Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Wikimedia Italia
Information
editWhat group or community is this source coming from?
| name of group | Wikimedia Italia |
| virtual location (page-link) or physical location (city/state/country) | Napoli, Italia |
| Location type (e.g. local wiki, Facebook, in-person discussion, telephone conference) | In-person discussion (before the general assembly) |
| # of participants in this discussion (a rough count) | 23 |
Summary
editThe summary is a group of summary sentences and associated keywords that describe the relevant topic(s). Below is an example.
The first column (after the line number) should be a single sentence. The second column should be a comma-separated list of keywords about that sentence, and so on. Taken together, all the sentences should provide an accurate summary of what was discussed with the specific community.
| Line | Statement (summary sentence) | keywords |
| 1 | [Example 1: Sentence] Wikimedia stands for a purity of knowledge and facts, untainted by commercial interests or political agendas, and promotes a knowledge culture of balanced information and cited sources. | [Example 1: Keywords] independence, verifiability, facts matter |
| 2 | [Example 2: Sentence] We should explore new kinds of knowledge spaces, embracing innovation in order to survive and thrive in 2030. | [Example 2: Keywords] innovation, forms of knowledge |
Summary for the discussion:
| Line | Statement (summary sentence) | Keywords |
| 1 | We should work more on existing "hinges" between general public and specialised reviews/sources, to reduce obstacles to digital literacy | mediation, general public, specialised sources, digital literacy |
| 2 | We should challenge existing biases in the academic research fields, encouraging experts to continue to vary approaches and methodologies to include other points of view that may be of scientific interest. | systemic bias, academic research, NPOV, cultural differences |
| 3 | We should focus more on fostering a multi-lingual approach to open data and open knowledge, to lower the barrier between projects and ensure translation of knowledges | multi-linguism, open data, open knowledge, translation |
| 4 | “Wikify the world”: extending the participatory model of Wikipedia to the existing reality. | globalisation, growth |
| 5 | "Bread and data": form as much as possible the current generations, because in 2030 will be those who will be in command ;-) | growth, community building, participation, education |
| 6 | “Open by default”: the production of data and documents by public and private organizations, and by school and universities, will be open thanks to legal obligation. | copyright, open content |
| 7 | Creating a network of relationships with associations with same vision, to increase political pressure for the sharing of data and knowledge. | growth, diversity, community |
| 8 | Involving universities and scholastic centers to increase the quality of the content of the wiki projects. | quality of wikimedia projects |
| 9 | Making the GLAM a real gateway for knowledge sharing with the territory and with the citizenry. | GLAM, education, participation, social inclusion |
| 10 | Increasing integration of the wiki model and projects within the primary and secondary schools, developing the critical spirit. | education, participation |
| 11 | Challenge: Education institutions and public institution still mistrust towards Wikipedia | mistrust, skeptism, reliability |
| 12 | Challenge: Most people do not participate or participate passively to projects, without a pro-active attitude | passitivy, lack of engagement |
| 13 | Challenge: [People outside the movement] do not know the project and the movement | outreach, awareness |
| 14 | Challenge: Wikipedia suffers a problem of reputation | reputation, reliability |
| 15 | Challenge: there is conflict within the community on Wikipedia | conflict |
| 16 | We should strive to earn legitimacy from the institutions. | reputation, legitimacy, institutions |
| 17 | We should aim for partnerships with high-profile insitutions (e.g. ministry) | partnership, institution |
| 18 | We should swap the direction of the relationship between institution and Wikipedia (i.e. we should reach a situation where the istitution seeks Wikimedia as a partner and not the other way around) | insitution, partnership |
| 19 | We should work for healing the relation between the affiliates and the community on the projects | community, affiliates |
| 20 | We should collaborate with universities | partnership, universities |
If you need more lines, you can copy them from Strategy/Wikimedia movement/2017/Sources/Lines.
Detailed notes (Optional)
editIf you have detailed notes in addition to the summary, you may add them here. For example, the notes may come from an in-person discussion or workshop. If your discussion happened on a wiki or other online space, you do not need to copy the detailed notes here.
See commons:Category:2017 Wikimedia movement strategy - Wikimedia Italia - Cycle 1 for pictures.