Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Al Lemos

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Al Lemos

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Personal info: my name is Al, I'm Brazilian and live in Rio de Janeiro. I've been active on Portuguese Wikipedia since 2006, with more than 2,000 articles created, and on Catalan Wikipedia since 2008, with more than 100 articles created. I was nominated for adminship in 2007, but I withdrew. My main concern is to create, translate and develop articles. Nevertheless, I have a strong interest in setting policies that can protect the community against disruptive editing and overreaching. So, I have presented a banning policy and an adminship revocation policy (mainly due to absenteeism and illegal use of sockpuppets), and both were approved and are in use (we don't have an ArbCom yet). I'm very worried about the increasing use of socks in Portuguese Wikipedia (a sysop was exposed this week there, a big shame), and, as a steward, my goal is to work with checkusering; as a retired programmer, I have a lot of time to do this job...
    user contributions (translated by me to Portuguese).
català:
  • Idiomes: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Informació personal: meu nom és Al, jo sóc brasiler i viu en Rio de Janeiro. He estat actiu en la Wikipedia lusòfona des de 2006, amb més de 2.000 articles creats, i en la Viquipèdia en català des de 2008 (amb més de 100 articles creats). Jo ha estat nomenat per al càrrec d'administrador el 2007, però jo he declinat la invitació: el meu interès principal és la creació, traducció i desenvolupament d'articles. Tanmateix, jo tinc un profund interès en establir polítiques que puguin protegir la comunitat contra comportaments disruptius i abús de poder. Així, jo vaig ser el proposador de la política de proscripció i de la revogación de l'estatut d'administrador (principalment per compte d'absentisme i ús il·legal de sockpuppets), i ambdues van ser aprovades i estan en ús (no tenim encara un ArbCom). Estic extremadament preocupat amb el creixent ús de socks en la Wikipédia lusòfona (un administrador va ser desemmascarat aquesta setmana, una gran vergonya), i, com steward, el meu objectiu és treballar amb verificació de comptes; com a desenvolupador jubilat, jo tinc molt temps per dedicar a aquesta tasca...
    d'usuari globals (traduïdes per mi a portuguès).
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Informationen zur Person: mein Name ist Al, ich bin Brasilianer und lebe in Rio de Janeiro. Ich bin auf der portugiesischen Wikipedia, wo ich über 2'000 Artikel erstellt habe, seit 2006 aktiv und seit 2008 auf der katalanischen Wikipedia, wo ich über 100 Artikel angelegt habe. 2007 wurde ich zum Administrator vorgeschlagen, habe die Wahl aber vorzeitig beendet. Mein Hauptinteresse liegt darin, Artikel anzulegen, zu übersetzen und weiterzuentwickeln. Nichtsdestoweniger bin ich sehr daran interessiert, Richtlinien aufzustellen, die die Gemeinschaft vor störenden Bearbeitungen und Selbstüberschätzung schützen können. Daher habe ich eine Sperrrichtlinie und eine Deadmin-Richtlinie vorgeschlagen (hauptsächlich weil es keine gab und aufgrund der unzulässigen Verwendung von Sockenpuppen) und beide wurden angenommen und sind momentan in Verwendung (wir haben noch kein Schiedsgericht). Ich bin von der ansteigenden Verwendung von Sockenpuppen in der portugiesischen Wikipedia sehr beunruhigt (ein Admin wurde dort diese Woche entlarvt, eine große Schande) und mein Ziel als Steward ist, mit Checkuser zu arbeiten; als Programmierer im Ruhestand habe ich jede Menge Zeit, diesen Job zu erledigen...
    in allen Projekten (von mir auf portugiesisch übersetzt).
español:
  • Idiomas: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Información personal: mi nombre es Al, soy brasileño y vivo en Río de Janeiro. Estoy en activo en la Wikipedia lusófona desde 2006, con más de 2.000 artículos creados, y en la Viquipèdia en catalán desde 2008 (con más de 100 artículos creados). Fui nominado para el cargo de administrador en 2007, pero decliné la invitación. Mi interés principal es la creación, traducción y desarrollo de artículos. Sin embargo, tengo un profundo interés en establecer políticas que puedan proteger la comunidad contra comportamientos disruptivos y abuso de poder. Así, fui el proponente de la política de proscripción y de la revocación del estatuto de administrador (principalmente por cuenta de absentismo y uso ilegal de títeres), y ambas fueron aprobadas y están en uso (no tenemos aún un ArbCom). Estoy extremadamente preocupado con el creciente uso de títeres en la Wikipédia lusófona (un administrador fue desenmascarado esta semana, una gran vergüenza), y, como steward, mi objetivo es trabajar con verificación de cuentas; como programador jubilado, tengo mucho tiempo para dedicar a esta tarea...
    globales del usuario (traducido por mí al portugués).
français:
  • Langues: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Renseignements personnels: mon nom est Al, je suis brésilien et je vis à Río de Janeiro. Je suis actif sur la Wikipédia en portugais depuis 2006, avec plus de 2 000 articles créés et sur la Wikipédia en catalan depuis 2008 (avec plus de 100 articles créés). J’ai été nommé administrateur en 2007 mais j’ai refusé l’offre : mon but principal est la création, la traduction et le développement des articles. Néanmoins, je suis vraiment intéressé par l’établissement de règles pouvant protéger la communauté des modifications qui désorganisent et qui veulent aller trop loin. J'ai donc proposé une règle de bannissement et une règle de révocation des administrateurs (principalement pour absentéisme et usage illégal de faux-nez) et toutes les deux ont été approuvées et sont en application (nous n'avons pas encore de Comité d'arbitrage). Je suis vraiment inquiet au sujet de l'augmentation de l'utilisation des faux-nez sur la Wikipédia en portugais (un administrateur ayant été exposé cette semaine là-bas, une grosse honte) et, en tant que steward, mon but est de travailler aux vérifications d'adresses IP ; en tant que programmeur retraité j'ai beaucoup de temps pour réaliser ce travail...
    user contributions (traduit par mes soins en portugais).
galego:
  • Idiomas: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Informacións persoais: meu nome é Al, eu son brasileiro e vivo en Río de Janeiro. Teño estado en actividade na Wikipedia lusófona desde 2006, con máis de 2.000 artigos creados, e na Viquipèdia en catalán desde 2008 (con máis de 100 artigos creados). Fun indicado para o cargo de administrador en 2007, pero declinei a invitación: o meu interese principal é a creación, tradución e desenvolvemento de artigos. Con todo, teño un profundo interese en establecer políticas que poidan protexer a comunidade contra comportamentos disruptivos e abuso de poder. Así, fun o propoñente da política de proscrición e da revogación do estatuto de administrador (principalmente por conta de absentismo e uso ilegal de sockpuppets), e ambas foron aprobadas e están en uso (non temos aínda un ArbCom). Estou extremamente preocupado co o crecente uso de socks na Wikipedia lusófona (un administrador foi desenmascarado esta semana, unha gran vergonza), e, como steward, o meu obxectivo é traballar con verificación de contas; como programador xubilado, teño moi tempo para dedicar a esta tarefa...
    globais do usuario (traducido por min ao portugués).
日本語:
  • 言語: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • 候補者の情報: Al と申します。リオ･デ･ジャネイロ在住のブラジル人です。2006年からポルトガル語版ウィキペディアで活動しており、2,000以上の記事を作成し、またカタルーニャ語版ウィキペディアで2008年から活動し、100以上の記事を作成しました。私は2007年に管理者に推薦されましたが、辞退しました。私の主な関心は記事を作成し、翻訳し、発展させていくことにあるのです。しかしながら、私はコミュニティを荒らしの編集やoverreachingから保護する方針の制定にも強い関心があります。そのため、私は追放の方針と管理者権限取消の方針を（主に長期不活動とソックパペットの不法使用のため）提案し、共に承認され発効しています（まだ裁定委員会がないのです）。私はポルトガル語版ウィキペディアにおけるソックパペットの使用の増加をたいへん不安に思っています（大変恥ずかしいことに、その中に管理者がいたことが今週発覚しました）。そしてスチュワードとして、私のゴールはチェックユーザーの仕事をすることです。またプログラマを辞めた身として、この仕事をする時間がたくさんあります……。
    [1] (私がポルトガル語に翻訳しました)。
한국어:
  • 언어 능력: 포르투갈어-모국어, 영어-고급수준, 스페인어-중급수준, 카탈루냐어-중급수준, 갈리시아어-중급수준
  • 신상 정보: 제 이름은 Al이고, 브라질 사람이며 리우데자네이루에서 살고 있습니다. 저는 2006년부터 포르투갈어 위키백과에서 활동했고, 2,000개 이상의 문서를 만들었습니다. 그리고 2008년부터는 카탈루냐어 위키백과에서 활동하여 100개 이상의 문서를 만들었습니다. 2007년에 저는 관리자로 추천 받았지만, 사퇴한 적이 있습니다. 저의 주된 관심은 문서를 만들고, 번역하며, 발전시키는 것입니다. 그렇지만, 저는 위키 공동체를 편집 분쟁 등으로부터 막을 수 있는 정책 제정에 대해서도 많은 관심이 있습니다. 그래서 저는 추방 정책과 관리자 권한 회수 정책을 제안하였고 (주로 장기 휴면과 다중계정의 악용에 대한 내용), 모두 승인되어 시행되고 있습니다 (아직 중재위원회는 없습니다). 저는 포르투갈어 위키백과에서 다중계정 사용이 늘어나는 것에 대해서 매우 걱정스럽습니다 (관리자가 다중계정에 포함되어 있었던 것이 이번 주에 발각되었습니다. 매우 부끄러운 일입니다.). 그리고 제 목표는 사무장으로써 체크유저에 대한 일을 하는 것 입니다; 프로그래머 일을 그만두어 저는 여기에서 기여 할 시간이 많습니다...
    위키 기여 목록 (포르투갈어 버전은 제가 번역하였습니다).
polski:
  • Języki: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Informacje osobiste: Nazywam się Al, jestem brazylijczykiem i mieszkam w Rio de Janeiro. Jestem aktywny na portugalskiej Wikipedii od 2006, gdzie stworzyłem ponad 2000 artykułów, oraz na katalońskiej Wikipedii od 2008, gdzie stworzyłem ponad 100 artykułów. W 2007 zostałem zgłoszony jako kandydat na administratora, ale wycofałem się. Moim głównym polem zainteresowań jest tworzenie, tłumaczenie i rozwój artykułów. Niezależnie od tego, jestem zainteresowany ustalaniem zasad, kŧóre mogą chronić społeczność przed szkodliwymi edycjami. Dlatego przedstawiłem politykę blokowania oraz odbierania uprawnień administratorskich (głównie ze względu na nieaktywność oraz nielegalne wykorzystanie pacynek). Obie zostały przyjęte i aktywne (nie mamy jeszcze Komitetu Arbitrażowego). Jestem zaniepokojony rosnącym wykorzystywaniem pacynek w portugalskiej Wikipedii (w tym tygodniu ujawniono takie działania sysopa, ale wstyd). Jako steward chciałbym się zająć checkuserowaniem; jako emerytowany programista mam dużo czasu, by się tym zająć
    wkład użytkownika (przetłumaczone przeze mnie na portugalski).
português:
  • Línguas: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Informações pessoais: meu nome é Al, eu sou brasileiro e moro no Rio de Janeiro. Tenho estado em atividade na Wikipédia lusófona desde 2006, com mais de 2.000 artigos criados, e na Viquipèdia em catalão desde 2008 (com mais de 100 artigos criados). Fui indicado para o cargo de administrador em 2007, mas declinei o convite: meu interesse preponderante está na criação, tradução e desenvolvimento de artigos. Todavia, tenho um profundo interesse em estabelecer políticas que possam proteger a comunidade contra comportamentos disruptivos e abuso de poder. Assim, fui o proponente da política de banimento e da revogação do estatuto de administrador (principalmente por conta de absenteísmo e uso ilegal de sockpuppets), e ambas foram aprovadas e estão em uso (não temos ainda um ArbCom). Estou extremamente preocupado com o crescente uso de socks na Wikipédia lusófona (um administrador foi desmascarado esta semana, uma grande vergonha), e, como steward, meu objetivo é trabalhar com verificação de contas; como programador aposentado, tenho muito tempo para dedicar a esta tarefa...
    globais do utilizador (traduzido por mim para o português)
русский:
  • Языки: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • Личная информация: Меня зовут Ал (Al), я бразилец и живу в Рио-де-Жанейро. С 2006 года участвую в португальской википедии, создал более 2000 статей, а с 2008 стал участвовать и в каталонской википедии и создал там более 100 статей. В 2007 году меня выдвинули на пост администратора, но я отказался. Тем не менее, я сильно заинтересован в установлении правил, которые бы защитили сообщество от деструктивного поведения и мошенничества. Мной разработаны правила блокировок и правила снятия полномочий администратора (в основном за неактивность и нелегальное использование сокпаппетов). Оба эти правила были приняты и ныне используются (у нас нет Арбитражного комитета). Я очень обеспокоен увеличением числа кукловодов в португальской википедии (на этой неделе был разоблачён администратор, какой позор), и, как стюард, намерен выполнять обязанности по проверке участников. Я программист на пенсии и у меня много времени для подобной работы...
    user contributions
中文:
  • 可说语言: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • 个人资料: 我名叫Al，是一名居住在里约热内卢的巴西人。我从2006年开始活跃于葡萄牙语维基百科上，共创建了超过2,000篇的条目；从2008年起，我也开始活跃于加泰罗尼亚语维基百科上，共创建了超过100篇的条目。2007年，我曾被提名为管理员，但我退出了该次提名。我主要关注的事是去创建、翻译与发展条目。然而，我对设立方针来保护社群免受破坏编辑与欺诈之苦也很感兴趣。因此，我曾提出过封禁方针以及管理员罢免方针（主要是由于旷职和非法使用傀儡），这两个方针都获得通过并正在运作中（我们还没有一个仲裁委员会）。我对葡萄牙语维基百科中使用傀儡的现象日益增多感到担心（本周就有一名管理员曝光，真让人羞耻）。作为一名监管员，我的目标是与其他人一同从事用户查核的工作；而作为一名已退休的程序员，我有相当多的时间来做这件事……
    [2]（也是由我翻译到葡萄牙语的）。
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • 个人资料: 我名叫Al，是一名居住在里约热内卢的巴西人。我从2006年开始活跃于葡萄牙语维基百科上，共创建了超过2,000篇的条目；从2008年起，我也开始活跃于加泰罗尼亚语维基百科上，共创建了超过100篇的条目。2007年，我曾被提名为管理员，但我退出了该次提名。我主要关注的事是去创建、翻译与发展条目。然而，我对设立方针来保护社群免受破坏编辑与欺诈之苦也很感兴趣。因此，我曾提出过封禁方针以及管理员罢免方针（主要是由于旷职和非法使用傀儡），这两个方针都获得通过并正在运作中（我们还没有一个仲裁委员会）。我对葡萄牙语维基百科中使用傀儡的现象日益增多感到担心（本周就有一名管理员曝光，真让人羞耻）。作为一名监管员，我的目标是与其他人一同从事用户查核的工作；而作为一名已退休的程序员，我有相当多的时间来做这件事……
    [3]（也是由我翻译到葡萄牙语的）。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: pt-N,en-3, es-2, ca-2, gl-2
  • 個人資料: 我名叫Al，是一名居住在里約熱內盧的巴西人。我從2006年開始活躍於葡萄牙語維基百科上，共創建了超過2,000篇的條目；從2008年起，我也開始活躍於加泰羅尼亞語維基百科上，共創建了超過100篇的條目。2007年，我曾被提名為管理員，但我退出了該次提名。我主要關注的事是去創建、翻譯與發展條目。然而，我對設立方針來保護社群免受破壞編輯與欺詐之苦也很感興趣。因此，我曾提出過封禁方針以及管理員罷免方針（主要是由於曠職和非法使用傀儡），這兩個方針都獲得通過並正在運作中（我們還沒有一個仲裁委員會）。我對葡萄牙語維基百科中使用傀儡的現象日益增多感到擔心（本周就有一名管理員曝光，真讓人羞恥）。作為一名監管員，我的目標是與其他人一同從事用戶查核的工作；而作為一名已退休的程式師，我有相當多的時間來做這件事……
    [4]（也是由我翻譯到葡萄牙語的）。


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1.   Support Jagwar 14:04, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Computer wh 15:58, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support Luan 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Lyon88 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) uneligible voter. Account created yesterday. es:Drini 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support Udufruduhu 00:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support --Ginosal 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Raafael D 02:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  7.   Support Mwaldeck msg 04:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Will he break the wiki? Most likely not. ErikTheBikeMan 04:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Definitely yes. I'd go with a staatement of values and intent anyday, over statements of experience. Apologies if I've got anything wrong on following this voting process though ~ I'm new, with one of the two articles I've submitted so far already under review for deletion~:o)Skankarbaba Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support --Sir James 05:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Sh1019 08:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Caspiax --Caspiax 09:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support Fruggo 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support--Konsnos 10:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support EUDOXIO 10:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support NoychoH 13:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support — Albert Krantz¿? 16:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   SupportGlobalphilosophy 16:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Yes. Definitely. CJS102793 18:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support --Nrainer 23:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --Jouris2009.2.2 (UTC) Uneligible voter. This account isn't registered on Meta. --Lucas Nunes 16:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support ----Zeljko 09:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Support Wouterhagens 16:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support--Psiblastaeban 16:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. Alex Pereira falaê 17:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --201.9.61.98 18:06, 2 February 2009 (UTC) uneligible voter. It's just an IP.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Support pro carioca! -- Linksfuss 21:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Support --Arcudaki 14:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Support --Lighterside 16:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support --Alex Esp 23:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Support - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 02:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Support Ozymandias 09:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Support Booksworm 19:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support yes -- A2 supersonique 22:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter --Nice poa 01:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Support Multilingual. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 17:47, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --Snake311 20:02, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support I voted for you. Now, where's that bribe you promised me? PM me and I'll give you the account number. Heh, these suckers are gonna be taken for a spin. --85.164.165.51 16:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter, it's just an IP. --Nice poa 21:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Support Muro de Aguas 17:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Matema 09:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter --Nice poa 00:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  29.   Support Albmont 11:31, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support Kabri 18:33, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Support --Lohen11 15:37, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support --4wajzkd02 09:33, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support --Alborz Fallah 18:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support Has all the right language and other skills Carsrac 23:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support Christian Hartmann 15:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1.   Oppose — Aitias // discussion 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Oppose --Thogo (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Oppose Imho the user has not enough experience, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Oppose No. Razorflame 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    No. Horacewai2 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter. Confirmed by AccountEligibility Béria Lima Msg 11:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Oppose No. Puntori 00:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Oppose No. Micha L. Rieser 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Oppose No.--Seha 00:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Oppose --Kanonkas 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Oppose No. Not enough experience for stewardship, what you describe is totally different from what stewardship is. Romaine 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Oppose Az1568 (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Oppose No/いいえ. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Oppose per Romaine Herr Kriss 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Oppose sorry, but No per Romaine Marcus Cyron 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Oppose Seems not to understand what being a steward is, or what would make one qualified to do the job.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Oppose No. Seems to not understand what stewardship is. — neuro(talk) 13:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Oppose --FollowTheMedia 01:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Yym1997 02:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible: This user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his homewiki —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 16:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Oppose I like the attitude, and the thoughtful question answers, but I think you need more experience with adminship and general wiki operations across multiple wikis. Perhaps next year? ++Lar: t/c 02:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose --Tomatejc 02:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19.   Oppose Not at the level I expect of stewards. Prodego talk 04:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20.   Oppose Avjoska 06:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21.   Oppose Achates 07:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22.   Oppose No --Shipmaster 07:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Oppose No --Producer 08:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Oppose Merdis 09:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Uneligible voter: The user don't have an account on Meta with userpage linked to his/her homewiki. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 17:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not anymore. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 15:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Oppose No --Dr. Gert Blazejewski 09:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Oppose Adrian 1111 09:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Oppose No, involved recently in too many unnecessary conflicts in Portuguese Wikipedia. RafaAzevedo 09:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[1][reply]
  28.   Oppose Whilst it'd be good to have non-en stewards, this chap lacks experience. Computerjoe 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Oppose --Brownout(msg) 09:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Oppose No --Church of emacs 10:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Oppose Béria Lima Msg 10:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I agree whit Romaine. "Not enough experience for stewardship"[reply]
  32.   Oppose Per Romaine. Jon Harald Søby 10:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Oppose --AFBorchert 10:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) per birdy and Lar[reply]
  34.   Oppose Njaelkies Lea 11:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Oppose Vyk 11:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Oppose I'm sorry. I believe in your good purpose, but not enough experience for stewardship. Smihael 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37.   Oppose Calandrella 13:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC) I agree with Smihael.[reply]
  38.   Oppose —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Oppose Stewards should have the experience and trust that comes with being an admin on their home project. John Vandenberg 14:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Oppose --MF-W 14:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Oppose Not this year. -- Nahum 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Oppose Stewards should be able to describe what stewardship is and should be an admin on their home wiki. Per Romaine and per Jauvdb. ѕwirlвoy ₪ 14:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43.   Oppose Filipe RibeiroMsg 14:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not now.[reply]
  44.   OpposeObelix 14:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --91.43.224.39 15:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Please login to vote. Bence  My Talk 14:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Oppose No. Jdrewitt 15:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46.   Oppose Not really. --Ciphers 17:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Oppose À cause du manque d'expérience avec les outils d'admin. / Lack of experience with admins' tools. --Edhral 18:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48.   Oppose Lack of experience and bad understanding of the steward duties — NickK 19:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Oppose ack NickK --RoswithaC 19:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50.   Oppose No. Alefbe 19:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51.   Oppose –Ejs-80 20:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Oppose NonvocalScream 20:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Oppose No. Wants to remove "absentee" admins for no good reason. Rspeer 21:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54.   Oppose --Ilyaroz 00:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55.   Oppose --PietJay 07:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56.   Oppose ~ putnik 07:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57.   Oppose Stewardship is not only checkuser. Leujohn 08:59, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Oppose --Uwe Gille 09:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Oppose no experience--Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60.   Oppose Too few user rights => not much experience. --FiliP × 12:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Oppose GlassCobra 14:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Oppose   Contra. QuartierLatin1968 20:15, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63.   Oppose I don't see expierence. Should be an admin.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64.   Oppose --Stepri2003 20:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65.   Oppose--Davecrosby uk 00:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Oppose Mailer Diablo 03:46, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Oppose Tcrow777 04:57, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Oppose Stef48 08:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Oppose --Tarantelle 10:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Oppose no experience to this. Alex Pereira falaê 12:12, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Oppose Not enough experience or understanding of the role. Maedin\talk 13:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72.   Oppose I am not sure you fully understand the role of stewards. Anonymous101 17:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Oppose Fred Xavier 19:07, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Oppose Tiptoety talk 20:50, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Oppose --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76.   Oppose Apparently doesn't know what the position is about.--Cerejota 04:55, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Oppose Doesn't seem like enough experience. ...Aurora... 11:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78.   Oppose Don't have experience. --Lucas Nunes 16:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Oppose Nones. --Tesi1700 17:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80.   Oppose Not enough experience. --Tchoř 02:45, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81.   Oppose sorry but need more experience --Gdgourou 10:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82.   Oppose No Modernist 03:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83.   Oppose GoEThe 10:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC) Tends to resolve disputes by attacking the opponent rather than the question and when proposing policy shoves opposition under the carpet by pushing for a vote instead of trying to build consensus.[reply]
  84.   Oppose Urielpunk 14:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)?[reply]
    Meekohi 22:42, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85.   Oppose No. TFBCT1 17:02, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86.   Oppose Nadzieja 18:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC) The user had a discussion with me in pt.wikipedia (initialized by he), and was agressive and impertinent with me and another user that was in his right: making comments in the discussion page of the pt.wiki article "Sockpuppet". The user don't have enough maturity to be a Steward. I agree with the user GoEThe: The user resolve disputes by attacking the opponent. 'Cause this my vote is no![reply]
  87.   Oppose IMatthew 20:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88.   Oppose --Nice poa 21:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry, but he 'argues' too much with everybody for everything and uses to offend and to mock his opponents![reply]
  89.   Oppose No -- per unaddressed concerns from other editors. Message From Xenu 10:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90.   Oppose at first you'll need to be experienced as sysop anywhere - IMHO - sorry --Rax 22:17, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Oppose not even a sysop on any project, and does not seem to understand well the stewards' role. O. Morand 00:03, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Oppose Not enough exp. --Sampi 02:17, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Oppose Lack of admin experience, misunderstanding of steward role. Nbarth 01:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94.   Oppose Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 06:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Oppose--Drboisclair 22:47, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96.   Oppose--Thesupermat 09:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97.   Oppose-- Harrywad 23:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98.   Oppose Nearby, but needs still experience --Höyhens 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99.   Oppose Tosão 20:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC) No,no,no![2][reply]
  100.   Oppose If you resign from proposed adminship why should we trust you stewardship? Masti 21:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101.   Oppose --Techman224Talk 02:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[3][reply]
  102.   Oppose -- it's not necessary for him to add footnotes to opposing comments, and his doing so clearly demonstrates that he should not be a steward. KrakatoaKatie 20:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1.   Neutral Efbé   10:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I know nothing about the experience of candidate. Unfortunately, I can not understand Portuguese, and I'm out of estimation.LexArt 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I am ambivalent. Rangond 06:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 19:27, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Neutral Kushal one 11:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Neutral Bence  My Talk 14:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Neutral Punx 09:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    WITSPUTZ 17:17, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 00:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Neutral DanielRute 22:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Neutral Mizunoryu 大熊猫❤小熊猫 13:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC) Nothing against the user. He's indeed a great editor on Wiki-pt. But he's a bit nervous and he does not like being questioned and contradicted. He must change that. But in general, he doesn't like canvassing and elitism, and that's great! Especially in Wiki-pt where our adminship is focused in elitism and friendship. Being an administrator there is nothing, really.[reply]
  7. --Mayer Bruno 21:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Info

edit

Meet some people from Lusophone Wikipedia that are not only voting against me (what is perfectly democratical), but blaming me... - Al Lemos 14:33, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ This fellow has so many enemies in the lusophone Wikipedia that was nicknamed "rabid dog" by a veteran editor.
  2. ↑ Candidate for sysop. In the voting under way, an editor (Pediboi) said about him: "without saving articles a large number of times in quick succession, a thing that he usually do, he don't will obtain the minimum number of 2000 editions in the mainspace; I smell a scam here."
  3. ↑ It's old news. The world has changed since January 2007...
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Al_Lemos&oldid=5738597"