Dbiel
on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.
| Welcome to my Meta talk page |
| Click here to start a new discussion. |
|
If you post a message here, I will reply here unless you explicitly ask me to do it on your talk page and please remember to sign your name at the end of your entry using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Please note: I do not log into this site very often, so if you want to get my attention, please post your comments on my talk page in the English version of Wikipedia where I am fairly active. Link to my active talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Dbiel Dbiel
|
My steward election
editThank you for supporting my steward election having passed with 72-1-4-99%.--Jusjih 23:43, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Edits
editWould you mind saving a page only when you've made all the changes you plan to make? :-) You have a bunch of edits for copyediting one document. Thanks! Cbrown1023 talk 14:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- On a normal article I would do so in practice, but in this case I felt it better to fully explain each edit individually in the edit summary. Is this wrong? Dbiel 14:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- If it's just copyediting, I don't see the need; but if you are actually changing something in the policy (which I don't think you were doing), then you would probably do that (or explain it on the talk page). Cbrown1023 talk 14:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply. This is the first time I have copyedited a policy page. Also considering the fact that it is a proposed policy page about to be voted on. Dbiel 15:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- If it's just copyediting, I don't see the need; but if you are actually changing something in the policy (which I don't think you were doing), then you would probably do that (or explain it on the talk page). Cbrown1023 talk 14:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)