Meta:Babel/Archives/2021-03

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in March 2021, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index.

Read only mode 23 March at 06:00 (UTC)

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Per Tech/News/2021/11, metawiki will be in read-only mode for a short period of time on 23 March at 06:00 (UTC).

“

… s7 also includes centralauth database, which means some operations might fail during the read-only period, such as: GlobalRenames, Changing/Confirming emails, logging into new wikis, password changes...

”

— phabricator:T276899

— billinghurst sDrewth 08:44, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: completed — billinghurst sDrewth 13:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikifunctions logo contest

Hello. Please help to choose a design concept for the logo of the new Wikifunctions wiki. Voting starts today and will be open for 2 weeks. If you would like to participate, then please learn more and vote now at Meta-Wiki. Thank you! --Quiddity (WMF)

01:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Survey for donation

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, where can I found the translations of the survey which can be compiled after making the donation to Wikimedia in these days? --Superchilum^{(talk to me!)} 07:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Migrating Template:Welcome?

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Should we be transferring our welcome message to the translation system so that it can be more widely available, and less problematic to update? — billinghurst sDrewth 01:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Support It should be systematic by using passage that based on the single source of default langauge English.--NP-chaonay (talk) 08:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC) (1st edited on 05:47, 24 March 2021 (UTC))

Proposed amendment to MSR

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion

Per Meta:Requests for adminship/Tks4Fish, I propose we add under "Administrative actions on Meta" the following provision - Admin actions related to Steward request pages as well as Stewards/Elections / Stewards/Confirmations. I see this analogous as how we grant limited adminship to trusted users to manage Chapter / Affiliates pages such as Meta:Requests for limited adminship/Willie Robert. Ideas. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Support Sensible Leaderboard (talk) 14:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Oppose without clarification, what exactly are actions related to these pages supposed to be that will address the situation that started this? Is there an issue that the action related to the pages (e.g. protect/delete) were an issue @Camouflaged Mirage:? The only contentious thing in that RfA had to do with actions related to users (i.e. blocking). — xaosflux ^Talk 13:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- FWIW, I'm fine with allowing stewards to use page management tools on any steward request pages, broadly construed. — xaosflux ^Talk 13:44, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

Comment

I would prefer that the conversation takes place on the relevant talk page, and a pointer to the discussion appear here. (missing userid: User:Billinghurst) 00:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Given the low participation here, this seems to be a non-problem. I suggest archiving. --MF-W 23:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: MF-W 23:22, 27 April 2021 (UTC)