Wikimedia Tunisia/Report/Strategy Salon 2020

Preparations before the salon


Date and location

edit

Participant List

edit

What happened

edit
 
Group photo of the attendees
 
Watching an explanatory video before each recommandation to have more information

Wikimedia TN User Group has organised a salon to discuss the Wikimedia 2030 strategy recommandations. It was an opportunity to hear suggestions from attendees about the futur of Wikimedia movement. Participants came from different parts of Tunisia.

Summary of the discussion points

edit

General Comments on the process

edit

The attendees felt some satisfaction about the recommendations and raised the issue of the lack of communication from the working groups during the synthesis of these 13 points.

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Creating a network of ambassadors representing all the communities.
  • Investing in youth to ensure sustainability

For

  • Attendees agreed the idea of hiring local employees by WMF.

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Improving the code of conduct to be more suitable with the current challenges.
  • Creating committees to solve problems inside and between communities.

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Creating a specific interface for each region or each community.

For

  • Code of conduct is the key to protect wikimedians.

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Investing more in communities to have more decision makers and leaders.
  • Training on Leadership skills

For

  • Exchange of knowledge and skills between affiliates, mainly well-structured affiliates.

For

  • Participants accepted all the idea of multiplying the number of training.
  • Also references need to be provided to improve the quality of articles.

Suggestions for Improvement

  • Creating a data base accessible for all.

For

  • Attendees pointed out in the flexibility that should exist in procedures to facilitate the work between affiliates.

For

  • We need a data base that show us where can we improve ourselves.

For

  • Supported by all participants

For

  • Attendees agreed on the importance of evaluation, mainly permanent evaluation.

For

  • Supported by all the participants.