Grants:Project/Rapid/Wiki Hour/WikiForHumanRights - Edit Contest Ghana/Report
- Report accepted
- To read the approved grant submission describing the plan for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Rapid/Wiki Hour/WikiForHumanRights - Edit Contest Ghana.
- You may still comment on this report on its discussion page, or visit the discussion page to read the discussion about this report.
- You are welcome to Email rapidgrants at wikimedia dot org at any time if you have questions or concerns about this report.
Goals
editDid you meet your goals? Are you happy with how the project went?
We were warm hearted and full of enthusiasm because we exceeded our goals. Spanning from the pre-campaign, securing fruitful collaboration with other groups with similar interests and advocacy that brought together 25 newbies and 10 experienced advocates in the space of environment and Human rights both virtual and in-person.
Editors who were newly recruited were from human rights institutions and environmental advocates who contributed enormously to topics on Human rights, institutions and climate topics, healthy natural systems. The wow factor came as a result of an increase in translated articles in the local language especially Hausa on both english Wikipedia and Wikidata items.
That notwithstanding, skills were increased for existing editors were they acquired knowledge in advancing Wikimedia through wikidata, about 5% of existing editors knew little or no information on contributing to Wikidata, at the end of the campaign there was an upsurge of contribution and knowledge filling using for all participants to improve upon Wikidata. Also, an increase with images on the topic with 676 as total results.
General outcome of the campaign can be found in the news publication here: [[1]]
Outcome
editPlease report on your original project targets. Please be sure to review and provide metrics required for Rapid Grants.
Target outcome | Achieved outcome | Explanation |
One Training, One edit-a-thon & a 14 days writing contest |
|
|
25 participants | 45 participants |
|
15 new editors | 30 new editors |
|
80 articles created or improved | 332 articles were created and over 949 improved |
|
Number of repeat participants 15 | 30 participants |
|
Learning
editProjects do not always go according to plan. Sharing what you learned can help you and others plan similar projects in the future. Help the movement learn from your experience by answering the following questions:
- What worked well?
It was amazing to have participants from Lebanon and Nigeria contributing to the campaign. This only proves that the campaign publicity and social media campaign went global. The hausa wikipedia also saw an upsurge on article translations both on Wikipedia and WikiData. Our diverse engagement on social media via our collaborators was great. Youth opportunity Ghana, Global Platform Ghana, CitiFm and Joy Aid Foundation fully engaged their network to support the campaign. In general, Global Platform Ghana, Amnesty International, Human Rights Ghana- resource kit, Joy Aid Foundation and Youth Opportunities Ghana helped us win diverse audiences.
1. Dashboard metrics (Writing Contest) - [2]
2. Article list which worked on here [3]
3. Wiki Hour Initiative campaign page with article list [4]
- What did not work so well?
This year, we had little language contributions especially on the Twi Wikipedia. Although we had many participants interested in joining the campaign, we had little space to accommodate them physically due to Covid19 restrictions. Some newbies who joined virtually and were not tech savvys had some slight challenges using their devices to edit.
- What would you do differently next time?
We intend to organise trainings for twi linguists to help decolonize the internet through languages. There was not many editors in this phase of the contest so we hope to increase awareness for the linguists.
Finances
editGrant funds spent
editPlease describe how much grant money you spent for approved expenses, and tell us what you spent it on.
- Food and Snacks - This catered for feeding for the 2 separate events (Training and Edit-a-thon) USD300
- Communication and design - USD150
- Data Scholarship - (USD10 was used to purchase data credit each for 15 participants)- USD150
- Jury - ( Gifts and internet for 4 Jury members) USD200
- Administrative expenses - USD250
- Awards - (Certificates to all top 10 winners, special prizes such as; (1)- Hard drive and gift (Improving entries on WikiData and Commons is a bonus)(3) - Pen drive and gift Gifts and Call credits - USD600
- Protocol kits - Purchase of nose masks and hand sanitizers for all participants. - USD30
- Space rental and food- a place and provide food for the working meeting for the information synthesis to gather feedback from team and report accordingly.USD200
- Miscellaneous - This catered for bank and data transfer charges, conversion and transportation expenses - USD20
Total grant expense = $1,900
Remaining funds
editDo you have any remaining grant funds?
No funds remaining.
Anything else
editAnything else you want to share about your project?
It has been a great learning and sharing moment for the team because we had the opportunity to clear myths about Wikipedia and we are glad to have met a high number of newbies who acquired valuable facts to churn their interest to improve or contribute to Wikimedia projects. We hope to expand our reach of audience to groups in rural areas because the knowledge movement has still not reached all. We look forward to increasing awareness on SDG related topics in Ghana.
Summary of feedback from participants: About how valuable an opportunity to learn about the benefits of Wikipedia and its sister projects. It also brought to bare the need to create more awareness to reach many diverse advocates of similar interest. This sort of campaign should be organised frequently.