Proposals for closing projects/Closure of Turkmen Wikibooks

The result of the following proposal for closing a WMF project is to CLOSE the project. Please, do not modify this page.

The following discussion is closed.

I propose to close the Turkmen Wikibooks. It is completely inactive and has no real conent (only two pages, which don't look very legitimate and could probably be moved to Incubator). -- Prince Kassad 00:26, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Wiki is inactive without any recent edits except for global pages changes. Though there are no vandalism either. Hydriz 09:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I support the closure of any "-books," -tionary," "-quote," or "-news" project where the "-pedia" isn't even strong enough. Seb az86556 12:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks like exactly two pages have been created since 2005 in addition to the main page, which itself is just a collection of redlinks. Jafeluv 12:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm a sysop at both tk -pedia and -tionary. They are OK. However, -books shall be incubated for sure.--Hanberke 22:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Completely inactive, without any new pages created and the latest editions are global actions.Salamat msg 14:58, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Ruslik 14:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support. İt is inactive, also one of the two pages is in Turkish, not Turkmen and the another has no relationship with the name of it. --Seksen iki yüz kırk beş 13:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No activity at all. Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 13:19, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support due to inactivity. --LexArt 08:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
-FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - inactive. Vibhijain 11:09, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pending unanimous consensus for closure of the wiki, I've filed bugzilla:29044 for this request. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:23, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]