Requests for new languages/Wikipedia l33t
l33t Wikipedia
editsubmitted | verification | final decision |
This proposal has been closed as part of a reform of the request process. This request has not necessarily been rejected, and new requests are welcome. This decision was taken by the language committee in accordance with the Language proposal policy. The closing committee member provided the following comment: This discussion was created before the implementation of the Language proposal policy, and it is incompatible with the policy. Please open a new proposal in the format this page has been converted to (see the instructions). Do not copy discussion wholesale, although you are free to link to it or summarise it (feel free to copy your own comments over). —{admin} Pathoschild 05:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC) |
Proposal summary |
---|
|
Please read the handbook for requesters for help using this template correctly. |
- International Hacker Communication Language
Although you might consider such a request a mere attempt to highlight (obvious enough) prominence of the Hacker culture, a strongly advise you to hold back any radical conclusions before you make yourself familiar enough with the subject. See w:L33t for details.
Support Fellow Hackers!
Підтримаймо Хакерське Братерство!
Поддержим Братьев-Хакеров!
Votes
edit- Oppose --Taichi - (あ!) 01:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Daniel (‽) Check out Wikiscope! 20:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Death to leet. :) --Cool CatTalk|@ 20:02, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose all languages that are merely a cypher of another language. —IJzeren Jan 11:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Get a life! --ARBE0 16:41, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Raghav 13:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Such a wiki would be unnecessary, l33t does not vary significantly from English to warrant a wiki. We can't just allow all slang into these languages. --Puellanivis 01:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
- conditional Support sorry to switch sides, but I read the article and it seems different enuf, but we would to find a standardized form.Cameron Nedland 00:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)