Talk:Wikibooks/Logo/Proposal/B

This talk page contains the archived discussions concerning Proposal B that may no longer apply to the current proposal. New discussion should be added directly to the proposal page itself. Thank you.

Other image options

These images did not receive a single positive comment in the latest round of comments as of 01:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC).

• 
  (r)
• 
  (r2)
• 
  (r4)
• 
  (r7)
• 
  (r8)
• 
  (r9)
• 
  (r10)
• 
  (r11)
• 
  (r12)
• 
  (r13)
• 
  (r14)
• 
  (r15)
• 
  (r16)
• 
  (r18)
• 
  (r19)
• 
  (r23)

Previous discussion

1. I like this[r].It's interesting and beatiful.Tosão 17:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
2. This [d] design is great, but I'm not a fan of the colours shown here. I believe there are other options in the archives. Scales reasonably well to small sizes. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
3. I love this [d] logo, and it's circular design, definitely one of my favourites. The colours would need looking at though I think. Reece (Talk) (Wikibooks) 22:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
4. Note that this [d] logo is, with color and minor changes, the same as (r), below. I think we can count these as basically being the same family of logo. --Whiteknight (meta) (Books) 22:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
5. I liked this [r] concept a lot, but these colours need to be more saturated. I think there are a bunch of variations for this one in the archives too. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 02:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
6. The idea is good, but the colours are IMHO bad. --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
7. I got something nice from the previous proposals. It doesn't scale very well :-( --Ramac 09:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
8. This basic "shape" for a log is what won the last logo discussion, although problems with the color scheme (the red-blue-green colors) caused it to be stalemated. I like this logo a lot still, although I'm not sure if these specific color combinations are the best. --Whiteknight (meta) (Books) 21:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
9. It's a bit too cartoony for my liking, and it might not be immediately clear for everyone that it's a book we're looking at here. I think this could be a lot better if it was remade with sharper lines, maybe it could also be more figurative, like it's a book in front of the sun? Husky 20:59, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
10. Great proposals! However, the colours aren't very good in in [d] and [r1] and they're okay in [r2]. The page turning in [d] really pushes thats it's a book, which I like. I'll assume that there will be the text from [r] on [d] if it is chosen. As for the favicon, [d] doesn't scale down very well. I wonder what it would look like scaled sown without the circle. I don't know what the other two would look like scales down as they have words underneath, currently. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
11. I don't really like the colors on these. ST47 20:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
12. I prefer version (d) but not its colors. I prefer the coloring of (r2) over the two others but I also think, we should find better ones. --Purodha Blissenbach 19:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
13. There are several color combinations for this logo available at Wikibooks/logo/archive-vote-5. --Whiteknight (meta) (Books) 23:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
14. Has that "Masonic" feel to it - should there be a compass in there too, perchance? (r2) if at all, but I'd prefer not. Webaware ^talk 01:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
15. For all versions a yes: really logo-like and with a recognizable book. Londenp 11:51, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
16. I like this design a lot. We can work on colors later. Νεοπτόλεμος 01:29, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
17. I like this design it looks similar to the wikimedia logo so it ties in well especially the white and green one. 82.42.238.108 20:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
18. I like r2 best. It's very logo-like. But IMO the colours should be changed. --OnkelDagobert 14:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
19. These are nice but unfinished. d is the way to show texture with shading in the book and also the corner page(nice!) but is missing the words under it. Still it's very good indeed and could be outstanding with some minor alterations. I also don't like the brown - but others may disagree. The others are missing both the texture and the corner page. So some modification is required here to take the good points of all and put them together, otherwise will under perform. [[User:SunCr--Afa86 17:32, 19 April 2008 (UTC)eator|SunCreator]] 13:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
20. I like those (think r2, r3?, r5?, r6? r9?, r11? and r16? have the best colors). I dont know about the page fliping, but they look more like books with the spine. - Jorge Morais 19:01, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
21. the blue one is a winner, and the grey one at the bottm too. they are clean, but not simple, they talk about themseves, without any captions.
22. dont like any of theseSaltysailor 21:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)