Tech/Archives/2025

Infobox isn't attached with documentation

Please tell me why the Infobox isn't attached (not included inside) from the documentation. At the end of the page I added an example of an infobox, but something seems to be interfering. Murat Karibay (talk) 05:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Phabricator profile question

mw:Talk:Phabricator/Help JJP_Master (she/they) 14:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

aide

Bonjour je n'y arrive pas c'est la triste réalité: Toujours ce message : Certaines informations figurant dans cet article ou cette section devraient être mieux reliées aux sources mentionnées dans les sections « Bibliographie », « Sources » ou « Liens externes » (février 2023). Vous pouvez améliorer la vérifiabilité en associant ces informations à des références à l'aide d'appels de notes. Je cherche à metter à jour cet article et ajouter une publication Je suis conscient que cela puisse demander du temps. Je suis ouvert à une proposition de remunerer une telle aide pour https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ioan_Petrescu Merci PETRESI073767 (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Vous devriez poser votre question sur la Wikipédia française. Essayez cette page Wikipédia:Forum des nouveaux MarcGarver (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

共有データベースを使用した場合のSocialProfileについて

当方、マルチwiki運用をした上でユーザーだけは共有データベースを用いております。 https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Shared_database/ja

その上で SocialProfile (https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SocialProfile) を使いたいのですが、wiki ごとに DB が分かれており、その wiki の DB を参照してしまいます。 wiki DB の下には user_profile は存在していないので下記のようなエラーが発生しています。 これを sharedDB に設定した DB を参照して、`share.user_profile` とさせるにはどうしたらいいでしょうか？

PHP Deprecated: Caller from MediaWiki::restInPeace ignored an error originally raised from UserProfile::getProfile: [1146] Table 'contents.user_profile' doesn't exist in /var/www/html/h1g-app/src/includes/debug/MWDebug.php on line 381

119.242.150.186 05:50, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This venue is not for general MediaWiki support. See the notice at the top of the page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:44, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Geohack patch

I have a patch for Geohack that I'd like to get reviewed and merged, but I am not getting any replies from Magnus Manske. Does anyone how I can progress on getting my patch merged? --ysangkok (talk) 22:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

A map problem on Belarusian Wikipedia

Hello!

There's a problem with the coordinates of the dot on the map on this page: https://be.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%81%D1%96%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%96%D1%87%D1%8B

The coordinates of the town in WikiData and in the main template are set right, but the point is located wrong. The red dot location is too much south.

The problem is connected with these module: https://be.wikipedia.org/wiki/Модуль:Location_map, https://be.wikipedia.org/wiki/Модуль:Location_map/styles.css

How can I fix it? Hapanovicz Anton (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Scoring tool for Wikidata

Hello! I would like to request a scoring tool for Wikidata. I am part of a project that organizes editing contests on Wikipedia, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Commons, and we feel the need for a tool that simplifies the process of scoring contributions on Wikidata. In the Brazilian context, we have a similar initiative for Wikipedia called Wikiscore, but nothing comparable for Wikidata. Does anyone here know of a similar tool for Wikidata or would be interested in participating in its development? Vsdetoni (Projeto Mais+) (talk) 18:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User group without rights

At Wikidata:Project_chat#Should_we_certify_Wikidata_trainers?, we are currently discussing how best to ensure that those embarking on the task of introducing new users to the project are appropriately experienced. A proposal is to create a new user group, say "trainer", that is not necessarily associated with any user rights. This is related to the existing Event Organizer group, but differs in a significant way: The criteria for event organizer say that the user should either have experience of organizing an event or be a grant recipient. We want to turn this around and say that editors should have qualifying experience of normal editing before either organizing an event or being eligible to receive a grant. I see that there is some precedent for having specific user groups only used on one project, but there seems to be little precedent for user groups not associated with user rights. We want it to be easy to check that someone is qualified, for example by using the global accounts page. I anticipate that other projects may want to adopt a similar process, so this would allow users to be checked on multiple projects at once.

My question is, is this a reasonable approach, or would there be resistance to the idea of a user group not (necessarily) associated with any user rights? Bovlb (talk) 21:21, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Technically it is impossible to create a group without rights, but this is often worked around by giving some dummy right like read. For example the VRTS member global group and Founder local group on enwiki work in the same way. Personally this idea seems a bit odd to me, but if you get local consensus to do it the sysadmins will be wiling to oblige. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 00:31, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Just out of curiosity, what about this idea seems odd? Bovlb (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2025 (UTC)