Objective Revision Evaluation Service/Issues/Edit quality

False positives

Portuguese Wikipedia

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42592387 damaging: 61%: unregistered user fixing a typo

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42696115 damaging: 78%: unregistered user fixing a typo

• Done false-positive pt:Special:Diff/43058644 damaging: 01%: user restoring user talk page blanked by unregistered user

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/40301056 damaging: 70%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42306215 damaging: 67%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42336350 damaging: 56%: unregistered user undoing his own vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42276758 damaging: 72%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42252038 damaging: 72%: unregistered user undoing his own vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42272830 damaging: 75%: unregistered user trying to improve grammar

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42271399 damaging: 75%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42268670 damaging: 57%: unregistered user linking to related article

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42301267 damaging: 67%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42331507 damaging: 76%: unregistered user fixing a typo

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42384608 damaging: 71%: unregistered user fixing a typo

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42402151 damaging: 63%: unregistered user undoing his own test/vandalism

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42151905 damaging: 58%: unregistered user replacing a word by its negation

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42151893 damaging: 79%: unregistered user updating the number of episodes in the infobox about a tv series

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42157938 damaging: 69%: unregistered removing badwords

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42191483 damaging: 69%: unregistered user removing duplicated punctuation at the end of a paragraph

• Done false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42191492 damaging: 36%: unregistered user removing unwanted code formatting

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42191490 damaging: 64%: unregistered user fixing a typo

• false-positive pt:Special:Diff/42239863 damaging: 64%: unregistered user fixing a typo introduced by another unregistered user.

English Wikipedia

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/657339116 damaging: 81%: anonymous user making a valuable factual correction.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 21:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/690027089 damaging: 71%: anonymous user fixing incorrect wording.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 23:30, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/689525426 damaging: 100%: an anonymous user adding a correct entry to w:en:list of English-language euphemisms for profanities.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 01:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/735864498 damaging: 83%: an anonymous user changing "artist" to "rapper" which is correct and more specific. Kaldari (talk) 20:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

• Done false-positive en:Special:Diff/736318755 damaging: 42%: an anonymous user correcting the tense of a verb. Kaldari (talk) 21:03, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/736663939 damaging: 81%: an anonymous user correcting a typo. Kaldari (talk) 01:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/748991956 damaging: 67%: A logged in user corrected bad capitalization and grammar. Kaldari (talk) 00:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/749355744 damaging: 71%: an anonymous user added an appropriate category to an article Kaldari (talk) 01:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• false-positive en:Special:Diff/788962116 damaging: 56%: a logged in user added an appropriate comma to a sentence Kaldari (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

• false-negative en:Special:Diff/788962116 goodfaith: 48%: a logged in user added an appropriate comma to a sentence Kaldari (talk) 21:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Italian Wikipedia

• it:Progetto:Patrolling/ORES Italian Wikipedia reports false positives in this page.

Indonesian Wikipedia

• Done w:id:Special:Diff/10407593 (45% reverted) Kenrick95 (talk) 02:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Spanish Wikipedia

• w:es:Special:Diff/85724570 (88% reverted): anonymous user making a copyedit.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 22:01, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
• w:es:Special:Diff/86457007 (87% reverted): registered user partially undoing some good-faith but questionable edits by an anonymous user.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 22:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
• w:es:Special:Diff/87647451 (83% reverted): new user adding an information; not the best grammar (incorrect space before the comma, missing accent in Hipólito) but not to be reverted as a whole. -jem- (talk) 20:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

False negatives

These are a few edits which were (or should be) reverted, but for which ores provided a score for "reverted" below 50%:

• w:id:Special:Diff/10407595 (0% reverted) Kenrick95 (talk) 02:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

See also

• Potentially damaging edits on Portuguese Wikipedia, generated by a script