Wikimedia Meta-Wiki

Stewards/elections 2009/statements/Fabexplosive

< Stewards | elections 2009 | statements
Warning The 2009 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

Fabexplosive

edit

translate: translation help, statement, template, headings

English:
  • Languages: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Personal info: I have been a member of Wikimedia projects since 2005. In the beginning of 2006 I became concerned with projects outside of the Italian Wikipedia and Meta, where I used instruments to fight vandalism and methods for management of the rights of users. I also helped the stewards to fight cross-wiki vandalism via IRC and in this way I believe I have also obtained their trust in me, I have been given the global rollback right since I'm an active cross-wiki vandal fighter. I have been a sysop on the Italian Wikipedia since October 2006. I want to become a steward to assist more effectively with crosswiki vandalism and for those in smaller projects.
Deutsch:
  • Sprachen: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Informationen zur Person: Ich bin seit 2005 Mitglied von Wikimedia-Projekten. Ab dem Frühjahr 2006 habe ich begonnen, mich mit anderen Projekten als nur der italienischen Wikiquote und Meta zu beschäftigen, wo ich Instrumente zur Bekämpfung von Vandalismus und Methoden zur Verwaltung von Benutzerrechten verwendete. Ich habe auch Stewards über IRC geholfen, Vandalismus auf unterschiedlichen Wikis zu bekämpfen und ich glaube, dadurch auch ihr Vertrauen gewonnen zu haben; ich habe die globalen Rollback-Rechte erhalten, seit ich aktiv gegen Vandalismus auf unterschiedlichen Wikis vorgehe. Seit Oktober 2006 bin ich Administrator auf der italienischen Wikipedia. Ich möchte Steward werden, um effektiver gegen Vandalismus auf unterschiedlichen Wikis und kleineren Wikis vorgehen zu können.
français:
  • Langues: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Renseignements personnels: Je suis membre des projets Wikimedia depuis 2005. Au début de 2006 je me suis intéressé aux projets en dehors de la Wikipédia en italien et méta, où j'utilise les outils pour combattre le vandalisme et les méthodes de gestions des droits utilisateurs. J'ai aussi aidé à combattre le vandalisme cross-wiki via IRC et de cette façon je pense avoir obtenu leur confiance. J'ai reçu le droit global rollback depuis que je suis un patrouilleur cross-wiki. Je suis administrateur sur la Wikipédia en italien depuis octobre 2006. Je veux devenir steward pour aider de manière plus efficace à lutter contre le vandalisme cross-wiki et contre le vandalisme des projets plus petits.
Bahasa Indonesia:
  • Bahasa yang dikuasai: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Informasi pribadi: tuliskan pernyataan Anda di sini
italiano:
  • Lingue: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Informazioni personali: Collaboro ai progetti Wikimedia dal 2005. All'inizio del 2006 ho iniziato ad interessarmi di altri progetti oltre a quello della Wikipedia in lingua italiana e a Meta, dove avevo usato gli strumenti per la lotta al vandalismo e per gestire i diritti degli utenti. Ho inoltre aiutato gli steward nella lotta al vandalismo su più wiki tramite i canali IRC e in questo modo ritengo di avere ottenuto la loro fiducia, ho inoltre ottenuto i diritti di global rollback, dal momento che sono attivo nella lotta al vandalismo. Sono stato amministratore nella Wikipedia in lingua italiana da ottobre 2006. Desidero diventare steward per aiutare in modo ancora più efficace nella lotta al vandalismo su più wiki e a quello nei progetti più piccoli.
日本語:
  • 言語: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • 候補者の情報: 2005年からウィキメディアプロジェクトに参加しています。2006年の初めにイタリア語版ウィキペディアと、荒らしに対処するツールと利用者権限の管理メソッドを使っていたメタの外部のプロジェクトに興味を持ちはじめました。私はIRCを通じて複数ウィキ間での荒らし行為と戦うスチュワードの手助けもし、この点で彼らの私に対する信頼も得ていると思っています。というのも、私が活発な荒らし対処をするようになってから、差し戻しの権限を頂きました。2006年10月からイタリア語版ウィキペディアの管理者をしています。私は複数ウィキ間や小規模プロジェクトでの荒らし行為への対処により能率的に援助をするため、スチュワードにさせていただければと思います。
polski:
  • Języki: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Informacje osobiste: Uczestniczę w projektach Wikimedii od 2005. W początnkach 2006 zacząłem się zajmować projektami innymi niż włoska Wikipedia i Meta gdzie wykorzystywałem narzędzia do zwalczania wandalizmów i uprawnienia do zarządzania prawami użytkowników. Wspomagałem również stewardów w zwalczaniu międzyprojektowego spamu poprzez IRC i mam nadzieję, że zdobyłem ich zaufanie do mnie i uzyskałem prawo do globalnego rewertowania. Jestem administratorem włoskiej Wikipedii od października 2006. Chciałbym zostać stewardem by wspierać bardziej efektywnie międzyprojektowe wandalizmy i te na mniejszych projektach.
português:
  • Línguas: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Informações pessoais: Sou um membro dos projetos da Wikimedia desde 2005. No início de 2006 fiquei preocupado com os projetos além da Wikipédia em italiano e o Meta, onde eu usava instrumentos de combate ao vandalismo e métodos de gerenciamento de direitos de usuários. Também ajudei os stewards na luta aos vandalismos xwiki via IRC e, desta forma, creio que também tenho a sua confiança em mim, eu tenho o direito de global rollback desde que me tornei um lutador contra o vandalismo cross-wiki. Tenho sido um administrador na Wikipédia em italiano desde outubro de 2006. Quero tornar-me um steward para ajudar de forma mais eficaz no combate a vandalismos crosswiki e nos projetos menores.
русский:
  • Языки: it-N, en-2, and I can read basic French
  • Личная информация: Я участвую в проектах Викимедиа с 2005 года. В начале 2006 года я начал беспокоиться о проектах вне итальянской Википедии и метавики, где я использовал инструменты для борьбы с вандализмом и методы для управления правами пользователей. Также, я помогал стюардам бороться с кроссвики-вандализмом посредством взаимодействия в IRC, и таким образом, я надеюсь, что я также заработал их доверие. Вскоре после того, как я занялся борьбой с вандализмом, мне был выдан флаг глобального отката. С октября 2006 года я являюсь администратором итальянской Википедии. Я хочу стать стюардом чтобы помогать в более эффективной борьбе с вандализмом между большими разделами, а также в малых проектах.


  Questions → Stewards/elections 2009/Questions

  Yes

edit
  1. —DerHexer (Talk) 00:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nemo 00:06, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --M/ 00:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Experienced global vandal fighter, no issues here. Majorly talk 00:15, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support. No problems here. Razorflame 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Mr.Z-man 00:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7. miranda 00:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Though global sysop would be nicer (I'm surprised that wasn't implemented) NuclearWarfare 00:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support The Helpful One 00:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Cbrown1023 talk 00:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. yes. Micha L. Rieser 00:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Seha 00:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Az1568 (talk) 00:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Herr Kriss 00:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes/Sí/はい. --Taichi - (あ！) 00:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Change my vote... --Taichi - (あ！) 03:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Kalan ? 01:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Yes. Seems to know what stewardship is for. Romaine 01:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. --Ivan Štambuk 01:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Support --Skyluke ★ 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. OK. Marcus Cyron 01:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Experienced cross-wiki vandal fighter - I see no issues whatsoever.  — Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 01:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. --Kanonkas 01:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Support — neuro(talk) 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24. --FollowTheMedia 01:27, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25. He has been fighting vandalism since before I joined Meta. hHe is very experienced and has my trust ..--Cometstyles 03:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26. bibliomaniac15 03:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Of course. --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 04:45, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
  28. --Sir James 05:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Yes bastique demandez! 06:05, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Avjoska 06:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 07:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32. --Triquetra 08:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Sebleouf 08:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  34. I'm starting thinking that if we won't support him this time, he will continue to come back every year :P :) --Filnik 09:56, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  35. --Lucien leGrey ( m | es ) 10:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  36. --Wing 10:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Sì. Jon Harald Søby 10:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Efbé   10:36, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  39. -- RaminusFalcon «…» («it.wikipedia») 10:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Rastrojo (D•ES) 10:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  41. →Na·gy 11:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Njaelkies Lea 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  43. --Senpai 12:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  44.   Support --Broc 12:50, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  45.   Support --EH101 14:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  46. --Yuma 13:21, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  47. --Ivocamp96 14:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  48. --MF-W 14:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  49. --Ahonc 14:37, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  50. Obelix 15:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  51. trusted fellow, useful in cross vandalism fighting. DarkoNeko 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  52. --Cotton 15:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  53.   Support — Albert Krantz¿? 15:52, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  54. --Oxymoron83 16:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  55. --Freed73 18:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  56. --ripe tolc 19:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  57. --Pigr8 20:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  58. TheNeon 22:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  59. --Aushulz 03:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  60. --P@d@w@ne 09:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  61. − Elfix × talk (fr) 10:38, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  62.   Support--Nick1915 - all you want 11:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Like last year. --FiliP × 12:21, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  64. --Stef Mec 13:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  65. vvv 13:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  66.   Support — MrDolomite • Talk 15:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  67. --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  68. Yes :D.- 天使 BlackBeast Do you need something? 20:58, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Alex Pereira falaê 12:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  70. --Torsolo 14:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  71. --Amarvudol 18:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  72. --Guidomac 18:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  73. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 21:52, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  74. I don't like his involvement in Italian languages issues, but: he is a good candidate, he could pass and we need more active stewards. If elected, I expect from him not to interfere in Italian languages issues. --Millosh 12:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  75.   Support Kingturtle 18:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  76.   Support Andcen 23:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Kronos 08:58, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  78. Ozymandias 09:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  79.   Support ok for me --Gdgourou 10:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Bence  My Talk 15:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  81. John Vandenberg 17:15, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  82. —Dferg (meta-w:es.) 21:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  83. Sirabder87 21:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  84.   Support --Wayiran 19:48, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      Support --§ Snake311 (I'm Not Okay!) 20:15, 7 February 2009 (UTC) Not eligible to vote, follow all instructions at Stewards/elections_2009/Guidelines#Voters please. --Nick1915 - all you want 11:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  85. yes. notafish }<';> 20:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  86. ~  SupportGustavocarra 11:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Si è mostrato degno per il suo bel lavoro.[reply]
  87. --Turgon the dark side of a normal user 19:01, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
  88. ok --Rax 23:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Seems convenient, no problem O. Morand 00:26, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Nbarth 03:01, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  91. --Gusme 16:31, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  92.   Support --Zeljko 08:18, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  93.   Support Andcen 16:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  94.   Support--Thesupermat 09:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  95.   Support Alexander VIII 12:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  96. --Mayer Bruno 23:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  97.   Support --Elijah/אליהו (Eliyahu)/إلياس (Ilyas) (Me!) 16:00, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  98. --.snoopy. ✉ 21:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  99. ~ putnik 11:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Yerul (comlink) 18:19, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Mike Halterman 09:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Роман Беккер 11:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  103. --Rave 21:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  104.   Support --‍‍Komeil 4life 13:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  105.   Support --Màrço 27 (msg) on it.wiki: user page — talk page 13:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Aleksandrit 17:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  107.   SupportNatanaeel83 20:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  108.   Support - Punx 07:48, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  109.   Support --Grebenkov 18:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  110.   Support Good luck! - Dorgan 12:39, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  111.   Support --دانقولا 23:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  112.   Support--Mstislavl 09:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  113.   Support --Сдобников Андрей 21:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  114.   Support -- Avi 23:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  No

edit
  1. — Aitias // discussion 00:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Puntori 00:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. I didn't yet understand Mori's affair (a diffamating campaign against another sysop, Valepert, made up by email in order to obtain Valepert's deflag which he seems to be involved in). I also have doubts about his CU-related knowledge--Vituzzu 00:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Isn't true, only supposition without positive response or evidence of this act. --Fabexplosive The archive man 17:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you give us some links which confirm this fact, please? --Pietrodn · talk with me 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Pietrodn don't pretend to ignore what I'm referring to--Vituzzu 23:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Vito don't pretend that everyone here is an it.wiki's community expert or can just take your word for these allegations. --Nemo 13:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Please Nemo don't pretend to be a fireman: Pietro knows what I'm referring to since we said so many times that Fab is involved into diffamating campaign against Valepert, an email was sent to an user who disclosed the fact, maybe it's better to take a look at deflag's page and to see if an user posted there: maybe you wouldn't say to be a community expert but simply to be coherent, and please stop this flame I'm not intrested in--Vituzzu 21:48, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    If "an user" "disclosed the fact", why don't you link to it? So everyone can see and evaluate the situation. Please provide links, precise information, and diffs. --Pietrodn · talk with me 13:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh it's lovable: to ask for a diff knowing that the requested diff won't mean anything to people who doesn't know the situation o who is not from it.wiki, really lovable--Vituzzu 14:09, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps because it doesn't actually mean anything, even to people who know the situation and are from it.wiki. This is only a house of cards. --Nemo 18:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Questions are unanswered. They should be answered by now. Prodego talk 05:32, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. I don't trust him enough to have access to checkuser and oversight tools; besides that, he has an history of executing tasks without a clear comprehension of the reasons behind them. --Brownout(msg) 10:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Aqwis 11:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Oppose Vyk 11:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. I agree with Brownout. --LaPizia 14:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Not ready Helios 14:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. very dangerous user. --valepert 14:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Perhaps it's a language barrier, but dangerous is a pretty harsh word in the English language. Could you clarify how Fabexplosive is "dangerous"? Thanks. Majorly talk 16:31, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    probably because he has an explosive user name :) :P --.snoopy. ✉ 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I think that's not a joke--Vituzzu 23:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Better be safe than sorry. Stweradship is one of the most sensitive jobs and should only be given with absolute trustworthiness. --Nahum 15:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Jehochman 17:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Oppose Guido den Broeder 19:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you are not eligible to vote this year, you must have had 600 edits on any project by November 1, and either an SUL account or a link to that account on your userpage. You must also have 50 edits since August 1 and not be blocked here. ST47 01:09, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Excuse me? Since when is a SUL account obligatory? Guido den Broeder 15:51, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    He said either SUL or link to the account which is eligible on the userpage, best regards, --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 15:55, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    In that, case, I want my vote restored. Guido den Broeder 16:33, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Restored per [1], --birdy geimfyglið (:> )=| 17:22, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Spacebirdy. Great tool, btw. Guido den Broeder 18:16, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. No. Alefbe 19:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. NonvocalScream 20:57, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Oppose --Nrainer 23:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Uwe Gille 09:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  18.   Strong oppose See The meatpuppeting attack on LMO wikipedia Szwedzki 18:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Béria Lima Msg 18:41, 2 February 2009 (UTC) Per Vituzzu and Brownout.[reply]
  20. Quoting Brownout. --KS 23:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Hargau 05:28, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Oppose. --Checco 12:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  23.   Oppose Agree with Szwedzki Gonzolito 11:29, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  24.   Oppose Quoting Vituzzu. --Rael 00:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  25.   Oppose - Funatic 14:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  26.   Strongest oppose possible per meatpuppetery incident on LMO Wikipedia. OhanaUnitedTalk page 15:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  27.   Oppose. Per The meatpuppeting attack on lmowikipedia. --Lucas Nunes 23:39, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  28.   Oppose, seems not trustful enough. --Wikikids 03:09, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  29.   Oppose Something doesn't seem right. Maedin\talk 21:03, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  30.   Oppose. If he was involved in the meatpuppetery incident behind his back then he didn't act circumspectly. The other possibility is worse. - Xbspiro 15:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  31.   Oppose - I can't make sense of the lmo.wikipedia case. --Jorunn 16:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  32.   Oppose - Lombard Wikipedia, a lot of problem with Fabexplosive. For example: http://lmo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Grott/Archivi/6#Analisi_del_comportamento_dell.27amministratore_Fabexplosive. --Dragonòt 16:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    (little precisation) I've blocked meatpuppets and trolls in lmo.wiki, some trolls attack me in this page (or "some users troll friendly attack me in this page")... --Fabexplosive The archive man 07:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Neutral

edit
  1.   Neutral. Il ha multo votas contra Fabexplosive, ma io non comprehende pro que. Il poterea esser util que le opponentes explica lor position... QuartierLatin1968 20:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  2. --Davecrosby uk 00:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Mailer Diablo 03:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Quoting QuartierLatin1968. --Xinstalker 13:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  5. ...Aurora... 11:34, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Neutral - I support this user generally, despite use of global rollback, but cannot support stewardship for that reason. - Amgine/meta wikt wnews blog wmf-blog goog news 21:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Neutral Per the dispute in lmowiki. --Taichi - (あ！) 03:05, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/elections_2009/statements/Fabexplosive&oldid=26366940"