Universal Code of Conduct/Enforcement guidelines/Voting/Results

Translate this page

The final results from the voting process are announced here, along with relevant statistics. A summary of comments is posted below. A full list of anonymised comments can be found here.

Results

	No	Yes
Do you support the enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct based on the proposed guidelines?	945	1,338
	40.25%	56.98%

A further 65 voters (2.77% of all votes) did not select "yes" or "no".
The complete voter list is available here

Announcement

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki.

More languages • Please help translate to your language

Hello all,

We would like to thank the over 2,300 Wikimedians who participated in the recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC). At this time, the volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review of the accuracy of the vote and the final results are available on Meta-wiki. A quick summary can be found below:

58.6% Yes, 41.4% No
Contributors from 128 home wikis participated in the vote
Over thirty languages were supported in the ballot

What this outcome means is that there is enough support for the Board to review the document. It does not mean that the Enforcement Guidelines are automatically complete.

From here, the project team will collate and summarize the comments provided in the voting process, and publish them on Meta-wiki. The Enforcement Guidelines will be submitted to the Board of Trustees for their consideration. The Board will review input given during the vote, and examine whether there are aspects of the Guidelines that need further refinement. If so, these comments, and the input provided through Meta-wiki and other community conversations, will provide a good starting point for revising the Guidelines to meet the needs expressed by communities in the voter's responses.

In the event the Board moves forward with ratification, the UCoC project team will begin supporting specific proposals in the Guidelines. Some of these proposals include working with community members to form the U4C Building Committee, starting consultations on training, and supporting conversations on improving our reporting systems. There is still a lot to be done, but we will be able to move into the next phase of this work.

Many people took part in making sure the policy and the enforcement guidelines work for our communities. We will continue to collaboratively work on the details of the strong proposals outlined in the Guidelines as presented by the Wikimedians who engaged with the project in different ways over the last year.

Once again, we thank everyone who participated in the ratification of the Enforcement Guidelines.

For more information regarding the results, please refer to the Results page.

Regards,

User:SNg (WMF)

Stella Ng on behalf of the UCoC Project Team

Senior Manager, Trust and Safety Policy

Next steps: Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) and UCoC Enforcement Guidelines

More languages • Please help translate to your language

The Community Affairs Committee of the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees would like to thank everyone who participated in the recently concluded community vote on the Enforcement Guidelines for the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC).

The volunteer scrutinizing group has completed the review of the accuracy of the vote and has reported the total number of votes received as 2,283. Out of the 2,283 votes received, a total of 1,338 (58.6%) community members voted for the enforcement guidelines, and a total of 945 (41.4%) community members voted against it. In addition, 658 participants left comments with 77% of the comments written in English.

We recognize and appreciate the passion and commitment that community members have demonstrated in creating a safe and welcoming culture that stops hostile and toxic behavior, supports people targeted by such behavior, and encourages good faith people to be productive on the Wikimedia projects.

Even at this incomplete stage, this is evident in the comments received. While the Enforcement Guidelines did reach a threshold of support necessary for the Board to review, we encouraged voters, regardless of which way they were voting, to provide feedback on the elements of the enforcement guidelines that they felt needed to be changed or fixed, as well as why, in case it seemed advisable to launch a further round of edits that would address community concerns.

Foundation staff who have been reviewing comments have advised us of some of the emerging themes, and as a result we have decided as Community Affairs Committee to ask the Foundation to reconvene the drafting committee and to undertake another community engagement to refine the enforcement guidelines based on the community feedback received from the recently concluded vote.

For clarity, this feedback has been clustered into 4 sections as follows:

To identify the type, purpose, and applicability of the training;
To simplify the language for easier translation and comprehension by non-experts;
To explore the concept of affirmation, including its pros and cons;
To review the conflicting roles of privacy/victim protection and right to be heard.

Other issues may emerge during conversations, and particularly as the draft Enforcement Guidelines evolve, but we see these as the primary areas of concern for voters and are asking staff to facilitate review of these issues. After further engagement, the Foundation should re-run the community vote to evaluate the revamped Enforcement Outline to see if the new document is then ready for its official ratification.

Further, we are aware of the concerns with the note 3.1 in the Universal Code of Conduct Policy. We are directing the Foundation to facilitate a review of this language to ensure that the Policy meets its intended purposes of supporting a safe and inclusive community, without waiting for the planned review of the entire Policy at the end of year.

Again, we thank all who participated, thinking about these critical and difficult challenges and contributing to better approaches across the movement to working together well.

Best,

Rosie

Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight (she/her)
Acting Chair, Community Affairs Committee
Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees

Summary of comments

It was possible to attach comments to votes. The comments have been published.

Please help translate to your language

Introduction

Following the completion of the Universal Code of Conduct (UCoC) Enforcement Guidelines Draft in early 2022, the guidelines were voted on by the Wikimedian community. A total of 2,283 community members participated in the vote. Out of these, 1,338 (58.6%) participants supported the guidelines as written and 945 (41.4%) did not support. Voters cast votes from 137 communities, with the top 9 communities being: English, German, French, Russian, Polish, Spanish, Chinese, Japanese, Italian Wikipedias, and Meta-wiki. See the results page.

All responders to the survey had the opportunity to provide comments on the contents of the Draft document. 657 participants left comments. Approximately 77% of the comments are written in English. Voters wrote comments in 27 languages with the largest numbers in English (508), German (34), Japanese (28), French (25), and Russian (12). Voter turnout by Wikimedia project can be found here.

This analysis was completed to identify the major themes of these comments and highlight areas of the document that are the major focus of community comments. The analysis of these comments is intended to increase community voice and input into this process. This has already guided the direction of the Community Affairs Committee to staff to continue exploring improvements and thus will also guide the revision of the UCoC Enforcement Guidelines which will be completed by the Revisions Committee.

Method for analysis

Once the volunteer scrutinizers confirmed there were no voting irregularities, the UCoC project team translated the feedback into English and grouped the feedback into categories.

The translation work was led by the Movement Strategy and Governance team with assistance from other multilingual Foundation staff. The Trust & Safety Policy team categorized the comments into topics, analyzed the results, and composed the report that was shared with the Wikimedia Foundation’s Board of Trustees, the revision drafting committee, and published on Meta-wiki.

Categorization of Feedback

Summary

There were 9 themes that emerged after the first round of analysis of the comments and were used for the initial categorizing. Figure 1 in Appendix details a breakdown of the comments and their representative values. In some cases, one comment would be put into multiple categories if it touched on more than one theme. The categorizing process revealed a need for further sub-groupings of the first 3 categories to organize diverse opinions expressed. For the categories that required continued organization or sub-groupings, charts have been added to further illustrate the sub-categories that were created. The details of the topics and sub-topics with quotes can be found below.^[1]

↑ Quotes are shortened with spelling edits for ease of understanding

General feedback

This is a larger category that covers all general feedback (positive and negative) that was not directly relevant to the UCoC or the Enforcement Guidelines as well as comments directed to the Wikimedia Foundation. It was broken down into the following sub-categories:

General Positive Feedback
- "...I am all in favor of any means that would make Wikimedia a more pleasant and safe space."
General Negative Feedback
- "The Foundation displayed a gross lack of respect for the community, and a gross lack of understanding of the community, in trying to push through a Code without bothering to seek community approval of the Code... revising the guidelines won't change my vote... the Code itself was botched... you need to start from scratch, letting the community develop something new and seeking consensus for it."

Figure 2 in Appendix reflects the distribution within this bucket.

Bureaucracy and top-down processes may create unnecessary burdens and barriers

Comments in this category varied in themes and were further grouped to highlight the various opinions and concerns expressed. A few of them are listed below with some example quotes:

The Enforcement guidelines are too top-down or authoritarian
- "I oppose this top-down takeover of the project…."
The Enforcement guidelines are bureaucratic
- "The whole Universal Code of Conduct is too complex, will create much bureaucracy and take [the] effort away from [the communities]..."
Mandatory training is unreasonable
- "Any expectation of training is unreasonable. There is no expectation of training for *anyone* in *any* permission level *anywhere* on Wikimedia projects…."
Affirmation is an unwanted imposition
- "I am opposed to the idea of administrators being required to agree to a loyalty pledge of sorts, among other things."
U4C committee
- "The bar currently set for cases to be heard by the U4C is very high and is likely to keep the status quo of exclusion and unhealthy communities for years to come..."

Figure 3 in Appendix reflects the distribution within this bucket.

Enforcement guidelines may backfire and create an unhealthy imbalance of power

Comments in this category highlighted the potential arbitrariness of the Enforcement guidelines and how it could cause abuse of power among enforcers and eventually damage communities. Comments in this category were also further sub-grouped into the following topics:

Arbitrariness
- "The general thoughts in the Universal Code of Conduct seem good, but I am afraid some users may pervert the Universal Code of Conduct into something that protects the aggressor."
Abuse of power
- "Just another power grab of the WMF and other groups who want to rule the projects without contributing."
Hurts diverse ecosystems
- "We fear that this will create a further gap between light users and heavy users and that the population of Wikipedians will decline further."

Figure 4 in Appendix reflects the distribution within this bucket.

Supportive of the Enforcement Guidelines and/or UCoC

Comments put in this category were generally positive and optimistic about the need and impact of the UCoC and Enforcement Guidelines. Some examples include:

"I'm really happy that the movement has as a reference a code of conduct that is put into practice universally, in all projects and in all language versions. The parts I like the most? Practicing good faith and empathy, opposing the abuse of power, privilege or influence…"
"I agree with the enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct, as it aims to help community members identify situations of bad behavior, which is something that should be supported with all the possible tools, and these guidelines are a strong ally in prevention."

The UCoC and/or Enforcement Guidelines do not support Wikimedia movement values (ie: privacy, freedom of speech, volunteerism, etc.)

Comments on this topic talked about how the UCoC and Enforcement Guidelines could suppress the rights of community members such as privacy, freedom of expression, etc. They also highlight the political leanings of the policy, as well as the misalignment of the UCoC and Enforcement Guidelines with the values of the movement. Examples of such comments are:

"More emphasis should be given towards the state of neutrality within our contents, especially regarding social issues. Any Wikipedia content should not be leaning towards any side of the political, economic or social spectra…"
"The UCoC pays insufficient respect to the fundamental and universal right to freedom of expression and, in its current form, intolerably infringes on that right."

UCoC and/or Enforcement guidelines lack global diversity

Comments in this category highlighted the lack of diversity and diverse geographic/cultural contexts, lack of translation into multiple languages, as well as ambiguity in the choice of words and text in the Enforcement guidelines. Some comments here include:

"Each community has its own culture and mindset, and enforcing the same rules for everyone will be unjust and will result in an oppression of minority cultures and groups."
"...it includes lack of expert understanding of local laws such as intellectual property and led to populism & influence-peddling amongst community members."
"The UCoC, as drafted … is written with a Western perspective in mind, which is liable to result in irreconcilable cultural clashes between the wikis responsible for enforcement and the communities they're being asked to enforce this on have a doubt about the judgment the UC4 will have to made on the issue on projects and communities whose history, cultural environment and language it does not understand or not well…"

UCoC is not Necessary/Locally Relevant

These comments highlighted the self-sufficiency of projects to regulate and resolve issues themselves and how having a UCoC and its accompanying Enforcement Guidelines are unnecessary and not needed. Examples include:

"I reject the introduction of a mandatory UCoC for the major, established, and functional Wikipedia language versions (including the English, German and French) for fundamental reasons. Such a code already exists in these projects and cannot be imposed from the outside. I see here the very serious danger of a split and weakening of the global community through forks."
"Each community must be sovereign in defining its founding principles."
"I don't see the need for additional regulations. Our community, I believe, handles conflict situations quite well, and I don't see what the desire for more regulation is coming from.

UCoC text is discriminatory

Comments in this category highlighted the text in section 3.1 of the UCoC that states that the policy "does not endorse race and ethnicity as meaningful distinctions between people" and how that enables racism and discrimination. Examples include:

"... I cannot endorse this policy with this statement in it. People DO experience discrimination based on race and ethnicity and it is painful. This notion ignores the problem and minimizes the experience of People of Color in the world."
"UCoC as written is offensive, discriminatory, unenforceable and lacks sufficient stakeholder engagement."
"...Race and Ethnicity ARE meaningful distinctions and form the base of an equitable approach which is prompted by the Foundation."

Right to be Heard language

Comments here focused on the need for a "right to be heard" policy where the accused will have the right to argue their case out or explain their point of view before a decision is made.

"It is absolutely necessary to include a right to know what you are accused of. Even more important is the right to be heard for the "accused". In spite of repeated comments in this direction, these basic requirements of a fair process were not included in the enforcement guidelines. Hence, the Guidelines are unfit to guarantee a fair process."

Conclusion

The report is now accessible to community members to review the data that was collected. Private identifiable information was removed from the vote comments, and the vote comment data is now available for review here.

There are limitations on the usefulness of the data. Only 658 participants left comments in 27 languages. Seventy-seven percent of the comments are written in English. Given the size of our community, this is too small a number to be representative of all views. To mitigate this, during the next round of community conversations, the UCoC project team will emphasize outreach to encourage participation from more community members.

Despite these limitations, voters from different size Wikimedia communities with different types of governance structures left comments providing diverse viewpoints on conduct and enforcement issues The comments were anonymous so the voter could freely express their opinions without concerns about reprisal.

This analysis of the UCoC voting results, the identified themes and feedback, in addition to data collected in upcoming conversation hours, will serve as guidance to the Revisions Committee to adapt and improve the current version of the guidelines.

Appendix

Note: Charts may display incorrectly in mobile responsive view.

Figure 1: Pie chart of all vote feedback categories

Discriminatory text: 19 (2.2%)
Right to be Heard: 39 (4.4%)
Feedback on Foundation: 32 (3.6%)
Hurts Global Diversity: 52 (5.9%)
Anti-Movement Values: 50 (5.7%)
Unhealthy Imbalance of Power: 113 (12.8%)
Unnecessary / Irrelevant to Local Communities: 127 (14.4%)
Supportive of the EG/UCoC: 172 (19.5%)
Bureaucracy: 151 (17.1%)
General Feedback: 128 (14.5%)

Figure 2: Pie chart of subcategorization relating to General feedback

Positive Feedback: 4 (3.2%)
Other (feedback on language): 18 (14.4%)
Attack on conservatism: 2 (1.6%)
Ratification process: 20 (16.0%)
UCoC Phase 1: 44 (35.2%)
Other (psychological manipulation, polite pov pushing, etc.): 37 (29.6%)

Figure 3: Pie chart of subcategorization relating to Bureaucracy and top-down processes may create unnecessary burdens and barriers

Complex Outsider Intervention: 19 (9.0%)
U4C: 20 (9.5%)
Too Top Down: 33 (15.6%)
Bureaucracy of process: 35 (16.6%)
UCoC Training: 60 (28.4%)
Affirmation of UCoC: 44 (20.9%)

Figure 4: Pie chart of subcategorization relating to Enforcement guidelines may backfire and create an unhealthy imbalance of power

Specific to RU.WP: 2 (1.6%)
Specific to JA.WP: 10 (8.0%)
Arbitrariness (Language is not fit for purpose): 31 (24.8%)
Hurts Diverse Communities: 37 (29.6%)
Concerns of Abuse of Power: 45 (36.0%)

Statistics

Please help translate to your language

These are statistics for the Universal Code of Conduct Enforcement Guidelines Ratification vote. If you would like to suggest other statistics or discuss what is posted here please do so on the talk page.

Trends and comparisons

Total voters

By period

Consolidated table

Days of voting	Time (UTC)	Cumulative total	By period
0	2022-03-07 00:00	0	0
0.5	2022-03-07 12:00	94	94
1	2022-03-08 00:00	253	159
1.5	2022-03-08 12:00	323	70
2	2022-03-09 00:00	432	109
2.5	2022-03-09 12:00	472	40
3	2022-03-10 00:00	522	50
3.5	2022-03-10 12:00	545	23
4	2022-03-11 00:00	588	43
4.5	2022-03-11 12:00	608	20
5	2022-03-12 00:00	672	64
5.5	2022-03-12 12:00	699	27
6	2022-03-13 00:00	750	51
6.5	2022-03-13 12:00	775	25
7	2022-03-14 00:00	802	27
7.5	2022-03-14 12:00	831	29
8	2022-03-15 00:00	890	59
8.5	2022-03-15 12:00	928	38
9	2022-03-16 00:00	999	71
9.5	2022-03-16 12:00	1193	194
10	2022-03-17 00:00	1349	156
10.5	2022-03-17 12:00	1405	56
11	2022-03-18 00:00	1482	77
11.5	2022-03-18 12:00	1540	58
12	2022-03-19 00:00	1591	51
12.5	2022-03-19 12:00	1642	51
13	2022-03-20 00:00	1835	193
13.5	2022-03-20 12:00	1957	122
14	2022-03-21 00:00	2087	130
14.5	2022-03-21 12:00	2191	104
15	2022-03-22 00:00	2352	161

Turnout by wiki

Wiki	Eligible	Voters	% of electorate	% of total voters	Eligible who voted
en.wikipedia.org	22862	866	33.950%	36.820%	3.788%
de.wikipedia.org	5580	233	8.286%	9.906%	4.176%
fr.wikipedia.org	3773	134	5.603%	5.697%	3.552%
ru.wikipedia.org	2935	119	4.358%	5.060%	4.055%
pl.wikipedia.org	1192	109	1.770%	4.634%	9.144%
es.wikipedia.org	2780	87	4.128%	3.699%	3.129%
ja.wikipedia.org	3375	81	5.012%	3.444%	2.400%
zh.wikipedia.org	2306	81	3.424%	3.444%	3.513%
it.wikipedia.org	2031	69	3.016%	2.934%	3.397%
meta.wikimedia.org	880	57	1.307%	2.423%	6.477%
commons.wikimedia.org	2554	51	3.793%	2.168%	1.997%
id.wikipedia.org	492	31	0.731%	1.318%	6.301%
pt.wikipedia.org	1110	27	1.648%	1.148%	2.432%
ar.wikipedia.org	445	26	0.661%	1.105%	5.843%
cs.wikipedia.org	539	26	0.800%	1.105%	4.824%
nl.wikipedia.org	987	24	1.466%	1.020%	2.432%
ko.wikipedia.org	575	21	0.854%	0.893%	3.652%
tr.wikipedia.org	445	21	0.661%	0.893%	4.719%
ca.wikipedia.org	333	20	0.494%	0.850%	6.006%
he.wikipedia.org	765	17	1.136%	0.723%	2.222%
fa.wikipedia.org	692	13	1.028%	0.553%	1.879%
sv.wikipedia.org	513	10	0.762%	0.425%	1.949%
en.wiktionary.org	254	10	0.377%	0.425%	3.937%
hu.wikipedia.org	432	9	0.642%	0.383%	2.083%
www.wikidata.org	667	9	0.990%	0.383%	1.349%
uk.wikipedia.org	668	9	0.992%	0.383%	1.347%
bn.wikipedia.org	130	8	0.193%	0.340%	6.154%
vi.wikipedia.org	408	7	0.606%	0.298%	1.716%
hr.wikipedia.org	86	7	0.128%	0.298%	8.140%
www.mediawiki.org	238	7	0.353%	0.298%	2.941%
fi.wikipedia.org	427	6	0.634%	0.255%	1.405%
fr.wikisource.org	74	6	0.110%	0.255%	8.108%
th.wikipedia.org	264	6	0.392%	0.255%	2.273%
sk.wikipedia.org	80	6	0.119%	0.255%	7.500%
sr.wikipedia.org	191	5	0.284%	0.213%	2.618%
el.wikipedia.org	190	4	0.282%	0.170%	2.105%
nl.wikimedia.org	10	4	0.015%	0.170%	40.000%
no.wikipedia.org	227	4	0.337%	0.170%	1.762%
incubator.wikimedia.org	121	4	0.180%	0.170%	3.306%
et.wikipedia.org	107	3	0.159%	0.128%	2.804%
pl.wikisource.org	19	3	0.028%	0.128%	15.789%
es.wikinews.org	6	3	0.009%	0.128%	50.000%
ro.wikipedia.org	170	3	0.252%	0.128%	1.765%
ba.wikipedia.org	27	3	0.040%	0.128%	11.111%
pa.wikipedia.org	11	3	0.016%	0.128%	27.273%
gl.wikipedia.org	62	2	0.092%	0.085%	3.226%
ig.wikipedia.org	8	2	0.012%	0.085%	25.000%
pl.wikimedia.org	5	2	0.007%	0.085%	40.000%
ha.wiktionary.org	2	2	0.003%	0.085%	100.000%
or.wikipedia.org	8	2	0.012%	0.085%	25.000%
eo.wikipedia.org	58	2	0.086%	0.085%	3.448%
ka.wikipedia.org	65	2	0.097%	0.085%	3.077%
sq.wikipedia.org	22	2	0.033%	0.085%	9.091%
en.wikiversity.org	44	2	0.065%	0.085%	4.545%
mk.wikipedia.org	49	2	0.073%	0.085%	4.082%
ur.wikipedia.org	27	2	0.040%	0.085%	7.407%
simple.wikipedia.org	58	2	0.086%	0.085%	3.448%
ne.wikipedia.org	8	2	0.012%	0.085%	25.000%
de.wiktionary.org	35	2	0.052%	0.085%	5.714%
ru.wiktionary.org	33	2	0.049%	0.085%	6.061%
en.wikivoyage.org	42	2	0.062%	0.085%	4.762%
bg.wikipedia.org	158	1	0.235%	0.043%	0.633%
fr.wiktionary.org	79	1	0.117%	0.043%	1.266%
te.wikipedia.org	46	1	0.068%	0.043%	2.174%
en.wikisource.org	44	1	0.065%	0.043%	2.273%
hi.wikipedia.org	38	1	0.056%	0.043%	2.632%
ckb.wikipedia.org	24	1	0.036%	0.043%	4.167%
pl.wiktionary.org	23	1	0.034%	0.043%	4.348%
de.wikisource.org	20	1	0.030%	0.043%	5.000%
de.wikiversity.org	20	1	0.030%	0.043%	5.000%
zh-yue.wikipedia.org	20	1	0.030%	0.043%	5.000%
sw.wikipedia.org	17	1	0.025%	0.043%	5.882%
tt.wikipedia.org	17	1	0.025%	0.043%	5.882%
sv.wiktionary.org	16	1	0.024%	0.043%	6.250%
en.wikinews.org	13	1	0.019%	0.043%	7.692%
cs.wiktionary.org	12	1	0.018%	0.043%	8.333%
fr.wikiversity.org	12	1	0.018%	0.043%	8.333%
test.wikipedia.org	11	1	0.016%	0.043%	9.091%
jv.wikipedia.org	9	1	0.013%	0.043%	11.111%
oc.wikipedia.org	9	1	0.013%	0.043%	11.111%
als.wikipedia.org	8	1	0.012%	0.043%	12.500%
ja.wikisource.org	8	1	0.012%	0.043%	12.500%
bcl.wikipedia.org	7	1	0.010%	0.043%	14.286%
beta.wikiversity.org	7	1	0.010%	0.043%	14.286%
ca.wikisource.org	5	1	0.007%	0.043%	20.000%
pl.wikibooks.org	5	1	0.007%	0.043%	20.000%
bar.wikipedia.org	3	1	0.004%	0.043%	33.333%
szl.wikipedia.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
zh-min-nan.wikipedia.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
zh.wikibooks.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
flaggedrevs-labs.wikimedia.org	1	1	0.001%	0.043%	100.000%
sv.wikinews.org	1	1	0.001%	0.043%	100.000%
tet.wikipedia.org	1	1	0.001%	0.043%	100.000%
ru.wikimedia.org	7	1	0.010%	0.043%	14.286%
ha.wikipedia.org	28	1	0.042%	0.043%	3.571%
fy.wikipedia.org	11	1	0.016%	0.043%	9.091%
uz.wikipedia.org	9	1	0.013%	0.043%	11.111%
fi.wikisource.org	1	1	0.001%	0.043%	100.000%
it.wikisource.org	20	1	0.030%	0.043%	5.000%
tl.wikipedia.org	15	1	0.022%	0.043%	6.667%
es.wikisource.org	5	1	0.007%	0.043%	20.000%
myv.wikipedia.org	5	1	0.007%	0.043%	20.000%
vi.wiktionary.org	3	1	0.004%	0.043%	33.333%
fa.wikiquote.org	1	1	0.001%	0.043%	100.000%
lt.wikipedia.org	51	1	0.076%	0.043%	1.961%
zh.wiktionary.org	7	1	0.010%	0.043%	14.286%
bs.wikipedia.org	16	1	0.024%	0.043%	6.250%
km.wikipedia.org	12	1	0.018%	0.043%	8.333%
es.wiktionary.org	9	1	0.013%	0.043%	11.111%
it.wikiquote.org	8	1	0.012%	0.043%	12.500%
tg.wikipedia.org	6	1	0.009%	0.043%	16.667%
os.wikipedia.org	3	1	0.004%	0.043%	33.333%
bjn.wikipedia.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
mzn.wikipedia.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
oc.wiktionary.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
hy.wikipedia.org	198	1	0.294%	0.043%	0.505%
da.wikipedia.org	140	1	0.208%	0.043%	0.714%
he.wikisource.org	24	1	0.036%	0.043%	4.167%
kk.wikipedia.org	23	1	0.034%	0.043%	4.348%
species.wikimedia.org	20	1	0.030%	0.043%	5.000%
cy.wikipedia.org	18	1	0.027%	0.043%	5.556%
nap.wikipedia.org	5	1	0.007%	0.043%	20.000%
lij.wikipedia.org	4	1	0.006%	0.043%	25.000%
pa.wikisource.org	4	1	0.006%	0.043%	25.000%
de.wikinews.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
de.wikiquote.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
hu.wikibooks.org	2	1	0.003%	0.043%	50.000%
de.wikibooks.org	47	1	0.070%	0.043%	2.128%
NULL	1771	0	2.630%	0.000%	0.000%
az.wikipedia.org	133	0	0.198%	0.000%	0.000%
eu.wikipedia.org	78	0	0.116%	0.000%	0.000%
sl.wikipedia.org	64	0	0.095%	0.000%	0.000%
ta.wikipedia.org	63	0	0.094%	0.000%	0.000%
ms.wikipedia.org	57	0	0.085%	0.000%	0.000%
lv.wikipedia.org	56	0	0.083%	0.000%	0.000%
ml.wikipedia.org	51	0	0.076%	0.000%	0.000%
en.wikibooks.org	44	0	0.065%	0.000%	0.000%
be.wikipedia.org	39	0	0.058%	0.000%	0.000%
se.wikimedia.org	35	0	0.052%	0.000%	0.000%
en.wikiquote.org	26	0	0.039%	0.000%	0.000%
nn.wikipedia.org	26	0	0.039%	0.000%	0.000%
ta.wikisource.org	25	0	0.037%	0.000%	0.000%
be-x-old.wikipedia.org	23	0	0.034%	0.000%	0.000%
mr.wikipedia.org	23	0	0.034%	0.000%	0.000%
as.wikipedia.org	21	0	0.031%	0.000%	0.000%
is.wikipedia.org	19	0	0.028%	0.000%	0.000%
kn.wikipedia.org	19	0	0.028%	0.000%	0.000%
sa.wikisource.org	17	0	0.025%	0.000%	0.000%
ua.wikimedia.org	16	0	0.024%	0.000%	0.000%
ga.wikipedia.org	15	0	0.022%	0.000%	0.000%
lb.wikipedia.org	15	0	0.022%	0.000%	0.000%
sl.wikiversity.org	15	0	0.022%	0.000%	0.000%
zh.wikisource.org	15	0	0.022%	0.000%	0.000%
la.wikipedia.org	14	0	0.021%	0.000%	0.000%
hi.wikisource.org	13	0	0.019%	0.000%	0.000%
my.wikipedia.org	12	0	0.018%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikivoyage.org	12	0	0.018%	0.000%	0.000%
sh.wikipedia.org	12	0	0.018%	0.000%	0.000%
wikisource.org	12	0	0.018%	0.000%	0.000%
af.wikipedia.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
br.wikipedia.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
it.wikibooks.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
mn.wikipedia.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wiktionary.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikisource.org	11	0	0.016%	0.000%	0.000%
de.wikivoyage.org	10	0	0.015%	0.000%	0.000%
ja.wiktionary.org	10	0	0.015%	0.000%	0.000%
uk.wikimedia.org	10	0	0.015%	0.000%	0.000%
ast.wikipedia.org	9	0	0.013%	0.000%	0.000%
azb.wikipedia.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
fi.wiktionary.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
hy.wikisource.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
ku.wikipedia.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
ku.wiktionary.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wikibooks.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wiktionary.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
yo.wikipedia.org	8	0	0.012%	0.000%	0.000%
hy.wiktionary.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
ky.wikipedia.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
min.wikipedia.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
outreach.wikimedia.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikiquote.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
sd.wikipedia.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
su.wikipedia.org	7	0	0.010%	0.000%	0.000%
an.wikipedia.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
el.wiktionary.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
es.wikiversity.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
he.wiktionary.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
ia.wikipedia.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
ja.wikibooks.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
pl.wikiquote.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wikibooks.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikinews.org	6	0	0.009%	0.000%	0.000%
arz.wikipedia.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
br.wikimedia.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
es.wikibooks.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
fr.wikibooks.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
gu.wikipedia.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
it.wiktionary.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
ko.wikisource.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
lmo.wikipedia.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
sa.wikipedia.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
sv.wikisource.org	5	0	0.007%	0.000%	0.000%
bn.wikisource.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
ce.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
fr.wikiquote.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
gd.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
io.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
nah.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
nds-nl.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
nds.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
no.wikimedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
pms.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wikiquote.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wikisource.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikibooks.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
si.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
th.wiktionary.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
tr.wiktionary.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
wikimania2014.wikimedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
yi.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
zh-classical.wikipedia.org	4	0	0.006%	0.000%	0.000%
ban.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
bat-smg.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
bh.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
cs.wikisource.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
da.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
dag.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
diq.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
es.wikivoyage.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
fa.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
gu.wikisource.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
he.wikibooks.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
he.wikiquote.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
hif.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
hu.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
hyw.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
kw.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
li.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
mg.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
mr.wikisource.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wikinews.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wikivoyage.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
pl.wikinews.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wikiversity.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
ro.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
sc.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
scn.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
ta.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
te.wikisource.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
tr.wikiquote.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
uk.wikisource.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
uk.wiktionary.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
vls.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
wa.wikipedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
wikimania2012.wikimedia.org	3	0	0.004%	0.000%	0.000%
ak.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
am.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
an.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
as.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
av.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
avk.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ca.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ca.wikimedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ca.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ceb.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
cr.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
crh.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
cs.wikiquote.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
cv.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
da.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
eo.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
es.wikiquote.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
et.wikiquote.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
eu.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
fa.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
fa.wikivoyage.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
fi.wikinews.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
fur.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
gom.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
hsb.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
id.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ie.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ilo.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
it.wikiversity.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
it.wikivoyage.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
iu.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ja.wikinews.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ksh.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
kv.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
la.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
lad.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
lt.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ml.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
mt.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
new.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
no.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
nov.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
pap.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
pcd.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
qu.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ru.wikiversity.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
rue.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
rw.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sah.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sat.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sco.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
shn.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
simple.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sl.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
smn.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sn.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
so.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sr.wikinews.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
sr.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
te.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
th.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
tr.wikibooks.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
tr.wikisource.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
udm.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ug.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
uk.wikiquote.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
usability.wikimedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
vec.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
vep.wikipedia.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
wa.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
yi.wiktionary.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
zh.wikiversity.org	2	0	0.003%	0.000%	0.000%
ab.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ace.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ang.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ang.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ar.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ar.wikiversity.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ar.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
arc.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ary.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
az.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
bg.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
bg.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
bn.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
br.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
bs.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ca.wikinews.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
chr.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
co.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
cs.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
cu.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
cy.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
dsb.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
dv.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ee.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
el.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
el.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
eml.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
eo.wikinews.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
eo.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
eu.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fi.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fi.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fi.wikiversity.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fiu-vro.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fo.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fr.wikinews.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
fr.wikivoyage.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
frp.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ga.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
gag.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
glk.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
gom.wikiversity.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
gv.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
hak.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
hu.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
hu.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
hy.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
id.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
inh.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
io.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
is.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
it.wikinews.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
jbo.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
kaa.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
kab.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
kk.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
kn.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ko.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ko.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ks.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
lez.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
lfn.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
li.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ln.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
lo.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
lt.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
lt.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
mai.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
mi.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
mk.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ml.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
mr.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ms.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
na.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
nl.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
nqo.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
om.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
pms.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
pnb.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
pt.wikivoyage.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
rmy.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ro.wikinews.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ro.wikisource.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
scn.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
se.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
simple.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
sk.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
skr.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
sv.wikiquote.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
szy.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
ta.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
tcy.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
tk.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
tl.wiktionary.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
to.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
tpi.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
tyv.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
uk.wikibooks.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
vo.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
wikimania.wikimedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
wikimania2010.wikimedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
wikimania2011.wikimedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
wuu.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
xmf.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
zea.wikipedia.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
zh.wikivoyage.org	1	0	0.001%	0.000%	0.000%
Total	67341	2351	100%	100%	3.491%

Extended eligibility statistics

Please help translate to your language

In these charts, a voter is considered to have qualified for a project if they had at least 20 edits between 7 August 2021 and 7 February 2022.

Voters by number of projects with qualifying edits: (including wikidata and commons)

0-1 project: 768 (33.5%)
2 projects: 548 (23.9%)
3 projects: 400 (17.5%)
4 projects: 245 (10.7%)
5 projects: 145 (6.3%)
6 or more: 186 (8.1%)

Qualifying voters per project: 299 projects had at least one voter with 20 edits in the qualifying period: a voter may represent more than one project

"home wiki voters": voters whose home wiki value is set to this project
"+most edited voters": additional voters where this project was their most edited project as of 7 February 2022
"+qualifying voters": additional voters who had 20 edits at this project between 7 August 2021 and 7 February 2022
while each voter only has one vote in the actual poll, these charts represent individual voters in each of: their home wiki, any project where they had 20 edits in the 6 months, and on their most edited project of all time
the charts eliminate double counting within projects by subtraction while the source data table is non-exclusive

More than 400 qualifying voters

250

500

750

1,000

1,250

1,500

Wikidata

English Wikipedia

Wikimedia Commons

Meta-Wiki

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

Although Wikidata only had 9 voters with a home wiki registry, it was the most edited project for another 149 voters, and a further 949 voters had at least 20 edits there (though this includes edits that were automatically connected).
While 865 voters had their homewiki registration set to English Wikipedia, only 699 voters had their most edits there.

80 to 270 qualifying voters

50

100

150

200

250

300

dewiki

frwiki

ruwiki

plwiki

eswiki

zhwiki

jawiki

itwiki

mediawikiwiki

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

Large projects saw gains in representation from voters who have other home wikis set.
This chart also depicts participation of users active at MediaWiki wiki.

30 to 60 qualifying voters

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

ptwiki

idwiki

nlwiki

enwiktionary

incubatorwiki

arwiki

simplewiki

enwikisource

cswiki

kowiki

cawiki

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

Major languages and other English Wikimedia projects show significantly increased representation when considering voters who had edited there recently.

20 to 29 qualifying voters

5

10

15

20

25

30

trwiki

hrwiki

ukwiki

svwiki

hewiki

fawiki

viwiki

frwikisource

enwikivoyage

hiwiki

bnwiki

enwikibooks

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

English Wikibooks had previously appeared entirely unrepresented, and only 1 users was registered from Hindi Wikipedia; each had 20 qualifying voters.

15 to 19 qualifying voters

5

10

15

20

mswiki

srwiki

frwiktionary

enwikinews

huwiki

specieswiki

fiwiki

skwiki

enwikiquote

enwikiversity

ruwikinews

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

This shows that home wiki does not provide a complete picture of representation, especially from project types other than Wikipedia.

10 to 14 qualifying voters

2.5

5

7.5

10

12.5

15

thwiki

rowiki

etwiki

nowiki

elwiki

zhwikisource

plwikisource

azwiki

bswiki

ruwikivoyage

idwikisource

home wiki voters
+most edited voters
+qualifying voters

More gains in representation including other language non-Wikipedias that had no homewiki voters.

An additional 241 projects had between 1 and 9 qualifying voters
project	qualifying	most edited	homewiki
wikidatawiki	1107	158	9
enwiki	1069	699	865
commonswiki	1013	154	51
metawiki	487	61	57
dewiki	263	189	233
frwiki	201	116	134
ruwiki	150	103	119
plwiki	138	100	109
eswiki	133	82	87
zhwiki	112	88	81
jawiki	102	72	81
itwiki	96	53	69
mediawikiwiki	86	15	7
ptwiki	60	27	27
idwiki	56	20	31
nlwiki	53	20	24
enwiktionary	46	13	10
incubatorwiki	44	2	4
arwiki	43	25	26
simplewiki	38	7	2
enwikisource	36	6	1
cswiki	35	16	26
kowiki	32	22	20
cawiki	31	19	20
trwiki	29	20	20
hrwiki	29	8	7
ukwiki	28	9	9
svwiki	27	11	10
hewiki	24	20	17
fawiki	23	14	13
viwiki	23	9	7
frwikisource	23	5	6
enwikivoyage	22	2	2
hiwiki	20	1	1
bnwiki	20	10	8
enwikibooks	20	3	0
mswiki	19	0	0
srwiki	17	5	5
frwiktionary	17	4	1
enwikinews	17	2	1
huwiki	16	6	9
specieswiki	16	1	1
fiwiki	15	4	6
skwiki	15	5	6
enwikiquote	15	0	0
enwikiversity	15	2	2
ruwikinews	15	1	0
thwiki	14	5	6
rowiki	14	2	3
etwiki	14	1	3
nowiki	13	4	4
elwiki	12	2	4
zhwikisource	11	3	0
plwikisource	11	4	3
azwiki	10	0	0
bswiki	10	2	1
ruwikivoyage	10	2	0
idwikisource	10	0	0
bgwiki	9	1	1
ruwikisource	9	0	0
eowiki	9	1	2
hawiki	9	6	1
ruwiktionary	8	3	2
zh_yuewiki	8	3	1
plwiktionary	8	4	1
shwiki	8	0	0
sqwiki	8	2	2
itwikisource	8	2	1
foundationwiki	8	2	0
lvwiki	7	0	0
uzwiki	7	3	1
bewiki	7	2	0
swwiki	7	4	1
dewikisource	7	3	1
ltwiki	6	1	1
slwiki	6	0	0
arzwiki	6	0	0
eswiktionary	6	1	1
cebwiki	6	0	0
dewikivoyage	6	0	0
frwikiversity	6	1	1
plwikiquote	6	0	0
plwikinews	6	0	0
dawiki	5	1	1
hywiki	5	2	1
kawiki	5	2	2
sourceswiki	5	0	0
pawiki	5	4	3
itwikivoyage	5	1	0
minwiki	5	1	0
yowiki	5	0	0
twwiki	5	1	0
tawiki	4	0	0
mlwiki	4	0	0
tlwiki	4	1	1
euwiki	4	0	0
glwiki	4	0	2
cswiktionary	4	1	1
arwikisource	4	0	0
newiki	4	2	2
frwikibooks	4	0	0
ocwiki	4	2	1
frwikivoyage	4	0	0
trwikisource	4	0	0
eswikivoyage	4	1	0
zhwikinews	4	1	0
bnwiktionary	4	0	0
napwikisource	4	0	0
dewiktionary	3	0	2
kkwiki	3	2	1
mrwiki	3	0	0
elwiktionary	3	0	0
urwiki	3	1	2
mkwiki	3	2	2
afwiki	3	0	0
itwikiquote	3	0	1
lawiki	3	0	0
nnwiki	3	0	0
svwiktionary	3	0	1
idwiktionary	3	0	0
jvwiki	3	1	1
ttwiki	3	2	1
bnwikisource	3	1	0
ptwikiversity	3	0	0
bclwiki	3	0	1
alswiki	3	1	1
bawiki	3	2	3
frwikiquote	3	0	0
plwikibooks	3	0	1
orwiki	3	1	2
ndswiki	3	0	0
arwikiquote	3	0	0
zh_classicalwiki	3	0	0
bnwikivoyage	3	0	0
bnwikibooks	3	0	0
hawiktionary	3	0	2
minwiktionary	3	1	0
jawikivoyage	3	2	0
dewikibooks	2	1	1
iswiki	2	0	0
nlwiktionary	2	1	0
astwiki	2	0	0
zhwiktionary	2	0	1
fiwiktionary	2	1	0
ruwikiquote	2	0	0
guwiki	2	1	0
cywiki	2	0	1
warwiki	2	1	0
scowiki	2	0	0
ruwikibooks	2	0	0
eswikiversity	2	0	0
tgwiki	2	2	1
brwiki	2	0	0
idwikibooks	2	0	0
fywiki	2	1	1
kowikisource	2	0	0
igwiki	2	0	2
zhwikiversity	2	0	0
ptwikinews	2	0	0
frwikinews	2	0	0
eswikinews	2	0	3
hifwiki	2	0	0
svwikisource	2	1	0
fawikiquote	2	1	1
banwiki	2	1	0
zhwikivoyage	2	0	0
bjnwiki	2	0	1
itwikinews	2	0	0
arywiki	2	0	0
dewikinews	2	0	1
ruewiki	2	0	0
idwikiquote	2	0	0
crhwiki	2	0	0
arwiktionary	2	0	0
napwiki	2	1	1
gorwiki	2	0	0
oswiki	2	1	1
azwikiquote	2	0	0
papwiki	2	0	0
akwiki	2	0	0
tpiwiki	2	0	0
suwiktionary	2	1	0
lbewiki	2	0	0
tewiki	1	1	1
knwiki	1	0	0
siwiki	1	0	0
hewikisource	1	1	1
jawiktionary	1	0	0
tawikisource	1	0	0
kmwiki	1	1	1
kywiki	1	1	0
eswikisource	1	0	1
viwiktionary	1	0	1
aswiki	1	0	0
trwiktionary	1	0	0
ckbwiki	1	1	1
tawiktionary	1	0	0
hewiktionary	1	0	0
be_x_oldwiki	1	1	1
zhwikibooks	1	0	1
thwiktionary	1	1	0
itwikibooks	1	0	0
dewikiversity	1	1	1
simplewiktionary	1	0	0
azbwiki	1	0	0
anwiki	1	0	0
trwikiquote	1	0	0
zh_min_nanwiki	1	0	1
barwiki	1	0	1
hewikiquote	1	0	0
wuuwiki	1	1	0
ptwikisource	1	0	0
mrwikisource	1	0	0
eswikiquote	1	0	0
thwikisource	1	0	0
pnbwiki	1	0	0
tewikisource	1	0	0
rowikisource	1	0	0
plwikivoyage	1	0	0
mznwiki	1	0	1
ruwikiversity	1	0	0
hewikibooks	1	0	0
ptwikiquote	1	0	0
vecwiki	1	0	0
sahwiki	1	0	0
cvwiki	1	0	0
iawiki	1	0	0
scnwiki	1	0	0
nds_nlwiki	1	0	0
szlwiki	1	1	1
huwikibooks	1	1	1
fawikibooks	1	0	0
gnwiki	1	0	0
lijwiki	1	1	1
vowiki	1	0	0
cswikiversity	1	0	0
gdwiki	1	0	0
thwikibooks	1	0	0
kwwiki	1	0	0
pmswiki	1	0	0
jawikinews	1	0	0
nlwikisource	1	0	0
viwikisource	1	0	0
mswiktionary	1	0	0
maiwiki	1	0	0
knwiktionary	1	0	0
etwikiquote	1	1	0
szywiki	1	0	0
cawikisource	1	0	1
ukwikivoyage	1	0	0
acewiki	1	0	0
bpywiki	1	0	0
sewiki	1	0	0
pamwiki	1	0	0
arwikibooks	1	0	0
fiwikiquote	1	0	0
gomwiki	1	0	0
bewikisource	1	0	0
myvwiki	1	0	1
fiwikisource	1	1	1
lezwiki	1	0	0
glkwiki	1	0	0
ukwikibooks	1	0	0
eowiktionary	1	1	0
hakwiki	1	0	0
nawiki	1	0	0
wawiktionary	1	0	0
avwiki	1	0	0
biwiki	1	0	0
cawikiquote	1	0	0
inhwiki	1	0	0
nowikisource	1	0	0
nqowiki	1	1	0
kswiki	1	0	0
nywiki	1	0	0
ukwikinews	1	0	0
iswiktionary	1	0	0
pagwiki	1	0	0
tetwiki	1	0	1
eowikisource	1	0	0
eowikiquote	1	1	0
jawikiversity	1	0	0
svwikivoyage	1	0	0
vewiki	1	0	0
cbk_zamwiki	1	0	0
ffwiki	1	0	0
chwiki	1	0	0
sqwikiquote	1	0	0
mrwikibooks	1	0	0
towiki	1	0	0
guwiktionary	1	0	0
dzwiki	1	0	0
bewiktionary	1	0	0
orwiktionary	1	0	0
bewikiquote	1	0	0
lijwikisource	1	0	0
bawikibooks	1	0	0
bewikibooks	1	0	0
cowiktionary	1	0	0
These values are non-exclusive

[1] Quotes are shortened with spelling edits for ease of understanding

[1]