Meta talk:Interface administrators/Archives/2023
Latest comment: 1 year ago by ToadetteEdit in topic Amendment proposal: inactivity review procedure
 | Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in 2023, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion or the archives index. |
Amendment proposal: inactivity review procedure
- This section was archived on a request by: Toadette (chat) 14:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello,
I propose that the inactivity checks for interface administrators be performed as part of the Meta:Administrators/Removal reviews we do each six months. Bundling it there makes sense to me given that even for non-administrators, the maximum inactivity allowed is less than 10 edits in the last 6 months. Since we review administrator inactivity each 6 months too I think it makes sense to bundle the IA activity review there. It'll also help not to forget to do the inactivity checks for this sensitive group.
Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Support as proposer. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:41, 20 March 2023 (UTC)- Support sensible proposal. Sounds good to me. Tulsi 24x7 13:14, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support - looks good. Syunsyunminmin 🗨️talk 13:29, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support necessary step - mostly IA rights are equally sensitive as sysop rights, if not more. Svartava (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support reasonable. — xaosflux Talk 13:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Krd 15:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support --Johannnes89 (talk) 16:48, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support —MdsShakil (talk) 18:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support -J. Ansari Talk 18:23, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
Done - I implemented this uncontroversial policy clarification on the page. --MF-W 18:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)