Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition/Administrator candidacy requirements

Below is a table summarizing various quantifiable, stated recommendations or requirements for prospective administrator candidates, across wikis with over 20 monthly active admins. This data comes from reading (in the source language, or via machine translation) various pages on advice for administrator candidates.

Wikis that seem to lack formal guidelines should not be understood to be automatically more lenient; they may simply prefer not to have explicit guidelines surrounding aspects such as account age or edit count. Additionally, every single one of these advice pages state that these are more predictors of successful candidates, but are not strictly necessary for a successful RFA. Conversely, a candidate may meet or exceed all of these requirements and still fail for many other reasons.

Among these advice pages, there were two universal factors that were considered necessary for a successful RFA. These are:

  • The candidate needed to be known by the general wiki community, or at least the community of eligible voters
  • The candidate needed to exhibit a willingness to engage in administrator work, or a history of engaging in administrator-like work, on that wiki

All of these guidelines spend much more time elaborating on important intangible qualities, such as willingness to cooperate, familarity with local policy, and so on, rather than these more concrete figures. Nevertheless, this allows us to make some basic comparative statements about candidacy across different wikis.

Admin candidacy guidelines
Wiki Candidate account age Candidate article namespace edits Other factors and notes
English Wikipedia 6 months 10000 edits Has email, part of extended-confirmed user group
Spanish Wikipedia 12 months None stated Has email
German Wikipedia 24 months 1000 edits
Japanese Wikipedia 4 months 500 edits At least 18 years old
French Wikipedia 12 months 3000 edits
Russian Wikipedia 6 months 1000 edits Has patrolling flag (editor user group) or auto-patrolled flag (autoreview user group)
Chinese Wikipedia 12 months 3000 edits Membership in patroller or rollbacker user groups, no blocks in the last year
Italian Wikipedia None stated None stated Member of autopatrolled group; very few formal requirements
Portuguese Wikipedia 12 months 2000 edits
Persian Wikipedia 6 months 1000 edits Emphasis on candidates needing to show they've read the whole guide
Arabic Wikipedia 12 months 150 edits Membership of editor user group (i.e. FlaggedRevisions patroller); edits must be "non-destructive" and "non-controversial". Candidate must be active in 4 months preceding nomination, have contributed to administrative matters (e.g., voting, recovering vandalism, nominating pages for deletion), and be fluent in Arabic
Polish Wikipedia 3 months 1000 edits, the first of which took place at least 3 months before the date of application Has email
Indonesian Wikipedia 3 months 500 edits in the past 3 months (at least 5 namespaces) Has email, has a user page over 500 bytes, no blocks in the last 6 months
Dutch Wikipedia 6 months 1000 edits Has email
Ukranian Wikipedia 6 months 2000 edits At least 200 additional edits in a "service namespace" (e.g. Template, Wikipedia, Help, Module)
Hebrew Wikipedia 9 months 2000 edits
Czech Wikipedia 6 months 250 edits Has email
Swedish Wikipedia None stated None stated
Finnish Wikipedia "A few" months None stated
Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia 4 months 1000 edits Has email, has a user page
Catalan Wikipedia 9 months 1000 edits States that these requirements were explicitly removed, but they remain "as a guideline"

The median candidate account age recommendation is 6 months. The median recommended article-namespace edit count is 1000 edits.

Return to main page: Research:Wikipedia Administrator Recruitment, Retention, and Attrition