The following are my thoughs on what should be discussed at the meeting: Things that haven't been sorted since the Sydney meet

  • How should those in charge of the organisation be selected? By ballot? Some other means?
  • How can we ensure the people aren't being drawn away from working on the projects?
  • Public Liability and defamation?
  • What benefits does membership provide?
  • How will AGMs be conducted?

Things in my mind

  • How should the management of the organisation be constructed?
  • Should membership be by fee or some other method?
  • How should the organisation itself be structured?
  • Where should we incorporate?
  • What does the foundation itself require from us?

Nathan Carter (Talk) 06:51, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See also

edit

See the summary and log 1 and log 2 for details of the two meetings.