Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Old Turkic

Old Turkic Wikipedia

edit
submitted verification final decision
  This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process.
This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy.

The closing committee member provided the following comment:

This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 03:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Proposal summary
  • Language details: Old Turkic (Köktürkçe, otk [invented])
  • Editing community: Yaroslav Zolotaryov (P)
    List your user name if you're interested in editing the wiki. Add "N" next to your
    name if you are a native speaker of this language.
  • Relevant pages: —
  • External links:
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
  • Number of speakers: No longer spoken natively. It has some modern learners.
  • Locations spoken: Altay, Siberia and Central Asia, 8-13 AC
  • Related languages: Tatar, Uyghur, Chulym, Kazakh

Notes/Comments/Questions

edit

Test wiki opened: http://incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Test-WP/yen --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 10:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: We have vocabulary of 20 000 and some enthusiasts of this, why not begin? This is language of old siberian turk culture and Yenesey Caganate --Yaroslav Zolotaryov 03:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support

edit
I Cevair Zufer Muslim Turk from western Balkan born and living in Sweden, supports the idea but we shouldn't call it
old turkish as the turkish language and history are much older. cevair@netatonce.net
  1. The official alphabet should real orkhon runiform also for current working may be Latin alphabet based on Turkish one. For transliteration scripts see kk:
  2. Native name should be Köktürkçe (it is very native name for ethnos and language) not Eski Türkçe thıs one means 'deprecated', sounds silly. English name should be Gokturk (is Latin as Old Italian? is Classic Arabic Old Iraqian? is Sanskrit Old Hindi?)
  3. Domain and language code preferably should be kok (this one currently is empty) tr-kok otk
  4. 'Locations spoken= Siberia and Central Asia, 8-13 AC' - it is wrong. Before disfalling 1st Turk Kaganate location is modern Northern China, Mongolia, East Turkistan, Altay and Turkistan. After 2nd Turk Kaganate control territoris from Hingan to Krimea, from Samarcand to Siberia. And time should be 5 century BC (Issyk inscriptions) - 8 century AD (dissolve turk community)
  5. 'Closely related languages, if any: Tatar, Uigur, Chulym'. Why only Tatar, Uigur, Chulym? It very closely to all turkic languages! --AlefZet 08:08, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support -- I strongly support this language.
  2. Support Kurdbuddha (talk) 10:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional support

edit

**Support --(Conditional support) The name "Eski/old" is not indicative for something including language. How old? Remember ; recent studies shows that Etruscan , Summerian ,assyrian and also some native American's languages are (most possibly) Turkish originated languages. (If so,) how we can call appr.20,000 years old languages if we named a a language as "Eski/Old" Turkish. I offer; lets make further studies on Turkish Language and its classification firstly.( I now that this work not so easy under the pressure of cultural imperialism on Turkish languages ). Regards and good luck to all. --Mustafa Akalp 15:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Mustafa Akalp 09:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

edit

Neutral

edit

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.