User talk:Anthere/archive11

Utilisateur bloqué

Utilisateur bloqué Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Aller à : navigation, Rechercher Votre compte utilisateur ou votre adresse IP ont été bloqués par Céréales Killer pour la raison suivante : . Vous pouvez contacter Céréales Killer ou un des autres administrateurs pour en discuter. Vous pouvez aussi laisser un message sur votre page de discussion pour l'administrateur qui vous a bloqué. Veuillez noter que vous ne pouvez utiliser la fonction de courriel si vous n'avez pas enregistré une adresse de courriel valide dans vos préférences. Votre adresse IP est 82.216.21.218. Merci d'inclure cette adresse dans toutes vos requêtes.

Joueurs de rugby à XIII Je vois que tu crées des articles-coquilles vides à tour de bras. (Tu en es à la lettre B, as-tu l'intention de faire tout l'orthographe comme ça ?) Il me semble que tu aurais plutôt intérêt à les remplir avant d'aller plus loin : d'ici que des contributeurs suppressionnistes tombent là-dessus et mettent tout à la poubelle...

Tu pourrais aussi te créer un compte, ce qui serait sans doute plus pratique. Cordialement • Chaoborus 22 octobre 2006 à 15:47 (CEST)

---

Ma réponse à Chaoborus ce jour 22.10.2006
Joueurs internationaux de Rugby à XIII
Oui je vais créer un peu plus de 300 joueurs, selon une maquette simple et bien précise (comme vous le constatez); Ayant constaté de nombreuses répétitions de même mots et l'emploi de mots similaires pour la répétition d'un fait, j'ai passé trop de temps à remettre en forme le CV avec un texte court et précis pour plus de 40 joueurs. Quand j'aurai fini la création de la maquette par joueur, pour chacun d'eux avec des collégues nous continuerons le remplissage. A quoi cela sert il de créer plus de 300 joueurs avec 2 ou 3 lignes s'il faut passer ensuite 3 mois pour tout reformater afin d'avoir la même structure simple et concise de présentation ?? (j'agis comme dans mon boulot (maquette pour des centaines de faits répétitifs à structurer à l'identique) et, comme il m'a été dit de le faire sur Wikipedia: neutre, précis, concis, + conseillé: structuration identique.) jp, IP 82.216.21.218.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Joueur_fran%C3%A7ais_de_rugby_%C3%A0_XIII
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ang%C3%A9lo_Boldini&action=edit

PS: je ne suis pas un utilisateur d'AOL,
Par ailleurs quel intérêt ai je à détruire alors que je fais le rappel d'un sport qui a été interdit et volé par la révolution nationale (voilà quelques jours j'ai crée et donc contribué au point méconnu de son éducation sportive) du régime de vichy.
Par ailleurs comment fait on pour une semi protection des pages créées, à créer, puis des mises à jour ensuite.

Remerciements de m'aider et me débloquer, jp

Russian Copyright Law issues

What do you think about commons:Commons:Village pump#Russian Copyright Law issues concerning edits in Wikipedia made by Russian citizens? --Jaroslavleff 18:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

errrrr. I go mention that to Brad Patrick. Anthere

ah, generally, for such issues, the contact in the future should be Eloquence. Anthere

Rugby à XIII

Chére madame
j'en ma claque de vos administrateurs, Aucune interconnexion entre eux: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Sherbrooke#Roger_Arcalis
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Grondin#Rugby_.C3.A0_13
etc. etc.

jp, IP 82.216.21.218.

Cspurrier; Wikinews Bureaucrat; misusing Bureaucrat and Checkuser authority

It's impossible to RfDA him because he has hijacked the RfDA process on Wikinews with unilateral striking of RfDA's and striking of votes.

Cspurrier has systematically been pushing anglo-american pov on wikinews and systematically pushing away editors who do not share that pov.

Infractions;

1; Reinstating an RfDA against User:PVJ59 unilaterally (no consensus) after the nominator of the RfDA withdrew the RfDA.[1]

2; Misused Checkuser against Blueliner who was accused of no misbehavior and then struck out her vote based upon circumstantial checkuser evidence(same IP range).[2]

3; Falsely accused Tohstsalstuen of being a sockpuppet and struck out his vote.[3]

65.95.151.127 16:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I have no specific authority (nor wish to have) to judge bureaucrat abuse. You should see that with your community. With regards to checkuser abuse, can you be more specific in an email sent to checkuser-l ATTTT wikimedia.org. A dedicated team will take you in charge if appropriate. Thank you. Anthere 16:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

w:User:Cool Cat/Wikipedia Panel 2006

Mind writing a paragraph about what you are going to talk about on the panel? I need to submit a general outline by Monday. --Cat out 14:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Errr, I am not aware I officially agreed to be on the panel. I had issues in the past which make me request that an official invitation is sent by email at least. With specifications. Also, given the time it takes me, I need to ensure this will really be a positive move to go there 3-4 days. I am sorry about that. But still digesting badly a couple of desillusions :-) Anthere

Sorry about that, I interpreted that you would be on the panel provided I get a sponsor for your travel and etc. At the moment the sponsor thing isnt clear yet since the sponsors will meet to discuss what kind of a budget that will be needed. No one participating in the entier conferance has any kind of sponsors yet. I am however confident there wont be issues about sponsors. What else should I do aside from aranging the sponsors?

I am to submit a general outline of the panel by monday. This will be a general outline describing what the panel is to be about. This is the equavalent of an application I believe. The paragraph I requested is to be about what you plan to talk about. It can be altered completely later on should you decide not to show up at all. However I do not have the slightes idea what topics you would cover. I basicaly need a general idea of the topics that you would cover assuming you would show up.

--Cat out 16:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

okay. Sustainability. Sustainability of an open and free project. Business strategy type.

AKA. How wikipedia survives financialy with the foundation? A little more detail please :) --Cat out 18:17, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Aka, explore the various business models we could follow, benefits and disadvantages of each model. Current situation and trends. Anthere

spamid.servebeer.com

Bonjour
, En Ido je met une réponse à un autre administrateur et elle est bloquée par cette page sans aucune explication précise. En plus elle ne charge pas. Cordialement. 216.86.113.16 21:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

je ne suis pas sure de comprendre quel est le probleme. Le mieux est de demander a Brion (bvibber AT wikimedia.org). Je présume que spamid.servebeer.com est sur notre liste noire ? Anthere 20:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Rugby à XIII ou Rugby

Madame, je m'excuse de vous importuner mais j'en toujours et plus que ma claque
- d'un contributeur qui se prend pour un Grand Chef ou Super Chef auto proclamé: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:ScArf (mes réponses qui ne lui plaisent pas, il les supprime => ainsi je suis une mer.de) : j'informe un de vos admin qui semble avoir purgé sa messagerie: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Sherbrooke à moins que je n'ai pas posté au bon endroit mais dans ma boîte http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:82.216.21.218

- Voici qu'un autre admin bien jeune s'en mêle: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Chaps_the_idol#R.C3.A9vocation
Meilleures salutations.

- encore un autre contributeur à la science infuse qui se mêle de modifier: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Utilisateur:Dingy#rugby , résultat un autre passe derrière et supprime une référence (+ l'explication que je lui donne): http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rugby_%C3%A0_XV&action=history

jp = IP 82.216.21.218

Réouverture de Wikiquote.

À la suite de notre conversation sur irc, je te donne la liste des liens meta pour la réouverture de wikiquote francophone.

Pour notre part, nous voulons appliquer au pied de la lettre et sans état d'âme les conditions suivantes :

1. Pour les droits de citation : Wikiquote FR/Droit de citation et protection des bases de données
2. Pour ajouts de contenus sur Wikiquote : Wikiquote FR/Comment ajouter du contenu sur Wikiquote

Pour la réouverture :

1. Pour la demande, le vote : Request for new languages
2. La demande d'ouverture :
   1. Request for permissions
   2. Demande faite sur Bugzilla.

Voilà pour les liens. Fais-en un bon usage.--Bertrand GRONDIN 13:44, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Inscrit au board agenda du 28-29 novembre Anthere 11:16, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Moderator requests help

hi, I'm one of the three moderators on the breton language wikipedia (you can reach me here[4] or via e-mail: jstefanlari@yahoo.com) and we've got a bit of a problem at the moment. I'm sorry to bother you but I'm not really sure who else to turn to - we have no stewards on our language. I highly suspect that one of the users who has recently been actively trolling is the holder of two accounts. This in itself is not a problem, what is a problem is the fact that both account holders have now taken part in a vote and, given the small number of active wikipedians active on the project, this could actually tip the balance of the result. The actual result itself is unimportant, however, it would not be fair for one person to vote more than once. so my question is:

is there anyway for a moderator to be able to compare the IP's for separate user accounts?.

I would really appreciate a swift reply, because the trolling situation is really getting out of hand and if I could demonstate ill practice in voting I could safely put a stop to the trolling by blocking both user accounts.

Thank you for your time (I can read French, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Catalan and, of course, Breton)--Neal (Breton wiki moderator)

I answered by email. Did you get it ? Anthere

Request to Stewards

I've posted a Request that is specifically addressed to Stewards, since it appears to be a delicate matter. Please review it and express your opinion. Thank you, M/ M/ 22:21, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I put a suggestion today Anthere 16:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

About Image:Wikimedia helsingin sanomat 2006-10-30.jpg

Hello Anthere. I'm going to answer you this: (no idea what is written in the article itself, though Cimon mentionned there are a couple of oddities, such as "Wikipedia edition will be only open with user who have given their real name". Really ?)

The article does not say that users have to give their real name. The title is in English "Wikipedia takes the new course" and short summary means "When Wikipedia Foundation has collected all information it wants to share it for whole world". I do not find there any mistake or piece of wrong information, but I can't be sure. The view in right bottom corner says that "Wikipedia has a huge responsibility" and it speaks about neutrality and independence of Wikipedia. The last one sentence means "How long can the foundation keep independent?"

If you want more translating about this, I may do it. Just ask some section or something and I'll translate it. I thought about translating the whole story - if I stand and have time, maybe. -- mzlla 22:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

If you have time, great. But the most important thing is to know there are no big mistakes in it. It is so frequent there are mistakes and then, it sometimes upset people. I am glad that at least you see nothing shocking :-) I wonder where Cimon read that... he mentionned the real name issue on irc, and I really understood it came from the article... Anthere

I translated it in English. You can read that from the image page. -- mzlla 13:03, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

They baned 10 users on serbian viki for voting against administrator

On Serbian vikipedia last night they blocked on 1 year 8 users like me for voting against administrator. http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%BE:Ipblocklist

After one voting for administrators rights in Serbian vikipedia http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%B5%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B0:%D0%97%D0%B0%D1%85%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B8_%D0%B7%D0%B0_%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%9A%D0%B5/%D0%9C%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D1%88 all users that voted are checked by checkuser and they are normal users like me. We are guilty because we voted against new administrator. Therefore we are blocked. To all of us just 40 minutes after voting they said that we obstruct project and that we are blocked for 1 year. Here is list of blocking last night at 4:09. End of voting was at 3:31 They blocked following users on 1 year , that voted aginst new administrator:

• Hajduci
• Sokolac
• РадованК
• Капетановић
• KordaDane
• Djuranovic
• Sunčica

Look This user Solinda was blocked on 1 year although had not contributions for last 43 days. http://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B1%D0%BD%D0%BE:Contributions/Solinda

And User Lindon was also blocked, because he tried to vote, but his number of edits was small.

What is worse they are explained that I am blocked because of continuation of obstruction of project. But that is first message that I obstructed project. I never done any obstruction, except voting against administrator that said he will block new users for something very small. I had never done even something very small. I never being in quarell or edit war with anybody. --KordaDane 13:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

After discussions with serbian editors, I fear the whole event is slightly different from what you reported. Thanks. Anthere 17:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

It depends on who you trust more. The fact that you believe them 100% is discriminatory. --Paunović 19:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I dont know what they explained you. Look there existed 3 users that used proxy, but users that I mentioned above, there is no users that used proxy. I never was in any revert war or edit war and I never voted until that moment against Miloš since he proclaimed he will block all new users on the spot, that he suspects are obstructing Wikipedia. But I never obstructed Wikipedia on any way. And not only me. For example Sunčica also never was in revert wars and that was first her vote until now. They are lying you. Solinda was voting against one of administarators 50 dazs ago and had no reverts until now but they blocked him now, after 50 days of not being active. It is easy to check for example that part of story that they are lying. They are administrators but they think they can do anything, realy anything, since they suspect that all new users are one blocked former administrator. Sorry it was me. --KordaDane 02:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

The incident of Serbian wiki

Anthere, I noticed what happened on sr wiki, and would like to explain what actually happened. The users that were blocked all voted against giving Milos admin priviledges. Milos is one of the earliest people who got engaged in editing Wikipedia, and he has the respect of the majority of administrators for helping to bring this project together. However, over the years, Milos has started using his respect for... lets say, not so noble causes. This is why he couldn't pull off 80% of the vote, he got only 63%. He actually asked to get admin priviledges so that he can block all users that are against him. When he found out that he didn't win, he got a few of his supporter admins to block almost all of the users that voted against him. Now, if someone mentioned this on the w:sr:Википедија:Трг, their edits will be:

1. reverted
2. the users that left the message will be blocked indefinately
3. the w:sr:Википедија:Трг would be protected, so that only admins can edit it.

This is where I would request something to be done on this matter, because sr wiki has become a dictatorship of a few admins. Not to mention an racist environment (one user was blocked because he was not Serb, but Turkish). Some people have tried to discuss these issues on sr wiki, but they have all been blocked indefinately for "wasting the time of the admins". Of course, whenever something like this is reported on Meta, the admins appear here and start discrediting whoever put up the request for something to be done. Now, can you please do something about this, because if we don't act soon (and I'm afraid that it's already too late), Wikipedia will be run by about 15 administrators and 0 regular users. Wikipedia shouldn't be a dictatorship, should it? --Paunović 22:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

simple

Apparently, I am being held to much higher standards than many other administrators on other wikis. Would you remove the status of an admin on EN over one contentious block? Would you do so without even so much as contacting them? -- Netoholic @ 22:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Charte pour Wikiquote francophone

Bonjour Florence,

Selon tes souhaits, j'ai élaboré un projet de Charte que je soumets à ton approbation et, le cas échéant, à celle du Board. Le texte reprend intégralement les conditions édictées sur Meta pour la réouverture du projet.

J'ai ajouté quelques dispositions claires et précises.--Bertrand GRONDIN 16:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

j'enchaine... Anthere

au programme du board le 28-29 nov Anthere

Authentication procedure

I've read that Stewards have to go trough an authentication procedure by one of WMF officials. Which is the best way to do that? --M/ 22:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

to contact Brad or Danny (bpatrick AT wikimedia.org) Anthere

Steward application guidelines

Hello Anthere. Danny and I discussed the steward application process, and I drafted User:Pathoschild/Stewards/Application guidelines to explain it. All the information relevant to application on the election page, along with some more that Danny explained, is on that page. We can move it to Stewards/Application guidelines and simplify the election page, with the added benefit of reuseability (so we can link to it from future elections, for example). Danny approves, and suggested that I ask you what you think of it. Any thoughts? —[admin] Pathoschild 17:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Help!

A robot is destroying the breton wikipedia completely, and there is no administrator there to stop it! Could you help me to solve the problem: i.e. stop the robot? Thanks in advance! Benoni on the breton wikipedia.

possibly. But it could be very helpful to give the user:name of the robot, as well as an example of one of the destroying behavior. Meanwhile, there is little I can do. Anthere 07:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Pourquoi une nouvelle discussion pour Wikiquote francophone ?

Salut Anthere,

Je viens de remarquer cette page : Requests for new languages/Wikiquote French 2, avec une nouvelle discussion etc... Je ne comprends pas la démarche de Pathoschild alors que le problème sera abordé au board les 28-29 novembre prochain.

Pour ma part, je persiste dans ma demande :-)--Bertrand GRONDIN 15:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

vu sur irc. Je le présente au board de toute façon, et je vois comment avancer d'une façon plus générale avec le new lang subcom Anthere

Merci à toi. J'ai ajouté sept votes motivés qui ont été passé à la trappe. J'ai annoté la page à ce sujet.--Bertrand GRONDIN 08:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

De-sysop of German Admin mo:User:Pill on the Moldovan Wikipedia

Hello Paginazero, you desysoped another vandal on Moldovan Wikipedia here. Now, I would like you to desysop another one, who was not accepted by community and replaced Epure.

Facts:

- there is already an elected sysop on Mo.wp so we don’t need this German Admin (mo:User:Pill)

- mo:User:Pill must be de-sysopped for abuse of administrative privileges and employing eliminating methods

- nobody asked him to request temporary sysop rights, he’s not accepted by community

Removal of new vote poll

• Removal of valid vote procedure for a new Administrator and CheckUser

Blocks of innocent contributors

• Block of mo:User:Alec

• User:Pill blocked Alec even if the only contribution of Alec was a question to Pill The reson for block was “irrelevant comments on Wikipedia:Кандидаць” and if you really want to see what Alec asked him please see here

I don’t think Alec deserved to be blocked and certainly his comments were not irrelevant to the fact that this Admin abuses his administrative privileges

• Block of mo:User:Dromihete

• Votes of Dromihete are deleted and then he’s finally blocked

Please don’t forget that both mo:User:Alec and mo:User:Dromihete are speakers of Moldovan language which is not the case of mo:User:Pill who is German.

POV pushing by Pill

Here's a question: what does Pill think he's doing? Here, my opinion on Epure's suitability for bureaucratship and another comment were deleted for what reason exactly? Here, a comment by en:User:Dahn is similarly deleted. So what is this ultimately, a rigged poll, any opinion Pill does not like is simply deleted? Here, User:Alec is blocked for two weeks for supposed "irrelevant comments on Wikipedia:Кандидаць" - since when is that a criterion for blocking? Does anyone else think Pill is going too far - I propose a petition for de-sysopment. As far as I can see, Pill is following the shining example of his predecessors User:Node ue and User:Epure (likely both the same person); both can't say anything beyond a couple of phrases in Romanian/Moldovan and both were de-sysopped for abuse of administrative privileges and employing methods used in Soviet Moldova for getting their way. Let's watch now as Pill deletes this comment under some similar frivolous excuse - let's see how well he responds to criticism and complaints of what I consider legitimate grievances.

Pill’s removal of petition against him

• http://mo.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%8C&diff=next&oldid=14330

3 times I tried to tell him to stop his abuse of privileges

• First time
• Second time
• Third time

Conclusions:

Due to the fact that:

1. He does not speak the language and we can’t understand him

2. His abuse of administrative privileges

3. His bias

We request immediately de-sysop of this bias Administrator. Thank you.

Translation was made by mo:user:Vania tractoristul. Смирнов 07:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

There is no place for further engagement of Pill there. Pill must quit and leave or will ask again a petition against him. He removed it last time but now he will be under supervision of Stewards. I asked him to leave or else he will be de-sysoppped. You should de-sysop now, because we can't stand such injustice from Pill. He can't communicate with us since he doesn't speak the language. He is also bias and blocked innocent users. He was temporary granted with rights and he abused his privileges. Thank you.Смирнов 18:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Logo Wikiversité - Copyright fondation

Bonjour!

Comme tu le sais sans doute, la wikiversité a ouvert ses portes en francais.

J'ai ajouté le logo de celle en anglais sur notre version bien francophone, mais maintenant le copyright de la fondation me fait douter...Est-ce que j'ai besoin de l'autorisation de la fondation pour mettre l'image ? (l'image est à [5]).

Egalement, puis-je modifier l'image pour traduire wikiversity en wikiversité et, si oui, où dois-je la poster sur commons? Où dois-je l'annoncer? Je suppose que, si je le fais, je dois remettre le copyright de la fondation?

Merci bcp!

chtit_draco ^{talk page} 22:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

PS : merci de me répondre ici ;)

Name for Wikiversity - 「維基大學」

Bonjour, Anthere! The Zh: wikimedia community is considering the the various choices for the Chinese name for Wikiversity. Would there be any legal problem if we call zh:wikiversity 「維基大學」, which means 「wiki-university」? I asked Brad Partick and here is his reply. Thank you. ---Hillgentleman|User Talk 12:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Charte Wikiquote

Bonjour Anthere,

J'ai bien reçu ton message en question sur ma page de wikipédia. J'ai fait comme tu me l'as dit. La Charte se réfère au droit américain, point barre.

Une autre page explique le reste sur Wikiquote FR/Informations diverses.

En outre, j'aurai besoin des outils de sysops pour lancer le projet comme l'a demandé guillom pour l'ouverture de Wikiversity en français. On reste en contact pour le reste.

Salutation à toi.--Bertrand GRONDIN 15:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion

Hello Anthere. I've nominated several files for deletion, some of which you uploaded. If you'd like to comment, please see the nomination. Thanks. —{admin} Pathoschild 02:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Stewards/confirm

Hi Anthere,

I would be happy to get your opinion on this confirmation-qustion on Talk:Stewards/confirm

Thanks :-) Fantasy 容 14:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

mo.wiktionary

Salut Anthere,

Comme la Wikipédia en moldave vient d'être fermée, je me demandais s'il ne serait pas possible de fermer également le Wiktionnaire en moldave, l'autre projet Wikimédia dans cette langue. Ce wiki, qui a été ajouté sur la page Inactive wikis par Hégésippe voilà plus d'un an, n'a connu aucune réelle activité, excepté du spam et du vandalisme (voir les "modifications récentes"). Korg + ⁺ 16:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Cela apparait tout à fait raisonnable en effet. Anthere

La Charte de Wikiquote francophone est définitivement adoptée

Bonjour Anthere,

J'ai le plaisir de t'apprendre que la Charte Wikiquote francophone ainsi qu'un amendement ont été adoptés à l'unanimité des votants. Les modèles se sourçage (6 pour l'instant) ont été créés à cet effet et la barre d'outil permet l'insertion automatique des citations ainsi que des sources ad hoc. Toute citation insuffisamment sourcée fait l'objet d'une suppression systématique si son auteur ne veut pas se manifester. En effet, certains viennent sur le projet, pondent leur bouse et se sauvent aussi sec. Si tu veux jeter un œil sur le projet et nous faire part de tes observations...

En te remerciant vivement pour la réouverture du projet.--Bertrand GRONDIN 09:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Hoax sur les Wikinews catalan et espagnol

Tu risques d'en entendre parler par d'autres canaux, mais je te signale quand même ce truc, qui passe vraiment très mal dans la conjoncture actuelle de controverse sur le fundraising : fr:Wikipédia:Le Bistro/28 décembre 2006#Joli hoax sur la wikipedia catalane.

Mon impression personnelle est que, puisque deux admins sont impliqués dans cette très mauvaise farce (un sur WN-CA et un autre sur WN-ES), une réponse énergique de la fondation serait utile. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 19:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Image licensing

Hello Anthere. There is no license information for an image you contributed, DSCN1103.JPG copie. I've added a description and categorized it. One of the following license templates may be appropriate (in order of preference):

License status	Template
Public domain	{{PD}}
GNU Free Documentation License	{{GFDL}}
Copyright by the Foundation	{{CopyrightByWikimedia}}

Thanks. —{admin} Pathoschild 21:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I've tagged this as GFDL [6]. MatthewFenton 21:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

yup. Thank you Anthere

Thank you. Wikipédia-24h.jpeg also needs license information; I've added a description and category. —{admin} Pathoschild 22:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

In the news

Hi Anthere, today the main italian newspaper "Il Corriere della Sera" has a half page article about you, with a nice portrait by Jerome Bonnet. I don't know if you can get a copy of it tomorrow in France, but if you like I can try to find a scanner and send it to you. --Snowdog 17:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

• Thats amazing. Congrats Anthere! --La gloria è a dio 17:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

That's cool ! I do not even know who Jerome Bonnet is... I doubt I can find this one in my city and I checked, it is not on internet. Yeah, if you can scan it, that would be great :-) Anthere

A question

Dear, Anthere

Do you know where I can find the source files of Wikimedia projects? I need to see them. If you don't know, do you know who might know?

Thanks a lot. --Soroush83 12:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

tstarling AT wikimedia.org ?

WikiNews

It has been discussed a number of times whether Wikipedia's Current Events Portal should be merged into WikiNews or vis a v; with no consensus being reached.

Please can I bring to your attention that as it seems to me, nor WP's Current Events Portal or WikiNews are currently having the affect on the community they could/would if they collaborated. They both generate allot of interest but there is allot of waisted energy since they both have the same goal and are not collaborating at all. As it is right now, many at the Current Events Portal think WN is an unnecessary fork, while WN's editorial are oblivious to this and are sustaining their Wiki.

There are only two possibilities, 1 that in the "In the news" template on the WP homepage it could forward all headlines to WN news articles, or 2 that WikiNews articles be mirror formats of recent changes to WP articles. As it is right now WN truly is an unnecessary fork.

Congrats on your new post. I think this will be your first major challenge, as there is allot of energy on both sides. But they are both WMF projects and we need to see more wiki sisterhood, after all it is a "sister project". I propose for you to introduce this idea at the next board meeting and to the wider community so that the problem I am addressing is recognised and discussed fully. Thanks.

TownCrier 04:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)