Travel Guide/Naming straw poll/de

Frage: Soll das neue Wikimedia Reiseprojekt WikiVoyage genannt werden?

edit

Hintergrund

edit

WikiVoyage ist ein unabhängig geführtes Reiseprojekt, das von WikiVoayge e.V. organisiert und gehostet wird. Es ist eine gemeinnützige Organisation aus Deutschland. WikiVoyage e.V. hat sich kürzlich entschieden WikiVoyage inklusive Domain zu WMF zu transferieren.

In the meantime, the WMF Board of Trustees decided to launch a travel project under the Wikimedia umbrella.

One of the first decisions for launching the project is whether the new project should be called Wikivoyage, or whether it should be launched under a new name. If the answer is the latter, this would substantially complicate the potential for integration of the existing Wikivoyage projects, as the community and non-profit organization supporting it would need to be persuaded to support the new name and be subject to legal approval.

Moreover, any public process to decide upon a different name may present challenges. Typically the choice of a name is a confidential process to ensure that domain names are not squatted or trademarks are not registered by third parties in an effort to sell back those names at high prices. The Wikivoyage name is well-established (the project has been in operation since 2006) and the non-profit currently owning the name has committed to supporting the idea of potential integration of its operations with WMF.

It is therefore WMF's stated preference to launch the new travel project under the name Wikivoyage, and to forego alternatives. With that said, we want to open up this process for a straw poll. If a majority opposes launching under this name, we suggest that we run a more open-ended naming process (with the risks that this entails, both for a successful Wikivoyage->WMF migration, and for fully securing a name).

Dauer

edit

Diese Wahl wird nach 7 Tagen am 26.09.2012 um 23:59:59 Uhr Pazifikzeit enden.

Voting eligibility

edit

Wikimedia Community Members

edit

You may vote from any one registered account you own on a qualified wiki (you may only vote once, regardless of how many accounts you own). To qualify, this one account must:

  • not be blocked on more than one project; and
  • not be blocked on the project you are voting from; and
  • not be a bot; and
  • have made at least 25 edits (edits on several Wikimedia wikis can be combined if your accounts are unified into a global account)

Affected Travel Community Members

edit

You may vote from any one registered account you own on a qualified wiki (you may only vote once, regardless of how many accounts you own). Please provide a backlink to a contribution history with no fewer than 25 edits on an affected travel community site. To qualify, this account must:

  • kein Bot sein; und
  • dort mindestens 25 Änderungen getätigt haben.

Entwickler

edit

MediaWiki-Entwickler sind stimmberechtigt, wenn sie:

  • are Wikimedia server administrators with shell access; or
  • have commit access to Wikimedia's code repository and have made at least one commit.

Staff and contractors

edit

Wikimedia Foundation staff and contractors qualify to vote if they are employed by or under contract with the Foundation on the date of their vote.

Board members and advisory board members

edit

Current and former members of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation and WikiVoyage and the Advisory Board are qualified to vote.

Wahlmöglichkeiten

edit

Möglichkeit 1: Start des neuen Reiseprojektes unter dem Namen WikiVoyage

edit

This assumes that WMF will be able to negotiate a migration of WikiVoyage operations to WMF servers, and a transfer of the domain name.





Option 2: Run an open-ended process to decide the name for the new travel project

edit

Kommentare

edit
  • What's the abbreviation of this name? "wv" conflicts with "Wikiversity". Liangent 07:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that I'm not voting, but I wonder a little about the community dynamics of merging fragments of several communities (plus a whole WikiVoyage community) into an existing name. I'm not sure whether an entirely new, fresh, shiny name might not be a better thing. But I've got nothing to base this on but gut instinct.  :) Philippe (WMF) (talk) 08:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]