Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2006

< Stewards

Stewards are people who can give users special flags, give bots bot flags, provide CheckUser information from every project and, overall, be good people for Wikimedia.

Warning : stewards are not extra-cops !!! If you wish to be a steward to be able to unsysop people on your own favorite project, forget it. It is generally frowned upon to desysop editors from your home project (best to leave that to neutral stewards).

A plea : most of the activity is likely not to be on your own mother project, but on small languages. To really help, you need to frequently come to meta and to FOLLOW pages of request (for permission, for bot status, for checkuser help). If you wish to apply only to help on your own project, please move on and let the job to others.

Now, who do we need? Someone who:

  • ...could provide some of their free time to do some Steward work
  • ...is multilingual and helpful towards people
  • ...is available
  • ...is an active contributor on meta

Rules

If you want to become a steward, please list yourself below. The voting will start on the 20th December 2005 and it'll end on the 10th January 2006. You can list yourself during that time, but you'll have lower chances then. The Board will choose a group of users (from 1 to 10) who'll gain steward status.

To get through the elections, you must:

  • Gain at least 30 votes in favor
  • At least 80% overall votes in favor
  • Have an account on Meta with a linked account on another project
  • Be active for at least 3 months on that project
  • Preferably show you are active on meta as well (link to your contributions on meta for example, or mention you are already sysop here)

You can provide a short statement regarding your background on Wikimedia, current activity and anything else you want.

Please remember to follow the Steward policies. Also be aware of the fact that inactive stewards will have their steward flag taken away.


Voters: Anyone can vote provided that he/she has a valid account on meta with a link to at least one user page, on a project where the editor is a participant, with at least 3 months participation (not just to his/her userpage but) to the project.
In case of suspicion of sock puppetry, checkusers could be asked to check and sock puppet votes cancelled.

Final results

List updated: 10th of January 2005 23:07 (UTC) - This is the last version before the closing - 2006-01-10 - 23:51 UTC
Total candidates: 16
Supported candidates: 9

Username Total votes For Neutral Against Support percent
(For/For+Against)
1 Jean-Christophe Chazalette 81 77 1 3 96,25%
2 Ausir 72 71 1 0 100%
3 Romihaitza 45 42 2 1 97,67%
4 Arno Lagrange 36 10 9 17 37,04%
5 Walter 83 82 1 0 100%
6 Traroth 26 9 10 7 56,25%
7 Klemen Kocjancic 16 3 4 9 25%
8 Paginazero 65 54 5 6 90%
9 Jredmond 19 5 3 11 31,25%
(10) brian0918 24 11 6 6 withdrawn
(11) Raul654 72 54 3 15 withdrawn
12 Jon Harald Søby 58 56 2 0 100%
13 Suisui 78 77 1 0 100%
14 Rdsmith4 48 44 3 1 97,78%
15 Ascánder 49 47 2 0 100%
16 Linuxbeak 6 0 0 6 0%

Candidates

The election starts 20th of December 2005 and ends 10th of January 2006.

Jean-Christophe Chazalette


Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Anthere
    1. en dépit du fait que tu ne me crois pas, je reconfirme mon oui. Si tu as des doutes sur ma parole, déplace moi dans les nons. En gros, décide pour moi puisque tu sais mieux que moi où se place ma confiance :-) Anthere 23:54, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes/Oui. Korg + + 00:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes Ausir 00:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. yes of course, villy is a reliable user and an attentive admin/bureaucrat; very friendly in addition :-) --:Bdk: 01:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 01:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes -- Get_It 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Ja/Да/Si/Oui -- BCorr|Брайен 03:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. oui, yes, ja! oscar 04:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  11. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. yes Shanes 07:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. oui Caton 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Phe 09:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Oui/Yes/はい Ryo 09:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Oui/Yes le Korrigan bla 11:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes Jon Harald Søby 12:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. yo Gangleri | Th | T 14:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes Dan100 15:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes --Mbimmler 17:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ja Fruggo 18:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Oui Yann 21:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sì M/ 21:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes Dbl2010 22:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yes/Oui/Ja Linuxbeak 04:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Strongly. — Dan | Talk 04:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes/Evet--Ugur Basak 09:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes, a trustworthy user. Thryduulf (en,commons) 11:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes of course. - Amgine / talk meta 14:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes stv ✉ 15:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes --Manjithkaini 19:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes Kipmaster 20:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. œuf corse/Yo notafish }<';> 23:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Oui. Solensean ᛁᛉᛁ 00:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oui heMmeR 08:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oui/Ja/Yes/Да Traroth 15:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. YesPoppypetty 19:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yes Danny 03:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ja --Walter 15:40, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. За --ajvol 18:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Oui/Yes/Ja villy, on t'aimeuh ! ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Yes --Paginazero 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes Feydey 21:54, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Yes --Aphaia 06:51, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Yes --Wgfinley 19:34, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Yes - Thuresson 01:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Oui/Yes Romary 19:28, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Yes/Ja/Oui - villy bah oui Boly38 23:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Oui Med 23:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Yes. Dbenbenn 01:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Cool. --Juntung 14:28, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Ja Effeietsanders 16:13, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Oui Bib 20:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Oui ! Solveig 23:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Oui/yes Jide 07:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oui/yes. Guillom (^_^) 21:59, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:24, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Oui. --Nicolas Brouard 16:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. ja Besednjak 17:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Oui Alvaro 00:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    1. OuiLucas Thierry Anon user (or simply not logged in!) cf. [1] ((:Julien:))
  67. 'Oui'Lucasthierry 17:50, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Oui David.Monniaux 15:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Yes Prevert 16:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Oc/Oui Gorann Andjelkovic 17:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --GerardM 18:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Yes --Snowdog 11:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. نعم--Chaos 14:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. yes -- Mathias Schindler 20:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Yes Sj 16:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Yes les yeux fermés ! --Pontauxchats 19:33, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral - Dake 10:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. no La question de confiance se partage, devrais-je t'accorder la mienne, ce que tu n'as pas fait avec moi? -Padawane 19:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No - concerned about discussion at Stewards/elections 2005 (n° 2). Flcelloguy 20:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. weak no - déjà vu perdre son sang-froid sur listes et pages de votes sur fr:, semble moins actif qu'auparavant. Greudin 15:46, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ausir

  • Language: pl (native), en-4, csb-1 de-1, ru-1).
  • Admin at Polish and English Wikipedia, Commons and Polish Wikinews. I also edit Kashubian Wikipedia. On the projects since February 2004. On meta I mostly deal with translations. I'm available on IRC at #wikipedia, #wikimedia, #wikipedia-pl and other channels most of the time. I'm one of the founding members of Wikimedia Polska. Ausir 12:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • about 180 edits on meta - I haven't been very active here, but I will frequent meta more often if I become a steward.


Yes
  1. Yes. A great and trustworthy contributor. TOR 00:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Anthere
  4. Yes. Szwedzki 00:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. villy ♦✎ 00:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes. Korg + + 01:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes. Borgx 01:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes.--Shizhao 01:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes -- Get_It 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. tak, yes, ja oscar 04:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  12. Yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes Phe 09:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Si Gac 10:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Tak/Oui Wulfstan 13:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. yes / tsca ✉ 14:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes Dan100 15:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes --Mbimmler 17:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes/Tak/Oui MatthiasGor 17:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes Cspurrier 18:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yes WarX 21:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes Yann 21:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Sì M/ 21:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes Jwrosenzweig 22:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yes Cinik 08:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes of course. - Amgine / talk meta 14:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes stv ✉ 15:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes Gdarin | talk 16:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes Berasategui 19:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes-- Manjithkaini 19:46, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes/oui Chris93 23:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. oui notafish }<';> 00:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yes IulianU 21:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Yes Danny 03:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. За --ajvol 18:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Yes Derbeth 23:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yes Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes --Paginazero 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes Ral315 (en) 04:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yes/Si/Da --Aphaia 06:52, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Tak/Yes/Ja/Hai aegis maelstrom δ 11:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes Przykuta 21:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Yes/Sì/Ja --Deprifry 19:27, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oui/Yes Romary 22:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Owszem/Yes/Jawohl Shaqspeare 02:55, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Cool. --Juntung 14:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. yes kocio ✉ 14:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Ja Effeietsanders 16:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Yes Meteor2017 23:30, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes Lzur 00:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:25, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Yes --Jovanvb 16:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Yes. -- Essjay · Talk 16:35, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Yes Jon Harald Søby 16:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oui Alvaro 00:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Yes --Wricardoh 15:23, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Yes --Snowdog 11:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Sì --Frieda 15:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Yes -- Mathias Schindler 20:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Yes Sj 16:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Yes --Millosh 16:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:01, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No

Romihaitza


Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Ausir 00:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. Korg + + 01:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes, ja oscar 04:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  7. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes, ja --Mihai Andrei 13:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. da – Mihai is a very motivated Wikipedian. Thanks for your work. Gangleri | Th | T 14:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes --Rebel2 20:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Sì M/ 21:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes of course. - Amgine / talk meta 14:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Gdarin | talk 16:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes Danutz 20:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC) Absolutely, he will be very useful.[reply]
  16. Yes/Da Elerium 21:18, 22 December 2005 (UTC).[reply]
  17. Yes IulianU 21:47, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes Danny 03:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Ja --Walter 15:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes Desiphral 17:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yes Jon Harald Søby 21:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes stv ✉ 16:18, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes --Paginazero 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Da --Dbl2010 00:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Ja/Yes/Sí --Deprifry 12:37, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes/Da -- Ronline 07:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes, definitely. --AdiJapan 16:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Da --Emilia007 18:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Cool. --Juntung 14:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes --Vlad 10:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yes/Da/Igen/Ja Mishuletz 17:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Da/Yes --Ditae 21:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. ja Besednjak 17:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. yes--Arado 22:36, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Oui Alvaro 00:51, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. نعم--Chaos 14:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral Phe 09:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. --:Bdk: 00:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Sorry (nothing personal), R. is a friendly and helpful user afaik, but every admin on the projects and - more than ever - every bureaucrat (and of course, steward) as a "(role) model" for other users should be aware of the importance of sources for free licensing. I got the impression that R. doesn't really care about this matter, after I've looked up his contributions a bit and found stuff like [2].[reply]
I really can't find any problem with that. At that date, the image was at enwiki with that licensing (which I can see is used now also at Commons); I have deleted it now because it is at Commons. Any other user from rowiki can provide you with informations about my battle against incorrect image uploads. -Romihaitza 12:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It's not fully traceable after your deletion, of course (log entry). But you have to state the author for GFDL images clearly, if you copy them, you didn't (just from en.wikipedia is not sufficient). Also you've only copied thumbnail versions (800px-) from en. to ro.wikipedia (but that's a more technical question). That is what I was criticising. I hope you'll keep this point in mind :-) Greetings --:Bdk: 00:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arno Lagrange

Sorry for asking but why do you candidate again? -Romihaitza 16:12, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
a mystery to me too, see here and here :-S oscar 02:28, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
Well, he was elected during the first elections in 2004. And he was quite far away from current requirements (he did not have 30 supports at all). So, it might make sense to reconfirm him anyway. Anthere

Voilà ! c'est la curée : on ne me voit pas sur IRC, mes actions de stiouarte ne sont pas très nombreuses et se concentrent sur les projets espéranto. J'ai eu commis l'erreur d'importer dans la Wikipédia des documents de licence non certaine - erreur de jeunesse, je ne le fais plus, juré - Alors pourquoi recandidater pour conserver le statut ? J'ai toujours répondu présent lorsque l'on m'a sollicité. J'ai toujours exprimé mes doléances que le fait de ne pas être un anglophone averti exclut tout individu des prises de décisions -en voilà un autre exemple-. Il me sembble en effet impossible de suivre correctement toute la vie des projets Wikimedia lorsque l'on n'a pas 48h par jour à y consacrer et une parfaite maîtrise de la langue de Bill Gates. Je n'ai pas le profil, soit. Mais y a-t-il des actions que j'ai commises et que l'on peut sérieusement me reprocher et qui justifient que l'on me retire le statut ? Il est vrai que le principal regret que je pourrais avoir est la perte de la possibliité d'accorder le flag bot aux robots qui interviennent sur les projets eo. S'il ne s'agit que de cela, ne pourait-on pas accorder aux bureaucrates de gérer ce flag ? sorry for the only-english speaker not to express myself in english - I let some good bilingusit translate my words : precisely it's the problem : may somebody which don't speek english very well do something in the Wikiemdia projects ? Salut à tous ! Portez vous bien Arno Lagrange ✉ 15:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mouais, à la base tu disposais du statut, suffisait de ne pas te représenter. Je me demande encore pourquoi ... villy ♦✎ 17:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes
  1. Yes Phe 09:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. jes – Arno provided valuable help to me when I started. You may not find him always in chats but you can e-mail him. Gangleri | Th | T 15:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Warofdreams 18:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. За --ajvol 18:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. yes Bawolff 17:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. yes Absolutely. Yekrats 20:09, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes Blahma 21:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sí --Fajro 02:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Jes Maksim 11:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Jes/Yes/Oui/Ja --Vitred 16:35, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral--Shizhao 01:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 03:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. neutral Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral, I can't be favorable or against his candidature - I just don't know him. Dake 10:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral - Amgine / talk meta 14:36, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutre/Neutral ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Neutral, --Zigger 13:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. It is a bit hard to say, but I vote no for two reasons. First because he was actually originally elected with quite few votes. Second, while I am sure he will never abuse the tool, I think he is not respecting the spirit of it which is to use it to help all projects and all languages. Arno is fine, but use it only to help eo editors and never take care of other requests. I find the position a little bit questionable. So, I will not mind if he is confirmed, but I have to state that opinion of mine nevertheless. Anthere
  2. Oppose. Wakes up only three or four times a year (of course I'm exagerating a bit) to the extend he actually does not remember he is already a steward. Geez, Arno. villy ♦✎ 00:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/Non. La plupart de tes actions bureaucratiques ne concernent que la version espérantophone de Wikipédia ; tu devrais justement éviter d'utiliser tes "super-pouvoirs" sur ce projet, et être au service de l'ensemble de la communauté. Par ailleurs je ne t'ai jamais croisé sur IRC... Korg + + 01:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No Agree with Anthere and villy Borgx 02:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no agree with the arguments stated above by anthere, villy and korg; nothing personal either btw. oscar 05:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  6. Nu/No He used the rights just for eo wikiprojects, he can be just a bureaucrat. Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Nee Fruggo 18:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No Cinik 08:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No Gdarin | talk 16:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No, doesn't seem to be interested in being active in this role. --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. No --Tanarus 22:22, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. No Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. No; too inactive for my tastes. Ral315 (en) 04:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No not personally, but his interest seems to me too narrow to do steward tasks for all projects. --Aphaia 06:54, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    No Of course not personally, but it seems he used his stewardes wand only on a certain project.
  15. no --:Bdk: 00:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Sorry (nothing personal), Arno is a friendly user afaik, but every admin on the projects and - more than ever - every steward as a "(role) model" for other users should be aware of the importance of sources for free licensing. I got the impression that he doesn't really care about this matter, after I've looked up his contributions a bit and found stuff like [3] (no source, no license ... is there an eo.-tag for "incomplete license"?).[reply]
  16. No David.Monniaux 15:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. no -- Mathias Schindler 21:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Walter

  • Languages; NL and EN, but I know how to use online translators

I am active on Wikipedia since early 2002, my home wiki is the dutch wikipedia. I am there a sysop on nl.wikipedia for many years now, and also the ambassador.And member of the OTRS- email team for the dutch wikipedia. On Meta I am sysop and active with Wikizine. w:nl:gebruiker:Walter


Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes Anthere 00:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. villy ♦✎ 00:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. Korg + + 01:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes/Hao Flcelloguy 02:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 03:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes, ja! oscar 04:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
  9. Ja/Yes Patio 05:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes Ausir 06:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes/Oui/Sí/Ja --Deprifry 06:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes WebBoy 06:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Andre Engels 07:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC) - reliable long-time Wikipedian[reply]
  15. yes/ja/oui Moribunt 08:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes SanderSpek 08:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC) - without a doubt[reply]
  17. Yes — empoor™ (consultation) 09:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Ja/YesPeter boelens 09:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes Phe 09:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes Borgx 09:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes JoJan 09:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC) The right guy for the right job[reply]
  22. Yes -- Zanaq 09:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes --Frieda 10:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ja, natuurlijk! --pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 10:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes Jon Harald Søby 12:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ja/Yes Tdevries 15:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ja/Yes Francis Schonken 16:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes Chris 16:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC) - a reliable and stable person for years[reply]
  31. Yes --Mbimmler 17:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Ja Fruggo 18:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes Yann 21:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yes Dbl2010 23:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes - Bemoeial 01:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. ja Oliphaunt 11:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes of course. - Amgine / talk meta 14:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ja Lennart 15:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yes stv ✉ 15:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ja/Yes Jcb 23:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yes Ellywa 23:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Yes/Oui Chris93 23:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yay! notafish }<';> 23:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Sì M/ 23:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Yes Danny 03:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. За --ajvol 18:58, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Jaaaaa. 145.53.247.55 20:55, 23 December 2005 (UTC) invalid vote --Walter 21:56, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Yes --JAranda | watz sup 23:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes absolutely. Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Yes; have had positive interactions and think that this user would be a good steward. Ral315 (en) 04:43, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Yes/Ja One of most active sysos on meta would be a good candidate in my tastes ;-) --Aphaia 06:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ja/Yes - Quistnix 09:16, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes. Ucucha 09:25, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Ja/Yes Noorse 09:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Ja. Dbiv 00:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  60. yes Mozzerati 21:00, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Yes – ABCD✉ 21:02, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Oui/Yes Romary 22:14, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Да M/ 00:01, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Cool. --Juntung 14:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Ja/Yes Donarreiskoffer 07:24, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Yes -Roberth 14:32, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. да Besednjak 17:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC) хороший кандидат[reply]
  69. Yo --:Bdk: 23:49, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Oui Alvaro 00:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. YES E^(nix) 14:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Yes Sybren 09:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Ja – gpvos (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
  75. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:31, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. :) GerardM 18:58, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ja/Yes. Firefox 09:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Ja/Yes. Londenp 11:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  80. نعم--Chaos 14:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  81. yes -- Mathias Schindler 21:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ja/Yes Cicero 18:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No

Traroth

I'm bureaucrat on wp:fr and admin on wikibooks:en and wikibooks:fr. I'm also member of the arbcom on wp:fr and member of Wikimedia France. I'm a regular contributor on wp:fr, commons and wikinews:fr and more rarely to wp:en and wp:de. I speak french, english and german fluently. I want to be a stewards to help wikipedias with a small amount of contributors. Currently, it's no way for me to help, and I think help small wikipedias to grow is a major issue for the project. Traroth 14:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Yes
  1. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 01:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. oui Caton 09:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. YesPoppypetty 19:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oui/Yes/Ja Why not ? :) ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. oui/ja Greudin 10:20, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Oui/Yes Romary 22:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes le Korrigan bla mais à condition que tu consacres assez de temps à tes différentes responsabilités :) le Korrigan bla 07:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oui Alvaro 00:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes No worry about you and the job you'll do c'est comme ça qu'on dit ? :) --Pontauxchats 19:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. villy ♦✎ 01:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. neutral Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. neutral --Mbimmler 17:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral/Neutre I was unable to verify if this was the same user as Wikibooks:en:User:Traroth. --Kernigh 21:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutral - Amgine / talk meta 14:38, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral Might be a good steward, but should first come more often on IRC to get him known. Yann 09:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Neutral --Aphaia 06:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Neutral. I don't trust you enough yet, but I have nothing to reproach you for. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. 'meural -- Mathias Schindler 21:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 15:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No/Non. Pas assez d'expérience sur Meta, et je ne t'ai jamais vu sur IRC. Korg + + 01:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No/Non/Nein - Dake 10:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No Cinik 08:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No notafish }<';> 00:28, 22 December 2005 (UTC) Stewardship requires lots of time, I don't think Traroth has it, seeing how he seems to hardly have the time to deal with his position on the French arbcom.[reply]
  6. No Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No David.Monniaux 15:25, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Klemen Kocjancic

about 100 edits on meta in a year


Yes
  1. Yes As the others don't tell me much yet and had some contact with him, I'll give him my vote -- Test-tools 20:18, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Klemen would be very useful as steward for ex-YU area. --Millosh 16:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Klemen contributes to many projects significantly. --Tone 17:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Botmasters do not have to edit with their bots, user pages for adding interwikis. This must be chosen by user themselves, and they should prefer to leave, on "foreign" wikis, only a link to the mother language user page. Also, a bot can't never be sure that the same user name on two wikis allows to the same user. So I can't trust this user until he has not given an engagement to stop that stuff. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral/中立--Shizhao 01:16, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutre I don't know him. ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 01:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. no Too less experience on meta --Mbimmler 17:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no Cinik 08:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. no Amgine / talk meta 04:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No not on Meta enough. Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No I had a problem with him. It was my fault, I adimitted it and gave my excuses. Seems it wan't enough. --Snowdog 11:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No I and other had(?) a problem with him. --Janeznovak 17:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paginazero

note: 5 edits on meta.
I realize I am Mr.Nobody on meta pages. Please don't think I advanced my candidature without any awareness of what a steward is expected to do and without any will to participate more actively. Wasting your time has never been my intention.


Yes
  1. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes/Да/是/はい----Shizhao 01:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. yes yes yes He has strong skills to have this role. --Ilario 10:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes --Senpaiottolo 10:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes - Not because is a friend, not because is a very good man, not because he speaks 5 or 6 different language, not because is the most active sysop on the it:wiki, not because is a very generous folk, not because is one of the founding members of Wikimedia Italia, but ... because he is right folk to do the Steward. Listen to me :-) - Gac
  6. Yes, strong support :-)) Frieda 10:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes - very good and active sysop on it.wiki; there is no sense in voting against just because one does not know him (by the way, he made a lot of contribution as non registered user) --Biopresto 10:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes - very skilled person. --Marcok 10:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes --Rosc0 10:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes/si/Да - very well known and respected on it.wiki pippudoz - (waarom? jus'b'coz!) 10:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Quoting friends above --Twice25 11:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes, strongly support Svante 11:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes, strongly support, right person for the task. --Cruccone 12:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Si/Da/Yes Romihaitza 13:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Si/Yes/Tak --Berto 13:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes --Civvi 14:19, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes --Archenzo 14:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes --Urby2004 14:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Strong support --M/ 14:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. yes agreeing with Gac The Doc 14:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Strong support --Fredericks 14:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC) (I've 9 edits on meta but I come here much more often: Paginazero too, I suppose)[reply]
  23. Yes Dan100 15:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Yes, right guy in the right place --Marius 16:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes User:Shaka 16:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Yes Fabexplosive 18.00, 20 December 2005 (UTC) anonymous vote removed. oscar 17:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Strongly support Helios89 17:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Strongly support of course! great sysop on it.wiki and very pleasant guy! --Kal-Eldrop me a line! 18:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes --Retaggio 20:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes-Padawane 21:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Yes --82.58.115.125 18:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC) anonymous vote removed. --Paginazero 20:08, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Si! notafish }<';> 00:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. hai Datrio 15:10, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Si! --Tanarus 22:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    1. YES --81.211.253.40 10:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC) anonymous vote removed. --Paginazero 11:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. За --ajvol 19:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Strongly support --Nick1915 13:19, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes Hellisp 21:44, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes Jon Harald Søby 21:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Strongly support --TierrayLibertad 22:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. 'Yes -- MisterX 15:14, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Yes stv ✉ 16:23, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Yes. M7 who I completely rely on, makes me change my vote in favour of a quiet approbation. villy ♦✎ 18:34, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Sì/Yes/Ja/Oui Manutius 14:30, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. YES --Square87 20:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes/Sì/Ja, strongly support -- PietroDn 12:57, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yes. Contribs and logs indicate a good user and good admin. Chick Bowen 20:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Cool. --Juntung 14:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes --Lilja ♫ 16:03, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:30, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Yes --Francesco Cosoleto 00:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oui Alvaro 00:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jes Maksim 11:50, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. Changing to neutral in seeing he is very supported. Only hope he understands that the job is not only to help italian wikipedians, but ALL editors in all languages. Which implies he must come to meta from time to time, or visit #wikimedia. If he does so and is so great and trusted a guy, will be warmly welcome. If invisible, I will just be disappointed. I stand hopeful, so will be neutral with regards to his candidacy. Anthere
    Anthere, I am aware of the tasks a steward is asked for and I understand your initial skeptical position, as I actually have been substantially absent on meta up to now. All I can say is that I can't afford disappointing neither you nor the community of the Italian wikipedians that showed such a quick and huge support. Thanks. --Paginazero 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC) [reply]
  2. - Amgine / talk meta 04:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. neutraal Besednjak 17:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. neutral oscar 09:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Not active on Meta (only 6 contributions at the time of my vote). Korg + + 01:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No I am glad you have friends and support but with almost no contributions on Meta, which is like project headquarter and stewardes home, I only can say... "I dont know you" --Dbl2010 23:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. As above. — Dan | Talk 20:40, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No --:Bdk: 00:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Sorry (nothing personal), but every admin on the projects and - more than ever - every steward as a "(role) model" for other users should be aware of the importance of sources for free licensing. I got the impression that also P. doesn't really care about this and other matters, after I've looked up his contributions a bit and directly found stuff like [4]. Note the senseless file name starting with 120px, see 3069, and that there is no clear/correct source given (compare the original on Commons).[reply]
    I didn't know that filenames such are deprecated; thanks for having pointed out my mistakes, I fixed them as soon as I could. --Paginazero 23:53, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No. Even if I knew him from a long time, and I'm sure he would be great for this role, I think that working a bit here before applying for steward, would have been better. Will support next time, i'm sure he will spend some time on meta. --Snowdog 11:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jredmond

  • Language: en, fr-2, es-2, la-1, da-1
  • I have been a registered user on en: since October 2003, and an admin there since July 2005. Though en: occupies most of my time, I also read meta: and commons: regularly, and often work on interwiki links in other projects. - jredmond 18:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
note: not really active on meta (less than 50 edits in more than a year)
I read here several times daily, but only edit when necessary. As a steward, though, I would edit here more often. - jredmond 23:49, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Since you commented... what can you tell us about the rules for check user tools use ? Anthere
I'm not sure exactly what you meant by that question, so I'll try to answer what I think you're asking. :)
Typically, the CheckUser tools are used to investigate vandals and spammers so that admins can apply range blocks or notify ISPs appropriately. Less frequently, the tools can be employed to look for sockpuppetry in votes; to vindicate users accused of sockpuppetry; and to help the Wikimedia Foundation comply with subpoenas and other court orders. The information gathered from the tools should not be released publicly, though — wherever possible, it needs to be generic in nature, and when it must be discussed in detail then that should only be done in strict confidence with a trusted user.
Most larger Wikimedia projects have their own users with access to the tools, so there is virtually no need for a steward to use the tool in those places. However, if a particular project has no such users and has a demonstrated need, then a steward can use the tools to answer yes/no questions about the similarities between two suspected abusers.
Is that what you had in mind? - jredmond 03:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Pretty much. Actually, only 2 or 3 projects have their own checkusers. Second largest one (de.wiki) and third largest (fr.wiki) for example, do not have checkusers right now. Ant


Yes
  1. Yes this user fights vandalism fiercely on en.wiki -- Zanaq 09:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes -- I know Jredmond well enough to know that he would not run unless he intended to fully commit to this work, which seems to be the primary concern (and an understandable one). Jwrosenzweig 22:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes --JAranda | watz sup 23:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes -- During many months, Jredmond has been very active in combatting vandalism on a frequently-attacked page that I have been working on, and I believe that he would be an excellent steward. Polaris999 20:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 00:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Nothing personal. I just do not know him and consider only editors active on meta and involved in multilingual issues should handle such a job. Electing a person never coming to meta or at least irc is not gonna improve the service. Anthere
  2. No/反对/Нет.I not know it.--Shizhao 01:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 01:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No/いいえ --Taichi - (あ！) 04:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. no Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. I think that if your main involvement is on en-Wikipedia, then you should be a bureaucrat there for a while before trying to become a steward. TacoDeposit 13:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No seems not to be active on meta --Mbimmler 17:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No Flcelloguy 19:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No - Amgine / talk meta 04:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. No Not personally, but more involved person to the project is my tastes. --Aphaia 07:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

brian0918 (withdrawn)

  • Reasons for nomination:
    • I have previously been granted temporary checkuser and admin powers by stewards, and believe I can handle the position.
    • I spend nearly every waking hour on the project, watching the mailing lists, and on IRC (#wikimedia, #wikipedia, and #wikimania, in particular), and can easily be reached in emergencies.
    • Danny suggested that I run :)

If you have any questions, let me know. Thanks!


Yes
  1. Yes Ausir 03:49, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes Datrio 05:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 06:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. -- Schnee 06:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes - Danny 09:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes -- Zanaq 09:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. yes – Gangleri | Th | T 15:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. Korg + + 15:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes Warofdreams 18:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral
  1. Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 04:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. neutral Anthere 07:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Neutral Chris93 23:28, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Neutre ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. Recent interactions with this editor has left me with a sour taste; I do not trust him with steward's rights. Kelly Martin 05:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. I think that if your main involvement is on en-Wikipedia, then you should be a bureaucrat there for a while before trying to become a steward. TacoDeposit 13:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No Dan100 15:58, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No Flcelloguy 19:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. As above. — Dan | Talk 04:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. non notafish }<';> 23:09, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Raul654 (withdrawn)

  • Language: en (native), es-1
  • I've been here for a long time and I'm pretty well known and trusted. I'm a Sysop/bureacrat/arbitrator/checkuser on en, sysop on meta, sysop on commons, OTRS user, and Frazzydee and I run the daily-article-l email list.

I appreciate the diplomatic way that Hahnchen, Eloquence, and Anthere expressed themselves. While I don't agree with them, I can appreciate where they are coming from. So, I'm withdrawing my candidacy, with no hard feelings. Raul654 18:45, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes
  1. Yes Ausir 06:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 06:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. Definitely. -- Schnee 06:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 06:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. Shanes 07:24, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 08:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes. Malathion 10:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes - indubitably. --Celestianpower 10:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes. Korg + + 11:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes Catherine 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. yes Datrio 13:45, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes Phe 14:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes --BRIAN0918 14:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Yes Dan100 16:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes --Mbimmler 17:41, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes Cspurrier 18:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes/hao Flcelloguy 19:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Sì M/ 21:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes Jtkiefer 02:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Certainly. — Dan | Talk 04:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes --PiaCarrot 12:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ja/Да/Si/Oui -- BCorr<font color=chartreuse>|</font>[[User talk:Bcorr|&#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085;]] 14:28, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes/Ya. (That was Malay, if you didn't know.) Johnleemk 18:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes - Amgine / talk meta 04:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sure Karmafist 05:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes Pureblade 16:20, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ja --Phroziac (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Da/Yes Romihaitza 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    1. Yes, trusted, invaluable bureaucrat on en. --TantalumTelluride 19:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I have been active on meta for only two months, so I can't vote. --TantalumTelluride 19:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    You need 3 months of activity on any wikimedia project, not specifically meta. This said, I leave you off as your english user page was created 2 months ago. See ya for next vote. Anthere 08:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes/Oui. -GregAsche 02:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes --JAranda | watz sup 23:41, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yes Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes MisterX 15:20, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Hai! --Cool CatTalk|@ 21:44, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes Ral315 (en) 05:55, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Sure --Aphaia 07:04, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Yes --Wgfinley 19:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Yes/Hai I share the concern of User:Hahnchen, however. Good luck :). WhiteNight T | @ | C 00:33, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yes I, too, share Hahnchen's concerns, but if there is anyone who can be entrusted with these responsibilities, it is he. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 06:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Yes —Locke Cole 08:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes Dbiv 00:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes -- Essjay · Talk 00:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yes. Jaxl 19:09, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Cool. --Juntung 14:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Yes. I shared some concerns expressed below but well, after all, I'm looking at Raul always active and creative where he is. So heck :) villy ♦✎ 23:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Yes Trodel 02:29, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Yes/Ja Donarreiskoffer 07:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. yes--Mathias Schindler 21:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. yes -- Polaris999 18:05, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. neutral oscar 09:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral' Jon Harald Søby 17:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Changed from "yes", due to concerns raised by others below. Jon Harald Søby 17:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No, inactive in other languages or projects. Danny 03:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No - Raul has a literal shedload of responsibility on en.wikipedia already. Arbcom, admin, featured article guy. My concern is that he wouldn't dedicate that much time to his increased responsibility and that there are other users who could contribute more towards stewardship demands, as well as requests in other languages. - Hahnchen 03:29, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No - For a longer tome on my views, I invite you to review RFC Raul 654. // NetEsq 00:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. No. 1) Because you're an arbitrator, as per steward policies, you cannot perform desysoppings on the English Wikipedia. You're also active on Commons and Meta, but not, to my knowledge, in any other language than English. 2) You are wearing many hats already. You're doing a great job in all of them, but I'm worried about a misperception that "power" is held by a small group of people. We have enough other volunteers for stewardship where that misperception would not arise. 3) I'm worried that you will burn out. We need you. 4) I'm concerned that you may underestimate the amount of time this role takes to fill responsibly. You are, at present, marked as away as an arbitrator because of work overload. Taking on yet another role is not likely to help. All that said, I have the utmost respect for you, as does pretty much everyone else in Wikimedia who knows you.--Eloquence 22:06, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. No I don't know you, Raul654, but I think you have already not enough time ;D Alvaro 00:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No - Change my vote, because take a unilingual policy in #wikipedia on IRC, and vote against the IRC Manifest who helps the multilingualism in the IRC.--Taichi - (あ！) 02:37, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. No. He can't act in is home Wikipedia (English), and he only talks English. Useless as a steward. --angus (msgs) 03:52, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. No --Sanbec 15:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No anglo-centricism --Edub 22:53, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. No - doesn't speak many languages; has enough on his plate already on the English language Wikipedia. I would prefer he focused on his arbitration duties. Talrias 21:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. No. After much much much hesitation. This is not a question of trust (I welcomed him on the Foundation site and I trust him). This is indeed the fact I did not see international activity from him (on meta, mostly irc quoting for example), so I am not convinced he will help much in steward activity. The only language he is indeed very active in... he is also in the arbcom... so should not do steward activity for en as Erik pointed out. So, while I will not have any trouble trusting as a steward, I just think it is not where he can help best. Anthere
  12. No. I share Anthere's concerns. Cinabrium 06:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. No. See concerns expressed above. notafish }<';> 12:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No. Zuirdj 13:02, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Per Eloquence. TacoDeposit 16:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Harald Søby

  • Languages: no, en-3, de-1, da-1, sv-1, es-1, eo-1
    I also have a special interest in languages, so I can understand more languages than these, e.g. French, Italian, Russian, Icelandic, Faroese, etc., even without having been trained in them.
  • I have been admin on the Norwegian Wikipedia since April 2005, and bureaucrat since October (I have some 21,000+ edits there). I am also an admin in the Nauruan Wikipedia (though I understand that nawiki is not very popular around here, for reasons which I might understand – it having no native speakers), and I am also very active in the English Wiktionary, and quite active on Commons (in form of uploading) and Meta (in form of reading rules et al) and updating myself, not so much editing yet). I am also very often on IRC (nickname Jhs@freenode). Jon Harald Søby 12:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Yes
  1. Datrio 13:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC) I trust him, knowing him a bit from the IRC channels[reply]
  2. Yes, Sí, Oui, Ja, Já--birdy (:> )=| 14:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC) knowing him from IRC too. He fights vandalism. I trust him.[reply]
  3. Ja --Boivie 14:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC) He would be appreciated as steward.[reply]
  4. Ja / Habj 14:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC) I think he has judgement and knows what it's about. Being a norwegian, he can communicate with people at svwiki and dawiki without major problems - we can use him :-)[reply]
  5. Yes/Oui/Sí/Ja --Deprifry 14:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes. Responsible and experienced user; often on IRC. /The Phoenix 15:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. jes – Gangleri | Th | T 15:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes. Korg + + 15:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes. --Duffman 15:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes Dan100 16:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:07, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Yes. villy ♦✎ 17:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 21:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sì M/ 21:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes Borgx 03:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes A trustworthy, active, prolific, and accessible contributor, from all I have seen. —Dvortygirl 07:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes Cinik 08:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. yes Wolfram 15:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes stv ✉ 15:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yups ThorRune 15:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yes/ja Kruosio 16:02, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes/ja Eirik 16:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Aye Czar 22:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Yes/oui Chris93 23:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Yes Cnyborg 00:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes - Amgine / talk meta 04:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Da/Yes Romihaitza 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes Danny 03:47, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes/Ja Mtande 13:11, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Ja --Walter 15:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. За --ajvol 19:01, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. yes oscar 04:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes --Paginazero 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Yes -Feydey 21:55, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jes. Kial ne? Kjetil r 01:48, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Ja/Yes - Quistnix 09:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ja/Yes/Ja - Noorse 09:45, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Ja Dbiv 00:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ja Thuresson 01:53, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Ja Grön 14:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Ja Mats Halldin 15:41, 31 December 2005 (UTC) (Jhs is (among everything else) a regular on the Swedish IRC and obviously he knows many more languages than he claims here. He should make a really good steward and is more than welcome on the Swedish projects).[reply]
  47. Cool. --Juntung 14:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes -- Get_It 16:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Yes Shanes 18:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:33, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oui Alvaro 00:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:38, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Jes Maksim 11:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  56. yes -- Polaris999 18:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral/中立--Shizhao 06:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No

Suisui

  • Language: ja(native) en-2 and I can read some more languages with machine translation
  • I'm mainly active on Japanese Wikipedia since 2003, admin since 2003 March, and bureaucrat since 2004 March, have around 40,000 edits (38,105 now). also joining info-ja team (something like arbcom in other project), owner of wikija-l.
  • I'm also admin on meta (here), have 1039 edits. and also editor at wikimediafoundation site have about 800 edits.
  • I also have admin Japanese WikiQuote and Japanese WikiBooks and have some activities on English projects.
  • I use IRC, acceptable at #wikimedia, #wikipedia-ja, #wikipedia and other some channels most of time.
  • I use pywikipediabot on ja.wikipedia, named SuisuiBot --Suisui 14:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Yes
  1. yes! Datrio 14:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes Kstigarbha 14:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Yes. Korg + + 14:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes Tietew✍ 14:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes Suguri F 14:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes --Goki 14:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes --Miya 14:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes --Hermeneus 15:35, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Yes. villy ♦✎ 17:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yes-Padawane 19:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Sí/Yes/はい --Taichi - (あ！) 21:12, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Oui Ja much needed. And you often around SuisuiAnthere 21:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Sì M/ 22:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes--竹麦魚 23:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes Borgx 00:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes--Tanadesuka 00:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Yes — Dan | Talk 05:57, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. yes/Да/是/はい--Shizhao 06:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Yes 任せても大丈夫そうだと思うから。--ja:User:せくそろじすと=The Saitou 08:31, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes/賛成 Kzhr 08:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Yes/Evet --Ugur Basak 09:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Yes --PiaCarrot 12:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. yes oscar 12:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. yes --Brevam 12:40, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. yes --Yhr 13:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. yes --っ [Café] [Album] 14:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Y E S from bottom of my heart --Ananda 14:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes stv ✉ 15:44, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes/Oui/Sì/네/是的 --Ultratomio 15:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. yep. notafish }<';> 23:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes/oui Chris93 23:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes/贊成 --kahusi (會話) 23:59, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes --Koba-chan 03:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes --Nnh 03:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Yes - Amgine / talk meta 04:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  38. jes – Gangleri | Th | T 08:45, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Yes --Taisyo 15:04, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:05, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Da/Yes Romihaitza 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Ja, Yes — empoor 20:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes Danny 03:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Yes Yann 09:26, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Yes --こいつぅ(meta)15:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  47. ja --Walter 16:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC) Very useful Japanse support[reply]
  48. はい e-Goat 21:03, 23 December 2005 (UTC). Trusty.[reply]
  49. Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Yes/贊成/Oui Greudin 13:45, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes --Paginazero 20:12, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Hai! if served with Onigiri --Cool CatTalk|@ 21:48, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Yes Feydey 21:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Yes/支持 --Moses 02:05, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Ja/Yes/Sí --Deprifry 12:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes--Toki-ho 23:55, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Yes --Gleam 12:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Yes--Tomomarusan 13:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Yes --Zigger 19:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Hai! - Andre Engels 16:27, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Cool. --Juntung 14:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Yes -- Get_It 16:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:34, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  66. oui Besednjak 17:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  67. yo --:Bdk: 19:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  68. yes --端くれの錬金術師 11:27, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Si Ascánder 17:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Yes. Prevert 16:47, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Yes --Snowdog 13:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Oui Alvaro 13:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Sì --Frieda 15:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Yesjaouisí --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 23:45, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Yes --Syohei.A(talk) 07:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  77. yes -- Polaris999 18:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Neutral
  1. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No

Rdsmith4

  • Languages: en; es-3; basic comprehension of most Romance languages due to extensive Latin and Spanish experience.
  • sysop at en.wikipedia, commons, and meta; bureaucrat at en.wikipedia; OTRS. I'm on #wikipedia, #wikimedia, #wikipedia-en, #wikimedia-commons et al. on a very regular basis, and I'm very willing to contribute where needed.
  • 120-ish edits on Meta.

— Dan | Talk 04:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes
  1. yes Anthere
  2. Yes. Korg + + 13:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Yes. Jon Harald Søby 14:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Ja/Да/Si/Oui -- BCorr<font color=chartreuse>|</font>[[User talk:Bcorr|&#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085;]] 14:28, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Yes. villy ♦✎ 16:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Yes/hao Flcelloguy (A note?) 22:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Yes Jtkiefer 01:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Yes --Angela 03:00, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Yes - Amgine / talk meta 04:38, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oui notafish }<';> 09:59, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Tak Datrio 15:12, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ja/Ja/Ja Waerth 17:06, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Ja --Phroziac (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Yes/Oui. -GregAsche 02:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Yes. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:36, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yep. NSLE (T+C) 04:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Yes --JAranda | watz sup 23:40, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Sam Korn 23:49, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Yes. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Affirmative - Ξxtreme Unction|yakkity yak 17:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Raul654 17:53, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Si/oui/yes 87.113.83.66 13:02, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    User not logged in. -Romihaitza 13:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry. --Celestianpower 13:18, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Romihaitza 13:06, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Si/ja/oui/yes Greudin 15:47, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Oui/Yes/Ja ▪ Eskimo ☼ 16:25, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Hai! --Cool CatTalk|@ 21:44, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes Ral315 (en) 05:56, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes --Aphaia 07:04, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes/Hai He has strong views but at least from what I see he can keep them seperate when doing duties :). WhiteNight T | @ | C 00:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Yes. -- Essjay · Talk 00:22, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Yes. -- Karmafist 07:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Yes. Jaxl 19:10, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Yes. FireFox (en) 16:17, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Yes —Locke Cole • t • c 07:26, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Yes/ใช่ Watcharakorn 18:47, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes. Chick Bowen 20:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Cool. --Juntung 14:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Yes -- Get_It 16:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Oui. Petrusbarbygere 22:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  40. yes --:Bdk: 19:47, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Oui Alvaro 01:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. yes oscar 09:41, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Yes Sj 16:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. Neutral/中立--Shizhao 06:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral --Taichi - (あ！) 09:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Neutral, I don't know you yet. Guillom (^_^) 22:10, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No
  1. No. A large part of being a steward is following requests, I think rdsmith4 holds his own views too strongly to be able to do this well. Dan100 10:10, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ascánder

  • Language: es (native), en-3, fr-3.
  • Bureaucrat at Spanish Wikipedia (since October 2004) and Spanish Wikinews (since March 2005). First registration on July 2004. Like to write/translate articles, mostly in/to Spanish (more than 1.500 articles created). Willing to help on tasks related to small wikis.
  • My activity on meta is mostly related to translations (more than 600 edits).
Yes
  1. --Edub 09:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Zuirdj 14:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC): No creo que sólo sea traducción. Su ligazón con meta se hizo más fuerte después de su participación en Wikimanía. En esa ocasión quedó muy en sintonía con los principales personajes de la comunidad Wikimedia. En los hechos, las comunicaciones oficiales sobre requerimientos de prensa y decisiones de la Fundación han sido comunicados a Wikipedia por su intermedio.[reply]
  3. Definitely great to see someone from the Spanish Wikipedia. Danny 16:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Lourdes Cardenal 16:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC) Ascánder participa también en Wikinoticias, y está siempre atento a los conflictos de Wikipedia. Fue invitado a la reunión de Francfort... por algo sería. Además, necesitamos gente seria que nos represente en todo este tinglado.[reply]
  5. --Sanbec 17:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Julián Ortega 18:10, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Superzerocool 18:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sí/Yes/Da/Ja/Oui--FAR 18:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC) He was a good editor, and he is involucrated in translations of meta pages. He has been already a good link between es: wikipedia and other communitys.[reply]
  9. Anna 19:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC) I agree with FAR-[reply]
  10. villy ♦✎ 19:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    1. --81.9.160.52 19:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC) invalid vote --Walter 20:07, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  11. byj 21:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Datrio 22:09, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Davidge 22:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Oui. I trust Ascánder to do a great job notafish }<';> 23:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Renacimiento Seguro. Es una persona mesurada y comprometida con el projecto, a la vez que su calidad multilingue será de gran ayuda.
  16. --Javier Carro 23:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Alvaro 01:02, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Cinabrium 02:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Comae 02:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Jimbo has expressed his concern about the lack of involvement of the Spanish Wikipedia in general matters, this can help to avoid that. Besides, he could help a lot to all these little projects in languages from places where Spanish is widely used. There are a lot of them, and some are maturing fast. --Comae 02:35, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Chlewey 13:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jon Harald Søby 13:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Airunp 16:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC) No estoy segura de si mi voto vale o no pero mi apoyo total para Acánder.[reply]
  23. support -Romihaitza 17:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  24. porao (responder) 19:03, 7 January 2006 (UTC) At last... spanish people getting involved... Congratulations.
  25. --Paginazero 19:04, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Ja/Sí --Deprifry 21:54, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Platonides 22:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Yes. Korg + + 01:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Jdiazch 11:32, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  30. --Dianai 13:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  31. --Ecelan 13:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Wricardoh 15:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC). Most certainly.[reply]
  33. Yes. Prevert 16:41, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Oc/Yes Gorann Andjelkovic 17:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --GerardM 18:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Yes Alhen 03:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  37. --Ecemaml 10:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Go for it. Taragui 12:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Oscar . 22:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC) ¿Por qué no?[reply]
  40. Ja --Walter 22:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  41. --SergiL 23:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Yes. Angela 00:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  43. oui Anthere 00:24, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Sí --Schummy 02:22, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Feydey 07:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  46. si oscar 09:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Sí Sj 16:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
  1. --Taichi - (あ！) 02:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC): Dejo expresado lo de abajo, pero me abstengo.[reply]
  2. rsg (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No

--Taichi - (あ！) 06:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC): No es por presumir pero sólo sabes traducir, revisando el historial; y para este trabajo es muchísimo más. Lo sé más que nadie que paso por Meta; por eso no me he atrevido yo mismo a ser steward.[reply]
¿Sólo votar a favor porque representa a la Wiki hispana? Muchos de los que ya virtualmente son stewards en esta votación, tienen el peso de ser sysop en Meta, y Ascánder no es sysop, primero debe liar con la experiencia de como se maneja el proyecto, lo siento necesita un tiempo más y no cambio mi voto aún si es mi colega.--Taichi - (あ！) 18:01, 6 January 2006 (UTC) # Cette découverte tardive prouve bien que tu ne passes pas très soivent par méta :) villy ♦✎ 15:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not answering in Spanish, but it probably will be faster if I do it in English. I believe being a steward does not require that you are an admin on meta, and being a steward requires that you spend time on the steward related pages on meta, not on meta itself. The idea is to understand the projects very well, not necessarily meta (I believe noone can understand meta anyway ;-)), and I believe ascander has a very good knowledge of the projects as a whole. notafish }<';> 00:05, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linuxbeak

  • Language: en, fr-1, de-1.
  • Active editor/administrator/bureaucrat on en and admin on meta. Starting to work on Commons as well. Well trusted, well known, and entirely too much time on hands. Linuxbeak 16:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes
Neutral
No
  1. <100 editions in Meta. --Taichi - (あ！) 17:59, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    How can I have less than 100 edits in Meta and be an admin? I don't have 100 edits under *this* name alone. :-) Linuxbeak 18:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, I don't understand. Do you have other usernames? — Dan | Talk 19:29, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    No. Anonymous editing and such. I've been working with meta for a while, but I made the user name not that long ago. Linuxbeak 20:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ouch. We made a mistake Linuxbeak... indeed, having at least 100 edits is a requirement on meta to become an admin, and it looks like no one checked :-((( You should probably not have been made admin.... as you are not in the requirements. And you actually should not have asked in the first place... the fact you did not know this was a requirement sort of show you did not read the rules for being a sysop on meta. Since it was done, it was done. I do not care myself if you stay one, but to be fair with all editors, I actually prefer to vote against you being a steward. It would not be fair and indeed, your level of contributions on meta is not suffiicient to insure you would help. Sorry. But this is mostly to be fair here. Anthere 21:02, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. Ditto Anthere. villy ♦✎ 21:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. NoRomihaitza 21:37, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Sorry, but I have to agree with Anthere. Flcelloguy (A note?) 00:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. No. Not much experience on Meta. Korg + + 01:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2006&oldid=24933364"