Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2010/votes/Fail

< Stewards | elections 2010 | votes
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（简体）： 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（繁體）: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

Fail (Justin Quintal)

edit

Fail talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: fr, en-5
  • Personal info: I'm Fail and i come from Montréal, Canada. I'm just here to except a massive fail in supports. If i get elected, i would make abusers fail by locking, making global vandal fail by a global block. I'd be a serious one. I'd be a bitch to anyone who tries to fail me if i'm a steward. I'd screw those who screw with Wikipedia.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: fr, en-5
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin Fail und ich komme aus Montreal, Kanada. Ich bin hier, weil der Support in vielen Dingen unzureichend ist. Wenn ich gewählt werde, möchte ich diejenigen, die diese Projekte missbrauchen, sperren, ebenso möchte ich global Vandalen jagen, indem ich sie global sperre. Ich möchte seriös sein. Ich werde jeden beißen, der versucht mich hereinzulegen wenn ich Steward bin (im Englischen: „I'd be a bitch to anyone who tries to fail me if i'm a steward.“).
Ελληνικά:
  • Γλώσσες: fr, en-5
  • Πληροφορίες: Είμαι ο Fail και είμαι από το Μόντρεαλ του Καναδά. Είμαι εδώ απλώς αναμένοντας τεράστια αποτυχία στην υποστήριξη. Αν εκλεγώ, οι καταχραστές θα αποτύχουν με κλείδωμα, οι καθολικοί βάνδαλοι θα αποτύχουν με καθολική φραγή. Θα είμαι σοβαρός. Θα φερθώ σαν σκύλα σε όποιον με απογοητεύσει αν είμαι steward. Θα γαμ... όσους γαμ... την Βικιπαίδεια.
español:
  • Idiomas: fr, en-5
  • Información personal: Yo soy Fail y vengo de Montréal, Canadá. Estoy aquí sólo para hacer una excepción a una masiva falla en apoyos. Si soy elegido, haría que los abusadores fallaran bloqueándolos, haciendo a los vándalos globales fallar con un bloqueo global. Sería un (steward) serio. Sería una bruja para cualquiera que trate de fallarme si soy un steward. Atornillaré a aquellos que atornillen Wikipedia.
suomi:
  • Kielet: fr, en-5
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Olen Fail ja tulen Montréalista, Kanadasta. Olen vain täällä odottamassa valtavaa epäonnistumista kannatusäänten suhteen. Jos minut valittaisiin, saisin väärinkäyttäjät epäonnistumaan lukitsemisen ja globaalin vandaalin epäonnistumaan globaalin eston avulla. Olisin totinen kaveri. Olisin inhottava kaikille, jotka yrittäisivät saada minut epäonnistumaan, jos olisin ylivalvoja. Panisin luun kurkkuun niille, jotka sotkevat Wikipediaa.
français:
  • Langues : fr, en-5
  • Renseignements personnels : Je suis Fail et je viens de Montréal (Canada). Je suis juste ici to except a massive fail in supports. Si je suis élu, je mettrai fin aux personnes qui abusent en les bloquant, mettrai les vandales globaux à néant avec un blocage global. Je suis sérieux. Je serai ferme/une garce (NdT:bitch) à qui essaye de m'embêter/me mettre en échec si je suis steward. Je ferai foirer ceux qui font foirer Wikipédia.
עברית:
  • שפות: fr, en-5
  • מידע אישי: אני פייל ואני גר במונטריאול, קנדה. אני כאן רק כדי לקבל מסיבי להיכשל תומך. אם אני להיבחר, אעשה למתעללים להיכשל על ידי נעילות, ואעשה אלמונים הגלובלי להיכשל על ידי חסימת גלובלית. אני אהיה אחד רציני. אני אהיה כאב בפני כל מי שניסה להכשיל אותי אם אני דייל. אהיה צרות לאלה שעושים צרות עם ויקיפדיה.
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: fr, en-5
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
日本語:
  • 言語: fr, en-5
  • 候補者の情報: カナダのモントリオールから参りました Fail と申します。皆さまのご支持のもと、駄目 (fail) の山を排除いたしたく、こちらに参上いたしました。選任頂いた暁には、荒らし等の不心得者はブロックにより、グローバル荒らしはグローバルブロックにより、駄目にして差し上げる所存です。斯くの如く真剣勝負です。私を駄目にしようと目論む輩の眼には、スチュワードになった私は忌まわしき犬畜生と映ることでしょう。ウィキペディアを潰そうとする輩は私が潰します。
русский:
  • Языки: fr, en-5
  • Личная информация: Я Fail, родом из Монреаля (Канада). Я здесь для того, чтобы исключить массовую нехватку поддержки. Если я буду избран, то нарушители потерпят провал из-за блокировок, а глобальные вандалы потерпят провал от глобальных блокировок. Я буду серьёзен. Если бы я стал стюардом, то я бы принял меры к тем, кто попытался меня провалить. Я доставлю проблему тем, кто будет мешать Википедии.

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#Fail

  Yes

edit
I don't want to make you fail :P --MisterWiki 05:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tu m'as l'air correct Cody escadron delta 06:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC) not eligible[reply]
  1. Vyk 09:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Galandil 09:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It's better to start off as a joke than to be all serious and end up as a joke anyway like has happened with so many in the past. Gets my vote for being different.--Xania 01:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes I belive in this guy - straight and honnest (?) Awayanoder 12:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry you are not eligible to vote --Egmontaℨ♤ 23:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. ... uh DarkoNeko 23:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Better than bloody annabel ToFonikoAgouri 18:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry you are not eligible to vote. Fontes 20:11, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Seems like a tough vandal-fighter. Limited experience but could learn on the job. Uncle Dick 09:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. Blurpeace 00:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. non serious voting page, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 00:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Just as he expected. :-) –Ejs-80 00:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Katerenka (d) 00:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Sorry, not trustworthy statement for a serious job --Egmontaz♤ talk 00:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Fail. -Barras talk 00:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Oppose, nomination statement and answers to questions do not inspire much confidence in ability to be a good steward. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Obelix 00:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mr.Z-man 00:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. --Closedmouth 01:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Willking1979 01:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. RP459 01:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Appears to be a trolling exercise rather than a serious candidacy. ++Lar: t/c 01:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Hey, let's all get naked and trash the world. —§ stay (sic)! 01:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. I realize you think this is funny, but the rest of us are trying to take such things seriously.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 02:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Oppose for fairly obvious reasons Shirik 02:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Octahedron80 03:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Fail nom :P  fetch comms ☛ 03:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you're ineligible--Nick1915 - all you want 14:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. -MBK004 05:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hosiryuhosi 05:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 06:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Stewardship isn't a joke... Pmlineditor ∞ 07:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Oppose - No. Tiptoety talk 08:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Moving to oppose per MisterWiki. And all of the above, and the fact that this user is so obviously trolling us and is unsuitable for this role. Jack Merridew 08:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --WizardOfOz talk 10:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --Treublatt 10:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Again, Fail. cassius1213 10:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  28. don't want to give informations. I don't know why I should vote positive. Marcus Cyron 11:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Oppose It´s a vote to elect new stewards, not a game Saloca 11:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Stewardship is a serious job, not a game — NickK 11:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  31. No serious statement. --Erwin 12:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Not a sysop in any of the Wikimedia wikis. -- Tofra Talk contributions 12:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  34. --MF-W 14:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35. For reasons too obvious to go into. 1ForTheMoney 16:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Harald Krichel 17:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Obv no Chaosdruid 17:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Not enough experience and seriousness. VonTasha 18:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  39. A Stop at Willoughby 19:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  40.   Oppose EPIC FAIL --MisterWiki 20:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Steward elections aren't a joke. Come on.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  42. I think this is how you want me to !vote... WereSpielChequers 20:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  43.   Oppose – I suggest this to be snow-closed as soon as possible. —MC10 (T•C•L•EM) 20:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Oppose - sees blocking as punishment Woudloper 23:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --თოგო (D) 00:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC) fail.[reply]
  46. --Lucas Nunes 01:01, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Epic fail! --Specious 01:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Miyagawa 09:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Not serious. --FiliP ██ 11:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Fruggo 14:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Oppose Sees all of this as a joke. The Thing That Should Not Be 18:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Oppositional support per nom I agree with TTTSNB. If you wanted epic failure you have the wrong user name. delirious & lost ☯ ~hugs~ + jh0367 ☯ ~hugs~ 22:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  53. NellieBly 02:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  54. I can has stewardship? Gamaliel 05:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Per above. Razorflame 07:07, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  56. nothing enticing or evident of a benefit in this candidature billinghurst sDrewth 11:38, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --SUL 17:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  58. oppose - oscar 21:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Troll. I hope he'll get an official warning as soon as possible. --FollowTheMedia 22:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --Griffinofwales 23:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Hell no. Glacier Wolf 01:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  62. seem to be very abusive so no. Corruptcopper 15:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Appears not to be serious. --Tryptofish 21:32, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Lacks experience on projects other than en.WP. John Vandenberg 22:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  65. not serious --XZise 09:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Sandstein 21:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  67. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  68. FRANZ LISZT 13:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  69.   Oppose Merdis 14:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Despite the lulz of the name,   Oppose due to lack of experience and seriousness. --Patar knightchat/contributions 04:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  71. Oppose, good for a laugh, but not for the serious responsibilities this role entails. Seraphimblade 02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  72.   Oppose It may not be deadly serious business - but neither is it a game. 01:21, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  73. Xwiki activity. ...Aurora... 13:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Ed (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  75. --Stepro 04:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC) never with this statement[reply]
  76. if this is serious, we don't need an authoritarian in this office. Chazz 19:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Decltype 07:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Caltrop 01:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Maturity issues. Sarah 03:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  80. LeinaD (t) 18:48, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Maturity issues don't begin to cover it. ;)  f o x  (formerly garden) 20:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Prodego talk 01:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Fail. Stifle 16:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Wrong tone, wrong name. We win.Botteville 20:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1. Neither support nor oppose :P —DerHexer (Talk) 00:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    per DENY. Jack Merridew 02:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Tpa2067 07:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Do not know enough about your experience to judge whether you would be a good or bad steward.--Coyote du 86 11:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Not eligible to vote, sorry. --Melos 11:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   « Click for your present as winrar of the election. For me, this is a neutral vote for making me smirk but not causing any need to vote yes or no. • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) wtf? • 17:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    : Can i use it?
  4. User:Juanjosemarin1 23:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2010/votes/Fail&oldid=24933432"