Meta:Requests for oversight/Xaosflux
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a closed Meta-Wiki request. Please do not modify it.
- Xaosflux (talk • contribs • deleted user contributions • logs • block log • abuse log • CentralAuth • stalktoy) Bureaucrats: user rights management.
- (RfOS requires at least 25 votes in favor and at least 75% of approval to be successful)
- Ending 26 January 2019 22:06 (UTC)
I am pleased to nominate Xaosflux for the oversight role as well. As I mentioned, the local oversight team would benefit from a bit of an expansion to potentially avoid requests not being processed in due time and better coverage of several time zones in this multilingual project (and while things work our currently I think it's better to prevent rather than to lament). As you may know, Xaosflux is an active member of our community, and a local regular administrator. He's also a long-term Wikimedian which holds trusted roles in other wikis such as administrator and bureaucrat at the English Wikipedia. Xaosflux has also sent us in the past requests to have material suppressed, and I think he's aware of the relevant policies that govern the use of the suppression tool. I think Xaosflux will be a good addition to our team and thus I hope you can, too, support this nomination. Thank you, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Candidate acceptance: I'd be happy to serve. I generally check in on metawiki 3-4 times a day doing normal janitorial work like speedy deletions and protected edit requests. I'm familiar with the meta oversight policy and have already completed the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. — xaosflux Talk 22:06, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support as nominator. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support sounds good. – Ajraddatz (talk) 21:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. --Stïnger (会話) 22:02, 19 January 2019 (UTC).
- Support. Hiàn (talk) 22:36, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Definitely. Trijnsteltalk 23:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. RadiX∞ 01:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Very active sysop and prompt to respond to queries are all we need for a OS candidate.--Cohaf (talk) 01:42, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Rschen7754 06:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support per my support in revi’s along with my general sentiment that more OS’rs are good here and that we should encourage people who want to help on meta to help. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:10, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support.--HakanIST (talk) 06:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- LGTM. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 06:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support OK. Leaderboard (talk) 07:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Eurodyne (talk) 07:36, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Novak Watchmen (talk) 13:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Jianhui67 talk★contribs 14:38, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sure why not? — regards, Revi 18:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 18:20, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support —AlvaroMolina (✉ - ✔) 22:55, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Stryn (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Natureium (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Esteban16 (talk) 23:54, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support Saederup92 (talk) 14:54, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:48, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Schniggendiller (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Defender (talk) 02:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support ToBeFree (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Alaa :)..! 13:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Xaosflux does not strike me as a particularly able candidate. --MF-W 18:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done. 27 supports - 1 oppose → 96% of approval. Matiia (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above request page is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Comments about this page should be made in Meta:Babel or Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat.