Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Kylu

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Kylu

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Personal info: I have assisted the current stewards with the daily chores of maintenance here since 2007 and wish to further help our communities develop. I am mostly interested in assisting resolve SUL conflicts amicably and responding to permissions requests, though I am familiar with all the currently granted steward tools. I enjoy working with other languages and can read at basic level in many not listed above. I have Sysop on the English and Sinhala Wikipedias, bureaucrat/sysop on meta and mediawiki.org. I have global rollback rights currently, as well as an account on the toolserver and access to the OTRS system. I am a member of the "Senior staff" for CVN, which coordinates countervandalism activities. (verify permissions) I am already identified to the Foundation (August 2007). Thanks. :)
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich habe die gegenwärtigen Stewards hier seit 2007 bei den täglichen Wartungsarbeiten unterstützt und möchte unseren Gemeinschaften weiterhin helfen, sich zu entwickeln. Ich bin hauptsächtlich daran interessiert, SUL-Konflikte im gegenseitigen Einvernehmen zu lösen und Freigabeanfragen zu bearbeiten, bin aber mit allen momentan aktiven Stewardwerkzeugen vertraut. Ich habe Spaß daran, in anderen Sprachen zu arbeiten und kann viele oben nicht aufgeführte Sprachen auf einem einfachen Niveau lesen. Ich bin Administrator auf der englischen und der singhalesischen Wikipedia, Bürokrat und Administrator auf Meta und mediawiki.org. Im Moment habe ich globale Rollbackrechte, sowie einen Toolserver-Account und Zugriff auf das OTRS. Ich bin Mitglied des „Senior staff“ des CVN, das Vandalismusbekämpfung koordiniert. (Berechtigungen überprüfen) Ich habe mich bereits der Foundation gegenüber ausgewiesen (August 2007). Danke. :)
français:
  • Langues: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Renseignements personnels: J'ai aidé les stewards actuels avec le travail de maintenant routinier ici depuis 2007 et je souhaite aider davantage notre communauté à se développer. Je suis principalement intéressé pour aider à résoudre les conflits de SUL amicalement et à répondre aux demandes de permission, bien que je sois familier avec tous les outils actuellement disponibles pour les standards. J'aime travailler avec d'autres langues et je peux lire à un niveau simple dans plusieurs langues non mentionnées ci-dessus. Je suis administrateur sur les wikipédia en anglais et en sinhala, bureaucrate et administrateur sur meta et mediawiki. J'ai actuellement les droits de global rollback, ainsi qu'un compte sur toolserver et l'accès au système OTRS. Je suis membre du "Senior staff" pour CVN, qui coordonne les activités contre le vandalisme. (verify permissions) Je suis déjà identifié envers la fondation (August 2007). Merci. :)
italiano:
  • Lingue: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Informazioni personali: Ho aiutato gli attuali steward con i lavori di manutenzione di routine già dal 2007 e desidero aiutare ulteriormente le nostre comunità a svilupparsi. Sono principalmente interessato ad aiutare a risolvere amichevolmente i conflitti relativi al SUL, a rispondere alle richieste di permessi, ma sono a conoscenza di tutti gli strumenti che sono al momento disponibili per gli steward. Mi piace lavorare con le altre lingue e posso leggere con un livello di base anche in molte di quelle non elencate qui sopra. Sono amministratore della Wikipedia in lingua inglese e Sinhala, burocrate e amministratore su meta e mediawiki.org. Ho ottenuto i diritti di global rollback, un account sul toolserver e un accesso al sistema OTRS. Sono membro del "Senior staff" del CVN, che coordina le attività anti-vandalismo. (verica i permessi) Sono già identificato presso la Foundation (August 2007). Grazie. :) Nick1915 suggerisce che mostrano come il sottoscritto che parlano italiano a livello di IT-3, ma non credo che la mia abilità è grande! Ci scusiamo per la confusione. :)
日本語:
  • 言語: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • 候補者の情報: 私は2007年からここで現職のスチュワードの管理活動の日課の手伝いをしており、私たちのコミュニティの発展をより手助けしたいと思っております。私は現在許可されているスチュワードツールに精通してはいるのですが、SULの競合を友好的に解決することと、権限付与依頼への返答の手伝いをすることに最も関心があります。他の言語の人と作業をするのは楽しく、上に挙げていない多くの言語で基本的なレベルのものを読むことができます。英語版とシンハラ語版のウィキペディアで管理者権限を、メタとmediawiki.orgで管理者・ビューロクラットの権限を、それぞれ持っています。私は現在ツールサーバのアカウントとOTRSシステムへのアクセスを持っており、また全ウィキ差し戻しの権限も持っております。荒らしへの対応のコーディネートをする、CVNの"シニアスタッフ"の一員です(権限の確認)。 私はすでに財団に身元の証明をしてあります(2007年8月)。ありがとうございました :)
polski:
  • Języki: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Informacje osobiste: Asystowałam obecnym stewardom w codziennym zarządzaniu od 2007 i chciałabym dalej pomagać w rozwoju naszych społeczności. Najbardziej jestem zainteresowana pomocą przy pokojowym rozwiązywaniu konfliktów związanych z globalnymi nazwami (SUL) i obsłudze zgłoszeń, gdyż jestem zaznajomiona ze wszystkimi dostępnymi narzędziami. Lubię pracować w innych językach i potrafię czytać, na poziomie podstawowym, w wielu nie wymienionych powyżej. Jestem administratorem na wikipedii angielskiej i Sinhala, biurokratą i administratorem na meta i mediawiki.org. Mam uprawnienia do globalnego rewertowania, jak też konto na toolserverze i dostęp do OTRS. Jestem członkinią "władz" CVN, który koordynuje zwalczanie wandalizmów we wszytkich projektach. (sprawdź uprawnienia) Moja tożsamość została już zweryfikowana przez Fundację (sierpień 2007). Dzięki :)
português:
  • Línguas: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Informações pessoais: Tenho ajudado os actuais stewards diariamente com a manutenção desde 2007 e desejo de ajudar ainda mais o desenvolvimento de nossas comunidades. eu estou particularmente interessado em ajudar a resolver conflitos com o SUL e a responder pedidos de permissões (OTRS), portanto sou conhecido de todos os actuais stewards. eu gosto de trabalhar com outras línguas e posso ler em nível básico quase todas as línguas listadas aqui nota do tradutor: as línguas as quais ele se refere são: Inglês, árabe, alemão, francês, galego, ilídiche, italiano, japonês, coreano, neerlandês, português e chinês. Eu sou administrador nas Wikipédias em inglês e Sinhala, administrador e burocrata no meta e mediawiki.org, tenho actualmente os direitos de global rollback, além de uma conta na toolserver wiki e acesso ao sistema OTRS. Eu sou um dos "membros" do Countervandalism Network, que coordena as actividades dos combatentes de vandalismos. (verifique as permissões). E também já fui identificado pela Fundação em (Agosto de 2007). Obrigado. :)
русский:
  • Языки: en-N, fr-2/3, es-2/3
  • Личная информация: Я помогала нынешним стюардам с ежедневными повседневными служебными работами с 2007 года и я хочу и дальше помогать развивать наши сообщества. Более всего меня привлекают помощь в корректном разрешении конфликтов SUL и реакция на запросы об узурпации, хотя я знакома со всеми современными инструментами, доступными стюардам. Мне нравится работать с другими языками и я могу на базовом уровне читать на большинстве вышеперечисленных языков. У меня есть флаг администратора в английском и синхальском (Sinhala) разделах Википедии, флаги администратора и бюрократа на метавики и mediawiki.org. Также, сейчас у меня есть права глобального откатывающего, аккаунт на тулсервере и доступ к системе OTRS. Я являюсь членом "Senior staff" в Антивандальной сети, координирующей антивандальную активность. (проверить наличие флагов) Я предоставила свои личные данные Фонду (ещё в августе 2007 года). Спасибо. :)


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Kanonkas 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Friendly, helpful, active in steward areas. Excellent candidate! Majorly talk 00:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Cenarium (Talk) 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support. PeterSymonds 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --M/ 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support GlassCobra 00:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Yes! Razorflame 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. BJTalk 00:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. miranda 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Captain panda 00:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support — vvv 00:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. NuclearWarfare 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Thogo (talk) 00:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support Without a doubt. The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support Willking1979 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Mr.Z-man 00:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support. Chick Bowen 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. --Seha 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Az1568 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    --Chrihern 16px 00:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Deskana 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --Ivan Štambuk 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Sí/Yes/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 01:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Yes, Seens to know what stewardship means. Romaine 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28. American Eagle (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes. of course. Marcus Cyron 01:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. (+) Hillgentleman 01:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Hell yeah! Nishkid64 (talk) 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. On the condition that Kylu continues in her official role as Meta's archive bot. :D In all seriousness, Kylu knows exactly what it takes to be a steward, and will do an excellent job. Highly experienced in cross-wiki matters, excellent judgement and always helpful.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support — neuro(talk) 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --FollowTheMedia 01:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Shizhao 01:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Durova 02:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Fer sure, she is probably one of the few I would vote for :) ..--Cometstyles 02:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Perhaps this year's best candidate. But only if I get a pony. ++Lar: t/c 02:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Support. Yes, a good contributor cross-wikis. -- Mentifisto 03:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Support--Luisfege 03:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support--1j1z2 03:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. --Revolus Echo der Stille 04:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. One of the most experienced candidates. --Millosh 04:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Giggy 04:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support Obviously. MBisanz talk 04:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Cecil 04:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. With some reservation, but I assume that I will be impressed, as I usually am, with Kylu. Prodego talk 05:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Yes. bastique demandez! 06:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Sir James 06:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Avjoska 06:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Achates 07:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Shipmaster 07:48, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Sebleouf 08:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Kwsn 08:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Daniel (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. yeaaaaaaaaa --.snoopy. ✉ 09:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Merdis 09:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Brownout(msg) 10:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Microchip08 @simpleWB 10:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. --Wing 10:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Yes. Alefbe 10:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Da. Jon Harald Søby 10:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. friendly and helpful, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 10:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Efbé   10:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66. →Na·gy 11:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Tak. Tomasz W. Kozłowski 11:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Béria Lima Msg 11:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Support--Konsnos 11:20, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support Vyk 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Garden 11:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Rudget (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Support Tinucherian 11:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74.   Support, VIGNERON * discut. 12:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support Yann 12:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76. feydey 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. --Александр Сигачёв 12:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. --Scott MacDonald 13:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Orderinchaos 14:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. —Dferg (meta-w:es:) 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --MF-W 14:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Obelix 15:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. -- Nahum 15:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84.   Support --Ahonc 15:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Very active in cross-wiki matters and familiar with the stewards "job". - Rjd0060 15:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. trusted fellow, useful in cross vandalism fighting. DarkoNeko 15:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Fabexplosive The archive man 15:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Herby talk thyme 16:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. A truly excellent candidate. She will make a very effective steward. Rje 16:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Have my confidence Mirgolth 16:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91.   Support iAlex 17:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Gurch 17:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93. support. --Ciphers 17:34, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94. First choice. Jehochman 17:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 18:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96.   Support — NickK 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97. –Ejs-80 20:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --Caspian blue 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Yes. NonvocalScream 20:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. One of the best candidates in my opinion. Steve Crossin Talk 21:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. TheNeon 22:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102.   Support --Jan eissfeldt 23:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103.   Support Very well deserving. --Charitwo 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Yes please. John Vandenberg 00:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105. John Reaves (talk) 00:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Support - without any hesitation whatsoever - I am sure Kylu will do a great job. WJBscribe (talk) 00:40, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Support. FT2 (Talk | email) 02:37, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108. FayssalF 02:57, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support -- Avi 03:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110. faithless (speak) 05:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111.   Support Aude 05:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112. ~ putnik 08:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113. --P@d@w@ne 09:07, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114. --Uwe Gille 09:45, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Ryan Postlethwaite 09:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  116.   Support--Alnokta 10:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  117.   Support yes indeed!--Nick1915 - all you want 10:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  118. An obvious choice. --FiliP × 12:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Jaranda | wat's sup 14:23, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Note: User is eligible to vote, enwiki account is User:Secret, which was checked with Pathos' tool and passed. The Helpful One 14:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC) [reply]
  120.   Support --OosWesThoesBes 14:56, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  121.   Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  122.   Support -- Lychee 16:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  123. definitely. Xavexgoem 16:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  124.   Support Juliancolton 17:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  125.   Ar son - absolutely 100%. Kylu is awesome :) - Alison ❤ 19:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  126.   Support. LaraLove (User:Jennavecia on my home wiki.) 20:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  127.   Pro. QuartierLatin1968 20:49, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  128. If i say no, 127 persons will kick me. xD. Well, you have experience. Yes.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 21:01, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  129. ~ Seb35 22:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  130. PhilKnight 22:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  131.   Support --NightMonkey 22:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  132.   Support Pharaoh of the Wizards 23:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  133.   Support Werdna 23:52, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  134.   Support Absolutely! Eliz81 00:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  135. --Davecrosby uk 00:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  136.   Support. I, for one, welcome our new Kylu overlords. - Mark 03:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  137. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 04:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  138.   Support - AnakngAraw 05:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  139.   Support ShapiroS10 12:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  140. of course. Alex Pereira falaê 12:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  141.   Support ---Zyephyrus 13:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Strong   Support, The Wiki honey bee has my vote every day. --Tarawneh 18:06, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  143.   Support yes please :) —Sean Whitton / 18:47, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  144.   Support James F. (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Tiptoety talk 20:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  146. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:53, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  147.   Support Edwtie 22:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  148.   Support (I'm fairly new to this, but have spent an hour studying this candidate. Yes.) Proofreader77 23:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  149. By all means. — Dan | talk 01:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  150. YEA! — Rlevse • Talk • 02:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  151.   Support Matasg 17:57, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  152. support --Complex 19:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  153.   Support Caiaffa 03:43, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  154. Yes. No question. -- (cypsy) 10:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  155.   Support --Gdgourou 10:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  156. ...Aurora... 12:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Oui Adailton 13:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  158. Duh. J.delanoygabsadds 14:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  159. --Church of emacs 16:22, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Yes...Modernist 04:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  161.   Support Yes, Kylu cares Sinhala Wikipedia well. Asiri 09:11, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  162.   Support (not already a steward?!) Huji 11:33, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  163.   Support --Jyothis 13:09, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  164.   Support Rosiestep 17:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  165.   Support --Versageek 03:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  166.   Support Positive interactions. Multilingual. ☺Coppertwig(talk) 18:06, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  167.   Support EdBever 18:37, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  168. --Aphaia 18:52, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  169. Support - Wutsje 19:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  170.   Support --Alexmaxbir 23:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  171.   Support en.wiki's The ed17 00:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  172.   Support --Tom 02:47, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  173.   Support Poco a poco 12:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  174.   Support — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 15:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      IS THE BETTER ONE IN SPANISH¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ User:jcimorra Uneligible to vote. --Lucas Nunes 23:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  175.   Support -- Good at conflict resolution tries to de-escalate tension. Jbolden1517 22:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  176.   Support -- PseudoOne 22:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Malinaccier (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  178.   Support --Sageo 01:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  179.   Support Coyets 14:25, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  180.   Support --Finn Rindahl 17:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --B 20:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC) switched to oppose --B 14:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  181. ok --Rax 23:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  182.   Support Sp5uhe 11:13, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  183.   Support If you want something done, give it to a busy woman. Gak 12:43, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  184.   Support Hégésippe | ±Θ± 14:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  185.   Support--Bapti 19:57, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  186. Nbarth 01:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Storkk 03:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  188.   Support --Diligent 19:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  189.   Support rootology (T) 04:33, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  190.   Support--Thesupermat 09:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  191. —Locke Cole • t • c 10:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  192.   Support — Gosgood 14:59, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  193.   Support --DorisAntony 21:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  194.   Support Maedin\talk 21:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  195.   Support --ysangkok 23:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  196.   Support -- Harrywad 23:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  197.   Support--Cspurrier 01:54, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sneaky #200 support (pre-indented) Werdnabot 07:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  198.   Support Seems to be the good person for the job. O. Morand 10:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  199.   Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  200.   Support Grandmaster 08:28, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  201.   Support Techman224Talk 01:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  202.   Support - Punx 07:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  203. --Kegns 17:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  204. - Josette 20:21, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  205.   Support More languages, more women! Yeah! --OrsolyaVirág 17:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  206.   Support — Aitias // discussion 11:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  207.   Support --Mardetanha talk 21:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
— Aitias // discussion 00:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Great user, does a lot, but does a lot already, and doesn't seem particularly equipped for multilingual coordination (no other languages at an advanced or fluent level.) Andre (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Just as a note, when ever I want something translated from any of at least 3 dozen languages, I seek out Kylu, unless i can find a native or near native speaker. She can puzzle out meaning in so many languages, it's stunning. So obviously I don't necessarily agree. But I'm biased, languages were a weak spot in my own candidacy. I'll say no more but I did want to point that out. Try her sometime, you'll see. ++Lar: t/c 04:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   반대 너무 자주 기계 번역을 사용해서 의사 소통상에 있어 오해가 생길 수 있다는 게 우려됩니다. 게다가 사무장이 되기에는 경험이 부족해 보입니다.--Kwj2772 05:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC) (+ Kwj2772 (論) 12:08, 19 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]
    Mmm, Korean: "Too often used against the machine translation could be misunderstanding and communication have to be on is concerned." Damned if there isn't a hidden message here. — CharlotteWebb 19:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    and lack of experience--Kwj2772 (論) 12:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. No. Tesi1700 18:14, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Oppose - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    nope, good user, has better things (and more important things) to do--Not politically correct 23:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters. --Meno25 23:35, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oppose --Valid 2:26 AM, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
    Please log in to vote. Daniel (talk) 08:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Plus, User:Valid isn't eligible to vote anyways, if you are indeed them. Daniel (talk) 08:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. oppose To "assume good faith", forgets to let people know what they should know in order to make informed choices about this person's role on wiki or presence elsewhere. Sticky Parkin 03:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Oppose - per block of Proabivouac. Regardless of the correctness of the block, blocking a user during the steward elections as response to his/her votes in the steward elections while you yourself are a steward candidate is not appropriate. --B 14:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that P. did not vote in the election at all. He was blocked for harrassment on a steward confirmation page, by Kylu as she is a regular sysop on Metawiki. This has nothing at all to do with this election. Thanks. --Thogo (talk) 11:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, the action does have something to do with this election - it is an inappropriate action where he/she should have recused himself/herself and allowed another admin to take the action. I'm sure there is at least one meta admin who is not currently up for reconfirmation or seeking election. That sends up red flags. Even if you disagree and don't think it sends up red flags, I am entitled to my own opinion. Why are we whispering? --B 14:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Oppose - blocking voters during an election is bad policy and reflects badly on the blocker. -- Robster2001 23:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether Kylu is up for election or not has exactly nothing to do with whether it was a good or bad block. If one judges the block on its merits (as should be done), I think the conclusion is quite clear: the block is perfectly appropriate. Kylu is continuing her excellent work even while in the vulnerable position of being judged by the community & I applaud her bravery in doing the right thing even in times when it is difficult to do so. We need to have stewards with backbones.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 23:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Mike R 17:14, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Oppose: My experience of Kylu is that she is untrustworthy and acts as an instrument of others before checking her facts. On En-Wikipedia she blocked me "per IRC" and then refused to comment at the ensuing case, while watching others hurl abuse and lies [1], one of her chief supporters being a now banned user. I cannot trust this person. Giano II 16:50, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Kylu&oldid=26366943"