Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2007/statements/Majorly

< Stewards | elections 2007
The following Election below has ended so please do not vote here since all votes made after the conclusion of the elections will be discounted or removed.

Majorly

edit

Identity confirmed for this candidacy by Cary Bass

English:
  • Languages: en, de-1 or 2, fr-1 or 2
  • Personal information: Hi, I'm Majorly, and I am an active Meta bureaucrat, and a Commons and Simple English Wikipedia sysop. If elected I will watch the various requests pages more than I do now. I am also a member of the Small Wiki Monitoring Team, where I have kept watch for spam and such on smaller wikis, and I am an OTRS volunteer, and am active on many mailing lists and IRC channels. Thanks for your time.
العربية:
Español :
  • Idiomas: en, de-1 or 2, fr-1 or 2
  • Información personal: Hola, soy Majorly, burócrata activo de Meta además de bibliotecario en Commons y la Wikipedia en inglés simple. De ser aprobado, vigilaré las diversas páginas de solicitudes más de lo que lo hago ahora. También soy miembro del equipo de monitoreo de wikis pequeñas, en donde vigilo por spam y cosas similares; soy también voluntario en el OTRS y activo en varias de las mailing lists y canales del IRC. Gracias por su tiempo.
Français :
  • Langues : en, de-1 ou -2, fr-1 ou -2
  • Informations personnelles : Ça va, je suis Majorly, bureaucrate actif sur meta et admin sur Commons et Simple English Wikipedia. Si je suis élu je surveillerai les pages de requêtes davantage. Je suis également membre du Small Wiki Monitoring Team, où je surveille les petits wikis pour spam et autres vandalismes; Je suis aussi volontaire sur OTRS et actif sur plusieurs mailing lists et sur plusieurs channels de l'IRC. Merci pour votre attention.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: en, de-1 oder 2, fr-1 oder 2
  • Informationen zur Person: Hi, ich bin Majorly und ich bin ein aktiver Metabürokrat, sowie Commons- und Simple-English-Wikipedia-Administrator. Wenn ich gewählt werde, werde ich die verschiedenen Antragsseiten noch häufiger bearbeiten, als ich es jetzt schon tue. Außerdem bin ich ein Mitglied des Small Wiki Monitoring Teams, bei dem ich kleinere Wikis und Spam beobachtet und gemeldet habe. Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit.
Gaeilge:
  • Teangacha: en, de-1 or 2, fr-1 or 2
  • Eolais pearsanta: Haigh, 'is mise Majorly, agus táim i'm mhaorlathach gníomhach ar Meta, agus riarthóir ar Cómhaoin agus Vicípéid Béarla Shimplí. Má bheidh thofa agam, beidh mé ag déanamh faire ar leathanaigh iarratais éagsúla níos mó ná anois. Freisin, táim ar an Foireann Faire na Vicí Bheaga, agus ansin, déanaim faire ar turscar agus rudaí mar sin ar na Vicí beaga, agus déanaim obair deonach ar OTRS, agus táim gníomhach ar a lán liostaí seoltaí agus cainéil IRC. Buíochas le do am.
Bahasa Indonesia:
Italiano:
  • Lingue: en, de-1 o 2, fr-1 o 2
  • Informazioni personali: Ciao, sono Majorly, un burocrate attivo su Meta ed amministratore su Commons e Simple English Wikipedia. Se sarò eletto terrò d'occhio le varie pagine delle richieste più di quanto non faccia ora. Sono inoltre un membro dello Small Wiki Monitoring Team, dove provvedo a tenere d'occhio lo spam e altri vandalismi sulle wiki più piccole; sono anche volontario nel OTRS ed attivo su varie mailing lists e su varie degli canali IRC. Grazie per la vostra attenzione.
日本語：
  • 言語: en, de-1 または 2, fr-1 または 2
  • 候補者の情報: メタのビューロクラットとして活動しています。また コモンズと簡単な英語版ウィキペディアの管理者でもあります。スチュワードに選任されましたら、さまざまな依頼のページを今以上に頻繁に注視したいと思います。私はSmall Wiki Monitoring Teamのメンバーでもあり、スパムなどが小規模ウィキに投稿されるのを監視しています。ご精読ありがとうございました。


Suomi:
Polski:
Português :
Српски / srpski:
中文：

Questions / Frage / Domande / Pertanyaan / Kysymykset / Perguntas / Ceisteanna

edit
  1. Are you sure you gain enough support for this position to justify you running, given that your recent RFA on the english wikipedia didn't succeed?--Phoenix-wiki 20:39, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not Majorly, but I want to make a comment here. Please note that the RfA did not fail because the Community didn't trust him; he withdrew it. --Agüeybaná (hábleme) 20:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    That's right :) I had significant support there, and I only withdrew because of false allegations being made, which needed to be sorted out - I felt it best to withdraw. And stewardship is very different to enwiki adminship. I feel my experience on Meta and Commons which are both interwiki projects, and of Simple English Wikipedia, a small project, is good enough that I'll be a positive addition to the current stewards. Majorly (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I wanted to avoid commenting on these elections, but I feel the need to comment here. As an enwiki bureaucrat, I would like to state that Majorly is welcome to resume adminship duties at any time without the need for RFA. --Deskana 01:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes / Sí / Oui / Ya / Ja / Za / Evet / За /支持 / مع الترقية / Kyllä / Sim / Tá

edit
  1. support —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nishkid64 (talk) 00:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. En drama has nothing to do with here, I trust him Jaranda | wat's sup 00:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support. Sam Blacketer 00:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SWMT should all have this kind of access. DarkoNeko 00:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Nick1915 - all you want 00:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --M/ 00:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Absolutely! Dreamafter 01:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Has my full trust. Philippe 01:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Strong Support - He is an excellent Meta Bureaucrat and he knows about all the Policies and guideliness and would make an excellent Steward..amen  ;) ..--Cometstyles 01:33, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support Captain panda 01:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Would make a very good addition. Would get requests done at a very fast pace. ;-) Absolutely. Cbrown1023 talk 02:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. While I do not always agree with him, I admit his virtue - separating his opinion and action: He is the one who can wait for another's opinion in potentially problematic issues. --Aphaia 03:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. --Shizhao 03:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Unquestionably. ----Anonymous DissidentTalk 05:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yep SQLQuery me! 06:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Plati 06:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. D'accord Icestorm815 06:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Okay" —translated by Pathoschild.
  19. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 07:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  20. don't see why not --.snoopy. AKA dario vet · (talk) 08:46, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. + --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 11:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  22. support —Geoffr 11:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. oscar 12:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. A really trusted user, always helpful for deleting commons' images! ^__^ --Filnik 12:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. .anaconda 12:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. --Kronin▄¦▀ 12:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. · AndonicO Talk 13:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Trusted and dedicated. Ryan Postlethwaite 13:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Active admin on multiple projects. And Engliah Wikipedia adminship failed due to utterly laughable allegations. Lurker 13:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Jon Harald Søby 14:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. MF-Warburg(de) 15:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --filip ⁂ 16:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --C-M 17:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Ja. Heimstern 18:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. He's a good fellow Gaillimh 18:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Catchpole 19:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Support - known and trusted. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk to me) 20:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  38. My interactions with Majorly on En-wiki have been more than positive, and I trust him. Acalamari 20:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. --Freegiampi 20:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Redvers 21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  41. TwoOars 21:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Maxim(talk) 21:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Titoxd(?!?) 06:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Ar Son - gan dabht ar bith. Beir bua, a chara :) - Alison ❤ 07:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  45. --Fabexplosive The archive man 11:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Sure! Snowolf 12:09, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Semolo75 12:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --Thogo (talk) 14:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Si. --DarkAp89 16:16, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  50. I'm Mailer Diablo and I approve this candidate! - 18:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Efbé   20:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Yes. en:User:Mercury Mercury 23:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  53. --Alastor Moody (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Giggy\Talk 07:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Doc glasgow 15:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --Giovanni 18:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Anthøny 19:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  58. I have serious concerns about his sometime tendency to act without first seeking out consensus, which I have shared with him in the past, but I believe that he means well, and that over time he will grow into this role if selected. ++Lar: t/c 04:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  59. + Hillgentleman 05:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Sí. Pedro :  Chat  10:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  61. -Royalguard11(Talk·@en) 19:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  62. WjBscribe 19:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    --U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 21:30, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Christopher Parham (talk) 01:36, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Dbiel 04:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  65. James086Talk | Email 09:08, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  66. --Support - Auroranorth 10:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Support--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 11:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  68. --Ahonc 19:52, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  69. ...Aurora... 08:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  70.   Support KTC 16:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  71.   Support Greeves (talk • contribs) 02:19, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  72.   Support I've always felt that Majorly has had his heart in the right place, and I'm happy to support him here. Grandmasterka 08:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  73. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 15:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  74. Lahiru k 03:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  75. Húsönd 06:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Will Majorly be a good and competent steward? Yes. No more thought required. --Deskana 10:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  77.   Support. --Smeira 10:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Majorly has my full support. Sarah 17:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Deskana's statement pretty much sums my thoughts. EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:21, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  80.   Support @pple 04:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  81. --OosWesThoesBes 18:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  82. positiv von commons in erinnerung. — ABF — 20:01, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
  83. Addhoc 00:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  84. --Oxymoron83 12:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Yes, please. He is a decent Wikimedian with exemplary knowledge, commitment, and consideration for others. My unqualified support. PeaceNT 14:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Support. --Connel MacKenzie 05:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  87. --Piero Montesacro 14:28, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  88. --Cspurrier 23:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Gribeco 00:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  90. مع، بالطبع.--Alnokta 21:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  91. — Manecke 18:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  92. Yes! — Kalan ? 11:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Excellent experience. IanManka 05:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  94. --Phoenix-wiki talk · contribs 12:24, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Support --King Edmund of the Woods 13:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  96. SlimVirgin (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  97. -- Az1568 10:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Bapti 11:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  99. --Berlin-Jurist 16:54, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Absolutely. Best of the best. GlassCobra 21:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Garion96 22:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No / Non / Nein / Tidak / Przeciw / Hayır / Против /反对/ ضد الترقية / Ei / Não / Níl

edit
  1. Joe 03:28, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. No VanTucky talk 03:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mr.Z-man 04:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Better not. --Complex 12:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I'm not entirely convinced here. Ral315 (talk) 13:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. mnh·∇· 19:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  7. PDD 20:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. -- MaxEnt 02:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  9. No. Xoloz 14:56, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Mike R 15:10, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  11. For the same reasons I had to oppose the RfB. Far too combative and prone to incite drama. --JayHenry 16:55, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Weak oppose, too much drama --BigDT 19:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  13. I cannot approve of someone who has an extensive history of hostility toward naysayers on RFAs. TML 05:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  14. I don't think Majorly is suitable yet for Stewardship. Maybe next year. -- Bryan (talk|commons) 09:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  15. I've considered this vote more than any others. I like & respect Majorly. However I feel that, while his judgment may ultimately be fine, he may be less considered in quick decision. For an admin this matters not, it can be quickly remedied - for a steward it does. --Herby talk thyme 20:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Weak no. --Coredesat (en.wp) 21:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Respectfully no. Majorly is a nice guy, but I am not sure he's ready for the job yet. Perhaps next year. en:Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 16:21, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  18. I am very worried that this user will leak information related to checkuser to third parties. Miranda 22:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Not now. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 22:58, 30 November 2007 (GMT)
  20. I'm sorry, but this really disturbs me, since the blocked user (Kmweber) seems to have done more on en-wiki than only making edits to RFAs. I understand that on English Wikipedia users who oppose self-nominations per se may be looked strangely at, but I personally don't find this to be particularly disruptive behaviour. Rejecting votes is one thing, but indefinite block... Maybe it's a cultural thing, but this is the reason why I cannot support this candidate. –Ejs-80 01:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Simplicius (de) 14:22, 1 December 2007 (UTC) I got known to Majorly in English Wikipedia: unfriendly, the sort of admin driving users away.[reply]
  22. Spartaz 18:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Zginder 21:56, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Picaroon (t) 01:12, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Recent enwiki RfA demonstrated that drama and controversy seem to follow Majorly around, which is something from which I like to see stewards distance themselves. AmiDaniel 06:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  26. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. --MONGO 08:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Samsara 14:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Spebi 05:43, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Crockspot 05:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Majorly is too busy deleting images from Commons to be a suitable candidate. As many of these "unknown source" images are actually very PD, deleting 20+ images per minute is not enough care in my opinion. I have had to spend many a night looking into images that have turned up on CommonsTicker (often being removed from many pages across many projects), and I have a backlog of images to check -- So far, every one that I have had reason to look into, the image has turned out to be PD.
    Perhaps it's a job that needs to be done, but it is not being done in a manner that I expect a steward to undertaking it. John Vandenberg 03:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  32. I like the candidate and think they do a worthy job where they are, but some of the concerns re this candidacy are too major to ignore. Orderinchaos 14:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. --AFBorchert 15:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC) Apparently, Majorly is fluent in one language only. I expect more from stewards.[reply]
  34. Sinn 15:23, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Kusma 06:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Tim Q. Wells 22:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Patrícia msg 23:18, 8 December 2007 (UTC) A fine admin, no complaints there, but I find him a bit too immature sometimes in certain discussions.[reply]
  38. Cecil 20:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Not yet. Videmus Omnia 02:52, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Iamunknown 03:27, 16 December 2007 (UTC) As per Orderinchaos[reply]
  41. Phil Sandifer 03:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Non ego credo, nunc in aeternum: (That's oppose): Geogre 12:36, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Thatcher131 22:31, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral / Neutrale / Neutre / Netral / Wstrzymuję się / Tarafsız / Воздержались /中立 / Tyhjää / Neutro / Neodrach

edit

May change my mind later. Miranda 02:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Refus de vote, à cause du système de confirmation des stewards. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 05:58, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Translation: "Refusal to vote, because of the stewards confirmation system." —translated by Pathoschild.
  2. ~ Riana ⁂ 16:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. xaosflux Talk 05:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. bibliomaniac15 21:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. After reviewing some more of Majorly's involvement, I can't support. This is not the sort of person I care to have as a steward, but if others wish to elect, then I won't stand in the way. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2007/statements/Majorly&oldid=24908128"