Connel MacKenzie
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Peteforsyth in topic Superprotect status
Vandalism
editI'm not sure i would characterise this [1] as reverting vandalism. Let's take those changes to the talk page, please... ++Lar: t/c 03:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Isn't blatant 3RR violation a type of vandalism? <shrug>. If you are around on #wm-checkuser I'd be happy to discuss it. --Connel MacKenzie 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- ah... most of your reversion removed stuff Himyeana had added repeatedly... and I agree, that was 3rr all right. But it also removed a small change from Salaskan which seemed to make sense to me... THAT was what I was suggesting maybe deserved talking about. I missed the other stuff, sorry for any confusion. I am supposed to be on break (but not doing too well at staying away) so may not see you on IRC right away. ++Lar: t/c 15:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- How could I have violated 3RR if I made only three edits which were not all on the same day? I made three of them because I seemed to be reverted for a mistaken reason. I contacted the person who made the reverts both on his talk page and through email. Himyeana 16:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- They were within 24 hours, and you didn't discuss anything on the talk pages. --Connel MacKenzie 16:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry to say but there were more than two full days in between the second and the third edit. Himyeana 13:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
My steward election
editThank you for supporting my steward election having passed with 72-1-4-99%.--Jusjih 23:51, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Superprotect status
editDear Connel MacKenzie, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.
- Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
- An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer