Wikimedia Foundation/Annual Report/2010-11

This wiki version of the 2010-11 Wikimedia Foundation annual report is intended to support localization and the production of derivative versions of the report by anyone in the community. Images used in the report are posted as galleries or in-line images. Please share your localized versions by providing links in the corresponding pages, or on a similar page.

The full PDF versions of the report can be found on the WMF wiki, and are hosted as well on Commons. A high-resolution version is suitable for printing and reproduction, and a smaller, landscape oriented version is better-suited for on-screen viewing.

As indicated by the template, you are welcome to expand and reflect on the report in this format. Please add any comments below, with your user signature - or comment on any of the discussion pages.

Thanks for taking the time to read the report!

Proceed to the wiki-version of the 2010-11 Wikimedia Foundation Annual Report >

Translations

Translated summary versions of the report (which contain the introductory letter, financials, contributors, and other core information) can be found below. Click on thumbnails for PDFs, or follow the "first page / all pages" links to the wiki versions:

التقريرالسنويلمؤسسة ويكيميديا للعام2011–2010 ملخص first page / all pages	Jahresbericht 2010–2011 der Wikimedia Foundation - Zusammenfassung first page / all pages	Informe anual de la Fundación Wikimedia 2010–11 - resumen first page / all pages
Résumé du rapport annuel 2010–11 de la Fondation Wikimedia first page / all pages	ウィキメディア財団年次報告書 2010～2011 年度概要 first page / all pages	Relatório anual da Wikimedia Foundation 2010–11 - síntese first page / all pages
	Summary of the Wikimedia Foundation 2010-11 annual report first page / all pages

General comments

Please sign and date your comments. JayWalsh 23:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The talk is about WMF being a sum of projects with Wikipedia as the flagship. Yet one looks at the 2015 targets, the focus just seems to be solely for WP, the other projects don't seem to rate. I think that a WP target is fantastic, however, it would have been great to see targets which encompasses the other projects, that omission/oversight is disappointing, and indicates or means that these parts of the project will continue to struggle to get resources. billinghurst sDrewth 09:13, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These targets are reproduced from the 2010-15 strategic plan, and in my understanding only one of them (the 50 million articles) is Wikipedia-specific. If the other projects grew to attract a substantial portion of the unique visitors or active editors of Wikimedia projects, for example, this would count towards the first and fourth target. However this was not the status quo around the time these goals were formulated last year - in a collaborative community process, which I am not familiar enough with to be able to tell you for sure whether it was considered to include targets that are specifically about non-Wikipedia projects. Regards, Tbayer (WMF) 15:45, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]