Stewards/Elections 2012/Votes/Cekli829
The following discussion is closed: This election is closed and these pages are an archive of that event.
- The following candidate has been disqualified from the election. No more votes will be accepted. Please do not modify it.
Yes
edit
- İncelemeelemani (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Why are you still oppose İncelemeelemani 00:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Tacirci (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • knowledgeable and honest vikipedist Tacirci 01:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Borovv (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Yes! Borovv 01:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Vago (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • I believe in your justice, and I think it is most important for stewards!Vago 06:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- MIKHEIL (Eligible, checked by axpde) • MIKHEIL 06:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Vugar 1981 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • N KOziTalk 07:33, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- 1player (Eligible, checked by axpde) • 1player 09:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Craig Rzayev (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I see his great help to Wikipedia. Craig Rzayev 10:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- BetelgeuSeginus (Eligible, checked by axpde) • BetelgeuSeginus 11:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Çalıştay (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I think, Cekli829 does this work.--Çalıştay 12:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mátyás (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I don't see why not Mátyás 12:30, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Vive la Rosière (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • I'm oppose to english domination on WP. This guy is able to speak azeri / turk / gagaouze, he's already doing his work on turk and azeri wiki. So what it's mean ? People who don't speak english are exclude from stewardship ? So in this case you must add it on the elligibility criterias to make it clear. I saw his contribution, it's ok for me to trust him. V!v£ l@ Rosière /Murmurer…/ 13:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ebrahimi-amir (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • I think that Cekli829 is excellent for this work . Ebrahimi-amir 13:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sortilegus (Eligible, checked by axpde) • --Sortilegus 16:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jaba1977 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Jaba1977 05:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Zeljko (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57) • why not? --Zeljko 13:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Goktr001 (Eligible, checked by Quentinv57) • I think he'll achieve nice works. Goktr001 13:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bluerasberry (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • This user has a huge amount of experience on Azerbaijan Wikipedia and enough experience on other projects. I say try the role. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Honmingjun (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • yes Honmingjun 00:33, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- да (yes) --Kmoksy 09:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wantanabe (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Wantanabe 11:38, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Utku Tanrivere (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I trust him and think that he will do his best. Utku Tanrivere 13:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mustafaalmas (Eligible, checked by Savh) • ИӘ (Yes in Kazakh) Mustafaalmas 14:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Brateevsky (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor) • I support! But why you don't say about yourself in Russian? You know it, aren't I? Brateevsky 17:23, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Luizpuodzius (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Luizpuodzius 19:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Кенан (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Кенан 19:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- WizardOfOz (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Moral support. There are opposes about people who have en only, and here are opposes because of en-1. WizardOfOz talk 19:59, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sj (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Moral support. Excellent contribution history. Would you consider working on other global tasks? It seems good mentoring from someone else who cares about these languages would be invaluable here (after 3 years of persistence :). –SJ talk | translate 00:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mikhailov Kusserow (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • Mikhailov Kusserow 07:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Saga City (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • Saga City 09:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comp1089 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • Knowledgeable, honest and a good helper to small Turkic Wikis. Comp1089 04:27, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- ITshnik (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • George Talk 12:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Spiessens (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Spiessens 17:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Orartu (Verification pending) • --Orartu 14:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jusjih (Verification pending) • Jusjih 15:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
No
edit
- MF-Warburg (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Was anything learned from the last candidacies? Unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case. MF-W 00:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ebe123 (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Per MF-Warburg. ~~EBE123~~ talkContribs 00:08, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Nothing has changed, still oppose. Ajraddatz (Talk) 00:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Katarighe (Eligible, checked by axpde) • No change yet, need cross-wiki experience still. Katarighe (Talk) 00:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wikiwind (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Wikit 00:27, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Pedroca cerebral (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • PcTalk 00:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Courcelles (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) • Courcelles 01:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Feedintm (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • ~FeedintmParley 01:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jeffwang (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • For someone who's basic languages are not known, NO. Jeffwang 01:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • minhhuy (talk) 02:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bencmq (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) • Bencmq 02:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Marcus Cyron (Eligible, checked by axpde) • You wrote a bit less about you. I can't vote for a person who don't tell enough about themself. Marcus Cyron 02:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fetchcomms (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • ←fetchcomms 02:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Shizhao (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Shizhao 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Superm401 (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Not enough experience. Superm401 | Talk 03:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Matanya (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Matanya 06:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Savh (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Savhñ 06:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Addihockey10 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Addihockey10 06:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Quentinv57 (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) • You clearly did not stated how you could help us. Sorry, Quentinv57 (talk) 06:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Miss Manzana (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 06:28, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Morning Sunshine (Eligible, checked by Savh) • per all above Morning Sunshine 06:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Filzstift (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I'm missing a introduction of you and why you want to be steward. Filzstift 06:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ul1-82-2 (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • 07:22, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
-
Eddyghazaley(Not eligible, checked by Geitost) • Your presentation and introduction lacks the rousing or fecund aspects of the uses Eddyghazaley 07:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Nihonjoe (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Unsure of experience as statement is very small. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Fastily (Eligible, checked by Thehelpfulone) • FASTILY (TALK) 08:24, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- LuCKY (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Low experience LuCKY 08:25, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- xqt (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • @xqt 08:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Przemub (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Przemub 08:36, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Americophile (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • lack of experience AMERICOPHILE 08:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hydriz (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Hydriz 10:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- M-J (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • en-1 only M-J 10:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jafeluv (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Jafeluv 10:53, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Pandukht (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • --Pandukht 11:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- SusikMkr (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • SusikMkr 11:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Guerillero (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Guerillero 13:23, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Emperyan (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Low experience. Also there are language problems. Emperyan-message/ileti-WMTR 13:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wpollard (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • I would like to see him have more experience with Wikimedia. Wpollard 14:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Vdkdaan (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Vdkdaan 14:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ca$e (Eligible, checked by bennylin) • Ca$e 15:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Aram-van (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Aram-van 15:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Odder (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • odder (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • Herby talk thyme 16:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- PiRSquared17 (Eligible, checked by Wikitanvir) • πr2 (t • c) 17:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Beko (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • --Beko 17:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Lori-m (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Lori-m 19:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- JurriaanH (Eligible, checked by axpde) • JurriaanH 20:40, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- NaBUru38 (Eligible, checked by axpde) • NaBUru38 21:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- VIGNERON (Eligible, checked by axpde) • I didn’t understand why you want to be steward VIGNERON * discut. 23:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wgfinley (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Virtually no response to question about what was done since last candidacies. Wgfinley 07:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bidgee (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Bidgee (Talk) 08:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Samo04 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Samo04 08:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Pmlineditor (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 11:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- KTo288 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • KTo288 12:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Micki (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • mickit 12:45, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Striker (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Striker talk 18:16, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Nemo bis (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Nemo 19:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Anne-theater (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Anne-theater 00:40, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Windchaser (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Windchaser 01:43, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Tiptoety (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • } Tiptoety talk 01:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mehran (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Mehran Debate 15:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Narek75 (Eligible, checked by Pmlineditor) • --Narek75 16:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mathonius (Eligible, checked by axpde) • --Mathonius 18:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Murma174 (Eligible, checked by Reder) • --Murma174 10:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Anacleto 00 (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Anacleto 00 10:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thompson.matthew (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • Thompson.matthew 10:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Asav (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Asav 11:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Mercy (Eligible, checked by Reder) • You seem to be fairly active at your home projects, but I don't see any reason why you should become a steward. Mercy 11:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Taweetham (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Taweethaも 14:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Ngagnebin (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • Ngagnebin 15:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • Armbrust 16:39, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- ASCIIn2Bme (Eligible, checked by Wagino 20100516) • ASCIIn2Bme 16:44, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Puffin (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Puffin 21:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Xania (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Xania 22:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Taichi (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • Taichi - (あ！) 07:57, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Arnaugir (Eligible, checked by Puffin) • Language issues Arnaugir 20:34, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Glane23 (Eligible, checked by Reder) • Geoff Who, me? 23:04, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Don4of4 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • Don4of4 03:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Chaojoker (Verification pending) • Though this user has made great progress in the past few years, finally realizing that there is such a thing as copyright law and is slowly trying to communicate that to the rest of the community at az.wiki as well, I haven't forgotten about the racist template he was once featuring on his user page, which he has now deleted for these elections. While I hope at least part of the reason for deleting it is honest remorse, I believe a user who even once displays a racist attitude should never be trusted with global stewardship. Chaojoker 08:38, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Beyond My Ken (Verification pending) • Beyond My Ken 10:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Alexmilt (Verification pending) • Alexmilt 12:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Laaknor (Verification pending) • I can't support someone that spams users by email to get votes. Laaknor 13:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Barras (Verification pending) • No to spam. Now you get votes, just not the way you wanted them. -Barras 13:37, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- DerHexer (Verification pending) • Say no to canvassing! —DerHexer (Talk) 13:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wpedzich (Verification pending) • Unfortunately. The practice of email canvassing makes it impossible for me to vote otherwise, this is not the way to get votes, but rather to make others wary of you. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 14:42, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- MZaplotnik (Verification pending) • Per all above— MZaplotnik (contribs) 14:56, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Leinad (Verification pending) • I can't trust a user who spams users by email to get votes LeinaD (t) 15:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- M7 (Verification pending) • Per above, with a pressing request to the Election Committee to exclude this candidate from the next election and to automatically disqualify people caught spamming. M/ 15:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Neutral
edit
- Wjalves (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Jardel @lves msg 01:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Érico Júnior Wouters (Eligible, checked by Logan) • Érico Júnior Wouters 03:42, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Martin1978 (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Martin1978 08:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Laurent Jerry (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • C'est un peu court, jeune homme Laurent Jerry 10:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Lankiveil (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Was going to oppose, but given that the candidate only has en-1, I consider it reasonable that they didn't write a lengthy nomination statement. Craig Franklin 12:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- Sebleouf (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • Sebleouf 17:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- VonTasha (Eligible, checked by Geitost) • More experience would be necessary. Next year, maybe ? VonTasha 18:37, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
- T137 (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • T137 02:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- U.Steele (Eligible, checked by Bencmq) • hard to choose U.Steele 06:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Billinghurst (Eligible, checked by Savh) • billinghurst sDrewth 11:09, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Rsloch (Eligible, checked by Wiki13) • Lack of experience stops a yes vote Rsloch 16:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hatonjan (Eligible, checked by axpde) • Hatonjan 18:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
- Slon02 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Slon02 02:19, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Reder (Eligible, checked by Savh) • Reder 20:11, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Henryk Borawski (Verification pending) •
- Duffyduck97 (Eligible, checked by Addihockey10) • Duffyduck97 21:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
- Theking17825 (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • Theking17825 01:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bhawani Gautam (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • Bhawani 05:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Floflo (Eligible, checked by Thompson.matthew) • Actually embarrassed with the so many "No". Floflo 14:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jules78120 (Verification pending) • Jules78120 07:09, 13 February 2012 (UTC)