CLo (WMF)

Welcome to Meta!

Hello, CLo (WMF). Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!

--Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

IP Masking Impact Report

Hi. I read your interesting IP Masking Impact Report. I just wanted to comment on one thing:

Underlying discussions and concerns around anonymous editing, anonymous vandalism, and bias against unregistered users are unlikely to significantly change if we mask IPs, provided we maintain the ability to edit projects while logged out.

I think that is pretty clearly incorrect. There would definitely be a shift in the discussions around anonymous editing. There would would be increased suspicion, disrespect, disregard, and reverts of masked editors (all of which are already high against IP-editors). Even with the best mask-tools those editors would be more difficult to deal with.

There is also currently a notable but limited level of support for banning IP editors. There would definitely a higher level of support for banning masked editors. The only question is whether that shift would be big enough to constitute a consensus to ban anonymous editors. If the shift is large enough then the masking project would effectively result in a ban. Either the community would demand that the Foundation implement such a ban, or the community has the ability to implement such a ban itself (at least at the project-by-project level, with EnWiki constituting half of our wiki-universe). If that happens then any software built mask users would go unused, as there would be zero anonymous users to mask. Any tools built to deal with masked editors would also be worthless and unused.

If there is ever any revision or followup to the report, I think these two points warrant coverage. Alsee (talk) 15:47, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:11, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Patch Demo Wikis Cleanup

You are receiving this message because there is/are wiki(s) on Patch Demo associated with your account. Per our records, the patches associated with them have been merged or abandoned. In an effort to manage space and ensure our systems have the capacity to continue providing the best service and experience for our users, we will be auditing and deleting wikis with merged or abandoned patches on Friday, March 14 2025.

Please refer to the list of wikis we will be deleting [1] and if you wish to keep any of the ones that belong to you, edit the table accordingly before Thursday, March 13 2025 11:59PM UTC. If we do not hear from you by then we will assume you are not opposed to this action and will proceed as planned. EBomani-WMF (talk) 22:15, 6 March 2025 (UTC)