To be filled in by the Community Tech team
- Which were your team's most important research questions?
- To what extent were these questions answered?
- What additional analyses does your team need?
- Which questions surprised your team?
- How does your team you plan to use the data?
- What survey questions would your team like to ask next time?
No pages meet these criteria.
|
Which Wikimedia project do you contribute to the most?
Note: this questions was used for routing purposes
|
|
- 1 – Wikimedia Commons (6%)
- 2 – English Wikipedia (7%)
- 3 – German Wikipedia (10%)
- 4 – French Wikipedia (7%)
- 5 – Spanish Wikipedia (12%)
- 6 – Japanese Wikipedia (5%)
- 7 – Russian Wikipedia (11%)
- 8 – Italian Wikipedia (6%)
- 9 – Chinese Wikipedia (5%)
- 10 – Portuguese Wikipedia (3%)
- 11 – Polish Wikipedia (2%)
- 12 – Dutch Wikipedia (4%)
- 13 – Arabic Wikipedia (3%)
- 14 – Ukrainian Wikipedia (2%)
- 15 – Persian Wikipedia (1%)
- 16 – Korean Wikipedia (1%)
- 17 – Hebrew Wikipedia (1%)
|
|
Question 216.01 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Reviewing recent changes
|
|
9% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (2%)
- 2 – Slightly (7%)
- 3 – Moderately (19%)
- 4 – Mostly (51%)
- 5 – Completely (21%)
|
72% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of reviewing recent changes.
|
|
Question 216.02 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Reviewing new articles
|
|
15% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (2%)
- 2 – Slightly (9%)
- 3 – Moderately (21%)
- 4 – Mostly (49%)
- 5 – Completely (19%)
|
68% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of reviewing new articles.
|
|
Question 216.03 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Identifying and surfacing content problems
|
|
18% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (5%)
- 2 – Slightly (22%)
- 3 – Moderately (31%)
- 4 – Mostly (32%)
- 5 – Completely (10%)
|
42% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of identifying and surfacing content problems.
|
|
Question 216.04 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Managing media
|
|
23% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (3%)
- 2 – Slightly (14%)
- 3 – Moderately (31%)
- 4 – Mostly (40%)
- 5 – Completely (12%)
|
52% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of managing media.
|
|
Question 216.05 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Working with templates
|
|
19% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (4%)
- 2 – Slightly (19%)
- 3 – Moderately (32%)
- 4 – Mostly (32%)
- 5 – Completely (13%)
|
45% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of working with templates.
|
|
Question 216.06 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Categorizing content
|
|
16% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (4%)
- 2 – Slightly (14%)
- 3 – Moderately (30%)
- 4 – Mostly (36%)
- 5 – Completely (16%)
|
52% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of categorizing content
|
|
Question 216.07 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Supporting gadgets
|
|
41% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (5%)
- 2 – Slightly (17%)
- 3 – Moderately (32%)
- 4 – Mostly (35%)
- 5 – Completely (12%)
|
47% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of supporting gadgets.
|
|
Question 216.08 (CT01)
edit
|
Do you feel the Wikimedia Foundation is meeting the technical needs of Wikimedia contributors in the following areas? - Bots and third party tools
|
|
41% selected "No opinion" [?]
- 1 – Not at all (8%)
- 2 – Slightly (15%)
- 3 – Moderately (34%)
- 4 – Mostly (30%)
- 5 – Completely (13%)
|
43% of sampled very active editors who participated in the survey feel that the Wikimedia Foundation is mostly or completely meeting the technical needs of bots and third party tools.
|
|
No pages meet these criteria.
No pages meet these criteria.
No pages meet these criteria.