Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Meta:Requests for checkuser/Vituzzu

< Meta:Requests for checkuser
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.

Vituzzu

edit

I won't say too many words but simply I'd find really useful to have checkuser bit on meta (most of abusers/spammers I have to check&lock make sul on meta) and I think I've done enough experience in checkusering during these 14 months of service as steward. --Vituzzu (talk) 12:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Support. --M/ (talk) 12:21, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support Support especially with the current proliferation of spambots, it is useful to get an indication of the extent of the bots on those problematic webhosts. Also with a lesser defence at meta, it does get a higher hit rate by the bots. :-/ — billinghurst sDrewth 12:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, surely. Savhñ 12:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Support - no problem (of course if I was fully active...:)) --Herby talk thyme 12:34, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  5. &   active, experienced and trusted user. Snowolf How can I help? 12:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support Trusted and could use the bit. Ajraddatz (Talk) 13:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Support Support I already suggested it a few times, so yes, definitely. Trijnsteltalk 13:43, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I already thought a few times about a nomination for you, but that works as well. -Barras talk 14:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Trusted user, this flag will be very useful. Restu20 16:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support Support--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:03, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Support - Tiptoety talk 17:32, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support Support Érico Wouters msg 18:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support Support --Rschen7754 20:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Support Support πr2 (t • c) 23:56, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Support Support Sure! --Ignacio (talk) 05:01, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Support --Meno25 (talk) 05:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Support Support Why not? -FASTILY (TALK) 07:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Support Support—Teles «Talk to me ˱@ L C S˲» 08:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Support Support, easy decision. -Mh7kJ (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Support Support Thank you for helping! Sotiale (talk) 01:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Support Support No worries and its easy for him to become a CU. --Katarighe (Talk) 01:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Support Support -- Very trusted user. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 12:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Support Support Sure! Trusted! –BruTe talk 12:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Support Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  25. To bring the 25th support... --MF-W 21:43, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Support Support He definitely needs it and will use it proficiently. --Mark91it's my world 00:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Support Support sure. Courcelles 05:05, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Support Support I think we need more meta CUs anyway.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Meta:Requests_for_checkuser/Vituzzu&oldid=4797598"