Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2010/votes/Avraham

< Stewards | elections 2010 | votes
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（简体）： 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（繁體）: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

Avraham (Avi)

edit

Avraham talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en, he-2
  • Personal info: I hold various privileges on the English Wikipedia that allow me to be very familiar and comfortable with the steward roles of checkuser, oversight, bot privileges, and renaming. While most of my contributions are on the English Wikipedia, I am also very active on the commons, where I am a sysop as well. I am an OTRS volunteer where I answer English and Hebrew tickets for EnWiki, HeWiki, and the Commons, and have some, albeit limited, experience in handling permission tickets on other projects such as the German and French Wikipedias. My other cross-wiki activities include adding free-use pictures to articles on various projects which lack them. I am on IRC regularly, and have helped the stewards with cross-wiki vandalism from the EnWiki perspective. I am also easily reached through e-mail, and will hopefully be able to respond quickly to the steward e-mail list. Thank you very much for your consideration.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, he-2
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich verfüge über verschiedene Rechte in der englischen Wikipedia und bin daher sehr vertraut mit den von Stewards auszufüllenden Rollen und Aufgaben bei Checkuser-, Oversighter-, Bot- und Umbenennungsanfragen. Neben der englischsprachigen Wikipedia, wo ich die meisten meiner Beiträge leiste, bin ich auf den Commons sehr aktiv und dort ebenfalls Administrator. Ich arbeite als Freiwilliger im OTRS mit und kümmere mich um die Beantwortung englischer und hebräischer Tickets für enwiki, hewiki sowie die Commons. Daneben habe ich etwas Erfahrung im Umgang mit Tickets in anderen Projekten, wie den deutsch- und französischsprachigen Wikipedia-Ausgaben. Meine anderen Cross-Wiki-Aktivitäten bestehen aus dem Hinzufügen frei verwendbarer Bilder in Artikel verschiedener Projekte. Ich bin regelmäßig im IRC und haben den Stewards beim Bekämpfen des Cross-Wiki-Vandalismus aus der en-Wiki-Perspektive geholfen. Ich bin auch einfach per E-Mail zu erreichen und bin hoffentlich in der Lage, schnell auf der Steward-Mailingliste zu reagieren. Vielen Dank für die Aufmerksamkeit.
Ελληνικά:
  • Γλώσσες: en, he-2
  • Πληροφορίες: Έχω διάφορα δικαιώματα στην Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια που μου επιτρέπουν να είμαι εξοικειωμένος και άνετος με τους ρόλους ενός steward checkuser, oversight, δικαιώματα bot και μετονομασία) Ενώ οι περισσότερες συνεισφορές μου είναι στην Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια, είναι πολύ ενεργός στα Commons, όπου είμαι επίσης διαχειριστής. Είμαι εθελοντής στο OTRS όπου απαντώ στα Αγγλικά και Εβραϊκά tickets για τα EnWiki, HeWiki, και τα Commons, ενώ έχω κάποια, ωστόσο περιορισμένη, εμπειρία στην διαχείριση ticket αδειών σε άλλα εγχειρήματα όπως η Γερμανική και η Γαλλική Βικιπαίδεια. Άλλες crosswiki δραστηριότητές μου περιλαμβάνουν προσθήκη ελεύθερων εικόνων σε άρθρα σε διάφορα εγχειρήματα που έχουν έλλειψη. Είμαι στο IRC τακτικά και βοηθάω τους Stewards με τον cross-wiki βανδαλισμό από την οπτική γωνία του EnWiki. Είμαι εύκολα προσβάσιμος με email, και θα μπορώ να απαντάω γρήγορα στη λίστα e-mail των Steward. Ευχαριστώ για το ενδιαφέρον σας.
español:
  • Idiomas: en, he-2
  • Información personal: Yo tengo varios privilegios en la Wikipedia en ingles que me permiten ser muy familiar y confortable con los roles de steward de checkuser, oversight, privilegios de bot y renombrado. Mientras la mayoría de mis contribuciones se encuentran en la Wikipedia en inglés, me encuentro muy activo en Commons, donde soy bibliotecario también. Soy un voluntario de OTRS donde respondo tickets en inglés y hebreo para EnWiki, HeWiki, y Commons, y tengo algo, pero limitada, experiencia en manejar tickets de permiso en otros proyectos como la Wikipedia alemana y francesa. Mis otras actividades cross-wiki incluyen la adición de imagenes de uso libre en artículos de varios proyectos que no las tienen. Estoy en IRC regularmente, y he ayudado a los stewards con vandalismo cross-wiki desde la perspetciva del EnWiki. Puedo ser alcanzado fácilmente por medio de e-mail, y con optimismo, podre responder rápidamente a la lista de e-mail de stewards. Muchas gracias por su consideración.
suomi:
  • Kielet: en, he-2
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Minulla on englanninkielisessä Wikipediassa monia oikeuksia, joiden ansiosta ylivalvojan roolit osoitepaljastajana, häivyttäjänä, bottioikeuksien myöntäjänä ja nimeämisten suorittajana olisivat minulle hyvin tuttuja ja kotoisia. Vaikka suurin osa muokkauksistani kohdistuu englanninkieliseen Wikipediaan, olen hyvin aktiivinen myös Commonsissa, jossa minulla on myös ylläpito-oikeudet. Olen OTRS-vapaaehtoinen ja vastaan englanninkielisiin ja hepreankielisiin viesteihin, jotka koskevat enwikiä, hewikiä ja Commonsia. Lisäksi minulla on jonkin verran, vaikkakin rajatusti, kokemusta muiden hankkeiden, kuten saksankielisen ja ranskankielisen Wikipedian, lupaviestien käsittelystä. Muihin wikienvälisiin aktiviteetteihini kuuluu vapailla käyttöoikeuksilla varustettujen kuvien lisääminen artikkeleihin eri hankkeissa, joista ne puuttuvat. Vietän säännöllisesti aikaa IRC:ssä ja olen auttanut ylivalvojia wikienvälisen vandalismin käsittelyssä tuomalla esille enwikin näkökulman. Minut on myös helppo tavoittaa sähköpostin kautta ja toivoakseni pystyisin vastaamaan nopeasti ylivalvojien sähköpostilistalle. Kiitoksia erittäin paljon mielenkiinnostanne.
français:
  • Langues : en, he-2
  • Renseignements personnels : J'ai divers privilèges sur la Wikipédia en anglais qui me permettent d'être très habitué et confortable avec les roles steward de checkuser, oversight, privilèges de bot et renommage. Tandis que mes contributions sont sur la Wikipédie en anglais, je suis aussi très actif sur commons, où je suis également sysop. Je suis volontaire OTRS où je répond aux tickets en anglais et en hébreu pour EnWiki, HeWiki et Commons, et ai quelque, bien que peu, expérience dans les les tickets de permissions sur d'autres projets comme les Wikipédias en allemand et en français. Mes autres activités inter-wiki comprennent l'ajout d'images libres de droits sur des articles de différents projets qui en manquent. Je suis sur IRC régulièrement, et ai aidé les stewards avec le vandalisme inter-wiki à partir de la perspective EnWiki. Je suis aussi facilement joignable par courriel, et serait heureusement capable de répondre rapidement à la liste de diffusion des stewards. Merci beaucoup pour votre considération.
עברית:
  • שפות: en, he-2
  • מידע אישי: אני מחזיק בהרשאות שונות בוויקיפדיה האנגלית המאפשרות לי להכיר ולהרגיש בנוח עם התפקידים של הדייל כמו בודק, מסתיר, הרשאות בוט, ושינויי שמות. בעוד שרוב תרומותי הן בוויקיפדיה האנגלית, אני פעיל מאוד גם בוויקישיתוף, שגם בו אני מפעיל מערכת. אני מתנדב ב־OTRS שבו אני עונה על פניות באנגלית ובעברית עבור ויקיפדיה האנגלית והעברית וויקישיתוף, ויש לי ניסיון, אם כי קצת מוגבל, בטיפול בבקשות בנושא הרשאות בפרויקטים אחרים, כגון ויקיפדיה הגרמנית והצרפתית. פעילויות כלל־מיזמיות אחרות שלי כוללות הוספת תמונות חופשיות לערכים בפרויקטים שונים אשר אין בהם תמונות. אני נמצא באופן קבוע ב־IRC, ואני עוזר לדיילים בענייני ונדליזם כלל־מיזמי מנקודת המבט של ויקיפדיה האנגלית. ניתן גם להגיע אליי בקלות באמצעות דוא"ל, ובתקווה אוכל להגיב במהירות לרשימת הדוא"ל של הדיילים. תודה רבה לכם על שיקול הדעת שלכם.
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en, he-2
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
italiano:
  • Lingue: en, he-2
  • Informazioni personali: Detengo vari privilegi sulla Wikipedia in lingua inglese che mi permettono di essere molto familiare e a mio agio con i ruoli di amministratore, checkuser, oversight, i privilegi di bot, e cambio di nome utente. Mentre la maggior parte dei miei contributi sono sulla Wikipedia inglese, sono molto attivo anche su Commons, dove sono un amministratore. Sono un volontario OTRS dove fornisco risposta alle code in lingua inglese ed ebraica per enwiki, HeWiki, e Commons, inoltre ho, seppur limitata, un'esperienza nella gestione dei ticket per i permessi su altri progetti quali la Wikipedia in lingua tedesca e in lingua francese. Ulteriori attività relative a più progetti, includono l'aggiunta di immagini con licenza libera a voci su vari progetti che ne sono prive. Sono reperibile su IRC regolarmente e ho aiutato gli steward per i vandalismi cross-wiki per il lato enwiki. Sono inoltre facilmente raggiungibile tramite e-mail e mi auguro di poter essere in grado di rispondere rapidamente alle richieste sulla mailing list degli steward. Molte grazie per la vostra considerazione.
日本語:
  • 言語: en, he-2
  • 候補者の情報: 私は英語版ウィキペディアで様々な権限を頂いており、チェックユーザー、版不可視化、ボットフラグ、利用者名変更といったスチュワードの役割には慣れており不安なくこなせます。活動の大部分は英語版ウィキペディアですが、コモンズでも活発に活動し管理者も務めています。私は OTRS ボランティアも務めており、英語版とヘブライ語版のウィキペディアおよびコモンズに関して英語とヘブライ語のチケットに応対しています。また、限られた経験ではありますが、他言語版（ドイツ語版やフランス語版等）ウィキペディアでの permission （自著持込時の使用許諾連絡）関連チケットに応対した経験もあります。これ以外に複数ウィキに関わる活動としては、様々なプロジェクトで、画像のない記事にフリー画像を追加しています。IRCでは常連であり、英語版ウィキペディアからの目線ではありますが、スチュワードの複数ウィキ荒らし対処を手伝ったりもしています。私にはEメールでも連絡がとりやすく、おそらくスチュワードのメーリングリストでも素早く応答できると思います。ご検討を頂き誠に有難うございます。
norsk:
  • Språk: en, he-2
  • Personlig informasjon: Jeg har en rekke privilegier på engelsk Wikipedia som gjør at jeg er svært kjent og komfortabel med forvalterrollene checkuser, oversight, robot-privilegier og omdøping. Selv om de fleste av mine bidrag er på engelsk Wikipedia, er jeg også meget aktiv på Commons, hvor jeg også er administrator. Jeg er OTRS-frivillig hvor jeg besvarer engelske og hebraiske e-post for EnWiki, HeWiki og Commons, og jeg har noe, om enn begrenset, erfaring med behandling av tillatelses for andre prosjekter slik som tysk og fransk Wikipedia. Andre aktiviteter på tvers av wikier er blant annet å legge til frie bilder til artikler på prosjekter som mangler dem. Jeg er vanligvis på IRC, og har hjulpet forvaltere med cross-wiki-vandalisme fra et EnWiki-perspektiv. Jeg kan også lett nåes gjennom e-post, og vil forhåpentlig kunne svare raskt på forvalternes e-postliste. Mange takk for din vurdering.
português:
  • Línguas: en, he-2
  • Informações pessoais: Eu detenho vários privilégios na Wikipédia inglesa que me permitem conhecer e estar bastante confortável com as ferramentas de CheckUser, supervisão, privilégios de robôs e renomeação que um Steward possui. Apesar de a maioria das minhas contribuições terem sido na Wikipédia inglesa, também sou muito ativo no Commons, onde também sou um sysop. Sou um voluntário no OTRS, onde respondo a pedidos de suporte em inglês e hebraico para a EnWiki, para a HeWiki e para o Commons, e tenho alguma experiência, se bem que limitada, em lidar com permissões noutros projetos, como nas Wikipédias alemã e francesa. As minhas outras atividades cross-wiki involvem adicionar imagens free-use a artigos que as precisem, em vários projetos. Estou no IRC regularmente e já ajudei os Stewards no vadalismo cross-wiki na EnWiki. Também sou facilmente contactável via email, e irei, espero, ser capaz de responder rapidamente à lista de email dos Stewards. Muito obrigado pela sua consideração.
русский:
  • Языки: en, he-2
  • Личная информация: У меня есть ряд привилегий в enwiki, которые позволяют мне быть на короткой ноге с такими знакомыми ролями стюарда, как чекюзер, ревизор, выдающий права бота, и с вопросами переименований. Хотя большая часть моих правок сделана в англоязычном разделе Википедии, я также весьма активен на Викискладе, где являюсь администратором. Я OTRS-волонтёр, отвечаю на английском и иврите на запросы по EnWiki, HeWiki и Викискладу, и имею также несколько ограниченный опыт решения запросов по другим проектам, таким, как разделы Википедии на немецком и французском языках. Прочая моя кросс-вики деятельность заключается в добавлении свободных иллюстраций в статьи разных проектов, где их не хватает. Я часто бываю на IRC, и помогаю стюардам бороться с кросс-вики вандализмом с точки зрения EnWiki. Я также легко доступен через электронную почту, и, надеюсь, буду быстро реагировать в рассылке для стюардов. Спасибо за внимание.
中文:
  • 可说语言: en, he-2
  • 个人资料: 我在英文維基百科中擁有許多權限，因此我對監管員在用戶核查、Oversight、機器人權限及重命名用戶等工作中扮演的角色較為熟悉。我主要對英文維基百科作出自己的貢獻，但此外也活躍於維基媒體共享資源，並在那裡擔任管理員。同時我還是OTRS志願者，主負責英文、希伯來語維基百科和commons的英文及希伯來語OTRS請求，並對處理德語、法語維百科等項目的請求也有有限的經驗。我其他跨wiki的活動包括向各個項目缺少圖片的條目中添加自由版權圖片。我通常使用IRC，並已通過IRC幫助監管員處理了與英文維基百科有關的一些跨wiki反破壞工作。通過電郵可以很方便的找到我，我也希望未來可以及時地回應監管員郵件列表中的事項。謝謝。
中文（简体）:
  • 可说语言: en, he-2
  • 个人资料: 我在英文维基百科中拥有许多权限，因此我对监管员在用户核查、Oversight、机器人权限及重命名用户等工作中扮演的角色较为熟悉。我主要对英文维基百科作出自己的贡献，但此外也活跃于维基媒体共享资源，并在那里担任管理员。同时我还是OTRS志愿者，主负责英文、希伯来语维基百科和commons的英文及希伯来语OTRS请求，并对处理德语、法语维百科等项目的请求也有有限的经验。我其他跨wiki的活动包括向各个项目缺少图片的条目中添加自由版权图片。我通常使用IRC，并已通过IRC帮助监管员处理了与英文维基百科有关的一些跨wiki反破坏工作。通过电邮可以很方便的找到我，我也希望未来可以及时地回应监管员邮件列表中的事项。谢谢。
中文（繁體）:
  • 可說語言: en, he-2
  • 個人資料: 我在英文維基百科中擁有許多權限，因此我對監管員在用戶核查、Oversight、機器人權限及重命名用戶等工作中扮演的角色較為熟悉。我主要對英文維基百科作出自己的貢獻，但此外也活躍於維基媒體共享資源，並在那裡擔任管理員。同時我還是OTRS志願者，主負責英文、希伯來語維基百科和commons的英文及希伯來語OTRS請求，並對處理德語、法語維百科等項目的請求也有有限的經驗。我其他跨wiki的活動包括向各個項目缺少圖片的條目中添加自由版權圖片。我通常使用IRC，並已通過IRC幫助監管員處理了與英文維基百科有關的一些跨wiki反破壞工作。通過電郵可以很方便的找到我，我也希望未來可以及時地回應監管員郵件列表中的事項。謝謝。

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#Avraham

  Yes

edit
  1. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Katerenka (d) 00:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -Barras talk 00:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Jan eissfeldt 00:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. JamieS93 00:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. trusted user, experienced, thanks for wanting to help, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Egmontaz♤ talk 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Obelix 00:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Closedmouth 00:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. –Ejs-80 01:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Ucucha 01:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Experienced user.--Shanel 01:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. RP459 01:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mr.Z-man 01:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Willking1979 01:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Jivee Blau 01:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. As last time. One of this year's best candidates, IMHO. ++Lar: t/c 01:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Tetraedycal 01:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. OlEnglish 01:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. —§ stay (sic)! 01:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Shirik 01:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. December21st2012Freak Talk to me at ≈ 02:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Avraham has good knowledge of tools. —Innv {ru-ws} 02:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  27. Outstanding as a crat, which is not easy. Dank 02:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Quite levelheaded, and has good experience with both technical and social aspects of roles similar to steward.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Definitely.  fetchcomms☛ 02:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are inelligible. Pmlineditor ∞ 13:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Octahedron80 03:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  30. yes!--Nick1915 - all you want 03:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Patar knightchat/contributions 03:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 03:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Themfromspace 03:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  34.   Support [[♠]] 04:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      Support Based on this user's activities+previous candidacy, I vote in favor Rab777hp 04:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are inelligible. Pmlineditor ∞ 15:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --auburnpilot talk 04:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Sandahl 04:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Very experienced. Surely yes. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes Chefallen 04:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are ineligible to vote --Egmontaz♤ talk 08:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  38.   Support --MisterWiki 04:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -MBK004 05:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Jayjg 05:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  41.   Support, of course. Mondalor 05:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  42. —Dark talk 05:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Trusted, knows how to use the tools. Pmlineditor ∞ 06:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  44. --アルトクール(Home in JAWP) 07:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Christian Giersing 07:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  46. MoiraMoira 08:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Nifky? 08:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Jafeluv 08:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  49. תומר א. 08:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Tiptoety talk 08:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Magister 09:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Sure --Herby talk thyme 09:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Vyk 09:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Galandil 09:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --WizardOfOz talk 10:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Treublatt 10:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    cassius1213 10:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Damzow 10:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Kimchi.sg 10:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  59. NickK 11:40, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  60. vvvt 11:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  61. SoWhy 11:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Ovedc 12:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Erwin 12:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Kjetil_r 13:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  65. DS-fax 13:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  66. ChristianH 13:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Is a sysop, bureaucrat, checkuser and oversight at enwiki. -- Tofra Talk contributions 14:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  68. PeterSymonds 14:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  69. AGK 15:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Albertus Aditya 15:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Approach as local cu/os impeccable; attitude right; trusted. FT2 (Talk | email) 15:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    --Rīdzinieks 15:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    sorry you are ineligible to vote. --Egmontaz♤ talk 08:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Cenarium (Talk) 16:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Ottava Rima 16:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  74. 1ForTheMoney 16:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Harald Krichel 17:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  76. PhilKnight 17:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Mezelf14 17:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  78. A rather good candidate from my point of vue. VonTasha 18:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  79. It's time we have a steward who knows Hebrew. Dolev 18:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  80. I am not satisfied with his answer to Sukida.4, but I have no other objections. Kv75 18:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  81. FRANZ LISZT 18:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Ryan Postlethwaite 18:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  83. A Stop at Willoughby 18:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  84. AniMate 19:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  85. יונה בנדלאק 19:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  86. חובבשירה 19:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Tide rolls 20:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  88. MBisanz talk 20:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  89. —MC10 (T•C•L•EM) 20:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  90. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 21:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  91. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Woudloper 22:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Jyothis 23:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --თოგო (D) 00:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  95. Proven himself and active enough. James (T C) 01:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Finn Rindahl 01:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  97. -Shizhao 02:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Icestorm815 • Talk 03:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Tim Song 05:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Highly trustworthy.--Caspian blue 07:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  101. --Saehrimnir 08:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  102. - Peripitus 09:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Miyagawa 09:29, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  104. Slark 09:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  105. --junafani 10:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  106. better than last year --FiliP ██ 11:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Woody 11:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Orderinchaos 12:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Straightforward yes on this one. A high-quality candidate. Cyril Washbrook 13:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Modernist 13:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  111. --Lucas Nunes 13:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  112.   Support Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 14:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  113.   Support without hesitation, seen Avi's CU work, and this is a logical extension. billinghurst sDrewth 14:33, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Evalowyn 15:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  115. -- lucasbfr talk 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  116. --Stefan64 16:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  117. --Rolf Obermaier 17:58, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Horologium (talk) 18:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  119. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 20:08, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Cirt (talk) 20:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  121. Pharaoh of the Wizards 21:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Razorflame 21:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  123. NellieBly 01:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Johnleemk 04:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Josephf 04:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are ineligible to vote, less than 50 edits from 1 Aug 2009 to 31 Jan 2010 --Egmontaℨ♤ 09:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Tony1 09:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  126. ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 13:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    --Farct 13:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry you are not eligible to vote. --Egmontaℨ♤ 17:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  127. --BarkingFish 14:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  128. - Bjoertvedt 18:27, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  129.   Support. Although I'm not too happy about his answer to Juliancolton's question, it's not enough of a reason for me to oppose this well-qualified candidate. JGHowes talk - 19:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  130. Höstblomma 19:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  131. support oscar 20:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  132.   Support. JGHowes has it, I think - not a great answer, but Avi's body of work overall more than compensates. Good luck, Ultraexactzz Talk 21:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Secret 21:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  134. --FollowTheMedia 22:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Ldorfman 01:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  136. BejinhanTalk 02:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Kameraad Pjotr 14:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  138. Pohta ce-am pohtit 18:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  139. An obvious choice for this role. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:48, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  140. RexxS 19:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  141. דוד 21:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Fred Bauder 21:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  143. {{en:CHU|note}} It has been a pleasure working with such a helpful and respectful user. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ + jh0367 ☯ ~hugs~ 22:49, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  144. Of course. --NSH001 09:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Fine to me. One of most active checkusers is a plus to the steward team I guess. --Aphaia 10:57, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Bodnotbod 19:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  147. Shii 19:27, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Szalakóta 20:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  149. // BL\\ 20:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Sandstein 21:11, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  151.   Support ~ Amory (u • t • c) 22:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  152. Tex0 08:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  153. — Lost(talk) 09:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  154. --Anatoliy (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  155. Noon 01:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Yes. --Millosh 12:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  157. Like last time, support. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  158.   Support Sphilbrick 20:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  159.   Support Dusti 00:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Have not seen any reason to doubt trustworthiness or good judgment in my experience with him. Seraphimblade 02:38, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  161. EdJohnston 02:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  162. --by Màñü飆¹5 (m†¹5™) 05:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  163.   Support Jonathunder 06:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  164.  Roger Davies talk 07:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  165. JoshuaZ 03:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  166. Will Beback 08:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  167. Collect 14:49, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Aviosis My name is Avi too!!
  169. Eytan6 14:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  170. Captain-tucker 14:53, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  171. Deror avi 10:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  172. Jujutacular 18:14, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Dhatfield 20:39, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Zyephyrus 00:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Eug 05:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  176. One of the most trusted editors on en-wiki, I wholeheartedly support Avi's candidacy. Valley2city‽ 06:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  177. Support: well-qualified candidate. --Alex F. 10:32, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  178. Easy call, no negatives. Trustworthy, experienced. Dank 21:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  179. --Chrkl 09:07, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  180. Decltype 09:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  181. looks like a nice guy. DarkoNeko 20:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Knows at least one language for which we don't have a steward yet, if Dolev is right. I find it particularly inappropriate to oppose any candidate in this election with the "job collector" argument. For someone who we want to be active in many different wikipedias, it is the best we can wish for if they enjoy collecting different ways to get involved here. SebastianHelm 21:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  183. Avraham is an outstanding contributor to en.wiki. Wikimedia will gain tremendously from his stewardship! Gidonb 21:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Vigorous action 01:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  185. Caltrop 01:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  186.   Support One of the best candidates. --Sulmues 15:56, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Romaine 17:53, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  188. --Connormah 00:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  189. --bienchido 23:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  190. Casliber 13:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  191. Excellent candidate. JzG 13:40, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  192. I've seen good stuff from Avi Polargeo 14:10, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  193.   Support Avi is a logical choice for the job. And like others, I am disturbed by the charge of "job collector"... it's an attempt to discourage those who can do a lot of jobs real well. Jusdafax 17:11, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Tinucherian 17:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Cenarium (Talk) 18:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  196. Yes. I have no issues with your commitment to the projects and the WMF. Thank you for offering to volunteer in such a public way. NonvocalScream 21:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  197. I would be happy to see you more often on irc --Mardetanha talk 14:31, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Lara 18:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  199. I hope you will be a good steward... LeinaD (t) 18:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Lolsimon 00:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  201. Prodego talk 01:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Malinaccier (talk) 02:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Бране Јовановић 06:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  204.   Support micki talk 09:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  205.   Support --VKokielov 13:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  206.   Support Ruslik 14:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Sceptre 15:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  208. Stifle 16:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Commons is getting to be in good shape. We need more.Botteville 20:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Ja, gjerne, with pleasure. --Geitost diskusjon 20:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Has consistently shown impressive reliability and sound judgement in my limited experience. . Dave souza 20:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  212. --Jusjih 23:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Jobcolector Marcus Cyron 11:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tenautomatix 11:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. actually I hate voting against people because they are "jobcollectors", but in this case I have to agree with Marcus Cyron totally. --MF-W 14:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Eddylandzaat 01:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Career wikipedian as pointed out above. Not voting for somebody who seeks even more power. Language skills are OK but not great.--Xania 01:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. lecks in neutrality/NPOV--Severino 04:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. MosinNagant 11:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gire 3pich2005 22:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't need more native en stewards, and I'm including myself in this statement Shii 07:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Sorry, my level of trust is just not high enough. --Apoc2400 22:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --SM 11:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Wikipedia is not a place for building a career. No confidence. JukoFF 11:44, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Qualified, but has too much power concentrated on Wikipedia already... Stevenmitchell 04:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Per above. ...Aurora... 13:03, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. -Atmoz 15:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. We don't need more trophy collectors. --JayHenry 21:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Why is it that anyone who happens to have more than a few responsibilities is a "trophy/hat/power collector"? –Juliancolton | Talk 23:30, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    For people who "just want to help" there are literally hundreds of deep backlogs that sit ignored. And yet people are falling over each other "just wanting to help" only when the jobs come with fancy trophies. You tell me why that is. --JayHenry 01:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Oppose per Marcus Cyron and Riffic. Bogorm 14:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Mzsabusayeed 14:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but you're not eligible to vote. Please see Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters for the criteria. --Erwin 15:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose Bolo1910 07:28, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Pretobras 22:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. May have been yes, but the statement "fail to see the relevance to the steward elections" from Julian's question leaves me thinking that more thought could have gone into the answer and that this person would perhaps not use global sysops to their full potential in aiding and assisting (by taking away many menial tasks from Stewards to allow them to concentrate on more worthy subjects) Chaosdruid 20:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree, but since a good portion of the candidates provided similar responses, I have a feeling my question may have not been clear enough. It shouldn't be held against Avi. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:25, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Julius1990 17:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. User:Juanjosemarin1 13:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. I've had good interactions with this user, and cannot really oppose, but I have a gut feeling of hat collecting and having an elitist view of the hierarchy. --Tryptofish 21:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Supported global sysops without evaluating the need or asking for evidence, which is not good stewardship. I'm not seeing significant improvement in the area which caused me to oppose last year; the burst of edits on non-English wikis after the last steward election and in the recent December/January doesn't convince me that your intention is to invest your time into these projects. I do appreciate that you have a lot of responsibilities on en.wp, and fulfill them well, so it is understandable that you haven't put significant time into non-English projects. John Vandenberg 22:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I did not feel the need to to pen my discussions with Mike Lifeguard, Birdy, and others which helped me determine whether or not to support GSs. My understanding was that we were involved in a straight-up vote. -- Avi 23:36, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Juwena 13:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
    You are not eligible to vote. Maedin\talk 17:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. no reasons to vote against, but he doesn't fully convince me--DoppioM (it:) 10:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Don't like some of the positions he has taken in discussions as an en 'crat. Ed (talk) 06:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. --Stepro 04:19, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Crat+CU+OS+Steward?[reply]
  9. Patio 11:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2010/votes/Avraham&oldid=24933366"