Requests for comment/Turkish Wikipedia Faulty CheckUser operation

This is a subpage; for more information, see the Requests for comments page.

Hello, I am a user who was previously banned from the Turkish Wikipedia for live sockpuppetry. In order to circumvent this ban, I used sockpuppetry once. As a result of this sockpuppetry, my message page on the local wiki is closed. Recently, CheckUser said that another user was my sockpuppet and that user was blocked. I was under reasonable suspicion for sockpuppeting, but I learned from my mistake and decided not to sockpuppet again. User:Ehlal, who is allegedly mine, is unjustly blocked. It is argued that I am untrustworthy in the eyes of the community due to persistent sockpuppetry, and that I should be stripped of my privileges on Turkish Wikiquote. I will not be upset if the community decides to strip me of my privileges, but it would be upsetting if the community decides to do so because of puppetry that I did not do. Although I pointed out to CheckUser via meta that I am not the same person as user Ehlal, he closed the solution by stating that he would report me if I continued to write for things on trwiki. I am willing to share my credentials to prove that we are two different people on the condition that this information remains confidential, but I don't know with whom I can do this process. Mustafa MVC (talk) 14:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~I advise to stick to one account. Ahri Boy (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)~~[reply]

What does this have to do with anything? I am aware that I have made mistakes before, but I have not repeated this mistake and I am victimized. Mustafa MVC (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just complain to U4C. Ahri Boy (talk) 03:53, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Ahri Boy, I did that now. Mustafa MVC (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ahri Boy, in the future, don't respond to something you clearly don't understand. --SHB2000 (t • c) 09:04, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arhi Boy, stop yapping about things you clearly know nothing about. You have been warned a myriad of times in the past. There is always a possibility of misreading or misrepresentation of all private data a user check obtains. Sadly, data was not shared on checkuserwiki so I could judge on whether the block was justified. Best regards, A09|(pogovor) 20:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh... I was on a wikibreak. Sorry about that. I would consider disengaging from replying to further high-profile CheckUser-related complaints. Ahri Boy (talk) 11:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"I would consider disengaging from replying to further high-profile CheckUser-related complaints" – no, you shouldn't "just consider", you should disengage. --SHB2000 (t • c) 10:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do you expect Meta to do here? None of us here have CheckUser on the Turkish Wikipedia so can't meaningfully evaluate this request. The only people who can take any meaningful action here are the other Turkish Wikipedia checkusers or the ombuds commission. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 02:53, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Checkusers in Turkish Wikipedia are notoriously prone to errors, as can be shown by the RuzDD case (which is still ongoing), Yaratmayıcı’s case (which never made to Meta as he vanished but can be seen from Turkish Wikipedia archives) and possibly more 85.98.16.63 09:19, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]