This project is funded by a Project Grant

Report under review

This Project Grant report has been submitted by the grantee, and is currently being reviewed by WMF staff. You may add comments, responses, or questions to this report's discussion page.

To read the approved grant submission for this project, please visit Grants:Project/Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos International Team/2021 coordination.

Review the reporting requirements to better understand the reporting process.
Review all Project Grant reports under review.
Please Email projectgrantswikimedia.org if you have additional questions.

Welcome to this project's final report! This report shares the outcomes, impact and learnings from the grantee's project.

Part 1: The Project

Summary

#WPWPCampaign official logo

#WPWPCampaign 2021 Mid-Term Report

The WPWP Campaign is an annual campaign with the primary goal of promoting the use of digital media files collected from various Wikimedia photography contests, photo-walks organized by the Wikimedia community, on Wikipedia article pages. Photos help to grasp the reader's attention better than a wall of text, illustrate content, and make the article more instructive and engaging for readers.

Thousands of images have been donated and contributed to Wikimedia Commons via various advocacy programs, photo-walks, and contests, including international photography contests such as Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves Africa, Wiki Loves Earth, Wiki Loves Folklore, etc. Yet relatively few of these photos have been used on Wikipedia articles. Our repository of media files, the Wikimedia Commons hosts millions of photo images but only a tiny portion of these have been used on Wikipedia article pages. This is a huge gap that this project aims at bridging.

The campaign launched in 2020 is held every July and runs through August. This year, 60 Wikimedia communities in 52 countries joined the campaign.

The WPWP Campaign was launched on July 1, 2021, and entries close on the 31st of August 2021.

Members of the International Team are Olaniyan Olushola, Deborah Jacobs, Kevin Payravi, Dansu Peter, Mohammed Bachouda, Tulsi Baghat, Alaa, Romaine, Sam Oyeyele, Florence Nibart-Devouard (Advisor), and Alex Stinson (Advisor). And members of the jury team include; Olatunde Isaac, Olaniyan Olushola, Rajeeb Dutta, Euphemia Uwandu, Abubakar Sideeq, Alhassan Mohammed Awal, Bhuvana Meenakshi, and Nethi SaiKiran.

Do you like this cup?

This year, the International Organizing Team began planning for the campaign in April 2021. The pre-campaign activities include the following

Development of the project central coordination page
Camapaign timeline design
Recruitment of the local organizers
Local organizers guide design
Workflow chart and checklist design
Communication material design
Tracking tool set up
Design of the best practices for organizing the campaign
Design of guide on how to use the tracking tool

Global implementation : We onboarded a total of 60 Wikimedia affiliates communities in 52 countries in the world. 66.67% of the participating communities are newcomers and needed more support to effectively implement the campaign. The campaign was implemented successfully in many of the new communities.
Global participation: Last year, the campaign recorded a total of 600 global participants across 270 languages Wikipedia. This year, the campaign has recorded more than 1,000 global participants. We surpassed the 2020's total participants in less than three weeks.
Total pages and Wikipedia languages impacted: This year, the campaign added media files to over 265,000 articles in more than 293 languages Wikipedias, of which photos were added to a total of 251,948 articles in 247 languages Wikipedia. Videos were added to a total of 3,794 articles in 240 languages Wikipedia, and audios were added to a total of 2,957 articles in 144 languages Wikipedia.
Social media engagement: The campaign followers on social media has grown by at least 50% in less than three weeks of the campaign.
Branding and outreach: Outreach materials were shipped to more than 25 participating communities in over 20 countries.
Low implementation barrier: We effectively reduced the burden of implementing the campaign locally by designing some documentations such as organizer's guide and Best practices in organizing WPWP Campaign in your community to support local organizers. Local organisers can easily managed the campaign and monitor participation from their community.
Meeting with local organizers: We met with some local organizers of the campaign to understand whether the framework under which the maiden edition of the campaign was organized is suitable and impactful for their community. Many of the communities believed that the current framework is good. Their challenges were highlighted and many of them were addressed before the campaign began on the 1st of July 2021.
Collect and share best practices with local organizing communities: In the first edition, some local organizers were unable to successfully implement the campaign largely because there were no enough resources, materials or documentation to support the implementation being a new campaign. This year, we designed and shared the organizer's guide and Best practices in organizing WPWP Campaign in your community with all local local organizers at least one month before the campaign. Some community signed up late but we did shared this resources with them within 24 hours.
Maintenance work: We mandated local organizers to help with maintenance work in their various local languages and closely monitor the campaign in their community. At least one participants were disqualified from the campaign for disruptive editing resulting from close monitoring of the campaign.
Language or regional ambassador: One of the priority goals of the WPWP Campaign is to grow communities that are underrepresented on Wikimedia projects and we learnt from the 2020's edition that central coordination may not be sufficient to achieving this goal. This year, we appointed to the international team one regional ambassador for West Africa, one ambassador for the Arabic communities and one community liaisons for the underrepresented communities.

Project Goals

The aim of the Wikipedia Pages Wanting Photos International Team has seven main goals. These goals are:

Promote the use of freely-licensed media files from Wikimedia Commons on Wikipedia articles
Increase contributions to Wikimedia projects
Build and engage community
Increase new editors or contributors
Increase diversity of contributions and content
Strengthen local Wikimedia communities
Support local organizers in implementing the campaign

Project Impact

Important: The Wikimedia Foundation is no longer collecting Global Metrics for Project Grants. We are currently updating our pages to remove legacy references, but please ignore any that you encounter until we finish.

Targets

In the first column of the table below, please copy and paste the measures you selected to help you evaluate your project's success (see the Project Impact section of your proposal). Please use one row for each measure. If you set a numeric target for the measure, please include the number.
In the second column, describe your project's actual results. If you set a numeric target for the measure, please report numerically in this column. Otherwise, write a brief sentence summarizing your output or outcome for this measure.
In the third column, you have the option to provide further explanation as needed. You may also add additional explanation below this table.

Planned measure of success (include numeric target, if applicable)	Actual result	Explanation
Increased contributions to Wikimedia projects	WPWP Campaign implementations this year resulted in the following outcomes Addition of media files to over 265,000 articles in more than 293 languages Wikipedias Photos were added to a total of 251,948 articles in 247 languages Wikipedia Videos were added to a total of 3,794 articles in 240 languages Wikipedia Audios were added to a total of 2,957 articles in 144 languages Wikipedia A total of 293 Wikipedia language projects were impacted Over 265,000 photos from Wikimedia Commons were used on Wikipedia articles (about 10,000 were not tracked in #WPWP hashtag but on country-specific hashtag)	This year, there is about about 211.76% increase in the total number of media files added to Wikipedia articles by the campaign last year. There were also increased in the total number of video and audios used.
Strengthened local Wikimedia communities	This year, 60 Wikimedia communities in 52 countries joined the campaign.	This is about 66.66% increase in the total number of participating communities last year. At least 25 new participating communities joined the campaign. There were also increase in participation from underrepresented communities such as Africa and Asia.
Collecting and sharing best practices:	We designed and shared the organizer's guide and Best practices in organizing WPWP Campaign in your community with all local local organizers at least one month before the campaign.	In the first edition, some local organizers were unable to successfully implement the campaign largely because there were no enough resources, materials or documentation to support the implementation being a new campaign. This year, we designed and shared the organizer's guide and Best practices in organizing WPWP Campaign in your community with all local local organizers at least one month before the campaign. Some community signed up late but we did shared this resources with them within 24 hours.
Increased diversity of contributions and content	Even thou, we aimed to add images to Wikipedia articles where they are lacking, there are thousands of videos and audios that are realistically useful for educational purposes waiting to be used on Wikipedia articles. As we did last year, we increased the diversity of contributions and contents; 3,500+ videos, 2,500+ audios and 5,000+ maps were added to Wikipedia articles in more than 150+ language Wikipedia.	Increased diversity of contributions and content were prioritized this year and the results surpassed last year's metrics
Increase in new editors or contributors:	This year, more than 27% of the total participants were new editors. There is a significant increase in new editors participation when compared to last year result (16.4%). In fact, the top contributor this year is a brand new editor	Our evaluation report revealed that the WPWP Campaign might not be a good model to recruit new editors. The report shows that participants who registered an account between 0 - 6 months (<p 0.05) are unlikely to comply with the campaign rules and are more likely to violate local editing policies. A significant proportion of participants in this experimental group did not meet the minimum expected competence to participate in the campaign. Participants in this experimental group may not be allowed to participate in the campaign to minimize disruption.

Story

Looking back over your whole project, what did you achieve? Tell us the story of your achievements, your results, your outcomes. Focus on inspiring moments, tough challenges, interesting anecdotes or anything that highlights the outcomes of your project. Imagine that you are sharing with a friend about the achievements that matter most to you in your project.

This should not be a list of what you did. You will be asked to provide that later in the Methods and Activities section.
Consider your original goals as you write your project's story, but don't let them limit you. Your project may have important outcomes you weren't expecting. Please focus on the impact that you believe matters most.

We collected stories from some local organizers and top contributors to better understand the campaign results, outcomes, inspiring moments, tough challenges, interesting anecdotes or anything that highlights the outcomes of the campaign:

User:Mrb Rafi : I chose “উইকিপিডিয়া হোক আরো রঙ্গিন, জ্ঞান হোক আরো প্রাণবন্ত” (English: Let Wikipedia be more colourful, Let knowledge be more lively.” as the tagline of this campaign in Bangla Wikipedia. My motivation behind leading this campaign in my country can be easily understood from this tagline. Actually, whenever I work for any Wikimedia event, the driving force is always the same. Wikipedia is more than just an online encyclopedia; Wikimedia Movement is more than just a movement. It will change you; it will help you to see the world from a different perspective; you can feel that good people are the most powerful in this planet; you can feel that your voice also matters; you can feel that our world is far happier and colourful than you think. If you watched the movie “Free Guy”, you may find these words which I find relatable: The point is, we don’t have to be the spectators to our own lives; we can be whatever we want. --- I want to make a goddamn difference in the world.” And yes, there were a lot of adversities while I was organizing this campaign. But where’s the fun if you get everything as you wanted? Life Is beautiful because we have to try to make it beautiful. Yes, we made mistakes, at some points we messed up the whole thing; sometimes, our participants were making so many mistakes that we couldn’t find any way out to solve them during the campaign but at the end of the day we all are so happy that we made an awesome campaign in our community. My fellow team members in the organizing team did great; the participants attended with so much enthusiasm that I can’t expect anything more from them. We have the experience of this year’s campaign and I promise we will work harder to make the campaign more awesome and more colorful next year.

User:Bhuvana Meenakshi: To assess all the WPWP contributions and come out with the top contributors was interesting and also requires a lot of patience. The role definitely comes with a lot of responsibility as everyone in the jury panel wanted to recognise all the efforts taken by various Wikimedia contributors across the globe in various languages. It was indeed a good experience to learn about the varieties of articles that the global editors are keen to edit and add the relevant images with right information. As a person who advocates and contributes to bridge the gender gap in Free and Open Knowledge movement I would appreciate more contributions if focussed on a specific stream of articles about women and LGBTQIA+ and also would encourage more contributors from these communities to participate in the same. On behalf of the panel I would like to once again applaud and thank all the efforts taken by all the contributors who made this campaign a huge success and also for accepting our decisions.

User:Dolphyb : One thing I loved about the campaign was the simplicity and easy-to-follow tasks which are adding photos/audios/videos to Wikipedia articles and tagging them with relevant titles. So this was really easy to do with the right training. I'll say that the WPWP Campaign is a great way to engage volunteers who are new in the movement and finds it difficult to contribute to Wikipedia and its sister projects. I was one of such people who found it difficult to edit Wikipedia until I participated in the 2020 edition. Initially, it was very difficult to navigate around and upload pictures correctly. But I got better halfway into the contest and have built knowledge and capacity by participating since 2020.

User:Wikipedsaur : Wikipedia is one of the most respectable and reliable source for knowledge. So it is always an honour to contribute to Wikipedia, and contests are a fun way of doing this. One of the best thing about the WPWP campaign is it's impact. A picture is worth a thousand words. Without any picture an article appears incomplete, hence adding a picture makes it more informative and visually appealing. And this makes it very relevant particularly for local and regional language Wikipedias that generally lack good pictures. Further the ease with which anybody, and not only a prolific editor or a photographer, can participate in this contest makes it even more accessible and interesting. One major bottleneck was finding the pages without images as the existing tools are inadequate. Focus in the coming years can be spreading the awareness about this contest and improving the tools to discover the pages without pictures and free to use images.

Survey(s)

If you used surveys to evaluate the success of your project, please provide a link(s) in this section, then briefly summarize your survey results in your own words. Include three interesting outputs or outcomes that the survey revealed.

Based on the survey conducted, the five (5) most commonly cited priority goals for the 2021 edition of the WPWP Campaign events were: Increase contributions to Wikimedia projects project; Increasing accuracy and/or quality of contributions; Building and engaging the community; Increasing usage of Wiki Loves Photos; Increasing readers satisfaction.

Priority goals

WPWP Percentage Increase in Contents (2020 - 2021)

Increasing contributions;

Data available on the total number of images used during the 2021 WPWP Campaign shows

Year	Total number of images used on Wikipedia articles during the 2021 WPWP Campaign
2021	265,104

Data available on the total number of vides used during the 2021 WPWP Campaign shows

Year	Total number of videos used on Wikipedia articles during the 2021 WPWP Campaign
2021	3,794

Data available on the total number of audios used during the 2021 WPWP Campaign shows

Year	Total number of audios used on Wikipedia articles during the 2021 WPWP Campaign
2021	2,957

Media files used on articles during the WPWP Campaign 2021 represent 0.31% of all the media files uploaded to Commons by registered users during the reporting period. This is above the value (0.14%) recorded last year.

Increasing awareness of Wikimedia projects;

More than 70% of the participants were existing editors. 27% of the campaign participants who took the survey reported that their participation in the #WPWP was the first time they edited Wikipedia. The campaign attracted more new editors in 2021 when compared with the data recorded in 2020. In 2020, over 85% of the participants were existing editors. Social media were used by local organizers for promotion. More than 62% of the participants reported that they learnt about the campaign through the central notice banner on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects.

Increasing accuracy of Wikipedia or quality of Wikimedia projects;

The priority goal of more than 52% of the participants who took the survey was to increase the accuracy of Wikipedia or quality of Wikimedia projects. Other priority goals of the participants were increasing their contributions to Wikimedia projects, increasing readers' satisfaction, and increasing diversity represented in contributions and contents on Wikimedia projects. More than 65% of the respondent reported that the campaign meet their expectations for achieving these goals.

Hours

Staff and volunteers hours input ranged from 0 to 10 hours per week and most of the organizers reported that they invested 1-3 hrs (39.1%) per week for implementing the campaign..

Time invested in organizing the WPWP Campaign	Percentage selected as priority
1-3 hours per day	39.1%
3-5 hours per day	26.1%
1-5 hours per week	21.7%
3-10 hours per week	13%

We collected data on number of staff and volunteer hours used in organizing the WPWP Campaign for 23 campaign implementations. Staff hours input ranged from 0 to 10 hours per week.

Budget

Reported budgets were available for almost all the WPWP Campaign. The average national campaign cost $939.12 to implement. This is slightly more than the average cost in 2020. This increase may be due to offline events in addition to online events

Reported budgets were available for 15 of the WPWP Campaign. These ranged from $0 to $1960, with an average of $939.12 ^[1]

Donated resources

The majority of WPWP Campaign implementations relied on rapid grant support from the WMF, mostly prizes.

Most of the 23 WPWP Campaign organizers who reported data on grant fund received used them for prizes, internet and communication support. 21.7% of the campaign organizers reported using grant fund received for prizes/giveaways and 13% for internet.

The donated resources received for the WPWP Campaign in form of grant support reported by local organizers were used mostly for prizes (21.7%) and internet support (13%).

Other

Is there another way you would prefer to communicate the actual results of your project, as you understand them? You can do that here!

See the campaign evaluation report 2021 for additional information about the actual results of the campaign.

Methods and activities

Please provide a list of the main methods and activities through which you completed your project.

Planning: Planning for the campaign started in late March to allow enough time for communication with organizers, onboarding of new and old local organizers, prizes design, documentation development, and adequate support for local organizers especially communities joining the campaign for the first time.
Setting up of campaign page: The campaign page setup began on the 1st of April 2021 and was finalized on the 10th of June 2021. Although there were a few revisions thereafter. The campaign page includes a section where Wikimedia and non-Wikimedia affiliates interested in organizing the campaign would sign up, a section for members of the international team to allow communication with any member of the team during the campaign. We also added sections for documenting resources to support local organizers, and detailed information on how to participate and were the results would be published at the end of the campaign.
Appointment of international organizing team new members: Six new members were appointed to the campaign international team. They include, a community liaison for underrepresented communities, regional ambassador for West Africa and a regional ambassador for the Arabic community, and Jury coordinators.
Onboarding new and old local organizers: In the maiden edition, a total of 36 affiliate's communities joined the campaign. This year, we invited all the Wikimedia affiliates to joined the campaign and a total of 60 affiliates communities in 55 countries joined the campaign. It comprises 19 old campaign organizers and 41 new campaign organizers. We shared the timeline with these organizers and helped them understand the expectations and vital information and resources needed to successfully organize the campaign in their communities.
Translation: #WPWPCampaign is a multilingual campaign and translation plays an integral role in its implementation. We invited translators to help with translating the campaign page, the central banner texts and all the vital resources needed to successfully implement the campaign. Translations were finalized on the 22nd June 2021.
Central-Notice Banner finalization: We submitted a request for central banner display on the 2nd of June 2021, to allow more time for discussions, comments, endorsement and translation of the central banner notice. The banner was activated on the 1st of July 2021 (on the day the campaign started)
Social media promotion: The campaign hashtag and User ID on all social media were shared with all local organizers at least 2 weeks before the campaign and a week before the campaign the campaign generic banner was shared with the organizers for social media promotion. We contacted the WMF social to helped with promotion using their various social handles. We often share at least two promotion materials on social media per week to promote the campaign and this has resulted in at least 50% increase in the campaign followers on Twitter where the campaign handle is most active.
Communication: We actively handles various queries and questions via email and campaign talk page. While this may sound like a trivial task, a non-negligible amount of time went into communications with local organizers, members of the international team and individual participants.
Outreach and branding: We have produced souvenirs; Custom mugs, T-shirts, keyholders, and visor caps for outreach. These materials are now ready for shipping to participating communities. We plan to begin the shipping of these materials to participating countries on the 29th of July 2021.
Campaign progress report: The campaign was launched on the 1st of July 2021 based on the campaign timeline. As at the time of this report (July 26th 2021), more than 1,000 participants added photos to 265,000 articles in more than 293 Wikipedia languages. The campaign will close on the 31st of August 2021.

Project resources

Please provide links to all public, online documents and other artifacts that you created during the course of this project. Even if you have linked to them elsewhere in this report, this section serves as a centralized archive for everything you created during your project. Examples include: meeting notes, participant lists, photos or graphics uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, template messages sent to participants, wiki pages, social media (Facebook groups, Twitter accounts), datasets, surveys, questionnaires, code repositories... If possible, include a brief summary with each link.

Documentations

Promotion material

Promotion banner 2021
Promotion banner 2021 template
WPWPCampaign official logo
WPWP promotion Mug
WPWP promotion Mug
WPWP promotion Mug
WPWP promotion T-shirt
WPWP promotion Face cap
WPWP promotion bag
WPWP promotion hoodie
WPWP promotion face mask
WPWP Campaign Generic T-shirt
WPWP Campaign Generic Mug
WPWP Campaign Generic Visor Cap
WPWP Campaign Generic Keyholder
Promotion flier 2021
Promotion flier
WPWP New Team Member 2021
Do you like this cup?
WPWP Campaign 2021 Timeline
#WPWPCampaign 2021 Mid-Term Report

Campaign social media networks

Learning

The best thing about trying something new is that you learn from it. We want to follow in your footsteps and learn along with you, and we want to know that you took enough risks in your project to have learned something really interesting! Think about what recommendations you have for others who may follow in your footsteps, and use the below sections to describe what worked and what didn’t.

What worked well

What did you try that was successful and you'd recommend others do? To help spread successful strategies so that they can be of use to others in the movement, rather than writing lots of text here, we'd like you to share your finding in the form of a link to a learning pattern.

Learning patterns/How to organize a multilingual campaign

What didn’t work

What did you try that you learned didn't work? What would you think about doing differently in the future? Please list these as short bullet points.

There are still challenges with the hashtag tool. We need to find an alternative tool that would not involve adding hashtag to edit-summary. This is a long-term issue that would not be resolved this year but we will continue to engage the WMF growth team and developer to find a lasting solution to this problem.
Many users need tools that will enable them to easily find articles without photos.
Since the campaign events were remote, it took more time to train newcomers
Hostility from Wikipedia admins
Dealing with infobox was sometimes tricky for newcomers
Tracking tool was difficult to use for newcomers
Inability of campaign participants to adhere to campaign rules
Participants adding images to multiple languages they do not actually speak
Enough time and schedule to conduct regular edit-a-thon.
COVID-19 pandemic impacted on in-person activities

Other recommendations

If you have additional recommendations or reflections that don’t fit into the above sections, please list them here.

We evaluated the compliance of participants with the campaign rules based on their year of editing experience. Different letters indicate statistical difference between compliance and non-compliance with campaign rules @ p<0.05

statistical result of analysis of the contributions of participants who registered an account between 0 to 6months

We sampled participants based on their years of editing experiences across five (5) languages Wikipedia. The participants were randomly selected from the English, Bangla, Arabic, Swahili, and Ukraine Wikipedia. They were grouped into the following 4 categories: 0 - 6 months old account, 6 months - 1yr account, 1yr - 2yrs old account, 2years and above @ p<0.05

As shown in the statistical representation below, participants who registered an account between 0 - 6 months (<p 0.05) are unlikely to comply with the campaign rules and are more likely to violate local editing policies. A significant proportion of participants in this experimental group did not meet the minimum expected competence to participate in the campaign. Participants in this experimental group may not be allowed to participate in the campaign in 2022 to minimize disruption.

Statistical result of analysis of the contributions of participants who registered an account between 6 month to 1 yr

Participants who registered an account between 6 months - 1 yr (<p 0.05) are more likely to comply with the campaign rules and local editing policies when compared with participants who registered an account between 0 to 6months. But the overall error rate of their contributions is significant. A significant proportion of participants in this experimental group did not meet the minimum expected competence to participate in the campaign. Participants in this experimental group may still be allowed to participate if they are well trained but their edits may be throttled to minimize disruption.

Statistical result of analysis of the contributions of participants who registered an account between 1 yr to 2 yrs

Participants who registered an account between 1yr - 2 yrs (<p 0.05) are likely to comply with the campaign rules and local editing policies. A significant proportion of participants in this experimental group met the minimum expected competence to participate in the campaign. They have the requisite skills and experiences needed to participate without training and their edits may not be throttled. The contributions of participants in this experimental group contains minimal errors that could easily be handled through local community processes and policy.

Statistical result of analysis of the contributions of participants who registered an account for 2 yrs and above

Participants who registered an account for 2yrs and above (<p 0.05) have the relevant experience, skills, knowledge and competent to participate in the campaign. A significant proportion of participants in this experimental group met the minimum expected competence to participate in the campaign.

Based on the above findings, we we recommend that the campaign participation be restricted to only participants who have registered an account at least 1 year before the campaign. Participants who registered an account between 0 - 6 months may still be allowed to participate if they are trained and their contributions are throttled based on community consensus.

Next steps and opportunities

Are there opportunities for future growth of this project, or new areas you have uncovered in the course of this grant that could be fruitful for more exploration (either by yourself, or others)? What ideas or suggestions do you have for future projects based on the work you’ve completed? Please list these as short bullet points.

WPWP Campaign is a campaign that have the tendency to grow into a great infrastructure for the Wikimedia movement if given the adequate supports needed to thrieve. One of the ways to strenthen the campaign is to restrict participation to only experienced editors while a better strategy is designed to manage participation of newcomers. This is evident in the evaluation report.

Part 2: The Grant

Finances

Actual spending

Please copy and paste the completed table from your project finances page. Check that you’ve listed the actual expenditures compared with what was originally planned. If there are differences between the planned and actual use of funds, please use the column provided to explain them.

Expense	Approved amount	Actual funds spent	Difference
Project Management	USD 7,200	USD 7,200	-
Outreach and branding	USD 4,900	USD 5,650	- 750 (We produced extra sourvenirs for winners and top 10 participants)
Award plaque for winners	USD 750	USD 750	-
Awards, certificate and swags shipping	USD 3,500	USD 2,650	850
International prizes and certificates	USD 750	USD 750	-
Admin and overhead (Phone calls, Internet, Zoom hosting, bank charges, local transport)	USD 1,000	USD 1,000	-
Total	USD 18,100	USD 18,000	USD 100

Remaining funds

Do you have any unspent funds from the grant?

Please answer yes or no. If yes, list the amount you did not use and explain why.

Yes - USD 100

If you have unspent funds, they must be returned to WMF. Please see the instructions for returning unspent funds and indicate here if this is still in progress, or if this is already completed:

Documentation

Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grantsadmin wikimedia.org, according to the guidelines here?

Please answer yes or no. If no, include an explanation.

Yes (see the expenses documentation sheet)

Confirmation of project status

Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?

Please answer yes or no.

Yes

Is your project completed?