Hercule

Global sysop

Wikimedia project members have demonstrated a consensus to allow you access to the global sysop toolbox. Please use it wisely. -- Avi 20:00, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks a lot --Hercule 20:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Can you tell me how to apply for a global administrator? --Velimir Ivanovic (talk) 22:05, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

I've replied on your talk page. Regards, Mathonius (talk) 22:21, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

FYI

[1]

[2]

[3]

Just saying... you've done a mass-delete before. What's your opinion on those? Should this be discussed (again)? Lousyi is pulling the same stunts on fj: ... Seb az86556 01:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Nevermind. Resolved. Seb az86556 02:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

I think these mass stub creation are stupid, ans maybe nocive. But as far as it contains few information on thé correct language it's out of scope for speedy deletion by global sysops.

regards,

Hercule 08:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Dellie

[4] It seems that bot was blocked before... Could you delete other items and blank the page, please ? -- Quentinv57 23:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Salut,

On va voir s'il repart, mais je ne pense pas qu'il était bloqué. La page que tu signales a été effacée le 26 août 2010 à 21:02. Je ne sais pas quand tu l'as tagguée, mais le bot n'agit pas immédiatement.

Pour les rapports manuels il vaut mieux passer par Steward requests/Speedy deletions

Cordialement,

--Hercule 23:16, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, j'utiliserai donc cette page la prochaine fois...

Ce qui semble bizarre, c'est que le bot ne réagit pas à la commande !update dans l'IRC, et ce avant que je n'édite manuellement le modèle. Je vais essayer de le blanchir pour voir ce que ça donne. Merci -- Quentinv57 23:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Non-sense reverts

Hello Hercule,

You reverted my edits on my.wiktionary. Can you give me a reason for this ? These templates are highly used on my.wikt and it has cause a syntax error on most of the project pages I can't correct without reverting you.

Thank you for your help, I wish you a good evenin. -- Quentinv57 21:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

J'ai reverté car je ne vois pas pourquoi tu souhaites supprimer les liens internes de ces modèles. Je trouve que c'est mieux quand ils sont présents.

J'ai regardé un échantillonnage de pages, et je ne vois pas d'erreur de syntaxe. As-tu des exemples ?

--Hercule 21:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Je pense que tu as trouvé la réponse par toi-même [5]. Ce modèle est un lien depuis deux ans, c'est sur, mais ce n'est pas pour autant qu'il faut le conserver ainsi. Et il en est de même pour toutes les autres langues, on ne le voit pas parcequ'il n'y a pas autant de pages en français qu'en anglais, c'est tout.

Les modèles de type Template:lang doivent contenir uniquement le nom de la langue, et c'est ainsi sur tous les Wiktionnaires, si je ne me trompe pas. Si tu veux un lien, il faut créer un autre modèle, comme c'est le cas sur le Wiktionnaire français avec {{en}} et {{=en=}}. -- Quentinv57 09:40, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

A ce jour il reste toujours un passage de bot à effectuer et Quentinv57 n'a pas le temps avec ses études... JackPotte 12:57, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Oui, j'ai dit à JackPotte qu'il pouvait s'en occuper, sinon je verrai ça samedi prochain. -- Quentinv57 15:30, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Révocations sur ace.wikipedia.org

Salut Hercule,

Je me dis que tu ne passe peut-être pas tous les jours sur ce site, alors je te préviens qu'un utilisateur t'a révoqué sur les 3 pages suivantes (pour que tu puisses gérer l'affaire par toi-même) :

• Hebe Camargo‎
• Julia Perez‎
• Geurija Isa Jatoë

Voila, bonne fin de soirée ! -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 19:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Merci de m'avoir prévenu. --Hercule 00:00, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Automatic approval of interwiki bots

Regarding this edit. Standard Bot policy has long allowed the granting of bot flags from Stewards for inter-wiki-only bots regardless of bcrat activity. Please direct me to the discussion that overturns this long-held consensus. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 18:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

hello,

my edit summary is explicit : the Steward policy explicitly says that the Stewards must only act when there is no active bureaucrat or in case of emergency. I have never seen steward granted on wiki with local active bureaucrat. So I think that m'y edit is just a clarification, not an overturning of long-held consensus.

For this reason there is no previous discussion.

Regards,

-Hercule 11:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

That is not my understanding of standard practice. I'll take this up with Stewards-l. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 03:46, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

When it comes to interwiki bots, since these often run on many wikis, both with and without active 'crats, my understanding was always that this was an exception, in that the steward can flag the bot on all projects with the standard bot policy, even if there are local crats. This allows the bot to get up and running on all the local wikis quickly instead of it having to wait for the usually longer process on wikis with crats. I speak from my expereince as both a steward and a local 'crat on EnWikiP. -- Avi 04:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Also, that is the point of the OPT IN by local wikis, in that they are specifically allowing stewards to act as local crats in this one instance. -- Avi 04:24, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

This is correct, it is standard "policy" for global iw bots. fr33kman 05:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, it seem to be at least discussed before the text is change. Avraham has removed my text, there is no more problem. --Hercule 22:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Suppression en masse des redirections cassées

Bonjour Hercule,

J'ai vu que tu es en train de vider les redirections cassées sur kshwiki. Merci d'entreprendre de telles opérations, je pense que ce projet avait grandement besoin que quelqu'un vienne vider les redirections cassées (et ce n'est pas le seul d'ailleurs, tu as encore du boulot ! :D).

Toutefois, si je peux me permettre, je voudrais te donner quelques conseils pour améliorer ton script. Notamment une chose qui me fait peur : si, avant le passage de ton bot, je remplace le contenu d'une page, prenons par exemple ksh:User:Hercule, par #REDIRECT[[fuhgfuisfse]], celle-ci sera supprimée dès le passage du bot. Et cela passera d'autant plus inaperçu que cette page sera introuvable parmi la liasse de pages supprimée par ton bot. Ton script devrait donc analyser l'historique de manière à vérifier qu'il ne s'agit pas d'une page de contenu qui ait été remplacée par une redirection (je pense que si tu vérifies que la page a moins de 5 révisions et que celles-ci font toutes moins de 100 octets, tu devrais éviter le plus gros).

Ensuite, penses à vérifier les pages liées lorsque tu supprimes des redirections si tu ne le fais pas déjà. Car si tu supprime une redirection cassée vers laquelle trois autres pages sont redirigées, sa suppression reviendra à créer trois nouvelles redirections cassées, ce qui n'est évidemment pas souhaité.

Et enfin, je pense que tu pourrais demander le botflag temporairement avant de faire cela. Il y a trois bureaucrates, donc ça ne me semble pas impossible. Ca évitera de flooder leurs modifications récentes.

Voila, merci à toi ! Et bonnes fêtes de fin d'année ! :-) -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 08:08, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Salut,

En fait j'utilise redirect.py, sans modifications.

Bonne année à toi aussi,

--Hercule 22:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Global rollback

Per the discussion here I have added globall rollback to your account. fr33kman 03:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks --Hercule 22:34, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Please check your part

Hi, I've added you name here. Please check your details there (the babel, IRC nick, and active from section), and include if any of the information is not included yet or added wrongfully. Thanks for your help. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 08:18, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

ok --Hercule 20:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

OTRS

Bonjour Hercule. L'équipe francophone n'est pas en grand besoin de nouveaux bénévoles pour le moment, et pour être honnête, tu ne serais pas vraiment mon premier choix si nous devions recruter. Merci cependant pour ton intérêt. guillom 15:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Ah. Je pense que tu dois te faire une idée fausse de qui je suis.

Si un jour vous cherchez du monde et que tu veux me donner ma chance de te convaincre n'hésite pas à me faire signe.

--Hercule 14:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Fundraising translation feedback

Hey Hercule,

I wanted to ask for your help. As you may be aware we have been running banners on many language wikis. We have a lot of new content this year and I really want to conduct a thorough review of our translations. This is a combination of feedback from the community, readers, donors as well as those with professional translator experience. This will help us ensure the highest quality of translations used in our messaging.

To help us out with this I wonder if you would be willing to give us feedback in french using This Link

Simply follow the simple instructions on that page and if you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Many Thanks

Jseddon (WMF) (talk) 07:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Global sysopship

Hi Hercule, per the global sysops inactivity policy (not having used the rights for the last six months outside of wikis on which you have local rights), your global rights have been removed. You can always re-apply for them via the usual procedure. Kind regards, SPQRobin (talk) 23:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Superprotect status

Dear Hercule, since you are an administrator on a wiki from which no user participated in this discussion, I'd like to make sure you are aware of some recent events which may alter what the Wikimedia Foundation lets you do on your wiki: Superprotect.

• Request for comment: Requests for comment/Superprotect rights
• An open letter about its implementation: Letter to Wikimedia Foundation: Superprotect and Media Viewer

Peteforsyth 09:21, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Global user page migration

Hello Hercule. I deleted your local user pages on all wikis as you requested via Synchbot. You can see the full log on your archive page. :) —Pathoschild 04:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Notice of removal of global bot status from one or various accounts of yours

Hello Hercule. You are being contacted as owner of one or more accounts flagged with global bot status. This is to inform you that pursuant §1.1.4 of the global bot policy as amended by this RFC one or various of the global bots which you operate are inactive in the terms laid out by the global bot policy. As such, global bot status from those account(s) have been removed. This message is being left on Meta-Wiki and on your homewiki. We thank you for your work as global bot operator. If you have any questions or concerns, you can raise them at the Stewards' Noticeboard on Meta-Wiki. Best regards. —MarcoAurelio ~~~
— This message has been automatically delivered by on behalf of MarcoAurelio.

Global bot

This message is being left on your talk page at Meta-Wiki and those of your home wiki(s). Sorry for the duplicates.

Dear global bot operator: Some days ago you received a message in which you were informed that one or various accounts you hold lost a global bot flag because of inactivity. Due to a mistake, messages informing about this were not sent before removal took place as policy mandates. As such, if you think your bot will be active again on global bot duties, you can request the restoration of the global bot flag on the stewards' noticeboard at Meta-Wiki within the next two (2) weeks after this message has been posted. Please note that this removal was purely procedural based on inactivity. If you have any questions, you can reach me on my talk page at Meta-Wiki. Please accept my apologies in advance for this. Best regards. -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of MarcoAurelio at 18:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021

Greetings SWMT member,

I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 10 July, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.

Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 03:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)