts, bag, internet data, power banks, diary, pen, dictionary, and certificates. - for top 3 winners) - NPR 44,750
  • Certificates (For each participant) - NPR 2,000
  • T-shirts (For jury and organizers) - NPR 5,000
  • Unexpected expense and logistical expense - NPR 15,250

Remaining funds

edit

Do you have any remaining grant funds?
No

Anything else

edit

Anything else you want to share about your project?
We are really excited and looking forward to organizing this event at the regular interval. The community members appreciated this event and we are working on it.