Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate/ca

< Wikimedia Foundation elections | 2021
This page is a translated version of the page Wikimedia Foundation elections/2021/Apply to be a Candidate and the translation is 100% complete.
Other languages:

Les eleccions van acabar el 31 d'agost 2021. No s'acceptaran més vots.
Els resultats es van anunciar el 7 de setembre 2021. Deixeu qualsevol comentari que tingueu sobre les eleccions de 2021 a la pàgina d'anàlisi posterior de les eleccions.

Agraïm als candidats que s'han presentat com a candidats a la Junta Directiva. Els candidats han completat la plantilla per presentar-se com a candidats a les eleccions a la Junta Directiva del 2021. Aquí tens un exemple d’un formulari de sol·licitud completat.

Eleccions a la Junta de 2021
Portada
Candidats
Informació de la votació
Vot únic transferible
Resultats
Discussions
PMF
Preguntes per als candidats
Organització
Traducció
Documentació
This box: view · talk · edit

Les sol·licituds es va acceptar entre les 00:00h del 9 de juny de 2021 (UTC) i les 23:59h del 29 de juny de 2021 (UTC). Els candidats només van poder canviar la seva sol·licitud fins a 3 dies després de la presentació o fins al tancament del període de candidatura a les 23:59h del 29 de juny de 2021 (UTC). S'accepten correccions ortogràfiques o de traducció menors fora d'aquests moments. (Vegeu la nota sobre les correccions d'enviament.)

Hi ha recursos disponibles per donar suport als candidats durant les eleccions del 2021. No dubtis a posar-te en contacte amb els facilitadors de les eleccions a la Junta per obtenir més informació.

Preguntes de la comunitat per als candidats

Del 9 de juny al 29 de juny de 2021, els membres del moviment Wikimedia van enviar preguntes a través d'aquesta pàgina als candidats a la Junta Directiva. Els membres de la comunitat van poder plantejar les seves preguntes en qualsevol idioma.

A més d'enviar una pregunta, els membres de la comunitat van poder aprovar o comentar les preguntes enviades per altres persones.

El 30 de juny de 2021, el Comitè Electoral reunirà seleccionarà i editarà les preguntes de la llista i llavors presentarà aquesta llista breu de preguntes perquè els candidats les responguin a partir del 30 de juny.

Aquest mètode s'utilitza per fer aquest procés més accessible i manejable per als candidats, traductors, Comitè Electoral i votants. Demanem que la gent respecti el temps de tots els implicats i no utilitzi les pàgines de preguntes per enllaçar a altres pàgines amb més preguntes, ni que es posi en contacte amb els candidats a les seves pàgines de discussió o per correu electrònic. Gràcies per endavant pel vostre respecte i cortesia.

Candidats

No comenceu a respondre les preguntes abans que el Comitè Electoral hagi publicat una llista classificada el 2 de juliol de 2021.

Es recomana que les respostes a les preguntes no superin aproximadament els 1.600 caràcters per pregunta (sense comptar espais). No enllacis a cap altra pàgina que contingui una resposta ampliada, tot i que els enllaços rellevants que s'utilitzen amb finalitats descriptives estan bé. A causa del nombre d'electors i candidats, és necessari perquè aquestes pàgines siguin llegibles, informatives i, per tant, útils per als votants.

Preguntes enviades

Gràcies a tots els que heu presentat preguntes per als candidats. El període d'enviament de preguntes ja està tancat. La llista de preguntes que el Comitè Electoral ha seleccionat per respondre als candidats es pot veure a la pàgina de preguntes i respostes dels candidats.

  1. Què pensen els candidats sobre augmentar el nombre de voluntaris en els projectes de la Fundació Wikimedia i com fer-ho realitat?
  2. On vols veure personalment la Junta en relació amb altres entitats de l'univers wiki (comunitats, afiliats, etc.) en el futur (vegeu per exemple, Assegurar l'equitat en la presa de decisions)?
  3. Com es connectaran els candidats amb la comunitat un cop a la Junta Directiva?
  4. Explica les teves opinions sobre transparència i comunicació.
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Què penses de les comunitats emergents de Wikimedia?
  6. Per què creus que series un bon candidat per a la junta?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Hi ha alguna connexió entre els vostres interessos professionals o financers i la Junta? Si és així, descriviu com podeu assegurar-vos que això no interfereixi.
  8. Com ha de tractar la Fundació els projectes gestionats per fundacions que tenen una gran oposició a la wiki?
    1. Endorse. I believe this is, by far, the most serious issue the Foundation needs to resolve. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse in the strongest possible terms. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse absolutely, "on-Wiki oppositions" and/or "over-all community disagreement"... -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:53, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse strongly. An important and sensitive issue. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 14:42, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Creus que hi ha límits a l'abast de la Fundació Wikimedia i, en cas afirmatiu, quins són aquests límits?
  10. Com us imagineu que les wikis donin forma al futur d'Internet i com pot la Fundació Wikimedia donar suport a les comunitats wiki per fer realitat aquesta visió?
  11. Com podem implicar més experts (investigadors, acadèmics, professionals) al nostre moviment?
    1. Endorse but might add "while maintaining the ability of non-experts to contribute." Smallbones (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Quina és la vostra opinió sobre la reivindicació d'autonomia de les diferents comunitats de la Viquipèdia i els intents que Wikimedia reguli ara de manera centralitzada?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Quina és la vostra opinió sobre el canvi de marca de Wikimedia a Wikipedia, que està difuminant la diferència?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Suggest removing "which is blurring the difference" -- that part makes this a leading question. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse with ProcrastinatingReader's suggested modification. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Endorse this question in either format. -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Endorse – Ammarpad (talk) 08:27, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Endorse strongly. EpicPupper (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Creieu que l'estructura actual de regles i processos de la Viquipèdia impedeix els biaixos de forma efectiva? Com a líder de la comunitat, què creieu que, si és el cas, es podria fer per millorar la lluita contra els biaixos?
  15. Què en penseu del creixent interrogant que tenen els projectes de Wikimedia a nivell mundial i què en faríeu?
  16. Hi ha diversos moviments (sobretot, fundats per la comunitat d'experts) que tenen la mateixa visió exacta que nosaltres (difondre coneixement lliure a Internet). Però van decidir crear la seva pròpia plataforma (o utilitzar una altra plataforma) que no fos la Viquipèdia per assolir la seva visió. Quina opinió en teniu? Hem d'intentar "integrar-los" per unir-se a Wikimedia o simplement deixar que tinguin la seva pròpia independència.
  17. Què opineu sobre com la Fundació Wikimedia hauria de relacionar-se amb més eficàcia amb les comunitats wiki del Sud Global en un futur pròxim (els propers dos o tres anys)?
    1. Endorse, global south and/or "emerging communities". -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 15:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Els projectes de Wikimedia haurien d'estar més implicats en la Dècada d'Acció de l'ONU (per als Objectius de Desenvolupament Sostenible, l'Acord de París, els objectius del Conveni sobre la Biodiversitat, etc.)? I quin paper intermediari pot o hauria de tenir la Fundació Wikimedia en aquest sentit?
  19. Quins pensaments teniu sobre el futur de Viquiespècies, Viquinotícies, Wikiversity i altres petits projectes vius? I com els pot donar suport la Fundació Wikimedia?
    1. Endorse, absolutely, yes please. I'll add Wikisource, Wikivoyage also. These projects often do not get the required support, and I find this question very important. -- টিটো দত্ত (কথা) 07:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse (but fix the capitalization please). --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Teniu algun objectiu o resultat específic que vulgueu assolir durant el vostre mandat com a membre de la junta?
  21. Què significa per a vosaltres la diversitat de la comunitat Wikimedia? I teniu un pla sobre com es pot aconseguir de manera tangible o quantificable? (per exemple, reducció dels bretxes de dades)
  22. Al llarg dels anys, hi ha hagut un creixement constant de les despeses de la Fundació Wikimedia. Què n'opines? Hi hauria d'haver límits de 5 anys en la despesa?
    1. Something like this would be good, but I don't think the question should specifically ask about caps. --Yair rand (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  23. A l'hora d'assignar recursos de la Fundació, com voldríeu prioritzar els fons entre amortitzar deute tècnic i treballar en noves iniciatives estratègiques?
    1. Endorse this question. Probably the single one I would choose if only one question was asked. MarioGom (talk) 15:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse the concept but prefer wording/formulation of #50. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  24. What do you think about the WMF using funds for purposes not related to Wikimedia projects?
    1. Endorse. --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse - I should note that this should be interpreted as "clearly and directly", as our inherent nature means everything could be claimed to be vaguely related Nosebagbear (talk) 21:12, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Do you think the WMF should take any active role in relation to undisclosed paid editing?
  26. What do you think about Wikimedia_Enterprise? Do you think its criticsm is justfied?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Given recent comments by ex-staffers, should the new Board conduct an investigation about management misconduct at the WMF, including but not limited to bullying, union busting and discrimination based on sex, race or disabilities?
    1. Endorse. Especially given that multiple individuals raised such complaints, this needs to be investigated and resolved. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. (I recommend excluding the "including" part, to keep if brief.) --Yair rand (talk) 21:09, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  28. How should the 4 community board seats due to be selected in 2022 be filled?
  29. Have you, or any members of your immediate family, received any financial benefits from the WMF or a WMF affiliate in the past 5 years?
  30. How did you contribute to the Movement Strategy process, the Movement Brands Project, the UCOC process, the proposed Bylaws amendments, and the call for feeback on community board selections?
  31. Under what (if any) circumstances should the board extend the term of community-selected trustees?
  32. When should Foundation projects require explicit approval by the community and how should that approval be assessed?
    1. Conditional Endorse. This is a good question in itself, but I consider #8 + #41 better. If those others are included then this question may have too much overlap. Alsee (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  33. If you had been a Board member in 2019, would you have supported the Board's statement on the ban of Fram from the English Wikipedia? Would you have proposed any changes or additions to this statement?
  34. Allegations of a hostile workplace environment at WMF have been made by former employees here and here. What is your reaction to this and is there anything that you would do as a board member to change this?
  35. Katherine Maher recently floated the idea of paying contributors. Should the Foundation start discussions on what a model of compensation would look like?
    1. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Given the amount of work stewards do, do you think stewards should be paid? Why (not)? If yes, how much?
  37. Should there be a waiting period between the time a Board member leaves the Board, and they take on an employee, consultant, or other paid role with the Foundation?
    1. Endorse. Chico Venancio (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse -Killarnee (C•T•U) 20:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    6. Endorse --RaiderAspect (talk) 12:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    7. Endorse -- though I'd prefer How long should be the waiting period... rather than Should there be a waiting period.... AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    8. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    9. Endorse - Jr8825 (talk) 23:06, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  38. To reduce the possibility of conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflict of interest do you commit to not accept any employed or remunerated position with the Foundation for at least the duration of your stay on the board and 6 months until after leaving the board?
    1. Endorse --Andreas JN466 20:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Endorse -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Endorse -- AllyD (talk) 06:07, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    5. Endorse -- B25es (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Non-affiliated volunteers (i.e. volunteers who are not members of any Wikimedia affiliate) do most of the work on the wikis, yet elect only a quarter of board seats. Do you think this is right?
  40. Com pot la WMF tractar les regles de responsabilitat intermediària proposades o establertes en diferents països i salvaguardar els voluntaris locals de Wikimedia de la persecució per part d'institucions governamentals?
  41. The Foundation rejected repeated calls to make the Movement Strategy a consensus process. I believe none of the resulting projects have an established consensus, including the Code of Conduct. Rebranding was 92% opposed,[1] and an item to undermine our core content quality policies appears to have 100% opposition.[2] I believe those running the process clearly advanced their own agenda, disregarding all opposition. Do you consider the Strategy process legitimate? Do staff have a valid mandate to impose these Strategy projects on us? (Please to not get sidetracked on the merits of any particular project, this is a process question.)
  42. Would you be in favor of hiring an outside firm to do an independent audit of board actions over the preceding two years?
  43. As a board member, would you encourage the board to evaluate the wisdom of close relationships with specific outside groups such as the Tides Foundation?
  44. What are your thoughts on how to handle the competing representation issues between giving "seats in the room" for smaller/medium projects at the expense of reducing the "per-editor" vote of large projects, such as may be a question for the Global Council? An example of a proposal along these lines can be seen here, with issues raised on the talk page.
  45. What do you think about the problem that there are arbitration committees in a few wikis, but not in all, and so the parties can transfer their conflict to other wikis in order not to be punished there, or if the conflict was already on the other wiki, there is no independent dispute resolution body at all? What do you think of a single point of contact for all wikis? Otherwise there would often only be a) abandoning the project to avoid the bullying or b) a civil lawsuit.
  46. How important is privacy for you? Are you in favor of anonymous editors not automatically publishing their IP address, or should Wikipedia continue to lag behind in terms of privacy?
  47. Several severe communication issues have been reported with the iOS and Android mobile apps and the web client, all currently in production. Do you agree with the WMF's response to these? More generally, how can the community ensure the difficulties they experience with the software are prioritised in development resource allocations?
    1. Endorse - Nosebagbear (talk) 10:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Endorse MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Do you feel the current spending and available personnel on development issues (both on building new features and fixing bugs in existing ones) is too low, too high, or about right?
    1. Endorse but I would favor wording of #23. MarioGom (talk) 16:19, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Which past Board resolutions or other actions would you vote to overturn, if any?
  50. What percentage of the WMF's annual budget should be allocated among the following categories: (1) maintaining server uptime now and in the foreseeable future, (2) clearing the phabricator backlog, (3) recruiting new participants, and (4) everything else?
    1. Conditional Endorse. Another category should be added: "Improving and modernizing the interfaces for readers and editors" not limited to the current phabricator backlog. DGG (talk) 01:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  51. A number of board members, as well as C-level Foundation employees, have been brought onboard who never provide any clue what their opinions or thoughts about Wikimedia's mission is or should be -- neither at the beginning of their tenure nor at any time afterwards. What thoughts do you have about requiring them to provide some statement to the volunteers on this matter? -- Llywrch (talk) 07:00, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Do you believe that communication with individual editors as a Trustee is important? What are you views on how quickly, and in how much detail, Trustees should be expected to reply to individual queries by editors with regards to issues and their role (as an average across the year/term)?
  53. Do you think a community member can be an effective CEO of the WMF? Should the WMF look within the communities, rather than outside, to fill that vacancy?
  54. Do you think that a larger portion of the board seats should be directly elected by the community?
  55. Wikimedia Foundation has no dedicated accessibility team, do you think we should be doing more given both legal (Americans with Disabilities Act etc.) and ethical ramifications? Should web accessibility be a commitment by the Board of Trustees itself, like with, say, BLP policy?
  56. Name three elephants in the room. How do you propose to deal with them?
  57. From the 8 prioritized Movement Strategy initiaves (letterd A to H on Movement Strategy), the top priority is creating a Movement Charter whereby a Global Council will be created, and resposibilities will be transfered from the (Board of Trustees) of the Wikimedia Foundation to the Global Council. Please elaborate on this top priority.
  58. Should the Board wait until after the elections to choose the next CEO?
  59. What skills and qualities would you look for in the next CEO?
  60. Should the WMF fundraise in impoverished countries?
  61. Who is ultimately responsible for the Board of Trustees collective ability to follow its own procedures, policies and code of conduct?

Llista recollida de preguntes

El 30 de juny de 2021, el Comitè Electoral reunirà les preguntes perquè els candidats les responguin a partir del 7 de juliol.

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikimedia_Foundation_elections/2021/Apply_to_be_a_Candidate/ca&oldid=26511821"