Archives
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · 23 · 24 · 25
26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 · 35 · 36 · 37 · 38 · 39 · 40 · 41 · 42 · 43 · 44 · 45 · 46 · 47 · 48 · 49 · 50

Lint error fixes

edit

Hello, Minorax! Thank you for your lint error fixes on Bosnian and Serbo-Croatian Wiktionary templates. Bosnian templates were imported to the Serbo-Croatian project, so feel free to make edits there as well, if you already haven't. We are waiting for the Unused template log to update on bs.wiktionary, so that we can delete them eventually. Greetings, Aca (talk) 06:58, 26 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Talk:Global_IP_block_exemptions#Inactivity

edit

Would it be possible to move it to RFC for more attention? aqurs 🍧 15:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

I wouldn't mind but is it really need though? It's just adding an activity requirement and doesn't affect users in any way unless they're inactive. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 00:35, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
There might only have a small amount of users will notice that at the talk page, currently users commented there are 'active' in meta, the proposal might (probably) affect everyone with GIPBE. aqurs 🍧 07:57, 28 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
While I do agree with you that only a small amount of users will notice that. This will only affect users who are inactive for > 1 year, and if they're already inactive, I don't think there's any chance of them participating in this. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 29 April 2025 (UTC)Reply