Talk:ILIKEHIM and IDONTLIKEHIM

General

I don't think voting keep or delete based on how long a user has been established would be a very good idea. Undeath (talk) 03:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

There are times when some users have a "momentary lapse of judgement". That can be based on multiple issues, one of which has it's own userbox for it. (describing that the user sometimes makes strange edits due to a mental condition). Just a hint. Undeath (talk) 03:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:USERPAGE notes, "The Wikipedia community is generally tolerant and offers fairly wide latitude in applying these guidelines to regular participants. Particularly, community-building activities that are not strictly 'on topic' may be allowed, especially when initiated by committed Wikipedians with good edit histories." This is, perhaps, a classic example of a "descriptive" policy. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Interesting view

Interested view from Wikipedia:Uphill Battles: "In general, fighting against the majority, and those more widely respected than yourself, is a bad idea." I don't really agree with that; I'm going to change it. If you have something valid to say, then it shouldn't matter who or how many oppose you. After all, we don't vote on Wikipedia. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 16:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)