Offline Projects/Movement Brand Project
- Link to the propositions : Communications/Wikimedia brands/2030 movement brand project/Naming convention proposals
- Link to the survey : [1]
Question related to proposition 1 (Wikipedia as a network)
editHow much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the above proposed naming convention? These statements are based on the Movement Branding Criteria that was generated in the 2019 through community consultation [select one option] (required)
| Movement Branding Criteria | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree |
| This proposal will help explain the different elements of our movement and reduce confusion | |||||
| This proposal will help protect and improve our reputation | |||||
| This proposal will help support and bring awareness to the sister projects | |||||
| This proposal will help mitigate legal risks | |||||
| This proposal will help support movement growth | |||||
| This proposal is sufficiently adaptable (personalizable and localizable) for movement members |
Please tell us why you have made these selections and/or provide recommendations for improvement [open question] (optional)
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement about each proposed descriptor term? "This descriptor term will help explain the different elements of our movement."[select one option] (required)
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | |
| [Descriptor term 1] | |||||
| [Descriptor term 2] |
What else could be improved of this overall naming convention proposal?[open question] (optional)
Question related to proposition 2 (Wikipedia as a mouvement)
editHow much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the above proposed naming convention? These statements are based on the Movement Branding Criteria that was generated in the 2019 through community consultation [select one option] (required)
| Movement Branding Criteria | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree |
| This proposal will help explain the different elements of our movement and reduce confusion | |||||
| This proposal will help protect and improve our reputation | |||||
| This proposal will help support and bring awareness to the sister projects | |||||
| This proposal will help mitigate legal risks | |||||
| This proposal will help support movement growth | |||||
| This proposal is sufficiently adaptable (personalizable and localizable) for movement members |
Please tell us why you have made these selections and/or provide recommendations for improvement [open question] (optional)
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement about each proposed descriptor term? "This descriptor term will help explain the different elements of our movement."[select one option] (required)
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | |
| [Descriptor term 1] | |||||
| [Descriptor term 2] |
What else could be improved of this overall naming convention proposal?[open question] (optional)
Question related to proposition 3 (Wiki)
editHow much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the above proposed naming convention? These statements are based on the Movement Branding Criteria that was generated in the 2019 through community consultation [select one option] (required)
| Movement Branding Criteria | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly Agree |
| This proposal will help explain the different elements of our movement and reduce confusion | |||||
| This proposal will help protect and improve our reputation | |||||
| This proposal will help support and bring awareness to the sister projects | |||||
| This proposal will help mitigate legal risks | |||||
| This proposal will help support movement growth | |||||
| This proposal is sufficiently adaptable (personalizable and localizable) for movement members |
Please tell us why you have made these selections and/or provide recommendations for improvement [open question] (optional)
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement about each proposed descriptor term? "This descriptor term will help explain the different elements of our movement."[select one option] (required)
| Strongly disagree | Disagree | Neutral | Agree | Strongly agree | |
| [Descriptor term 1] | |||||
| [Descriptor term 2] |
What else could be improved of this overall naming convention proposal?[open question] (optional)
Additional body questions, for affiliates only
editWhat would the name of your affiliate be in this structure (in English and/or your local language)?[open question] (required)
No change? Wikimedians for Offline Wikis ~~~
How much do you agree or disagree with this statement? "This name will help our affiliate." [select one option] (required)
Please explain why you made this selection. [open question] (optional)
Nice acronym, no need to change. Offline Wikigroup is ok but a bit blander / wouldn't be better. ~~~