User talk:SHB2000/2025

Implement my suggestion to filter 384

In addition to opting out dewiki, could you implement my update to the repeating characters filter? I opted out some wikis that have their own filters, including the English Wikivoyage, and have done some optimizations:

equals_to_any(page_namespace, 0, 1, 4, 5, 1198) &
!("autoconfirmed" in user_rights) &
( 
    characters := "[bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{6,}";
    consonants := "([^_:.,*'|=#}{0 -]{1,9})\1{7}";
    match := characters + "|" + consonants;
    
    (
        (
            added_lines rlike characters &
            !(removed_lines rlike characters)
        ) | (
            rmwhitespace(added_lines) rlike consonants &
            !(rmwhitespace(removed_lines) rlike consonants)
        )
    ) &
    !(added_lines rlike ("<\s*(?:code|source|syntaxhighlight)|(?:data\s*:|https?:\/\/)\S*?(?:" + match + ")")) &
    !(rcount("(?:^|\n)[!|]|<br>", added_lines) > rcount("(?:^|\n)[!|]|<br>", removed_lines)) &
    !(equals_to_any(wiki_name, "cawiki", "ckbwiki", "cswiki", "dewiki", "enwikibooks", "enwikivoyage", "eswiki", "etwiki", "fawiki", "fawikivoyage", "frwiki", "frwikibooks", "frwikiquote", "frwikiversity", "glwiki", "itwiki", "nlwiki", "simplewiki", "wikidatawiki"))
) &
global_user_editcount < 50

Codename Noreste (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

@Codename Noreste: Done --SHB (t • c) 03:22, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Edited it again to fix the regex part of the rcount exclusion part. Codename Noreste (talk) 04:23, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Done – fixed. --SHB (t • c) 04:31, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: SHB (t • c) 09:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Speedy deletion requirement

SHB2000, Hello, I happy to see you with sysop privileges at metawiki but I here to telling you something Today I nominated two page as spam on metawiki but in present time they are not deleted by any sysop please see my today's contributions and you're contributions are Valuable for us.Happy editing! --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:58, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

If you're talking about User:Obiorabesttoll and Salman Farsi, I think they were eventually deleted? Is that what you meant? --SHB (t • c) 21:39, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Yes, that is what I meant and was asking for these two articles to be removed, which were later deleted by Xaosflux then you replied to me.Happy editing! --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 05:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Ah, righto – yeah Meta admins aren't nearly as active as say enwiki or Commons, so it might take some time for CSD-related deletion requests to be processed. --SHB (t • c) 07:16, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for you're reply but I have few concern releated to global rollback, I think to nominate self for global rollback to easy to remove vandalism on multiple wikis in minutes via SWViewer and I have rollback on multiple wikis, can you give me you're opinion I'm eligible for global rollback? my previously username is Aviram7 I use SWViewer from 3 year when I got rollback permission on hiwiki wiki but after renaming my username I've restart reverting vandalism from O edits at SWViewer.Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:26, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Hmm I'd probably say neutral for now – purely due to your edit matrix being the way it is right now, but I reckon you can give it a shot once you've got a more extensive edit matrix tbh. --SHB (t • c) 07:28, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reply but I thought you're means is crosswiki activity is not enough of mine for requesting global rollback,I have need to more reverts vandal and antispam from several wikis Via SWViewer for 1 months or more. Happy editing --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

I'd say there's no hard and fast rule, feel free to take my opinion with a grain of salt – but do request GR when you feel you have a decent cross-wiki matrix and trust your judgment. :) --SHB (t • c) 07:53, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

Hmmm;Thanks a lot for given you're important opinion of me as global sysop and global rollbacker.  :)--- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 07:59, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: SHB (t • c) 04:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Request

Hi @SHB2000: just that your thought appeared at the top of my head, could you please delete all of the /2025/ redirects from Special:Contributions/RamzyM_(WMF) (AffCom health report). This is because the spaces need to be entirely clean for 2025 reports when submitted. /2025/ should not redirect to /2024/ as such it is a broken/implausible redirect. A more detailed reason is at here in myn response to Ramzy. _signed, Aafi (DCW) ^(talk) 08:27, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Done – I think I deleted all the /2025/ redirects, though I don't know if I missed any. --SHB (t • c) 09:00, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

all perfect. Thank you. _signed, Aafi (DCW) ^(talk) 14:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: SHB (t • c) 01:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikimedia Forum

Thanks for the housekeeping at Wikimedia Forum. I'd shorten the protection, as I doubt most users are autoconfirmed here. e 10:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Most users who have a need to edit the page will be autoconfirmed. --SHB (t • c) 10:37, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Possibly. The barrier at Meta:Autoconfirmed users is fairly low and would have saved us some of the recent stuff.

I recall first wanting to comment on the steward request page to notice that this wasn't possible. I noticed since, that I could have used the talk page of that, but then responded at the user's page. e 10:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Most genuinely new users aren't gonna spend their first few edits editing pages like SRG or Wikimedia Forum (though it might not be the case for "new" users). Thus the chances of a user actually being hit by the protection is very low, and even then there are workarounds to it. --SHB (t • c) 11:17, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 08:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Best regards, BZPN (talk) 11:26, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 08:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Answer

Hi, on behalf of NPP patrollers, thanks a lot! Take care, Karol739 (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

No worries, mate! :) //shb (t • c) 23:44, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 05:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Special:Diff/25032458/28227718

Hi, I'm not endorsing the request or criticizing your revert, but just wanted to note that this looks like a legitimate unblock request (though written in Roman-transliterated Hindi) related to the poster's block by SM7 on Hindi Wikipedia (their use of {{unblock}} was obviously not correct). That said, it does seem that SM7 doesn't generally entertain messages related to other wikis here on his Meta talk page. Svārtava (tɕ) 05:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Oh whoops, my bad – I've reverted my edit. //shb (t • c) 06:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 05:08, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

"United Kuki State Council" (UKSC) စာမျက်နှာကို Spam ဟု သတ်မှတ်ပြီးဖျက်သိမ်းခဲ့ခြင်း၏ အကြောင်းရင်းများကိုရှင်းပါ

"United Kuki State Council" (UKSC) စာမျက်နှာကို Spam ဟု သတ်မှတ်ပြီးဖျက်သိမ်းခဲ့ခြင်း၏ အကြောင်းရင်းများကိုရှင်းပါ 2A01:799:5D8:A300:8C25:4ABD:C8B6:4A48 15:51, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Because it wasn't an encyclopedia article. At the time of deletion, it read more like the state council's personal website rather than an encyclopedia article. //shb (t • c) 20:16, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 20:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

You've got mail!

BZPN (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: shb (t • c) 20:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)