Grants:Project/Rapid/Soni/MediaWiki Hackathon BPHC/Report
- Report accepted
- To read the approved grant submission describing the plan for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Rapid/Soni/MediaWiki Hackathon BPHC.
- You may still comment on this report on its discussion page, or visit the discussion page to read the discussion about this report.
- You are welcome to Email rapidgrants at wikimedia dot org at any time if you have questions or concerns about this report.
Goals
editDid you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went?
Yes, we found the event very successful. The quality of the event was up to the mark according to both participants and facilitators, and we learned a fair amount about organizing more such events.
Outcome
editPlease report on your original project targets.
Target outcome | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
Number of participants = 20-30 | 20 | We had 20 participants in the Hackathon, as expected. |
Bugs Fixed | 5 Patches merged | The full list of patches worked on, and bugs fixed can be found at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WMHBPHC. Out of all the patches worked on during the hackathon, 5 have been already merged. |
Learning
editProjects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:
- What worked well?
There was a number of things that really worked out with respect to planning. Getting participants to do a set of pre-requisites was a good idea, in terms of making sure everyone started out on the same page. Having a relatively small number of highly interested participants was also good in making sure people were vested in the event.
- What did not work so well?
There were some minor issues with respect to getting the internet requirements for the Hackathon, which were finally sorted a day or two before the event. It could have ideally be done at least a couple weeks before time so possible delays could be accounted for.
- What would you do differently next time?
Organise it for a longer period of time. A hackathon is a really good chance for developers to work with each other, but the time constraints are a little less. Plan things out more flexibly. This would allow us to be able to handle last minute problems better, if any.
Finances
editGrant funds spent
editPlease describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on.
Title | Amount (INR) |
---|---|
Cab travel | 5222 |
Flights | 26286 |
Trains | 4201 |
Total expenses (INR) | 36009 |
The exact amounts for each sub-section (along with the bills) have been mailed to the Grants team.
Remaining funds
editDo you have any remaining grant funds?
No
Anything else
editAnything else you want to share about your project?
All the relevant details about the event, including the final set of Patches submitted (the overall outcome of the event) can be found at https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WMHBPHC
We conducted two small surveys to the facilitators and the participants to gain relevant feedback about how the event went -
WMHBPHC Facilitators Survey
|
---|
WMHBPHC Facilitators SurveyeditAll the information collected in this document is accurate as of 29 September 2016 (1200 hrs, UTC). For any clarifications, please contact the User:Soni. About the SurveyeditThe survey was aimed at all the facilitators of Wikimedia Hackathon BPHC and is aimed at getting their feedback on all relevant matters. The survey was hosted on Google Forms at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSey_fjyP0U9Nmu9MZkipnH7E3ZhOi_UbMrB6qheVFhTGxFAEA/viewform?c=0&w=1 The ResponsesThere were a total of 3 responses from all the facilitators - Abdeali JK, Tony Thomas and Srijan Agarwal. The QuestionsHow did it help you as a contributor to Wikimedia?
Additional feedback on logistics
Any additional comments regarding the sessions or overall agenda?
How likely will you be to host future Hackathons here? (required)There were five options for each of these questions
Any overall feedback for the event and facilitators?
Overall rating for the Hackathon (required)The rating was from a scale of 1 to 10.
About the Hackathon (required)There were five options for each of these questions
How relevant was the hackathon to the participants?
How prepared were the participants for it?
How much do think they learned from the Hackathon?
Was the quality of the participation good?
How good was the overall output from the conference?
How much do think they will continue contributing to Wikimedia projects?
How satisfied were you with the Logistics (required)There were five options for each of these questions
Planning
Schedule
Transport
Accommodation
Food
Venue of the Hackathon
Electricity and internet arrangements
|
WMHBPHC Participants Survey
|
---|
WMHBPHC Participants Survey All the information collected in this document is accurate as of 29 September 2016 (1200 hrs, UTC). For any clarifications, please contact the User:Soni. About the SurveyeditThe survey was aimed at all the participants of Wikimedia Hackathon BPHC and is aimed at getting their feedback on all relevant matters. The survey was hosted on Google Forms at https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeDYxWAD-QY2BhsZOxQQ_CV75KLqzuTUcOi4iOwMqAgyUFabQ/viewform?c=0&w=1 The ResponseseditThere were a total of 14 responses from the participants, all of them anonymous. The QuestionseditWhich Hackathon did you participate in?edit
Which days of the Hackathon did you attend?edit
About the HackathoneditThere were five options for each of these questions
How relevant was the hackathon to you?edit
How appropriate were the pre-requisites?edit
How helpful were the facilitators?edit
How much did you learn from the Hackathon?edit
How likely are you to contribute further to Wikimedia Projects?edit
What were your key take aways from this event?edit
How satisfied were you with the logistics?editThere were five options for each of these questions
Scheduleedit
Venueedit
Electricity and internet arrangementsedit
In hackathon snacksedit
Additional feedback on logisticsedit
Did you attend the prerequisite workshops?edit
How helpful was the workshop?editAnswer on a scale of 1-5edit
Was the quality of the participation good?edit
Any additional comments regarding the sessions or overall agenda?edit
Any overall feedback for the event and facilitators?edit
Overall rating for the HackathoneditRating out of 10edit
|