Talk:Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

Incubator:Wikinews projects

Hi, it seems like the Language Committee is not functioning properly, possibly due to understaffing or the majority of members being inactive and not engaging with the Incubator communities. It's possible that many of the members are not interested in smaller Wikimedia projects outside of Wikipedia. In light of this, I request that the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees create a separate committee for small wikis. Currently, according to the Language Proposal Policy and general guidelines, a project must demonstrate activity by having 3+ users active for 3+ months. Our Wikinews project (Requests for new languages/Wikinews Sylheti) has been active for 12+ months, but no action has been taken by Langcom. Please consider my proposal to create a separate committee for smaller wikis. -- ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 08:23, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

If the Language Committee is understaffed or has too many inactive members, why do you think a second committee will have enough active members? It would be more effective to simply encourage more users to join the existing committee. —Tacsipacsi (talk) 20:03, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Feedback on Language committee

Hi, I just want to give a feedback on Wikimedia Foundation Language committee (Langcom), based on our Incubator experience.

• My feedback: User:ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ/Feedback on LangCom

Thank you. --ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 22:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Feedback on Wikimedia Bangladesh

Feedback on Wikimedia Bangladesh, focusing on whether they are catering to all 50 languages, addressing knowledge gaps, and whether the dominant language communities (such as Bengali) are supporting or disrupting smaller language projects:

• My feedback: User:ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ/Feedback on Wikimedia Bangladesh

Thank you. --ꠢꠣꠍꠘ ꠞꠣꠎꠣ (talk) 09:43, 25 January 2025 (UTC)