Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2010/votes/J.delanoy

< Stewards | elections 2010 | votes
Warning
English: The 2010 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.
Suomi: Vuoden 2010 ylivalvojien vaalit on loppu. Uusia ääniä ei hyväksytä enää.
العربية: انتخابات المضيفين لعام 2010 انتهت. لا أصوات أخرى سيتم قبولها.
Deutsch: Die Stewardwahlen 2010 sind beendet. Weitere Stimmen können nicht mehr berücksichtigt werden.
Español : Las elecciones a Steward del año 2010 han concluído. No se aceptan más votos.
فارسی: .رای‌گیری در مورد انتخابات ویکیبدهای جدید پایان یافته است.رای‌های جدید مورد قبول واقع نخواهد شد.
Français : Les élections de 2010 pour Steward se sont conclues. Aucun vote au-delà de cette date ne sera compté.
Gaeilge: Tá na toghcháin Maoir 2010 dúnta anois. Ní féidir aon vótaí eile a glacadh as an am seo amach.
Galego: Xa remataron as eleccións a steward do ano 2010. Non se aceptarán máis votos.
Alemannisch : D Stewardwahle 2010 sin umme. Du chasch nimmi abstimme.
עברית: בחירות הדיילים לשנת 2010 הסתיימו. הצבעות נוספות לא תתקבלנה.
Magyar: A választás lezárult, további szavazatokat nem fogadunk el.
Italiano: Le elezioni del 2010 a Steward sono terminate. Nessun voto ricevuto dopo questa data sarà preso in considerazione.
日本語： 2010年のスチュワード選挙は終わりました。今後の投票は受け付けられません。
Nederlands: De stewardsverkiezingen van 2010 zijn gesloten. U kunt niet meer stemmen.
Polski: Wybory stewardów w 2010 roku zakończyły się. Nowe głosy nie będą akceptowane.
Português : As eleições para Steward de 2010 estão encerradas. Nenhum voto lançado a partir desta data será computado.
Русский: Выборы стюардов — 2010 завершены. Дальнейшие голоса не будут приняты.
Svenska: 2010 års val av stewarder är avslutat. Ingen ytterligare röstning kommer att accepteras.
中文： 2010年监管员选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（简体）： 2010年监管員选举已经结束。逾期投票将会作废。
中文（繁體）: 2010年監管員選舉已經結束。逾期投票將會作廢。
Ελληνικά: Οι εκλογές επιτρόπων για το 2010 έχουν τελειώσει. Δεν γίνονται δεκτές άλλες ψήφοι.
Türkçe: 2010 kâhya seçimleri tamamlanmıştır. Daha fazla oy kabul edilmeyecektir.
Azərbaycanca: 2010 eşikağası seçkiləri tamamlanmışdır. Daha çox səs qəbul olunmaz.

J.delanoy

edit

J.delanoy talk · contribs · SULutil / stalktoy · globalcontribs · crosswiki-ness · confirm eligibility
translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: en, es-2
  • Personal info: I have been a Wikipedian since October 2006. My home wiki is the English Wikipedia, where I am an administrator and a checkuser. I am an administrator on Commons and Meta, and I am a global rollbacker. I also have access to the info-en and permissions queues as an OTRS volunteer.
    I believe that I would be a good steward because I already have experience in many areas that stewards deal with. I have extensive experience using the checkuser tool on my home project, and I watchlist most of the steward request pages here on Meta, so I think I have a good idea of how nearly all requests of that sort are handled. I monitor an IRC channel with bots reporting edits from many of the Wikimedia Foundation's less-frequented wikis, and I have made almost 4000 edits over the past year combating vandalism on these projects. As part of my work monitoring these wikis, I often request that stewards block/lock/globally block disruptive users.
    Thank you for your consideration! J.delanoygabsadds 04:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, es-2
  • Informationen zur Person: Zur Person: Ich bin seit Oktober 2006 ein Wikipedianer. Mein Heimatwiki ist die englischsprachige Wikipedia, in der ich Administrator und Checkuser bin. Zudem habe ich Adminrechte auf Commons und Meta sowie ein globales Rollbacker-Flag. Als Freiwilliger im Supportteam (OTRS) habe ich Zugriff auf die Info-en und Permissions.

    Ich glaube, dass ich ein guter Steward werden würde, weil ich bereits Erfahrungen in vielen relevanten Bereichen, wie mit dem CU-Tool und den Funktionsseiten hier auf Meta.wikimedia, und Projekten habe. Ich bin im IRC verfügbar und überwache in den internationalen IRC-Channels die Bot-gestützten Meldungen aus den kleineren von der Wikimedia Foundation betriebenen Wikis. In den vergangenen Jahren habe ich in diesen kleinen Sprachausgaben und Projekten über 4000 Edits im Kampf gegen Vandalismus gemacht und würde künftig gern auf die den Stewards vorbehaltenen Transwiki-Funktionen wie Global-Block zurückgreifen können um das noch effektiver tun zu können.

    Vielen Dank fürs lesen :)
Ελληνικά:
  • Γλώσσες: en, es-2
  • Πληροφορίες: Είμαι Βικιπαιδιστής από τον Οκτώβριο του 2006. Το κύριο wiki μου είναι η Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια, όπου είμαι διαχειριστής και checkuser. Είμαι διαχειριστής και στα Commons και στα Commons, ενώ είμαι και global rollbacker. Επίσης έχω πρόσβαση στο info-en και permissions queues ως εθελοντής στο OTRS.
    Πιστεύω ότι θα ήμουν καλός steward γιατί έχω ήδη εμπειρία σε πολλά πεδία της δουλειάς των steward. Έχω εκτεταμένη εμπειρία με το εργαλείο του checkuser στο κύριο εγχείρημά μου, και έχω στην λίστα παρακολούθησής μου τις περισσότερες σελίδες των αιτημάτων προς τους stewards εδώ στο Meta, έτσι πιστεύω ότι έχω μια καλή ιδέα στο πως διαχειρίζονται αυτού του είδους οι αιτήσεις. Παρακολουθώ ένα κανάλι στο IRC όπου αναφέρουν bot επεξεργασίες από τα λιγότερο συχνά wiki του Ιδρύματος Wikimedia, και έχω κάνει σχεδόν 4000 επεξεργασίες τα προηγούμενα χρόνια παλεύοντας τον βανδαλισμό σε αυτά τα εγχειρήματα. Ως μέρος της δουλειάς μου να παρακολουθώ αυτά τα wiki, συχνά ζητάω από τους steward να φράξουν/κλειδώσουν/φράξουν καθολικά κακόβουλους χρήστες.
    Ευχαριστώ για το ενδιαφέρον!
español:
  • Idiomas: en, es-2
  • Información personal: Soy un Wikipedista desde octubre de 2006. Mi wiki hogar es la Wikipedia en inglés, donde soy administrador y checkuser. Soy un administrador en Commons y Meta, y soy un reversor global. También tengo acceso a las colas de info-en y permissions como volutario de OTRS.
    Creo que sería un buen steward porque ya tengo experiencia en muchas de las areas que los stewards tratan. Tengo extensiva experiencia usando la herramienta checkuser en mi proyecto hogar, y sigo la mayoría de las páginas de pedidos de stewards aquí en Meta, por lo que tengo una buena idea de cómo todas las peticiones son clasificadas. Monitoreo un canal de IRC con bots reportando ediciones de muchos de los wikis menos frecuentados de la Fundación Wikimedia, y he hecho al menos 4000 ediciones el año pasado combatiendo vandalismo en esos proyectos. Como parte de mi trabajo monitoreando esos wikis, a menudo pido que los stewards bloqueen/baneen/globalmente bloqueen usuarios disruptivos.
    ¡Gracias por su consideración!
suomi:
  • Kielet: en, es-2
  • Henkilökohtaiset tiedot: Olen ollut wikipediaani lokakuusta 2006 lähtien. Kotiwikini on englanninkielinen Wikipedia ja olen siellä ylläpitäjä ja osoitepaljastaja. Olen ylläpitäjä Commonsissa ja Metassa ja minulla on globaalin palautustyökalun käyttöoikeus. Lisäksi OTRS-vapaaehtoisena minulla on pääsy info-en- ja lupaviestijonoihin.
    Uskon, että olisin hyvä ylivalvoja, sillä minulla on jo kokemusta monilta sellaisilta alueilta, joilla ylivalvojat toimivat. Minulla on laaja kokemus osoitepaljastimen käytöstä kotiwikissäni, ja tarkkailulistallani on suurin osa ylivalvojille kohdistetuille pyynnöille tarkoitetuista Metan sivuista. Näin ollen luulen, että minulla on hyvä tuntuma lähes kaikenlaisten pyyntöjen käsittelytapoihin. Valvon IRC-kanavaa, jolla botit raportoivat muokkauksista moniin Wikimedia Foundationin vähän vierailtuihin wikeihin, ja viimeisen vuoden aikana olen tehnyt lähes 4 000 muokkausta kyseisissä hankkeissa vandalismia torjuen. Osana näiden wikien valvomistyötäni pyydän usein ylivalvojilta häiriköivien käyttäjien estämistä/lukitsemista/globaalia estämistä.
    Kiitoksia mielenkiinnostanne!
français:
  • Langues : en, es-2
  • Renseignements personnels : Je suis Wikipédien depuis octobre 2006. Mon wiki principal est la Wikipédia en anglais, où je suis administrateur et checkuser. Je suis administrateur sur Commons et Meta, et je suis reverteur global. J'ai aussi accès aux files info-en et permissions en tant que volontaire OTRS.
    Je crois que je serai un bon steward car j'ai déjà de l'expérience dans de nombreux domaines auxquels les stewards sont confrontés. J'ai une expérience approfondie dans l'utilisation des outils de checkuser sur mon projet principal, et je surveille avec ma liste de suivi la plupart des pages de requêtes de stewards ici sur Meta, ainsi je pense que j'ai une bonne idée de comment presque toutes les requêtes de cette sorte sont traitées. Je surveille un canal IRC avec des bots qui rapportent les éditions de plusieurs des wikis les moins fréquentés de la Wikimedia Foundation, et j'ai fait presque 4000 éditions l'année passée en combattant le vandalisme sur ces projets. Comme partie de mon travail à surveiller ces wikis, je demande aussi souvent que les stewards bloquent/lock (NdT:?je connais pas..)/bloquent globalement les utilisateurs turbulent.
    Merci pour votre considération ! J.delanoygabsadds 04:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
עברית:
  • שפות: en, es-2
  • מידע אישי: הייתי על ויקיפדיה מאז אוקטובר 2006. פרויקט הבית שלי הוא ויקיפדיה האנגלית, ושם אני מפעיל מערכת ובודק. אני גם מפעיל נערכת בויקישיתוף ומטא, ויש לי זכות חזרה גלובלי. יש לי גם גישה לתורי info-en והרשאות כמתנדב OTRS. אני מאמין שאני יהיה דייל טוב, כי כבר יש לי ניסיון בתחומים רבים להתמודד עם הדיילים. יש לי ניסיון רב באמצעות כלי בודק על הפרויקט בית שלי, ואני משגיח ביותר דפי הבקשה הדייל כאן על מטא, אז אני חושב שיש לי רעיון טוב של איך כמעט כל הבקשות מהסוג הזה מטופלות. אני צג ערוץ בIRC עם בוטים דיווח עריכות של רבים מן הויקיים הקטנים ביותר של קרן ויקימדיה, ועשיתי כמעט ארבעת אלפים עריכות בשנה האחרונה נגד ונדליזם על הפרויקטים האלה. במסגרת העבודה שלי ניטור הויקיים האלה, אני מרבה לבקש כי הדיילים לחסום / לנעול / לחסום גלובלית המשתמשים המפריעים. תודה על שיקול שלכם!
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: en, es-2
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
italiano:
  • Lingue: en, es-2
  • Informazioni personali: Sono un wikipediano dal mese di ottobre 2006. La Wiki dove sono "di casa" è la Wikipedia in lingua inglese, dove sono amministratore e checkuser. Sono amministratore su Commons e Meta,sono inoltre un Rollbacker globale. Ho anche l'accesso alle code relative alle informazioni e ai permessi in lingua inglese come volontario OTRS.
    Ritengo di poter essere un buon Steward, dal momento che ho già avuto esperienze in molti settori che gli steward affrontano regolarmente. Ho una vasta esperienza di utilizzo dello strumento checkuser sulla mia home wiki, e ho in watchlist la maggior parte delle pagine di richiesta agli steward qui su Meta, quindi penso di avere un'idea di come quasi tutte le richieste di questo genere vengono gestite. Tengo sotto controllo il canale IRC dove un bot fornisce indicazioni sulle modifiche effettuate su molti dei progetti meno frequentati della Wikimedia Foundation, e ho fatto circa 4000 modifiche nel corso degli ultimi anni riguardanti la lotta contro atti di vandalismo su questi progetti. Come parte del mio lavoro di monitoraggio di questi progetti wiki, avanzo spesso verso gli steward richieste relative al blocco in locale o, nel caso di vandalismi particolarmente distruttivi, relative al blocco a livello globale.
    Grazie per la vostra considerazione!
日本語:
  • 言語: en, es-2
  • 候補者の情報: 2006年10月にウィキペディアンとなりました。私の本拠は英語版ウィキペディアで、管理者とチェックユーザ係を務めています。私はコモンズとメタでも管理者であり、また、グローバルロールバック係でもあります。また、 OTRS ボランティアも務めており、 info-en キューと permissions キューの権限を持っています。
    すでにスチュワードが扱う領域の大半で経験を積んでいますので、良いスチュワードになれると思います。チェックユーザーツールは本拠ウィキで豊富な使用経験を積んでいます。メタではスチュワードへの依頼ページのほとんどをウォッチリストに入れていますので、依頼のほぼ全種類について、どのように処理されるものかわかっているつもりです。財団のウィキ群のうち人通りの少なめなウィキ群での編集をボット群によって監視する IRC チャネルを私はいつも見ていまして、昨年は 4000 近くの荒らし編集を扱いました。それらのウィキを監視する活動の一環として、たびたびスチュワードさんたちにブロック（あるいはグローバルブロックやロック）を依頼しています。
    ご検討を頂き有難うございます。
русский:
  • Языки: en, es-2
  • Личная информация: Я википедист с октября 2006 года. Моим домашним проектом является Википедия на английском языке, где я являюсь администратором и чекюзером. Я администратор Викисклада и Меты, также я глобальный откатывающий. В рамках работы волонтёром в OTRS я имею права на очереди рассылки info-en и permissions.
    Я считаю, что я мог бы быть хорошим стюардом, поскольку у меня есть опыт во многих делах, которыми занимаются стюарды. Имею большой опыт использования инструментов чекюзера в моём домашнем проекте и я держу в списке наблюдения большинство страниц с запросами к стюардам на Мете, поэтому я думаю, у меня есть хорошее представление о том, как обрабатываются запросы подобного рода. Я просматриваю IRC-канал, где боты делают отчёты о правках во многих малых проектах Фонда Викимедиа и я сделал почти 4000 правок в прошлом году, борясь с вандализмом в этих проектах. В качестве части своей работы по мониторингу этих вики, я часто прошу стюардов блокировать / глобально блокировать участников-нарушителей.
    Благодарю за внимание!

Questions: See Stewards/elections 2010/Questions#J.delanoy

  Yes

edit
  1. Jon Harald Søby 00:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC) Excellent helper. Has to become a steward.[reply]
  3. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Definitely. Blurpeace 00:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Of course Laaknor 00:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. ec Microchip08 sewb 00:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support -- Soap 00:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Sounds good. Experience in combating interwiki vandalism is a sure benefit, of course. –Ejs-80 00:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. --Jan eissfeldt 00:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. If anyone's worthy of stewardness, it's J.delanoy. He has always stood out as a user who is willing to assist in cross-wiki maintenance, and has proven to have the clue needed for the job. X! 00:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Yes, certainly. JamieS93 00:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Egmontaz♤ talk 00:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Gribeco 00:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support --Taichi - (あ！) 00:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Obelix 00:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Mr.Z-man 00:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. fr33kman t - c 00:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Another great candidate. Has been doing the work of a steward without the tools for some time. Will be a great addition to the team.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Closedmouth 01:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Yes, please. --M/ 01:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Ucucha 01:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  23. M.nelson 01:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Strongest Possible Support Willking1979 01:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  25. RP459 01:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Jivee Blau 01:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  27. VMS Mosaic 01:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  28. No qualms. This candidate will do fine. ++Lar: t/c 01:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  29. OlEnglish 01:27, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Support, no problems. —Innv {ru-ws} 01:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  31.   Support Ottava Rima 01:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Support Go for it. Seb az86556 01:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  33.   Support trustworthy, useful user --Shirik 01:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Lots of relevant experience, and no history of drama.--Shanel 01:58, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  35.   Support —§ stay (sic)! 01:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  36.   Support Niteshift36 02:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Great candidate. -- Avi 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Committed, competent. Dank 02:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  39.   Support please!--Nick1915 - all you want 03:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Octahedron80 03:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Patar knightchat/contributions 03:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  42.   Support, has done a lot on IRC and inter-wiki. Samwb123 03:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      Support, very strongly.  fetchcomms☛ 03:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you're ineligible--Nick1915 - all you want 14:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Themfromspace 03:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support like crazy. [[♠]] 04:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --auburnpilot talk 04:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Sandahl 04:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  47.   Support Techman224Talk 04:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Most definitely   Support Alphos [bother me] 04:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  49.   Support Razimantv 04:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Of course. —Dark talk 04:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  51. -MBK004 05:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  52.   Support --MisterWiki 05:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Support--Mike Searson 05:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Jayjg 05:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  55.   Support — SpikeToronto 05:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --RoyFocker 06:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Yes, no doubt. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 06:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  58.   Support --Holder 06:31, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  59.   Support Absolutely... The Thing That Should Not Be 06:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  60. I don't know why steward candidates need to be article writers really. JD is a great choice for the bit. Pmlineditor ∞ 07:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  61.   Support I recognize that name -- as I do anti-vandal activities, I keep seeing his name, brokering peace agreements between arguing editors, reverting vandalism wholesale across multiple contents. He's involved, like, everywhere. ;) Banaticus
  62. MoiraMoira 07:17, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  63. WWGB 08:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Probably the most active CU at his home wiki. I trust him with the tools. --Bsadowski1 08:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Vandal fighting mingles with steward capability. Nifky? 08:16, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Absolutely. Jafeluv 08:20, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  67.   Support   Support   Support Kenrick95 08:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  68.   Support - A very good candidate. Tiptoety talk 08:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  69. rubin16 09:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Vyk 09:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Galandil 09:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Per Anonymus: extremly active vandal fighter and CU, it´s a good reason for me to make his work easier and let him do the same in crosswiki issues.--WizardOfOz talk 10:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  73.   Support --Piero Montesacro 10:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  74. --Treublatt 10:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    cassius1213 10:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  75. -jkb- 10:59, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  76. vvvt 11:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  77. While I understand AD's concerns below, I think stewards should come from all backgrounds, so a pure vandal-fighter can be a good steward even without other involvement. I certainly have little reason to doubt his judgment. Regards SoWhy 11:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  78. 25924 edits in a single project in a single month? We need that active stewards — NickK 12:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  79. iAlex 12:13, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  80. --Vituzzu 12:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --Melos 12:26, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Erwin 12:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Rastrojo (D•ES) 12:37, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Quaro75 12:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Of course. Icairns 12:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  86. PeterSymonds 13:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Sysop and checkuser at enwiki. -- Tofra Talk contributions 14:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  88. yes please --MF-W 14:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  89. --Notedgrant 14:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Rjd0060 14:48, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Henrykus 15:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    --Rīdzinieks 15:49, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    sorry you are ineligible to vote. --Egmontaz♤ talk 08:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Support; opposing arguments do not convince me at all. Positive interaction at other projects, competent user, no reason not to give out the steward bits. Tempodivalse [talk] 16:03, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Cenarium (Talk) 16:04, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Lara 16:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  95. One of the most highly qualified candidates standing this election. Definite support. NW (Talk) 16:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  96. No hesistation in voting for this candidate. 1ForTheMoney 16:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Harald Krichel 17:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Chick Bowen 17:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Bahamut0013 18:01, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Kv75 18:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  101. AniMate 18:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Very good candidate. Finn Rindahl 18:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  103. Ryan Postlethwaite 18:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  104. A very good candidate in my opinion. VonTasha 18:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  105. A Stop at Willoughby 18:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  106. It Is Me Here t / c 19:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Jrtayloriv 19:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  108. LonelyBeacon 20:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  109. One of the best Wikipedians we have. Opposes are extremely weak I feel.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 20:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Tide rolls 20:28, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  111.   Support --ra1n★ 20:29, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
  112. MBisanz talk 20:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  113.   Support – Have met this user before on Wikipedia and is very helpful. —MC10 (T•C•L•EM) 20:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  114. Good luck WereSpielChequers 20:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Support Ulric1313 21:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  116. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Yes. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 22:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  118.   Support - Woudloper 22:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Jyothis 23:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Looks good. JoshuaZ 00:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  121. --Lucas Nunes 00:47, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  122. --თოგო (D) 00:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Nakor 01:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Yes please. Leonard^Bloom 02:13, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  125. --Shizhao 02:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  126. — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 03:23, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Tim Song 05:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  128. Mezelf14 07:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  129. --Mercy 08:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  130. --Saehrimnir 08:35, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  131. --Peripitus 09:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Miyagawa 09:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  133. --junafani 10:28, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  134. One of the finest candidates. --FiliP ██ 11:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Support - All of my experiences with this user have been positive, and he has always seemed fair and trustworthy. Nutiketaiel 12:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  136. Modernist 13:41, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  137. Nsk92 14:14, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  138. --The Evil IP address 14:30, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  139. Fruggo 14:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  140. -- lucasbfr talk 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  141. --Stefan64 16:31, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  142. Polargeo 17:40, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  143. ✔ • Lirion (Λιριων, Лирион, ليريون) wtf? • 17:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  144. --Rolf Obermaier 17:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  145. Horologium (talk) 18:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  146. Geoff Who, me? 18:10, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  147. William Avery 19:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  148. Cirt (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  149. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  150. Razorflame 21:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  151. Pharaoh of the Wizards 21:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  152. --Otherlleft 22:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  153. Timmeh 22:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  154. NellieBly 02:25, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  155.   Support --Albert galiza 03:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  156. Tony1 10:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  157. easy. billinghurst sDrewth 11:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  158. ---- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) 13:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  159.   Support -- Bazj 14:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      Support--Farct 14:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry you are not eligible to vote. --Egmontaℨ♤ 17:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  160. Of course! FRANZ LISZT 14:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  161.   Support -- Knows how to disagree without being disagreeable. Works hard to improve the project(s). Knows how to act fast and when not to. A very strong yes.David in DC 14:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  162.   Support -- Have interacted with the user. Have literally seen him grow from an editor, vandalfighter to an admin and cu. Have seen his work on en.wiki. No doubts about support if he wants stewardship. Prashanthns 15:14, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  163. - Bjoertvedt 18:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC) - probably a good candidate.[reply]
  164.   Support, without any hesitation whatsoever. JGHowes talk - 18:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  165. Definitely the best of the available candidates. Neelix 19:42, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  166.   Support. Can't help it - J. delanoy is an excellent admin at enwiki, and would be an asset as a Steward. I'd like to see stronger language skills, but that's not a dealbreaker. Good luck! Ultraexactzz Talk 20:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  167. support - excellent candidate. oscar 21:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  168. Secret 21:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  169. --FollowTheMedia 22:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  170.   Support -- Scray 23:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  171. EEMIV 00:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  172. --Ciphers 01:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  173. Definitely yes BejinhanTalk 02:33, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  174. Absolutely, no reason not to. The Wordsmith 05:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  175. Yes. One of the most dedicated and experienced admins on the project. Materialscientist 10:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  176. User:Juanjosemarin1 12:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]
  177. Kameraad Pjotr 14:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  178.   Support. --Autrigón 16:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  179. Seems qualified for the job, even if foreign language skills are suboptimal. Pohta ce-am pohtit 17:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  180. RexxS 19:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  181. AroundTheGlobe 19:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  182. Strong support, seems like the ideal candidate for this role. --Tryptofish 21:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  183. looks promising, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 21:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  184. Majorly talk 22:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  185. --Ken-Z!   Talk 23:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  186. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  187. Shii 07:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  188. Bruno2wi 10:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  189. Bodnotbod 20:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  190.   Support Overwhelmingly supportive. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 23:06, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  191. --Flopy 08:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  192. Support -- MightyWarrior 13:07, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  193. Support J04n 13:34, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  194. Excellent candidate. --Specious 21:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  195. Support --Tckma 21:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  196. --Anatoliy (talk) 00:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  197. highly qualified and trusted user Beeblebrox 02:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  198. Noian 02:40, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  199. Support Diggers2004 03:44, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  200. Support From what I see extremely active on enwiki and very trusted. Frozen4322 05:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  201. --Nioger 07:19, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  202. Support appears to be a worthy candidate. Jezhotwells 22:59, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  203. Support. I've seen this user here and there, and he's always been doing good things when I see him. Bob the Wikipedian 01:28, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  204. Support — This user is worth every vote. Very sound judgment. He already has experience with CU and I believe OS, so he's well versed on a technical level. He is also dispositioned more towards administrative things, which means we should give him roles he's likely to be active in and is suited for. Master&Expert 07:14, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  205. Support per Banaticus. </AAAD>... haz (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  206. Yes, --MARKELLOS 11:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  207. Yes. --Millosh 13:06, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  208. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  209. Support - EdJohnston 02:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  210. Support - Examined his history of actions, trust as Steward. Stanistani 03:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  211. Support--Lemur12 05:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      Support2thuriel 05:58, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, but you are not eligible to vote. Wkr, Fontes 19:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  212.  Roger Davies talk 07:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  213.   Support Ruslik 09:24, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  214.   Support - --Zivax 09:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  215. Support. Valuable wikicitizen. Uncle Dick 17:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  216.   Support - I love this guy. Seriously. Message From Xenu 19:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  217.   Support - Diligent and trustworthy. NawlinWiki 21:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  218. ...Aurora... 13:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  219. Bob Burkhardt 17:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  220. Laser brain 20:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  221. Maximillion Pegasus 22:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  222.   Support I owe him this vote: he reverted vandalism from my friend's userpage :D... Just kidding: he fully deserves stewardship, or better, we all would take full advantage from his stewardship. - εΔω 22:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
  223. Renaissancee 02:44, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  224. — ξxplicit 03:37, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  225. Highly deserving Ed (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  226. Will Beback 08:59, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  227. --Gökhan 18:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  228.   Support Absolutely, my friend. Maxis ftw 02:38, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  229. Wknight94 02:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  230.   Support เห็นชอบ --Love Krittaya 15:27, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  231.   Support Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) 22:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  232. When I did RC patrol, I saw the name J.delanoy literally thousands of times. (humor follows) While I have some slight concern J.delanoy is actually a bot from a nearby galaxy, the community surely has complete faith in them. So shall I. Proofreader77 22:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  233. :)  --Lambiam 15:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  234. Support Cardamon 18:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  235. Glatisant 19:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  236. Thanks for taking out the trash. Dhatfield 20:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  237.   Support -- Yes, without reservations. -- Alexf 22:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  238.   Support nsaa 23:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  239. --Stepro 04:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC) absolutely[reply]
  240. As long as you know Steward involves more than just vandal fighting, you'll be fine with this job. OhanaUnitedTalk page 05:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  241.   Support A very responsible and mature candidate from my experience. – Jerry teps 13:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  242. Jehochman 13:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  243. Muro de Aguas 16:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  244. m:Mark W (Mwpnl) ¦ talk 18:43, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  245. Easy call. He's not just a vandal-fighter, as claimed by some of the opposition, he's a well-known, well-trusted and exceptionally active all-around Wikipedian. Dank 21:07, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  246. User:Juanjosemarin1 23:13, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  247. Decltype 07:39, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  248. Captain Jones 11:47, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  249. Caltrop 01:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  250. :) - Neutralhomer 06:08, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  251. Mdd 10:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  252.   Support per Dank--Sulmues 15:48, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  253. --Pontificalibus (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  254. JD's been a boon to en-wiki and all other wikis can benefit from his expertise. Valley2city‽ 07:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  255. Romaine 17:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  256. Logan Talk Contributions 20:59, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  257. Connormah 00:35, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  258.   Support A very valuable and trusted member of the Wikipedia community -- Marek.69 talk 01:06, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  259. User:Isaee100 --Isaee100 21:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  260.   Support Happy to be one of your 260 supporters (to date)... Jusdafax 06:50, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  261. Excellent candidate. JzG 13:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  262. Tinucherian 17:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  263. I do agree with concerns about users collecting too many hats and admitedly it did give me pause for a few minutes but ultimately I've been impressed with J Delanoy's contributions to Wikimedia and I think he'd be an excellent steward so am happy to support his candidacy. Sarah 03:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  264. Scray 03:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  265. I don't have a concern with the hattery, if you can do all the jobs well. Thank you for volunteering to operate here. NonvocalScream 05:40, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  266. Good candidate , would be a good steward --Mardetanha talk 14:35, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  267. Good luck! -- Optimus Pryme 15:14, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  268. Sure! I believe he will be a hardworking steward. LeinaD (t) 18:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  269. Lolsimon 00:31, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  270. Prodego talk 01:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  271. Malinaccier (talk) 02:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  272. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 02:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  273. Бране Јовановић 06:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  274.   Supportmicki talk 09:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  275.   Support seen him around doing good, appears sane. -- Gesslein 12:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  276.   Support --VKokielov 14:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  277. Support. I believe he is trustworthy. SlimVirgin (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  278. Sceptre 15:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  279. アルトクール(Home in JAWP) 17:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  280. Awersowy 19:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  281. Experienced. Good cop. Willing to work.Botteville 20:10, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  282. Trustworthy . . Dave souza 20:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  283. SandyGeorgia 22:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Dabomb87 23:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Indented as post-deadline. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. J.delanoy is an extremely active vandal-fighter and checkuser. That's all I have experienced of him, and it seems that it's mostly all he does. I like to see more in steward candidates. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 04:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    He's one of the three guys who daily (!) helped on #cvn-sw , #cvn-unifications and #wikimedia-stewards for months. Those actions are not logged for him on luxo's tool because they are the stewards which does them which he very often reports. He of course should be able to that on his own without begging others, imho. Kind regards, —DerHexer (Talk) 15:36, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Considering that is pretty much all the stewards do (vandal fight, checkuser, and oversight), what more would you have like to have seen? NW (Talk) 16:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    That's a dangerously shallow view of the steward role, as I explained to the candidate when he questioned me on IRC. It involves much more power and much more authority than its component user rights. (Even in terms of raw access, stewardship involves more than CU/OS and counter-vandalism, by the way. Bureaucratship is a major one, what with SRP and SRUC and all.) —Anonymous DissidentTalk 11:13, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, I am going to have to disagree with you there. Requests on SRP are made only after local consensus has been achieved (or at least no substantial objections, in the case of temporary adminship), and stewards will not honor requests in absence of this. The stewards do not judge these requests in the same way that a bureaucrat judges a Request for Adminship, and they are almost never called upon to determine consensus. If anything, (almost) the only part of the bureaucrat bit that stewards use at all is the rename bit, and that is the simplest of the bureaucrat tools. J.delanoygabsadds 07:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Tenautomatix 12:00, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Blanket 'NO' votes for all candidates as a form of protest against open balloting. Riffic 13:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. J.delanoy is competent and reliable. He does a tonne of work over on en.wiki. But he has too many hats and too much work at the moment; I couldn't vote to give him more. AGK 15:30, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Appears to be a job seeker in my opinion. Too many edits which suggests little else to do and that he's already part of the wikipedian establishment. Language skills fairly weak - need much more experience across other language wikis.--Xania 02:07, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Too many hats already. --Caspian blue 07:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    And that's a bad thing? IMHO, having that much trust in the community is a good thing. I would love to support a user dedicated to the project like that. If I'm the only person who thinks that, I'll shut up. :) Glacier Wolf 01:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    "To many hats" is not used for editors who can do multi-tasking pretty well and whose judgment are not questioned.--Caspian blue 17:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm well aware of that. When someone uses the "too many hats" rationale, they don't assume the person is doing this to show off, and I'm the kind of person inclined to give benefit of the doubt and assume he's doing it for a good purpose. In my dealings with J.delanoy, I haven't really see him showing off his flags or anything, so I felt inclined to question your oppose, mostly out of curiosity. Glacier Wolf 03:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Too many hats. Corruptcopper 15:08, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -Atmoz 15:38, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Per anondiss. --JayHenry 21:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  10. NO: too much jobs. --Alex F. 10:42, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
  11. Not enough languages Nicolas1981 12:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  12. NO Bolo1910 07:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Any particular reason for the oppose? Pmlineditor ∞ 07:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Lack of language skills, lack of experience contributing on other wikis, especially smaller wikis, and pushed for global sysops. John Vandenberg 00:13, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Pretobras 22:33, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit

I'll put my vote in neutral. J.delanoy certainly has some great contributions, and is a sysop on several projects, including Commons, EnWiki, and Meta, but I think stewards should become bureaucrats before they go for stewardship, to get some experience with adding and removing user groups. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:38, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, stewards don't do anything but check a box, enter a few characters in a text field, and press "submit". All decisions are made locally, and the stewards merely flip the switch. I think can handle that without much experience ;-) J.delanoygabsadds 21:55, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Or did you not mean solely wrt SRP? J.delanoygabsadds 22:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. I'm a dummy. I'll change my vote. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:34, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2010/votes/J.delanoy&oldid=24933443"