Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Steward requests/Global

< Steward requests
(Redirected from SRG)
Latest comment: 27 minutes ago by MajavahBot in topic Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding
Skip to top
Skip to bottom
Shortcut:
SRG
This page hosts requests for global (un)blocks, (un)locks and hidings.

If you are here because you have been affected by a global block, please see Global blocks/FAQ for more information about global block and routes to appeal.

Note: (un)blocks apply to IP addresses or accounts; and (un)locks apply to global accounts.


Cross-wiki requests
Meta-Wiki requests

Requests for global (un)block

Latest comment: 2 hours ago25 comments12 people in discussion

  Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions.
Please also review Global blocking .
Global blocks don't affect Meta-Wiki, so if your IP address or account is blocked, you can still appeal here. IP addresses or accounts that cause disruption on Meta should be reported at Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat instead of here so that they can be blocked locally.
Please describe the kind of cross wiki abusive activity you see from the IP or account. Saying an IP or account is a long term abuser is not helpful, but saying "IP vandalizes at ban.wikipedia, no.wikipedia and vi.wikipedia" is. This is especially important for range blocks. If you do not provide enough details, your request might be declined.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting, make sure that:

  1. You know the IP address(es) or accounts you wish to have globally blocked or unblocked.
  2. For blocks, the global blocking criteria are met.
  3. For unblocks, your request addresses the original reason for blocking the IP or account, if any.

To make a request for the address(es) or account(s) to be blocked or unblocked

Copy the template below to the bottom of this section and explain why the address(es) or account(s) should be blocked/unblocked.
=== Global block/unblock for [[Special:Contributions/Some IP address or account|Some IP address or account]] ===
{{Status}} <!-- Do not remove this template -->
* {{Luxotool|IP address/username}}
Description, evidence, diffs, etc. --~~~~
When requesting that your IP be unblocked, note that stewards need to know your IP address to even consider a request.
To find your IP, please visit https://www.whatismyip.com/
You are not required to disclose your IP in public - you may make requests privately to any steward on IRC or by email at: stewards wikimedia org

Global block for ~2025-5618

Status:    In progress

Spambots. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 18:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 89.64.93.40

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Thanks in advance, Karol739 (talk) 23:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by EPIC. MajavahBot (talk) 21:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 84.226.7.83

Status:    In progress

Evasion of global lock by en:WP:LTA/Jermboy27. Thanks in advance! -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 01:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 186.84.89.124

Status:    In progress

LTA / Proxy. Estrellato (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 38.175.141.13

Status:    In progress

LTA / Proxy. Estrellato (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 46.193.67.148

Status:    In progress

LTA / Proxy. Estrellato (talk) 20:40, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 151.181.202.107

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Rgalo10 (banned globally by the WMF). quebecguy ⚜️ (talk | contribs) 02:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 121.140.122.51

Status:    In progress

Proxy. aqurs ❄️ 04:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 106.167.105.154

Status:    In progress

Proxy. aqurs ❄️ 04:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 2400:2200:389:A983:5002:3613:5165:118D

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. HEATHROW XReport --Ayane aka. eunn 06:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 194.30.41.8

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse and Long-term abuse. IP already blocked several times on esWP. Eihel (talk) 11:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 45.82.252.97

Status:    Done

Open proxy. Leonidlednev (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 19:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block/unblock for User:Shāntián Tàiláng

Status:    In progress

See [1] and [2] This user was originally blocked on en.wikt in 2019, and has subsequently been blocked from en.wp, el.wikt, and blocked a few times on Commons for importing the same dispute from one wiki to the next. And now they are importing it here as well, in fact, it seems the all or nearly all of their edits here at meta are either regarding this situation or trying to get others to proxy for them on projects where they are blocked, so a local block may also be in order. Additionally, at least one of their known socks User:Man with a boon is already globally locked for cross-wiki disruption. Five years of disruption and harassment over one block on one project is more than enough. --Beeblebrox (talk) 20:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 51.159.107.240

Status:    Done

Open proxy. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 20:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 21:25, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 195.12.232.227

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

I misread the dates, but given they're doing the exact same thing as 11 days ago, it's probably still blockworthy. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 195.12.232.226

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. XXBlackburnXx (talk) 22:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 46.36.201.102

Status:    In progress

Spambot [3] [4] [5]. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 62.4.45.24

Status:    In progress

Spambot [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 83.24.171.42

Status:    In progress

Spambot [11] [12] [13]. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global block for 91.196.154.10

Status:    Done

Spambot [14]. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by AmandaNP. MajavahBot (talk) 00:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requests for global (un)lock and (un)hiding

Latest comment: 27 minutes ago52 comments29 people in discussion

  Be sure to follow the instructions below:
  • Your request might be rejected if it doesn't include the necessary information.
  • Warning! This page is publicly viewable. If the account name is grossly insulting or contains personal information please contact a steward privately in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect or email your request to the stewards VRT queue at stewards-oversight wikimedia org (direct wiki interface) but do not post it here. Thanks.
  • Warning! This is not the place to ask for locks based on your opinion that someone is disruptive. Global locks are used exclusively against vandalism and spam, not because of content disputes, not because you think that someone deserves to be globally blocked. In such cases, you should ask for local blocks at appropriate places.
  • If you are globally locked, you should appeal your lock to stewards-appeals wikimedia org.
Please describe abusive activity of an account before reporting them here. Since stewards are often not active at projects the reported accounts are, things that seem obvious to you may not be equally obvious to the reviewing steward.
Instructions for making a request

Before requesting that a global account be (un)locked, please be sure that:

  1. You have evidence of cross-wiki disruption from the account(s).
  2. You can show that it is not feasible to use local-only blocks or other measures like page protection to combat the disruption.
  3. You have considered making the request in #wikimedia-stewardsconnect, especially for account names which will be hidden, or for urgent requests.
To make a request for an account to be locked or unlocked
Copy one of the codes below to the bottom of this section and explain why the account(s) should be locked/unlocked.
=== Global lock/unlock for Foo ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
* {{LockHide|username}}
* {{LockHide|username|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the name to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc. --~~~~

For many accounts: 

=== Global lock for spambots/vandals ===
{{status}} <!-- do not remove this template -->
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3}}
{{MultiLock|username|username2|username3|hidename=1}} <!-- if you do not want the names to be visible on this page -->
*...
Reasons, etc, --~~~~

Global lock for GMerosh

Status:    In progress

Longterm abuse. Puppet account of Baran Agir. See discussion on ku.wiki. --Penaber49 (talk) 08:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for অনুরাগ

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse --HuynhTuanVi (talk) 10:56, 22 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Bsadowski1, @EPIC Please consider this case. HuynhTuanVi (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
We should probably wait for the outcome of the enwiki SPI, looks like it's not 100% clear if the user belongs to LTA ThedetectivePiash1? None of the sockpuppets mentioned at en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ThedetectivePiash1/Archive appears to be globally locked by the way, can probably be resolved locally at bnwiki & enwiki? Johannnes89 (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Tunar.ee

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. cross-wiki spammer. Kadı Message 09:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Are there any recent edits from this account? The last edits I found are from 2024. EPIC (talk) 09:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@EPIC, this user is sock account of Çınarcan. He is using Çınarcan account now. I emailed the steward about gagwiki adminship. He is a cross-wiki spammer. Kadı Message 10:17, 24 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Randa Kassis spam ring

Status:    In progress

Spam/undisclosed paid editing. All of them are primarily focused on promoting Russia-backed Syrian resistance politician Randa Kassis and her husband Fabien Baussart (except for RoyalKnight66, which is a self-disclosed alternate account of Tortino66's). English Wikipedia established a CU link between Hazar Sam and Ecrivain Wagner. Ecrivain Wagner and Sarah.rammost uploaded the same image with the same name years apart, among other behavioral/content clues. Shpah elnour blew the whole thing open by suddenly making a bunch of edits promoting SEO optimization services, which got that account - and then the whole network - caught. All of the accounts are somehow able to speak a huge number of languages (especially Arabic, English, and French), and are collectively operating on at least 28 languages of Wikipedia + Wikidata + Commons. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:32, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Nublo777 sock

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. — Tarkoff / 09:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1 et al

Status:    In progress

Rampant sockpuppetry. Please see c:Special:Diff/988774670#User uploading own pictures over multiple usernames and c:Category:Sockpuppets of Anonymous Hong Kong Photographer 1. -- Jeff G. ツ (please ping or talk to me) 14:23, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for QuantumFoam66

Status:    In progress

User is currently indefinitely blocked on dewiki and simplewiki and was recently temporarily blocked on sewiki all for the same disruptive editing to video game-related categories. The user has been warned not to edit in languages they do not know According to the user themselves, English is the only language they speak: "Closing note: someone else in this discussion appears to think that my native language is Ukrainian? It is not. It is indeed English. I'm not good at speaking any other languages, there's no way I could write all this German. --QuantumFoam66 (Diskussion) 06:57, 25. Jan. 2025 (CET)", but this does not stop them from editing in languages they clearly do not know. In addition, it has been pointed out on at least sewiki and dewiki that the English category hierarchy cannot and should not be forced on other language editions and especially not when they do not know the language, not even via machine translation, yet they continue to edit and make changes to the category hierarchy and articles in other languages they clearly do not know. In addition, they have been reported to the incident board on enwiki for this disruptive behaviour. So block on grounds of LTA, cross-wiki abuse (and wasting way too many people's time because of it). --Yupik (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

With no home wiki block I am inclined to decline at this time, it seems to be something that perhaps could be handled by local communities for now. Leaving open for another steward to give a potential opinion though. EPIC (talk) 13:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
With that being said, if we do decide to decline this then I suggest to do it with a note to QuantumFoam66 to please be careful when performing potentially controversial edits in languages they do not know. I see Yupik's point here, and several of the edits are on small wikis as well, where changes are not as closely monitored. EPIC (talk) 13:59, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
I concur that I think it has to be a decline. A global lock isn't appropriate when they are contributing to some projects constructively.MarcGarver (talk) 17:03, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
If they are contributing to even a single project constructively, we should not be sacrificing the rest of them for that one project's sake imo. Many of their destructive edits are on smaller Wikipedia editions (which also bleed over into Wikidata) that do not have the resources to constantly fix the mess left behind. This editor has been warned on multiple Wikis to stop their destructive editing already, yet continues it anyways; how much more damage do they have to do? :/ - Yupik (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
If their behaviour is so harmful, I would expect more local blocks to follow, at least in larger wikis like en, es, fr... have you tried contacting local admins in a few larger wikis? A global (b)lock would have much better chances if there were more local blocks, given that stewards usually act on consensus and currently most project apparently don't really care about their edits. Johannnes89 (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
There is currently a proposal to close the Greenlandic Wikipedia, which I hope that you all will read and reflect upon in relation to this request. This is also the situation in many of the Wikipedia versions this user is "editing". The Greenlandic Wikipedia admin also wrote a really good article in the Kurier about AI and how it affects Greenlandic and the Greenlandic Wikipedia, which echoes what Trosterud said back in 2021 at Arctic Knot about the Wikipedia editions in the circumpolar region and Scannell said this fall at Celtic Knot about the Irish Wikipedia and quality. I hope that you (pl.) will reassess your belief that what this user is doing is not bad enough for a global lock just because en/es/frwiki has failed to block them. - Yupik (talk) 09:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for The-super-world & SPs

Status:    In progress

Persistent disruptive behavior on multiple projects (mainly itwiki), inability to contribute constructively, failure to heed warnings, and repeated nonsensical edits (also copyvios on Commons), making the user irrecoverable --Vale93b (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Appledisk

Status:    In progress

Cross-wiki abuse. Spam / spambot. 𝐖𝐢𝐤𝐢𝐁𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 👤💬 (WikiBayerCatHelper) 23:06, 27 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for 현월

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. 김현호. Skilsdhuo (talk) 14:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Piersino

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:13, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by Stryn. MajavahBot (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Bakelyazid8

Status:    In progress

Long-term abuse. Global lock evasion, see Yazid8Bakel and YAZID8 as prior accounts, making edits to the same articles on en wiki. Ravensfire (talk) 17:47, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock evasion

Status:    In progress

Probable master is Bakelmuhammad0 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)

Latest disposable SPA LTA sock is Mard87664 (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser). Always uploading B4U logos to Commns. Timtrent (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Gregory12977

Status:    Done

Spam / spambot. KonstantinaG07 (talk) 20:27, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by Stryn. MajavahBot (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Vikipedi tarafsız bu değildir

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Cross-wiki abuse. Kadı Message 20:49, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done EPIC (talk) 20:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for ChristenR46

Status:    Done

Spambot(s). KonstantinaG07 (talk) 20:53, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 21:15, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Sur-činski M-ani-jak u Iloku 667

Status:    Done

Lock all:

Long-term abuse. Kolega2357. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done EPIC (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for ジフ・メディア

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. w:ja:LTA:AIHI. Milion Base (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 22:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for 羅翼匡

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Manchiu (talk) 23:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:21, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for CodsodorsWriter

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse XReport --Codename Noreste (talk) 23:14, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Joebassmaster cool

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki vandalism. ~delta (talk • cont) 23:32, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global locks for spambots

Status:    Done

Spambots, spam log. ClumsyOwlet (talk) 23:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 23:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for 細川軍

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Lock evasion of Syun respect for music. あづまはし (talk) 00:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 00:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Rishad Talukdar sock

Status:    Done

Sockpuppet found in enwiki sockpuppet investigation, see w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rishad Talukdar. case involving cross-wiki abuse. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Higef34127

Status:    Done

Cross-wiki abuse. Mtarch11 (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by Bsadowski1. MajavahBot (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for Syrer in Hamburg vor Gericht Frau nach Bein-Amputation misbraucht

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Avoided. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Bsadowski1 (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Global lock for SamueleLeva

Status:    Done

Long-term abuse. Albania spam. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 02:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Robot clerk note:   Done by Bsadowski1. MajavahBot (talk) 02:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

See also

Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation

Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Steward_requests/Global&oldid=28186525"